This is a place for friendly and civil discussion of horse racing of all types including handicapping.
Latest Jul-22 by Oldbettowin
Latest 11:49 AM by DogsUp
Latest Dec-2 by smartyslew
Latest Nov-27 by PhatMama469
Latest Nov-26 by Wintertrian
Latest Nov-22 by Gerh
Latest Nov-21 by pianot
Latest Nov-13 by Plus2lbs
Latest Nov-10 by DogsUp
Latest Nov-9 by TexSquared
Latest Nov-6 by Northof64
Latest Nov-5 by PISTOL9
Latest Nov-5 by DogsUp
Latest Nov-5 by PhatMama469
Latest Nov-5 by Pedigreestar
At best Baffert clears up the method of drug administration if 2nd test shows the ointment ingredients .
Churchill Downs; publicly stock traded. And so many stake holders to answer to as owners, trainers, trainers, betting public.
Precedent legal drug cases give C Downs the opportunity to clean break from this PR and sales- marketing Derby fiasco. With ointment documentation.
DQ Owner is most injured
SameSteve G said...A more equitable distribution of equine talent will be good for the sport because the sport is much bigger than Beta Bob
Yes, nailed it.
There's plenty of hard working barns who know how to train a horse, but their talents are eclipsed by super trainers who have 2, 3, and sometimes even 4 horses in one field.
But this is what happens when the little guys to disappear (and they will if there's no way for them to win anything).
I wonder if trainers have agents as jockeys do? Perhaps some of the lesser known barns/trainers could benefit from publicists, agents, social media campaigns....where their skill level, humane practices, and gamesmanship can be marketed properly.
And the sport also needs owners who care more about the treatment of their horses as well.....
And I could never understand how wealthy owners would want to compete for spots against others using the same trainer, just does not make sense
If the other compounds are present it may prove that the ointment was used but it may not prove that an injection was used also
The measurement is in parts per million. PPM. The lab probably uses Mass Spectrometry equipment.
The compound as it was manufactured and used on the colt should/will have measurement amounts of each ingredient proportionally.
The amount of the illegal drug will have to be proportional to the total ointment compound mixture.
If not, that is, the illegal drug dosage of the drug 'significantly exceeds' the amount in relationship to other compound and materials/ingredients; then yes, Baffert has no remedy that the drug was; only as you mention, in the compound. Commercially approved drugs in the manufacturing stage have a chain of custody from inception to any changes in the pilot trials right down to making it on the shop floor
But, then a good lawyer will seek records from the manufacturer to ascertain if every batch has exact proportions or if there could be an overage amount of the drug in the ointment batch by batch as it is manufactured. And if that is the case, it really helps Baffert's case.
Horse shoes; close enough results and everybody is happy.
The measurement is in parts per million. PPM.
No. The measurement is in picograms. Parts per trillionth. In the sample, obviously.
The equipment measures in parts per million. The calculations can find the sample in the trillions (Greater than) or conversely Less than.
The manufactured 'equipment capabilities/ measurement/calibration registrations; and the science math of equations for final answers finding of LC / GC - liquid and gas chromatography is PPM.
Yes from the 'equipment's capabilities = PPM' and the math models it will mathematically discover to trillions or the opposite higher amounts.
Thank you Loootenant Obvious.
I thought this thread was about Medina Spirit's overage which was 21 picograms.
I didn't realize you were engaging in a general science lesson. :)
21st Century Truesdail Labs you say !
Should have made thread to All.
My point in a way earlier thread was how the analytical test equipment was so electro-mechanically- computerized software scientifically concise and accurate. And how it worked. As well we spoke to the chain of custody concerns.
Easy stuff for the machine.
The hidden story is Bob and his people and Vet relied on the other guy to meet qualified drug screening standards for/in the Kentucky Derby. Nobody checking the checker.
And as always the Dogs likes to get his blog amigos juices flowing. Good for their hearts and minds and souls.
Love yah Steve O