AASLD/EASL/DDW CONFERENCE NEWS -  LowSVR Tx-Naive Advan-FibrosisCirrhosisnotify me whenever anyone posts in this discussionSubscribe  
 
From:  myer (myer1)  DelphiPlusMember Icon 11/9/2008 5:03 pm 
To: ALL  (1 of 1) 
 41436.1 

Low SVR Rates for Treatment-Naive Genotype 1 HCV-Infected Patients With Advanced Fibrosis or Cirrhosis at Baseline: Results of Canadian POWeR Study

Posting Date: November 06, 2008

  • Prospective Optimal Weight-Based Dosing Response (POWeR) study: prospective, open-label, noninterventional, phase IV study[1]

Summary of Key Conclusions

  • Lower rates of sustained virologic response (SVR) for genotype 1 HCV-infected patients with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis compared with patients with mild to moderate fibrosis at baseline
  • High baseline fibrosis scores associated with lower SVR and higher relapse rate compared with lower baseline fibrosis scores among genotype 1 patients
  • Baseline HCV RNA had no effect on SVR among genotype 1 patients with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis
    • Baseline HCV RNA predicts SVR only among patients with mild to moderate fibrosis

Background

  • 54% to 63% of all patients with chronic HCV infection treated with peginterferon alfa-2b/ribavirin achieve SVR[2-4]
    • SVR rates lower for genotype 1 patients [2-4]
  • Baseline HCV RNA and fibrosis stage identified as predictors of treatment outcome in genotype 1 patients
    • SVR rates higher in patients with low HCV RNA[4]
    • SVR rates lower in patients with bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis at baseline[4]
  • Above results attained in randomized clinical trials that strictly control enrollment and treatment regimens
    • Results may not apply in real-life clinical practice settings
  • Current study assessed impact of advanced liver disease on SVR rates in previously untreated, genotype 1 HCV-infected patients treated with weight-based peginterferon alfa-2b/ribavirin in real clinical practice

Summary of Study Design

  • Prospective, observational study
  • Collected data only—no study-related intervention
  • 138 community and academic centers in Canada 2002-2007
  • Patients characterized at baseline for
    • Genotype
    • Liver histology by METAVIR score: F1 (= mild) to F4 (= cirrhosis)
    • HCV RNA (low: ≤ 600,000 IU/mL; high: > 600,000 IU/mL)
  • Patients treated according to current treatment guidelines or standard of care at each site
    • Peginterferon alfa-2b 1.5 µg/kg/week plus ribavirin
    • Ribavirin dose weight based
      • < 64 kg: 800 mg/day
      • 64 - < 85 kg: 1000 mg/day
      • ≥ 85 kg: 1200 mg/day
    • Recommended treatment duration: 48 weeks
  • Efficacy analyses
    • Primary endpoint: SVR (undetectable HCV RNA 24 weeks posttreatment)
    • Secondary endpoints
      • End-of-treatment (EOT) response: undetectable HCV RNA at completion of therapy
      • Relapse: undetectable HCV RNA at EOT but detectable during 24 weeks posttreatment
    • Intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis on all patients with liver biopsy and who received 1 treatment dose

Baseline Characteristics

  • 718 genotype 1 HCV-infected patients with baseline METAVIR scores
    • Mild to moderate fibrosis (F1-F2): 432/718 (60%)
    • Bridging fibrosis-cirrhosis (F3-F4): 286/718 (40%)
  • Baseline HCV RNA available for 651/718 (91%) patients
    • High HCV RNA(> 600,000 IU/mL): 356/651 (55%)
    • Low HCV RNA(≤ 600,000 IU/mL): 295/651 (45%)
  • Combined baseline fibrosis and HCV RNA characteristics (n = 651)
    • Among 391 patients with mild to moderate fibrosis (F1-F2)
      • 56% had high HCV RNA
      • 44% had low HCV RNA
    • Among 260 patients with advanced fibrosis-cirrhosis (F3-F4):
      • 52.7% had high HCV RNA
      • 47.3% had low HCV RNA

Main Findings

  • Overall SVR rate: 38% (ITT: n=718)
  • SVR rate highest in patients with mild fibrosis (F1) at baseline, lowest in patients with baseline cirrhosis (F4)

Outcome, %

F1
(n = 180)

F2
(n = 252)

F3
(n = 152)

F4
(n = 134)

P Value
(F1 vs F3 or F4)

SVR, %

52

46

26

18

<.0001

  • SVR and EOT responses significantly higher in patients with baseline mild to moderate fibrosis (F1-F2) compared with those with baseline fibrosis or cirrhosis (F3-F4)

Outcome, %

Baseline Fibrosis F1-F2
(
n = 432)

Baseline Fibrosis F3-F4
(n = 286)

P Value

SVR

48

22

<.0001

EOT

59

34

<.0001

  • Relapse rates also higher in F3-F4 patients vs F1-F2: 35% vs 18%, respectively (P = .0009)
  • Virologic response by baseline HCV RNA (n = 651)
    • Among patients with mild to moderate fibrosis (F1-F2) and baseline HCV RNA assessment (n= 391), SVR rates significantly higher for patients with low HCV RNA

Outcome, %

HCV RNA ≤ 600,000 IU/mL
(n = 172)

HCV RNA > 600,000 IU/mL
(n = 219)

P Value

SVR

58

41

.0008

    • Among patients with bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis (F3-F4) and baseline HCV RNA assessment (n = 260), no significant difference in SVR rate by HCV RNA

...[Message truncated]

Edited 11/9/2008 5:04 pm ET by myer (myer1)
View Full Message
 
   Options Reply 
  

Account Controls for Guest (DelphiBasic Member)
Inbox    Block Ads: Off    Personal Icon: Off
Photos    Web Space    Hide Signatures: Off
Friends    Staff Badge: Off    Manage Signature   

Adjust text size:
Is this too complicated? Switch to Basic View

Software © 2009 Mzinga Inc.  All rights reserved.
Home | Help | Forums | Chat | Blogs | Games | Search | Advertising | About Delphi
Copyright © Mzinga All rights reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Service.