Hosted by gatnerd
This is intended for people interested in the subject of military guns and their ammunition, with emphasis on automatic weapons.
Latest 12:29 by Harrison Beene (harrisonbeen)
Latest 12:04 by schnuersi
Latest 8:39 by smg762
Latest 2:08 by stancrist
Latest 25-Mar by gatnerd
Latest 25-Mar by nincomp
Latest 25-Mar by Farmplinker
Latest 24-Mar by stancrist
Latest 29/8/22 by EmericD
Latest 23-Mar by graylion
Latest 23-Mar by mpopenker
Latest 21-Mar by ZailC
Latest 21-Mar by graylion
Latest 21-Mar by graylion
Latest 19-Mar by mpopenker
Latest 18-Mar by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 15-Mar by JPeelen
Latest 13-Mar by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 13-Mar by schnuersi
Latest 13-Mar by Jeff (Jefffar)
Latest 13-Mar by Refleks
Latest 12-Mar by graylion
Latest 11-Mar by graylion
Latest 10-Mar by graylion
Latest 10-Mar by Farmplinker
Latest 9-Mar by graylion
Latest 7-Mar by schnuersi
Latest 6-Mar by stancrist
Latest 6-Mar by graylion
Latest 6-Mar by Farmplinker
Latest 5-Mar by gatnerd
Latest 5-Mar by Farmplinker
Latest 3-Mar by Farmplinker
Latest 3-Mar by Farmplinker
Latest 26-Feb by graylion
29/8/22
The ".30" refered in the text is the .30-06, and France was OK to use this round for rifles and MGs, should the US decided to push this round into NATO standardisation process.
The ".30" like the T-65 was less well received, and France transition from 7.5x54 mm to 7.62x51 mm was a very slow process.
29/8/22
Look at the date (1951).
At this time, the T65 cartridge was still probably loaded with the 137 gr T-104 ball and the 136 gr T-93 AP used for the comparative tests performed in february - march 1950.
Those loads were balanced for rifle application, but did not provide the long-range performance of the German 7.9 mm s.S or the US .30-06 M1 cartridges when fired from a GPMG, which was the "hotest trend" for western armies after WWII.
The case volume and cartridge length of the T-65 were probably considered too small to fit a slender 180 gr class bullet and give it the required MV.