2678 messages in 352 discussions
Latest Mar-28 by Sheree Moondove (moondove07)
Latest Mar-24 by gunter
60019 messages in 6465 discussions
Latest Mar-28 by Sundowner (dannigirl67)
Latest Mar-27 by gunter
27550 messages in 3049 discussions
Latest Mar-28 by INSCOP
Latest Mar-22 by Gimmie Chocolate Shorty (TOILETHEA1)
Latest Mar-21 by Lyndy (Lyndy7)
Latest Mar-21 by thebaron (albinahlvin)
Latest Mar-20 by gunter
Latest Mar-17 by 8645 (RedBV)
Latest Mar-13 by Sheree Moondove (moondove07)
8369 messages in 1218 discussions
Latest Mar-26 by jnlwriter
25067 messages in 2269 discussions
Latest Mar-25 by Sheree Moondove (moondove07)
Latest Mar-24 by gunter
Latest Mar-10 by queenlightning
Latest Mar-3 by Gimmie Chocolate Shorty (TOILETHEA1)
Latest Feb-29 by MRCROSSROADS
29521 messages in 4463 discussions
Latest Mar-24 by fafa (suzare)
Latest Mar-8 by Show some Love (wtraves)
Latest Mar-7 by joegabe11
6175 messages in 465 discussions
Latest Mar-19 by MRCROSSROADS
Latest Mar-1 by Lyndy (Lyndy7)
4898 messages in 641 discussions
Latest Mar-10 by Marlene (ms_lainy)
Latest Mar-8 by gunter
13975 messages in 1394 discussions
10038 messages in 881 discussions
23398 messages in 570 discussions
6538 messages in 675 discussions
842 messages in 44 discussions
1045 messages in 494 discussions
see attachment - how can that be explained... I've been running the place since 99 and it is been one of the busiest if not busiest forums on the platform for those 21 years.
it has never been on top.
bp is ALWAYs promoted and ahead of us for some reason too... hmm
I have asked this question a few times over the years, never get an answer, but it's NEVER been this... bad:
Have you tried asking Lyndy or Kidmagnet (instead of Walt/gunter)?
You've heard this before, but it's worth repeating. We never explain the algorithm used to rank forums. Frankly, aside from the original programmers, I'm not sure anyone knows the details of the algorithm now. If we did know, we wouldn't reveal it, because we know some hosts would try to use the information to game the rankings. Our advice is always to make the forum the best you can to attract lots of members, and let the rankings take care of themselves.
I'll give you one more thing to think about. Perhaps the ranking algorithm does not just consist of things that raise your standing. It may include factors that lower your ranking, too. Think about it!
Yes, I've heard this before. You can not deny there is some purposeful bias going on, and disrespect to what we do and how busy we always are.
No, do you mean PM them?
I just happened to see the front page today (rarely do) and was like w.t.h.
Aside from what was mentioned, I've pointed out before that activity is not how many messages are posted. There may be more messages posted, but if few people are looking at those messages that's less activity.
One person posting 100 messages and only 10 people look at them counts less than someone posting 10 messages and 100 different people look at them ... who has the most traffic?
That's the main difference in the listings.
that makes the most sense of any explaination I've seen... but we are ahead in those categories usually also I'd say-
There is no other explaination for always being under certain forums.... other than it is human 'choice' or preference.
There is no human intervention in the listings. They are machine generated, and none of us has seen the algorithms used. The persons who programmed it probably have never been to your forum at all. It is what it is.
ok i accept that - but can't shake the strong bias when we're almost always alot busier in all ways though
they can promote bp, we are a bit more ... free speech but not as promotable and pc (usually the two go together).... perhaps?
it's been so long I really don't give too much of a crap, it's not changing obviously so I must just accept that
thanks for replying. I consider the matter closed.