Whats it all about? -  The Cherokee Nation's contradictory stan (109 views) Notify me whenever anyone posts in this discussion.Subscribe
 
From: ROSETTA3215/29/07 12:58 AM 
To: stormshaddow unread  (2 of 4) 
 741.2 in reply to 741.1 
  • Steven Newcomb / Indigenous Law Institute

More correctly:

"Steven Newcomb, Shawnee/Lenape, is the indigenous law research coordinator for the Sycuan Education Department of the Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay Nation" ... >http://www.indiancountry.com/content.cfm?id=1096414762<

 from  Pagans in the promised land:  a primer on religious freedom By Steven T. Newcomb @ 1992, 1995, Eugene, Oregon.  All rights reserved. >http://www.ailanyc.org/pagans%20in%20the%20promised%20land.htm<

The article at the first link starts with what appears to be a deliberate misstatement of the facts behind the Cherokee nation vote to deny membership to immigrant blacks of european Negro ancestry applying for membership with no blood ancestry to their confederartion of Shemite Native American tribes. 

"The Cherokee Nation has received a great deal of heated criticism for its decision to eject the black freedman from their national rolls. The freedmen are the descendants of blacks who were once held as slaves by some wealthy members of the Cherokee Nation. ..."

As we all know, the so-called "blacks" who were sold and used as slaves in the USA were indigneous Native Americans of Kushyte (son of Racham/Cham/Ham) ancestry, repopulating the Shemite or middle portion of the world in North America with the indigneous Shemite Native Americans who were brought here by our ancestors... long before the so-called 'white man' or 'white race' was created as a weapon of mass destruction by the immigrant europeans of Yaphetite ancestry (as all descendants of Yaphet/Japheth are indigenous or native to the northern portion of the world, with the exception of the southern tip of the Iberian peninusla in europe) and their apostate Jewish allies. Nothing is said of those Shemite Native Americans and Yamases who were also captured and sold as slaves.... just this suspicious concentration of attention of the 'blacks' or Kushytes who were sold as slaves to justify the USA Congress illegally intervening into this soverign matter so that immigrant Negroes of european ancestry can infiltrate <warfare is assumed> the Cherokee nation.

The few thousands blacks or Negroes of european Yaphetite ancestry were hired and brought to the USA as indentured servants from the Caribbeans <West Indies> and not Africa as the lies and propaganda goes.  These indentured servants had contracts that were enforced by this white rule government ... and they were paid freedom fees at the end of their years of labor they agreed to work. <Some were even given our ancestral homelands as payment also.>  There are even references to these indentures servants written the records of the Freedmen Bureau <for unknown reasons as they were never slaves>.  No one of european Yaphetite ancestry was ever been enslaved by other europeans or whites as they have invaded others ancestral homelands throughout the world.  The Negro or black european was always hired and paid as an indentured servant throughtout euroepan colonies around the world.  The only selling of the european Negro as slaves came from these Negroes selling their own children as slaves ... a practice that still goes on today where they have set up colonies in Africa.   As we all know, also, it was the English <now calling themselves the British> who brought this inhumane slavery to the USA and enslaved our ancestors of Shemite/Kushyte descent.  The British even had a contract with the Spanish to supply slaves to all Spanish colonies in the USA.

As for the dispute within the Cherokee Nation with the Delaware/Lenape Indian members  ... I was under the impression that the Cherokee Nation included the Delaware/Lenape and the Shawnee Native Americans of Shemite/Kushyte ancestry.  But where money is involved, I read that the there is a dispute over whether or not the Delewares should be recognized as a sovereign tribe <as much any Native American tribe is recognized as sovereign in this illegal white-ruled  european colonial rule nation of the USA>.  Since the reservations are illegal ... all members of the Cherokee nation  including the descendants of Kushytes as former slaves with Shemiteic blood ancestry should be returned to their own ancestral homelands in the eastern USA.  Allowing immigrant blacks and their white footsoldiers to become members in the Cherokee nation is counter-productive and a security risk to the survival of the entire Cherokee Nation.  Having color in the skin does not make anyone 'black' ... as there is no such thing as a 'black race' <as the european Negroes and allies falsely claim as their basis to steal the ancestral homeland of all the descendants of HaShem/Shem and Racham/Cham/Ham> ... nor is there any such thing as a 'white race' because our Lord created all people with color (pigmentation) in our skin.

Congress and the press in the USA should address itself to the implementing the 1960 UN General Assembly Declaration on Granting Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples ... which calls for (1) the end of illegal european colonial rule throughout the world, (2) the restoration of all ancestral homelands by to the indigneous peoples and (3) self-governance or sovereignty of all indigenous peoples ... without foreign interference or continued foreign subjugation.  But instead we get all this bad press and postering from the white press and immigrant european Negro blacks in the USA Congress interferring in the sovereign right of the Cherokee nation to restrict its membership to only those of blood ancestry... which is the basis for the compostion of all nations in this world today.  Aren't all the europeans related? Once cannot be a european unless one has european ancestry.

 
 Reply   Options 

 
From: ROSETTA3215/29/07 1:00 AM 
To: stormshaddow unread  (3 of 4) 
 741.3 in reply to 741.1 

[continued]

To:  ALL

...  As for the dispute within the Cherokee Nation with the Delaware/Lenape Indian members  ... I was under the impression that the Cherokee Nation included the Delaware/Lenape and the Shawnee Native Americans of Shemite/Kushyte ancestry.  But where money is involved, I read that the there is a dispute over whether or not the Delewares should be recognized as a sovereign tribe <as much any Native American tribe is recognized as sovereign in this illegal white-ruled  european colonial rule nation of the USA>.  Since the reservations are illegal ... all members of the Cherokee nation  including the descendants of Kushytes as former slaves with Shemiteic blood ancestry should be returned to their own ancestral homelands in the eastern USA.  Allowing immigrant blacks and their white footsoldiers to become members in the Cherokee nation is counter-productive and a security risk to the survival of the entire Cherokee Nation.  Having color in the skin does not make anyone 'black' ... as there is no such thing as a 'black race' <as the european Negroes and allies falsely claim as their basis to steal the ancestral homeland of all the descendants of HaShem/Shem and Racham/Cham/Ham> ... nor is there any such thing as a 'white race' because our Lord created all people with color (pigmentation) in our skin.

Congress and the press in the USA should address itself to the implementing the 1960 UN General Assembly Declaration on Granting Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples ... which calls for (1) the end of illegal european colonial rule throughout the world, (2) the restoration of all ancestral homelands by to the indigneous peoples and (3) self-governance or sovereignty of all indigenous peoples ... without foreign interference or continued foreign subjugation.  But instead we get all this bad press and postering from the white press and immigrant european Negro blacks in the USA Congress interferring in the sovereign right of the Cherokee nation to restrict its membership to only those of blood ancestry... which is the basis for the compostion of all nations in this world today.  Aren't all the europeans related? Once cannot be a european unless one has european ancestry.

 

 
From: ctj5275/29/07 10:15 AM 
To: stormshaddow unread  (4 of 4) 
 741.4 in reply to 741.1 

Good morning,   Stormshadow...

But I'm afraid the author failed to do his homework...

I. e.,   if a reporter et al can't break it all down,  as in--so a person not familiar with the issues/problems/etc.  comes away feeling or thinking--after having read the piece--then they do-- here's something else which isn't presenting the Cherokee Freedmen Descendants side of the conflict clearly and concisely...

The flip side:

The Smith camp hypes 'Cherokee by blood'?

What they're really writing/talking about is close or distant ancestry...

Also ironic (other than Smith himself)  that most (if not all)  of his cronies own ancestry seem pretty distant (since most of them look like white folk to me too)!

FYI...

Later...



Edited 5/29/2007 10:21 am by ctj527
  • Edited 5/29/2007 10:24 am by ctj527
 

First Discussion>>

 
Navigate this discussion: 1 2-4
Adjust text size:
Using a mobile device? Switch to the Mobile Site.

Welcome, guest! Get more out of Delphi Forums by logging in.

New to Delphi Forums? You can log in with your Facebook, Twitter, or Google account or use the New Member Login option and log in with any email address.

Home | Help | Forums | Chat | Blogs | Advertising | Membership Plans
© Delphi Forums LLC All rights reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Service.