Members removed from Indian tribes complain of unfairness
By RAY HENRY
Associated Press writer
October 26, 2007 6:00 AM
PROVIDENCE — Dennis Champlain's grandfather helped win federal recognition for the Narragansett Indian Tribe. Later, Champlain danced in tribal powwows. He teaches his children that they are Narragansetts.
Yet the Narragansetts say he no longer is.
Champlain and his extended family are among thousands of people removed from American Indian tribes in recent years, often amid tribal squabbles or when a casino comes to town. Tribal officials say they have the right to decide who's a member and to prevent fraud from people angling for a share of gambling money. But many of those kicked out complain they have little recourse to fight what amounts to an attack on their identity.
"We're in the process of a redefinition of tribal identity at its core," said David Wilkins, a political scientist at the University of Minnesota and a member of North Carolina's Lumbee Tribe. "It's ramping up in a way that's really quite frightening to a lot of native people."
Wilkins traces most purges to four factors: internal political squabbles, stricter racial requirements for membership, punishment for gang or drug-related crime and, most often, during debates over sharing casino profits.
A 1978 U.S. Supreme Court ruling said the federal government should not intervene in most tribal membership disputes, leaving appeals up to the tribes.
Tribal casinos generated $25 billion in revenue last year, according to the National Indian Gaming Commission. Tribes often split the profits by making payments to members. Fewer members can mean a larger paycheck for those left.
But that paycheck can lure people with dubious claims of ancestry. The Pechanga Band of California said it was deluged with membership claims after it opened its casino in 1995.
In Rhode Island, the Narragansett's removal of about 140 of roughly 2,400 members has become an issue in Saturday's election for the tribe's chief sachem, or leader. Paulla Dove Jennings, a historian, is running an underdog campaign against the incumbent, Matthew Thomas, saying it's unfair to take people's identities as Narragansetts away.
The tribe began a review of its roster about three years ago — amid a failed push to build a casino — but there's a dispute over why. Thomas says a tribal assembly, similar to a town meeting, voted to verify all tribal membership before adding several children to the roster.
But Leslie Champlain, a cousin of Dennis Champlain, said she attended the meeting and believes the tribe did not approve an audit. She suspects tribal leadership wanted to root out dissent after her sister, a tribal councilwoman, demanded a detailed audit showing how the tribe spent millions of dollars, some of it from the gambling company Harrah's Entertainment Inc.
Thomas called Champlain's claim "ridiculous," and said he understands those removed from the tribe are upset. "Of course, no one would like it," he said.
But he said he's bound by the decisions of the tribal assembly and can't be held responsible for someone else's ancestry.
Members were asked to prove they descend from ancestors listed on an 1880 census using birth, death and marriage certificates. The Champlains had used other documents as recently as 1994. This time, it wasn't enough.
Dennis Champlain said he learned his family was kicked out by reading about it in a newspaper. Thomas says members can appeal to a tribal court, but the Champlains say no one ever told them how to appeal.
Dennis Champlain does not blame his fellow Narragansetts, but he calls the process unjust.
"It's not a matter of whether it's right or wrong," he said. "It's a matter of who has the power. The tribe has the power — we don't."