Cstar1 said:

I don't have to justify my anti-gun stance to you, or to anyone.

Very true, but you certainly do.

Are you saying that if some violence happened to your family and you did nothing to prevent it, it would not bother you? I think it would. The problem is that this is not Japan or Australia. We already have hundreds of millions of guns in circulation. I am not opposed to serious gun laws. I just doubt how we b would implement them or what we would implement.

"Fewer rounds in a magazine" does nothing. It does not keep guns out of the hands of killers.

HWPeeler (HPeeler) said:

Are you saying that if some violence happened to your family and you did nothing to prevent it, it would not bother you?

I'm saying that guns are not the answer. 

I don't have a gun. My son doesn't have a gun. My parents don't have guns. My brothers don't have guns. Most of the people I know don't have guns. This "only guns will keep us safe" mentality is insane, and I won't be a party to it. 

Fewer rounds in a magazine reduces the number of fatalities in spree shootings. You're quite simply wrong about this.

And I really don't get this "I'm all for gun laws but they're too hard to implement."

B.S. It just takes the courage to start.

Cstar1 said:

Fewer rounds in a magazine reduces the number of fatalities in spree shootings. You're quite simply wrong about this.

No, it just means they carry more magazines.

Cstar1 said:

B.S. It just takes the courage to start.

I wish it were that simple.

Real classy organization.