- ... the Africans in the Caribbean, the Americas and Africa can sit down together and discuss the same divities and healing work and udnerstand each other in the same context even with slight geographical and linguistic changes.
You are not talking about the real indigenous Africans or the children of Kham (mistranslated as Ham) ... you are talking about the millions of migrating western european blacks or Negroes (Celts, Spanish, Portuguese) or the children of Yapheth (Japheth in Latin) who invaded Africa (Khamitic lands) and the West Indies (Shemitic lands) as indentured servants with the whites of Spain, Portugal, England (U.K.) and the Dutch. It was from the West Indies that these european blacks or Negroes were carried in small groups to South America (Khamite lands) and Central America/Mexcio/USA (Shemite lands) and into Canada (Yaphetite lands). There is no reason for these european Negroes not to be able to discuss the same divities and healing work and understand each other as they are all the same western european peoples. Yet there is very little they can discuss with the real Africans who are the Bushmen or Hottentots or the Pygmies or Twa or the Egyptians or the Berbers or the Ethiopians or the other real Africans who do not and have never spoken a western european language as do the migrating Negro who fasely call themselves "Africans." The ancestry of a person is not determined by geographical location but by blood ancestry. Western european Negroes born on the African continent or in the West Indies do NOT make them Africans, who are the children of Kham by blood ancestry.
BTW, I remember reading that indigenous Spanish-speaking black slaves or Ladinos were brought over to Hispaniola in the West Indies (now called Dominican Republic/Haiti) about 1502. If these Spanish blacks were in fact slaves, then they would have been the children of Kham who are indigenous to the southern part of the Iberian peninsula or europe (now called Portugal/Spain, etc.) .... which was first colonized by the children of Canaan or the Phoenicians. However, if they were indentured servants, as they were brought in small groups into the USA, then they were the indigenous Spanish/Portuguese blacks or Negroes who were conquered by both the Greeks and the Romans .... and then finally bowed to the whites or Goths from Scandinavia as their gods. As no western european Negroes were ever slaves in the Americas or Africa or India or any other place where the western europeans spread their colonization... these Negroes were always indentured servants as historical records show.