Hosted by gatnerd
This is intended for people interested in the subject of military guns and their ammunition, with emphasis on automatic weapons.
Latest 8:46 by farmplinker2
Latest 29-Sep by stancrist
Latest 29-Sep by stancrist
Latest 21/3/23 by ZailC
Latest 27-Sep by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 26-Sep by PRM2
Latest 26-Sep by stancrist
Latest 24-Sep by schnuersi
Latest 24-Sep by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 24-Sep by farmplinker2
Latest 22-Sep by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 22-Sep by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 20-Sep by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 20-Sep by Mr. T (MrT4)
Latest 20-Sep by gatnerd
Latest 19-Sep by stancrist
Latest 19-Sep by stancrist
Latest 19-Sep by smg762
Latest 18-Sep by JPeelen
Latest 17-Sep by graylion
Latest 17-Sep by schnuersi
Latest 16-Sep by gatnerd
Latest 14-Sep by smg762
Latest 8-Sep by gatnerd
Latest 7-Sep by EmericD
Latest 5-Sep by stancrist
Latest 4-Sep by renatohm
Latest 4-Sep by Mr. T (MrT4)
21/3/23
4700 fps (1,400 m/s) is beyond the typical 20-30mm APDS launch velocity. 1,300 m/s is a more "typical" velocity.
Barrel wear with APDS rounds is generally less than with conventional rounds. Discarding-sabot projectiles are lighter and the barrels see less time with the projectiles 'inbore''. The projectiles usually have plastic rotating bands and bore-riding surfaces; reducing frictional and engraving forces. Initial propellant gas temperatures may be higher, but total propellant energy down the tube is about the same - pretty simple thermodynamics when specifications dictate a maximum pressure.
Very high rate of fire without spreading it out over multiple barrels isn't common with 20-30 mm weapons and might require some active cooling.
.338 caliber might be problematic beyond its thermodynamics. High rate of fire means high temperatures. 4,700 fps would require an awfully light projectile and/or high pressures. The unit cost of ammunition with such light projectiles (read as poor flight and terminal ballistics) kind of works against the idea. .50 caliber attempts have not worked well on a cost/benefit basis.