General Babble (Read-Only Folder) -  5-2-04: Wrong is Wrightnotify me whenever anyone posts in this discussionSubscribe  
 
From:  Heidi M. (COMIXACE)  Staff DelphiPlusMember Icon 5/2/2004 11:14 pm 
To: ALL  (1 of 55) 
 3635.1 
As you all know by now, Micah Wright has come clean about lying about his service record. Why did he do it? Well you should check out his original apology helpfully archived by Jim Treacher. Treacher talks about it in greater depth on his blog.

Unfortunately I'm a bit pressed for time tonight, but I want to get this out while the feelings are fresh.

I interviewed Micah on three occasions. The first was an email interview about Stormwatch, which I can't find the link for at the moment. The second time was an in-depth 2-part interview conducted in person. The third was an email interview regarding the upcoming Vigilante series for DC.

I enjoyed interviewing Micah. He was smart and funny and articulate, and his wacky background as an Army Ranger turned animation scribe made him instant copy.

And make no mistake. That is instant copy. Wrestler turned writer Mick Foley. Actor turned governor Arnold. People are always interested in folks who can switch gears. They say there are no second acts in American lives, so it's fun to see someone flip the script.

An amusing anecdote occurred during the in-person interview. It was one that raised warning bells at the time, as small as it was. We were walking down the street and I was walking at my normal, New York pace. Which is fairly speedy because we have a lot of ground to cover.

And Micah said "You're walking a little too fast for me!"

And I of course, gave him a big ribbing. Former Army Ranger can't keep up with a tiny little woman? But I wondered. I mean not that people who were in the service don't get out of shape like everyone else. But people who are physically fit for a period of time – and Micah was in the Army 4 years, supposedly, remember – generally have some kind of fitness jones to begin with.

So anyway, the fact that I walked faster than Micah just seemed amusing at the time. But there were a few other things.

Don't let his apology confuse you. Micah constantly goes on about the Rangers. Maybe he was playing it up for a reporter, but this wasn't something he tried not to talk about. He made constant references in his conversation to it. I remember him looking at a billboard of some sixpack sporting male models in a beer ad and remarking how phoney that was "Even the guys who were in the Rangers who were in really good shape didn't have those kind of six-packs," he said.

Which, now that we know he just hung around the Rangers, could have been a true statement now that I think about it.

Anyway, why am I going on like this? Well, as if you can't tell, I'm steamed. I'm steamed because I saw first hand Micah being a spokesman for the anti-war movement, a movement I very much believe in. The reason I interviewed him in person was because he was in New York for a week promoting his book. I attended one of the slideshows he did. It was full of Zinn-loving, granola crunching lefties. And they were eating it up with a spoon. He was a good spokesman, full of outrage and soundbites. He did a bunch of liberal talk shows as well – or claimed he did anyway.

And now he's handed all the people he clashed with a giant fucking howitzer to discredit everything he believed in – or said he did – and a lot of things I believe in.

And I resent that. The right-wing blogerati have already picked this up. Go here to get started. His book is called "anti-American." That hurts. Criticizing our nations bad behavior in order to make it the place we know it should be is not anti-American. You'll also see a bunch of Micah's propaganda posters ticked up with anti-Micah Wright slogans. What's sauce for the goose, I guess.

The first of many, I suspect, smoking guns is here where an ex-girlfriend reveals what he was really doing during the Panamanian conflict: lying, stealing newspaper and being a funny wacky kind of guy.

Is this story going to blow over in a few days? Yep. But it's also entered the great vat of paranoid conspiracy. Right-wingers are going to remember, because you know what, if it were a guy from the right who got caught, I would remember. When you get caught in a lie that huge and monumental, people use it. It's the ad hominem attack.

I'm also really steamed for another reason. Over on Micah's forum, people came over and called him a liar. And they would be gagged and banned. Supposedly because they were illiterate trolls. But if you read this thread over on Socnet, the ranger forum, you'll see they are actually just regular internet folks. Who could smell a phoney miles away.

Look, guys lie about being firemen or police officers or in the army all the time. They do it to get into women's pants, to get attention and other things. And the real deals know about these phonies. Trust me on that. Being in the army certainly doesn't make you a good person. The recent photos of atrocities committed by Americans and Brits in Iraq proves that. Some soldiers are rapists and thieves. Some are heroes. Some fight for what they believe in. But at least they put their lives on the line, for real. And I respect that. I respect our armed forced, even though I'm anti war. Many male members of my family served. Some thought it was the worst time of their life, others got medals. Two of my grand uncles are decorated WWII vets. A distant cousin died on the beach in Normandy.

It really, really bugs me that Micah called so many people who really did serve and risk their lives, liars. His contrite, inconsistency riddled "apology" delivered when the jig was up, doesn't even begin to cover that or make amends.

Okay that's all I have time for now. As I said, this will blow over in a few days. If nothing else, Micah has proven himself a vividly imaginative writer, with a gift for sloganeering and verisimilitude. Honestly, I hope he can find a way out of this and find a way to make a living doing what he does best: telling lies for fun and profit. He's obviously very very good at it.

 
   Options 
  

 
From:  Jim Hanley (JHUNIVERSE)  DelphiPlusMember Icon 5/2/2004 11:35 pm 
To: Heidi M. (COMIXACE)  DelphiPlusMember Icon  (2 of 55) 
 3635.2 in reply to 3635.1 
To answer your first (though clearly rhetorical) question, he did it because he's an asshole. Even people with whom we agree on most everything can turn out to be assholes. A hard lesson learned over the years from hiring and firing lots of people, it still stings when it happens.

Jim Hanley
 
   Options 
  

 
From:  Chris Eckert (ambushbug23)  5/3/2004 12:42 am 
To: Heidi M. (COMIXACE)  DelphiPlusMember Icon  (3 of 55) 
 3635.3 in reply to 3635.1 
The "exposing the foolishness of the media" bit is really grating when you consider that some of the media blindly beating the drums of war that he lied to in order to prove this point include Democracy Now/La Pacifica, Howard Zinn, Kurt Vonnegut and National Public Radio. Any sort of criticism of "poor journalism" he wants to levy against Fox News et. al will be equally valid towards all of these people and organizations. And as you mentioned, stringent fact-checking is not SOP for human-interest/promotional pieces for non-academic books.

Not to mention Seven Stories, his publisher. They also publish work by Noam Chomsky, Ralph Nader, Zinn, Vonnegut and dozens of other "left wing" authors. This is just more fodder for reactionary radio hosts and others to throw off when you mention any book published by Seven Stories, that these are are the same bozos that published the phony Army Ranger's book, why should we even believe these other people?

Honestly, the blame-shift to the media bothers me more than anything else in this fascinating debacle.


Edited 5/3/2004 12:43 am ET by Chris Eckert (ambushbug23)
 
   Options 
  

 
From:  Heidi M. (COMIXACE)  Staff DelphiPlusMember Icon 5/3/2004 12:50 am 
To: Chris Eckert (ambushbug23)  (4 of 55) 
 3635.4 in reply to 3635.3 
Well here's another fun fact. The CBR piece links back to his original interview where he claims to have been nominated for a Daytime Emmy for THE ANGRY BEAVERS.

First, google Micah Wright, Emmy and Beavers: http://www.google.com/search?num=50&hl=en&lr=&ie=ISO-8859-1&oe=ISO-8859-1&newwindow=1&safe=off&q=%22micah+wright%22+emmy+beavers&btnG=Search

Now look at the actual list of nominess, from Nick's website:

http://www.nick.com/all_nick/everything_nick/awards_home.jhtml

 
   Options 
  

 
From:  Chris Eckert (ambushbug23)  5/3/2004 1:02 am 
To: Heidi M. (COMIXACE)  DelphiPlusMember Icon  (5 of 55) 
 3635.5 in reply to 3635.4 
I was wondering about that myself. I was poking around before Sopranos this evening and managed to find the less-cited reference to being nominated for an Annie:

http://www.annieawards.org/awards.html

back in 2000, as a general "outstanding achievement" for the show. I couldn't find anything but those Sound Editing noms from the Emmys, but was still in "benefit of the doubt" mode, since the Annie thing (somewhat) panned out.

I'm also curious about the "sweetening" of his animation CV by including reference to work on Rugrats, Spongebob, Invader Zim and other more popular Nickelodeon projects, and whether it was just uncredited support work or outright fabrication. It doesn't show up on his official "about" page, but I could've sworn it came up in message board postings and interviews, and various reviews of his work certainly mention it. I don't think fans would've just conjured up, "this guy wrote for Spongebob and Rugrats" out of thin air while they were busy writing lukewarm reviews of Stormwatch.

I just went back to his website, and he's pulled the sarcastic, "Golly Braniac, you've found me out!" portion of his FAQ which linked to his mea culpa.

He's still got the, "Micah was cloned in a labratory from the DNA of Victor Lustig, Charles Ponzi, Frank Abagnale, Henry Gondorf and Limehouse Chappie. He is an accomplished practical joker, and an incredible prevaricator." part up though, which even further disinclines me to cut him any slack, or assume that any other portion of his history is not fabricated.

Classy. Tell Kurt Vonnegut he just got PUNK'D, Micah Ian Wright style!


Edited 5/3/2004 1:06 am ET by Chris Eckert (ambushbug23)
 
   Options 
  

 
From:  Jay Donald (JayDonald34)  5/3/2004 1:05 am 
To: Heidi M. (COMIXACE)  DelphiPlusMember Icon  (6 of 55) 
 3635.6 in reply to 3635.4 
Don't you get it? He was just showing how blinkered and easily fooled various entertainment media are when it comes to their "reporting". You're only suggesting that he lied to shamelessly promote his career because YOU work in the entertainment media, and Wright's brave, brilliant stunt has struck at the heart of your credibility. You yourself admit to having run interviews with him that contained enormous whoppers about his military service; your failure to detect his distortions makes YOU complicit in his lie-mongering. In fact, it's a bit rich for you to criticize him about anything, given your own deep involvement. Actually, his credibility is greater than yours - he's admitted his mistakes. Why haven't you, hmmm? Cat got your tongue all of a sudden?

Ranger or not, Micah Wright is a true American hero, and a far greater person than you could ever hope to be.

(At least, that's what some of his defenders on the MWF would have replied. Oy...)

 
   Options 
  

 
From:  Heidi M. (COMIXACE)  Staff DelphiPlusMember Icon 5/3/2004 1:31 am 
To: Jay Donald (JayDonald34)  (7 of 55) 
 3635.7 in reply to 3635.6 
You know, I will say this: I know Micah and like Micah. Or did. We have corresponded on a number of topics and were...are...?...on friendly terms.

When this scandal first broke, I can see people on his forum being flabbergasted. And not wanting to believe that this person -- who is funny and smart and a very good writer -- was a pathological liar. So I can see some shock.

but as more of it comes out, I'm more amazed at the defenses.

But I'm even MORE troubled by the people who say "So he lied, so what?" Sure we all tell little lies and pad ourselves here and there. This is not a case of someone telling a whoppr and getting caugt up in it. This is NOT a Robin Williams movie. This is a guy who lied every single day for years.

 
   Options 
  

 
From:  I HAVE THE HIGH GROUND (Paul_Pogue)  DelphiPlusMember Icon 5/3/2004 1:36 am 
To: Heidi M. (COMIXACE)  DelphiPlusMember Icon  (8 of 55) 
 3635.8 in reply to 3635.4 
As the day progresses and this just gets more and more out of hand, I'm starting to wonder about everything from his claim to have written the McDonald's training video "Sexual Harassment and You" to his having taken a writing class from Terry McMillan.
 
   Options 
  

 
From:  BrainDeath1  5/3/2004 2:47 am 
To: Heidi M. (COMIXACE)  DelphiPlusMember Icon  (9 of 55) 
 3635.9 in reply to 3635.1 
No offense intended here, but you might want to look into how your desire to believe Wright lead to your ignoring the warning signs you mention. I always felt that the reason that Stephen Glass got away with his fabrications was that they were fabrications that suited the biases of his editors--they wanted to believe there was a church that worshiped George H.W. Bush, and that electronics companies would engage in a bidding war for a third grade programmer. How much did Wright's fabrications about being a Ranger (and the details of the awful things that Rangers did in Panama and elsewhere) suit your biases?
 
   Options 
  

 
From:  Shad Petosky (soli2d)  5/3/2004 3:00 am 
To: Heidi M. (COMIXACE)  DelphiPlusMember Icon  (10 of 55) 
 3635.10 in reply to 3635.7 
"who is funny and smart and a very good writer -- was a pathological liar."

I specifically avoided this term and characterization since I've never hung out with Micah. However, I think that anyone who's ever dealt with a compulsive liar will see shades of it in his reported habits and have less "pity" for the predicament he is in. Everyone has met plenty of exaggerators, especially when defending themselves and am sure that most people out there feel like everyone is capable of lying and would prefer a world that leans on the side of forgiveness.

On the other hand, I've met two compulsive liars in my life, both of them were smart and funny, incredibly social, and made fast friends and both ended up hurting people over and over again.

Micah characterizes this lie in his explanations as something that spun out of control. Yet he brought it up in nearly every interview, many times on his forums, at cons, to other pros, on his website, and the lie snuck its way into all the press releases. If he had insisted that publishers did not use his military service to sell book or had insisted that it was a completely private matter, I'm sure he could have done a much better job at burying the lie. Not coming up with detailed accounts of combat action might have helped too.

Micah pulls a typical compulsive liar trick with "I'm sorry...that you're so gullible." On the other hand, he doesn't just disappear into a new life either. I didn't know he was lying then, and I don't know what he's feeling now.

I don't care about what happens to Micah Wright. I am a little sad that nearly every time comics appear in main stream press the result is either vain or embarrassing. It's also sad to see long time Delphi regulars who are moderators over on his forum defend him in such weird ways.

 
   Options 
  

 
From:  Josh Kleefeld (JoshuaKlay)  5/3/2004 3:52 am 
To: BrainDeath1  (11 of 55) 
 3635.11 in reply to 3635.9 
Every day since birth, I've been growing less and less gullible.
 
   Options 
  

 
From:  Jay Donald (JayDonald34)  5/3/2004 3:57 am 
To: Shad Petosky (soli2d)  (12 of 55) 
 3635.12 in reply to 3635.10 
Compulsive is a pretty good word for it. His original mea-culpa-cum-apology was completely demolished by actual facts in less than 24 hours, and if his ex-girlfriend's account is to be believed, he's been bullshitting and hoaxing his way through life for a long, long time (including lying about his ROTC service to get out of doing classwork). Wright's response on the thread - his feeble effort to spin these revelations as an example of his heroism, and the transparency of his story - really does indicate someone who thinks he can lie his way out of any situation.
 
   Options 
  

 
From:  Lea Hernandez (DivaLeaCom)  5/3/2004 10:46 am 
To: Heidi M. (COMIXACE)  DelphiPlusMember Icon  (13 of 55) 
 3635.13 in reply to 3635.4 
Funny how one lie makes you take a stick and start poking the anthill, because you say, "Wait. If he/she/it told one whopper, how many others have they told?"

I could not Google up any actual documentation of Micah's sometimes-nomination (bio at http://www.inthefray.com/bios/Bio-Wright_Micah.html, http://studentwritersconference.org/swc2004_authors6.htm, http://www.comicbookresources.com/news/newsitem.cgi?id=954), sometimes-won (http://www.newsreview.com/issues/chico/2003-05-15/cheese.asp)Daytime Emmy for The Angry Beavers. Even in his bio in the DV-8 pitch (http://www.micahwright.com/downloads/DV8_Pitch.pdf), he claims an Emmy nom for The Angry Beavers. But he doesn't make the same claim on the 2001 Angry Beavers page at his website.

I couldn't find him at http://uagrad.org/FindFriend/, which is the place to look up/hook up with fellow University of Arizona graduates. (I tried just entering "Wright" and graduation years from 1990 to 2003. There were graduating Wrights, even one M Wright--but she's not a guy, and there was still no Micah, or even Ian.)

According to the usual MW timeline, he served four years as a Ranger, then went to and graduated from UofA with degrees in poli sci and creative writing (sometimes just creative writing), then on to Nickelodeon. He never provides a graduation date, which is peculiar. Don't most graduates?

A statement posted today at http://www.thespoonsexperience.com/archives/002152.php#002152, supposedly from an ex-girlfriend of MW, places him at UofA in 1989. The (alleged) ex says, "The Panama invasion started in December, 1989, and ended with Noriega's surrender in January, 1990. Micah was definitely at the U of A, not Panama". Since Micah's supposedly 34, this would've made him about 19. Obviously, he wasn't in Panama from ages 15-19. However, the usual MW timeline suggests he was at UofA in the mid-1990's, post-Panama.

What a can of worms.

Incidentalloy, the guy who DID win an Emmy for his work on The Angry Beavers was Marc Mailand. The category was Sound Editing Special Class. (http://www.editorsguild.com/newsletter/JulAug98/ShrtksJulAug98.html)

 
   Options 
  

 
From:  Heidi M. (COMIXACE)  Staff DelphiPlusMember Icon 5/3/2004 11:07 am 
To: Lea Hernandez (DivaLeaCom)  (14 of 55) 
 3635.14 in reply to 3635.13 
Good work, Inspector Diva!

I was always a little hazy on Micah's age vs service. One of the reasons for this was that in Swamp Thing, when I was editing it, one of the characters was an ex-marine who had been in Panama, and I was always trying to work his age out with Brian Vaughan.

 
   Options 
  

 
From:  Lea Hernandez (DivaLeaCom)  5/3/2004 11:55 am 
To: Heidi M. (COMIXACE)  DelphiPlusMember Icon  (15 of 55) 
 3635.15 in reply to 3635.14 
I want to get paid for my mad Google Skillz!

 
   Options 
  

 
From:  Heidi M. (COMIXACE)  Staff DelphiPlusMember Icon 5/3/2004 5:07 pm 
To: ALL  (16 of 55) 
 3635.16 in reply to 3635.15 
I've been doing a little investigating (don't have time for more than a littl) but to give this all some perspective, another one of Micah's bio claims was that he spearheaded an attempt to get aniamtion writers into the DGA for his show Constant Payne, and got canned from Nick for it. After doing a little digging and talking to some animation folks I know, this has checked out.

The fact that animation writers aren't part of the Writer's Guild is a giant crock and something that no one has ever been able to do something about. I glad to hear that this really was one of Micah's causes and he took a real risk for it.

 
   Options 
  

 
From:  Shad Petosky (soli2d)  5/3/2004 5:19 pm 
To: Heidi M. (COMIXACE)  DelphiPlusMember Icon  (17 of 55) 
 3635.17 in reply to 3635.16 
Awesome. Now can you find out if George Bush Jr. ever reported for duty?

Edited 5/3/2004 5:22 pm ET by Shad (soli2d)
 
   Options 
  

 
From:  KennyTears  5/3/2004 8:31 pm 
To: Heidi M. (COMIXACE)  DelphiPlusMember Icon  (18 of 55) 
 3635.18 in reply to 3635.14 
I now realize who Mr Wright reminds me of:

Eve Harrington from "All About Eve". The phony background, the living a lie, the using the background to get ahead professionally, there is a movie in here somewhere.

If you have never seen it, rent it out and watch the early scene where Eve tells her tale. Great movie.

 
   Options 
  

 
From:  Heidi M. (COMIXACE)  Staff DelphiPlusMember Icon 5/3/2004 9:11 pm 
To: KennyTears  (19 of 55) 
 3635.19 in reply to 3635.18 
Seen it...I've LIVEd it! Twice! Just call me Margo Channing.
 
   Options 
  

 
From:  Brett Tennant (BRETEN)  5/3/2004 9:36 pm 
To: Lea Hernandez (DivaLeaCom)  (20 of 55) 
 3635.20 in reply to 3635.13 
She also mentions later on that he was still there when she graduated, and they started dating when she was a freshman and he was a junior. Being Canadian I'm not sure what year a junior is, but I know freshamn is first year, so assuming she spent 4 years there, he probably spent another year or so after her.

As for this whole situation, I have no idea what I feel, other than shocked.

Brett

 
   Options 
  

Account Controls for Guest (DelphiBasic Member)
Inbox    Block Ads: Off    Personal Icon: Off
Photos    Web Space    Hide Signatures: Off
Friends    Staff Badge: Off    Manage Signature   

Navigate this discussion:  1-20 21-40 41-55
Adjust text size:
Is this too complicated? Switch to Basic View

Software © 2009 Mzinga Inc.  All rights reserved.
Home | Help | Forums | Chat | Blogs | Games | Search | Advertising | About Delphi
Copyright © Mzinga All rights reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Service.