Non-Jews- What's On Your Mind? -  The Vaccine Mandates - A Few Suggestions (642 views) Notify me whenever anyone posts in this discussion.Subscribe
 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member IconOct-14 1:46 PM 
To: All  (1 of 116) 
 11605.1 

        Copies of this thread should be made in full, including the Pfizer PDF that is attached. The information, in my opinion, should be delivered to all unions and attorneys who are representing people who are faced with vaccine mandates that they do not want. Perhaps what will be seen here will be helpful. I hope so.

To Everyone,

       This is a very important thread, perhaps the most important I have ever begun.

       The vaccines are experimental and they are dangerous. The future effects cannot yet be known as the vaccines are too new, but there are many indications that should concern people. Reasons why this is so will be included as part of this thread.

       I am writing to discuss a few options for countering the vaccine mandates which I have not seen pursued anywhere else, and may (or may not) prove to be an exceedingly valuable way to proceed.

       The idea of refusing vaccinations for religious reasons is fine, but there is another exceedingly important reason which I do not think has garnered near enough attention. It stems from the idea that no one should be forced to take a medicine, particularly an experimental medicine, where the long term effects cannot yet be known.

       There is ample evidence that the vaccines MAY be harmful...or even deadly. We see the problems that are occurring today, but we don't yet see definitively the problems that can occur 2, 3, 5, and 10 years from now. Just because the vaccines lose their effectiveness against COVID over a series of months, thus the boosters...does not mean the vaccines stop doing things to the body...EVER!

  • Edited October 27, 2021 6:16 am  by  WEBELIAHU
 
 Reply   Options 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member IconOct-14 2:04 PM 
To: All  (2 of 116) 
 11605.2 in reply to 11605.1 

We begin here:

October 4, 2021

FDA never really approved Pfizer COVID vaccine, Sen. Ron Johnson tells Tucker Carlson

‘These mandates are driven by the bait and switch of the FDA that we now have an approved vaccine. We do not have an approved vaccine in America.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) never actually approved the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine currently available in the United States, Republican U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin told Fox News host Tucker Carlson this week.

“These mandates are driven by the bait and switch of the FDA that we now have an approved vaccine. We do not have an approved vaccine in America,” Johnson said Monday on Tucker Carlson Tonight. “They did it for the Comirnaty – it’s available, I guess, in Europe, but the Pfizer vaccine available in the U.S. is not FDA-approved – it’s got an emergency use authorization (EUA).”

The Republican senator added that he sent a letter to the FDA days after the agency approved the Pfizer COVID vaccine branded as Comirnaty, which is “legally distinct” from Pfizer’s jab that remains under EUA in the United States, according to the FDA.

An FDA fact sheet for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine released in August described the two jabs as “legally distinct with certain differences that do not impact safety or effectiveness” and said the vaccines “can be used interchangeably.”

Pfizer representatives have said that those distinctions refer to manufacturing differences, like the use of different sites or materials from different suppliers, though not formulation.

  • Edited October 14, 2021 2:14 pm  by  WEBELIAHU
 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member IconOct-14 2:31 PM 
To: All  (3 of 116) 
 11605.3 in reply to 11605.2 

To Everyone,

        We need to discuss the article just posted. We being with this:

       "‘These mandates are driven by the BAIT and SWITCH of the FDA that we now have an approved vaccine. We do not have an approved vaccine in America.’"

        What does, BAIT and SWITCH mean?

        BioNTech/Pfizer makes the Pfizer COVID vaccine, and they make a COVID vaccine called Comirnaty. They say however, and the Pfizer vaccine and the Comirnaty are the same thing.

         YET!!! They SAY they have approved the Comirnaty (have they?), but they have NOT approved the Pfizer. To the Pfizer they gave an EUA, Emergency Use Authority.

         An EUA means a drug is still experimental, not enough is know about the drug to give in a full FDA approval. That being the case, how can they approve Comirnaty and not approve Pfizer, since they tell us they are the same thing?

        What I happen believe is that we are talking about money and lawsuits. Under an EUA, the FDA is protecting a company from lawsuits. Once an EUA is converted into a full approval, the company loses that protection and can be sued like anyone or anything else.

        So Pfizer supposedly has an approved drug, called Comirnaty, but Comirnaty is not available in America, and so they say, "WELL, go ahead and use the Pfizer because it is the same thing anyway." IS IT? We are going to talk about that.

        That is the bait and switch, we have an approved vaccine that you could use to sue us, but we won't give it to you. Instead, we will give you an EUA vaccine that you CANNOT use to sue us, although we tell you it is the same thing.

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member IconOct-14 2:43 PM 
To: All  (4 of 116) 
 11605.4 in reply to 11605.3 

BAIT and SWITCH

       "An FDA fact sheet for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine released in August described the two jabs (PFIZER and COMIRNATY) as legally distinct with certain differences that do not impact safety or effectiveness and said the vaccines “can be used interchangeably.”

        We are going to see the above-mentioned fact sheet in a minute. For now, think about this: Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine released in August described the two jabs (PFIZER and COMIRNATY) as legally distinct with certain differences that do not impact safety or effectiveness

        If it were true that Pfizer and Comirnaty are the same, except for "certain differences," that have no impact upon the products whatsoever, then WHY APPROVE Comirnaty, and NOT APPROVE Pfizer? Could it be that Pfizer does not want to be sued in the United States?

        FDA, if they are the same, APPROVE THEM BOTH. You don't want to do that, do you?

       Let's look at that FACT SHEET that you provided. I'll show you a jpeg of the first page in the next post. You may find our rendering satisfactory, but you can read it more clearly if you click on their PDF link.

  • Edited October 14, 2021 3:56 pm  by  Leah (muppetmel1)
 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member IconOct-14 2:47 PM 
To: All  (5 of 116) 
 11605.5 in reply to 11605.4 
 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member IconOct-14 3:10 PM 
To: All  (6 of 116) 
 11605.6 in reply to 11605.5 

More on this BAIT and SWITCH. Here are some highlights from page 1 of the fact sheet:

       "The FDA-approved Comirnaty...and the FDA authorized Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) have the same formulation and can be used interchangeably to provide the COVID-19 vaccine series."

       WELL...IF Comirnaty and Pfizer "have the same formulation and can be used interchangeably," then why does the FDA APPROVE Comirnaty, and NOT APPROVE the Pfizer?

       Also, just a small question here from Page 1 of your fact sheet.

       Why does the BioNTech-Pfizer vaccine have an EUA for "a two dose primary series for individuals 12 years of age and older."...

        While the FDA Comirnaty has been APPROVED for "a two dose primary series for individuals 12 through 16 years."

         I mean, this may seem minor, but if the EUA BioNTech-Pfizer vaccine is identical to the FDA APPROVED Comirnaty vaccine, shouldn't the listings of who they are approved and authorized (EU authorization) for also be identical? Just wondering.

         Another note from information on the fact sheet. In the listing of side effects I noticed that one side effect, probably many actually, but one in particular was omitted: DEATH. Do not all the people who you KNOW died because of the vaccines, and many others you are pretty sure died from the vaccine, don't they count as side effects?

         One last inquiry from the fact sheet. It says there may be some compensation for harm suffered from the vaccine if such harm occurs within one year of taking the vaccine. Well, that's not lawsuit money, but it's better than nothing. Question though, what about effects that can occur more than one year out, such as possible heart attacks, or organ failures, or brain aneurysms, or cancers, that may be discovered to be linked to your experimental vaccine that could not have undergone the necessary observation or testing about the potential long term harmful effects? (That's why the FDA takes 10 to 15 years to approve a new vaccine, while the Pfizer got an almost immediate EUA, and the Comirnaty received an almost immediate "APPROVAL." Seems strange...does it not?)

  • Edited October 14, 2021 3:57 pm  by  Leah (muppetmel1)
 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member IconOct-14 3:39 PM 
To: All  (7 of 116) 
 11605.7 in reply to 11605.6 

THE VACCINE MANDATES - A few suggestions - Part 1

       It is time for my suggestions about what to do if they are giving you a mandate of taking one of the dangerous, experimental vaccines, or losing your job, or other penalties?

       First, and very important, there are many people who will not take any of those vaccines, unless they are proven to their satisfaction that they are 99%+ safe NOW, and into the future. For them, do not let what I am about to say sway anyone. They must stick to their guns, because people may try to trap them by their own words.

       That is, you say, "I won't take the vaccine unless I know it is safe." No good. Many of these people will swear up and down it is safe, and they have their degrees and studies behind them. They may be dead wrong, but that won't matter. It will be you against THEM.

        ANSWER: You have decided not to take the vaccine, and that is all there is to it. The vaccines have not been observed for 10 to 15 years like other vaccines, and you do not trust them. It does not matter how many degrees they have, how many short term studies they have undertaken, or how nicely they smile.

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member IconOct-14 3:49 PM 
To: All  (8 of 116) 
 11605.8 in reply to 11605.7 

THE VACCINE MANDATES - A few suggestions - Part 2

      There are going to be people who are on the fence, not because they are willing to take the vaccine, but because they don't know how to feed their families if they lose their jobs.

       If a person knows he is going to fold, he is giving up, and only in those circumstances, here is what I suggest...unions and attorneys take note.

       They are trying to force you to take unapproved, experimental, potentially toxic vaccines with unknown long term effects. At the same time there is an APPROVED vaccine available...although they tell you it is not available. Well, if you are going to allow them to force you to take a vaccine, MAKE THEM give you the APPROVED vaccine: Comirnaty.

        I think you have the right to take the approved vaccine rather than be forced to take the unapproved experimental vaccine. 

        Furthermore, you can say, you want you family to be protected. That is, if you die, or if you are seriously harmed and lose part of your productive ability because of the vaccine, you want your family to be able to sue them. You have a terrible mountain to climb if you take an EUA vaccine and want to sue Pfizer. Tell them you want the approved vaccine ONLY, so that your family will have the legal authority to file suit. ALSO, require they give you an official document that states that you received the Comirnaty vaccine, and nothing else.

         That is my suggestion.

         Pfizer, by the way, probably won't care much if you sue the FDA, instead of them. After all, any money won from the FDA will be taxpayer money, and we are not seeing that people care much about taxpayer money anymore.

  • Edited October 14, 2021 4:00 pm  by  Leah (muppetmel1)
 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member IconOct-14 4:04 PM 
To: All  (9 of 116) 
 11605.9 in reply to 11605.8 

September 27, 2021

https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/affidavit-of-lieutenant-colonel-theresa-long-md-mph-a-brave-indictment-of-covid-vaccines-joel-s-hirschhorn-this-article-celebrates-the-amazing-bravery-of-a-physician-and-senior-military-officer/?utm_source=top_news&utm_campaign=usa

Army physician warns about toxic ingredients in COVID shots

'Use of mRNA vaccines in our fighting force presents a risk of undetermined magnitude in a population in which less than 20 active-duty personnel, out of 1.4 million, died of the underlying SARs- CoV-2.'
 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

In this pandemic where truths are crowded out by propaganda and political insanity, it is critically important to credit a truly remarkable document by a courageous medical professional.

Here are highlights from such a document, well worth the attention of all those who genuinely have informed concerns about current COVID vaccines.

Physician and Army Lieutenant Colonel Theresa Long is a rare, courageous truth-teller willing to probably jeopardize a military career for the greater good.  To try and steer the Department of Defense to policies that protect military personnel from dangerous and unnecessary COVID vaccines and defend our national defense.

Here is an initial observation: “Use of mRNA vaccines in our fighting force, presents a risk of undetermined magnitude, in a population in which less than 20 active-duty personnel out of 1.4 million, died of the underlying SARs- CoV-2.”  Statistical truths are routinely ignored by government officials mismanaging the pandemic.

Dr. Long focused on a now widely recognized health impact of current COVID vaccines, saying “vaccination with mRNA increases the risk of myocarditis.”  “Research shows that most individuals with myocarditis do not have any symptoms.  Complications of myocarditis include dilated cardiomyopathy, arrhythmias, sudden cardiac death and carries a mortality rate of 20% at one year and 50% at 5 years.  According to the National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, “despite optimal medical management, overall mortality has not changed in the last 30 years.’”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

With regard to the Pfizer vaccine, “One of the primary ingredients of the Lipid Nanoparticle delivery system is “ALC 1035.”  This is a toxic material.  It “comprises between 30-50% of the total ingredients.”  Among a number of serious possible effects is this reality: “Caution: Product has not been fully validated for medical applications.  For research use only.”  Also noted: “Other journals and scientific papers also denote that this particular ingredient has never been used in humans before.”  The Colonel correctly notes “My assessment is that ALC 1035 is a known toxin with little study, specifically restricted to ‘research only’ and effectively has no prior [medical] use history.”

Another ingredient in the vaccine is a known toxic chemical: “Polyethylene Glycol is the active ingredient in antifreeze.”  There have been countless cases where people have been fatally poisoned with this chemical.  This comment by the Colonel is especially impressive: “I cannot discern what form of alchemy Pfizer and the FDA have discovered that would make antifreeze into a healthful cure to the human body.”

Another important point is that “Moderna’s key ingredient, SM-102… is significantly more dangerous than the Pfizer ALC 3015.”  Noted is that “This Moderna ingredient is deadly.”

“I have also reviewed scientific data and peer reviewed studies that discuss, analyze results and conclude that natural immunity is at least as good if not far superior to any Covid Vaccine available at this time.”  Exactly correct.  Noted is that “natural immunity provides a 13-fold better protection against Covid 19 infections than any currently available Covid 19 Vaccine. 

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member IconOct-14 4:18 PM 
To: All  (10 of 116) 
 11605.10 in reply to 11605.9 

October 13, 2021

Dr. Joseph Mercola: How the Spike Protein Hurts the Heart

In July 2021, the U.S. military published a study in JAMA Cardiology in which they asked the question if myocarditis was a possible adverse event following a jab with mRNA COVID-19 injection. They identified 23 men who were diagnosed with myocarditis within 4 days of getting the shot. They determined that there was a diagnosis of myocarditis after “vaccination in the absence of other identified causes.”

And yet, despite finding myocarditis in previously healthy individuals following the shot, the writers only recommended vigilance. The heart problems in 23 military men who had signed up to protect the citizens of the U.S., “should not diminish overall confidence in vaccinations during the current pandemic.”

As of September 3, 2021, the vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) had received 675,591 reports of adverse events following vaccination. Of these, there were 14,506 deaths, 6,422 heart attacks and 5,371 cases of pericarditis or myocarditis.

It is important to note that the VAERS has tracked adverse events since 1990. In 2019, there were 605 reports of deaths from all vaccines given. In 2021, there were 14,594 deaths reported in nine months. Although these numbers are significant, a 2010 Harvard study commissioned by the Department of Health and Human Services revealed data demonstrating the VAERS likely only represents approximately 1% of those who are injured. ~~~~~~~~~

In early 2020, many clinicians, scientists and other health experts warned that millions of people may experience potentially permanent or long-term injury or death after the shot. Interestingly, it is the call for greater surveillance of vaccine injury that has, in part, generated censorship from social media platforms through AI surveillance of your posts.

~~~~~~~~~~

This is important, since the study demonstrated that the spike protein associated with SARS-CoV-2 damages endothelial function. In other words, before the emergency use authorization jab that injected instructions to create the spike protein was first administered, the CDC, FDA and NIAID were well aware the spike protein was likely causing damage to the endothelial cells lining the circulatory system.

 

Navigate this discussion: 1-10 11-20 21-30 ... 91-100 101-110 111-116
Adjust text size:

Welcome, guest! Get more out of Delphi Forums by logging in.

New to Delphi Forums? You can log in with your Facebook, Twitter, or Google account or use the New Member Login option and log in with any email address.

Home | Help | Forums | Chat | Blogs | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
© Delphi Forums LLC All rights reserved.