Enjoy Delphi Forums ad free!Click here.
CURRENT EVENTS -  Keeping Track Of The Corona Virus (54106 views) Notify me whenever anyone posts in this discussion.Subscribe
 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon11/9/21 6:10 AM 
To: All  (2545 of 3678) 
 10301.2545 in reply to 10301.2525 

November 9, 2021 - AUSTRALIA

         "It seems that at The Age in particular, you can’t go near the Covid story except in a way that’s supportive of the Victorian government’s handling of it. And if you’re not supportive, that’s reason enough for you to be cancelled"

          The publishers could be right that comparing the vaccines to the Tiananmen Square massacre isn't a fair comparison. It could be that the vaccines will turn out to be vastly worse than that massacre. We simply do not know yet, with the possible exception of the Chinese, who may well know.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10126303/Cartoonist-Leunig-AXED-cartoon-comparing-Dan-Andrews-vaccine-mandates-Tiananmen-Square.html

High-profile cartoonist Leunig is AXED over cartoon comparing Dan Andrews’ vaccine mandates to the Tiananmen Square massacre

Controversial cartoonist Michael Leunig has been axed from his prime spot in The Age newspaper after a cartoon comparing resistance against mandatory Covid vaccines to the fight for democracy in Tiananmen Square was censored.

'Apparently, I’m out of touch with the readership,' Leunig told The Australian's Media Diary of his sacking from providing the editorial page cartoon in Monday editions of the Melbourne-based publication.

Leunig's cartoon, which never made the paper, featured one of his typically fragile, big-nosed figures facing the silhouette of a tank with a syringe in place of the gun turret. In the top left corner, the 76-year-old copied the iconic 'Tank Man' image showing a Beijing demonstrator standing in the path of a column of tanks in 1989. 

He posted the drawing on his Instagram page in late September with the word 'mandate', after it was rejected for publication by The Age editor, Gay Alcorn.   

Leunig confirmed to The Australian he had been dumped from the editorial page spot, with the paper saying it was 'trialling new cartoonists' on the page. 'If what Gay says is right, I don’t much want to work for the sorts of readers who are so censorious,' Leunig said. 

'It seems that at The Age in particular, you can’t go near the Covid story except in a way that’s supportive of the Victorian government’s handling of it. And if you’re not supportive, that’s reason enough for you to be cancelled.”

Leunig revealed that 12 of his other cartoons, also about vaccines and the Victorian government, had been censored by the paper this year.

He said the way he had been informed his editorial cartoons were no longer wanted by The Age was 'pretty blunt [and] discourteous'.

'It is not rejection that bothers me. It’s the wokeism and the humourlessness, which seem without courage, good spirit or creative imagination,' he said.

 
 Reply   Options 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon11/9/21 6:17 AM 
To: All  (2546 of 3678) 
 10301.2546 in reply to 10301.2545 

November 9, 2021

          "China Braces For Another Major COVID Flareup By Forcng Jabs On Children As Young As 3"          

        China is doing this for a reason, but in my opinion, not the reason the free world thinks. I do not believe this is an attempt to get the Chinese vaccinated. This is an attempt to get the free world vaccinated. WHY? You won't see the following in this article, or likely anywhere...a deathly shame.

        The Chinese use a live virus vaccine, which allows the bodies natural immunity to learn about Covid, and then defend against Covid. The vaccines used by the free world are NOT live virus vaccines. They are chemical soup mixes, which harm the bodies natural immunity, among other harms, leaving people vulnerable to cancer, blood clots, heart attacks, and anything else you can imagine. If the free world is under attack through these vaccines, and there are many indications, again in my opinion, that this is so, can you think of a sweeter way for the Chinese to make people think that the vaccines are safe and necessary, even for 5-year-olds, than to vaccinate (or at least SAY they are vaccinating) their own 3-year-olds, who are not even at risk from COVID?

China Braces For Another Major COVID Flareup By Forcing Jabs On Children As Young As 3 

The notion - oft-repeated in western media - that China has successfully managed to bring COVID to heel using the tools unique to an authoritarian state couldn't be further from the truth. Earlier this month, leaked CCP documents revealed that China's leadership has commanded local officials to be on alert for another large-scale COVID outbreak, before ordering them to complete two tasks:

  • One is to build central isolation sites, with local authorities required by the end of October to create facilities of not less than 20 rooms per 10,000 people. The second: the scale of each isolation site must be more than 100 rooms.

But that's not all. As outbreaks continue to flare up across the world's most populous country, Beijing has warned that local officials should prepare for COVID outbreaks flaring up in certain areas to get even worse in the coming days, and that the virus might spread to affect more cities in towns across China.

In an attempt to get ahead of the next major COVID wave (potentially driven by the delta variant or its "sub-variant" delta-plus) local media reports cited by Bloomberg attest that China has started giving COVID jabs to children as young as three, despite the fact that China has one of the highest vaccination rates in the world, with 75% of its 1.4 billion people already vaccinated. ~~~~~~~~~~

The moves come as China tries to quash what has become a 'whack-a-mole' series of flareups across its vast territory, with flareups of the virus coming more frequently than they did before delta arrived. Beijing remains committed to its "zero-tolerance" COVID strategy, which has kept its borders closed and heavy handed quarantines in place even as its peers roll back most of their COVID limitations. 

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon11/9/21 6:17 AM 
To: All  (2547 of 3678) 
 10301.2547 in reply to 10301.2546 

Ohio house wins Halloween with epic skeleton display complete with COVID-19  twist - YouTube

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon11/9/21 6:23 AM 
To: All  (2548 of 3678) 
 10301.2548 in reply to 10301.2386 

November 9, 2021

        "Any cursory review of terminology, mechanisms of action, literature review, or VAERS data should lead a physician to conclude that this gene therapy, never widely used in humans without incurable conditions, with limited data, and more morbidity and mortality than any true vaccine, should be avoided like a true plague."

The complicated vaccine game resisting physicians must play

We are living in a game come to life.  As with any game, there are rules.  But sometimes in life, if you want to survive, you learn how to game the game. We no longer live in your grandfather's world, where medical care was physician-directed.  Increasingly, control is in the hands of an opposition force comprising hospital administrators, insurance executives, lawyers, and elected and unelected government officials.  Physicians are now mostly cogs on the medical wheel, where the cogs are rapidly being worn out.

On top of Medicare compliance, insurance precertification, and time-wasting electronic records, we have foisted upon us a "vaccine."  Any cursory review of terminology, mechanisms of action, literature review, or VAERS data should lead a physician to conclude that this gene therapy, never widely used in humans without incurable conditions, with limited data, and more morbidity and mortality than any true vaccine, should be avoided like a true plague.

When it comes to COVID-19 injections, many physicians have fallen like dominoes and gotten stabbed in the deltoid due to hospital staff requirements, increasingly being justified by the supposed FDA approval of a product currently unavailable.  Obtaining a medical or religious exemption has been a fool's errand.  To many, succumbing to gene therapy appeared to be the best short-term solution.

The truth is that hospital administrations care about "vaccine" effectiveness as much as they do about its morbidity and mortality, which means they care not one whit.  How could they if they reviewed the government-created reporting system that presently tallies more than 17,000 deaths and 500,000 adverse reactions in less than one year?  What they actually care about is the hospital's image; continued billing of government, insurers, patients; and their salaries.  And why shouldn't they?  They control the hospital board, which pays them, and the medical staff that generate the hospital's income.

Critically, what it all boils down to is compliance, and what hospital administrations want is documentation.  Therein lies the nature of the game.  The sophisticated physician recognizes that, recognizes that this is all a game, like cat and mouse, or raising stakes in poker.

Some physicians will not play the game according to hospital rules, so their resistance is to play an outside game, giving up their association with the hospital.  That's fair.  They are adults and should be able to control their lives.  If what leaves one's body is a personal decision, so too should be what enters it.  

Not all physicians, however, can or want to play that outside game.  They cannot if they are hospital-employed.  To play the outside game requires terminating their position and to some will be akin to patient abandonment.  They know that when they hear "Your papers," it will be without the "please," the statement being a demand: your arm or your job.

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon11/9/21 6:24 AM 
To: All  (2549 of 3678) 
 10301.2549 in reply to 10301.2405 

November 9, 2021

       “I’ve seen strokes, I’ve seen Bell’s palsy, I’ve seen a heart attack, blood clots, I’ve seen breathing disorders where people just cannot breathe after they’ve had these vaccines. I’ve seen people with autoimmune disease where it’s acted up afterwards."

        Those "afterwards" are short term afterwards. We haven't seen the long term afterwards yet, but they are coming. Maybe they won't be too bad, but maybe they will devastate life as we know it in the free world. They do not know. These vaccines are unlike any vaccines ever created, they are experimental, and they are WAY too new. The idea of vaccinating the world with these is beyond suicidal...it is, in my opinion, homicidal. If you shoot a gun into a crowd, not knowing if it will hit someone or miss everyone, what happens if someone is hit and dies. The shooter is charged with murder...right?

Tyrannical COVID agenda violates every law of the land: Canadian doc blasts jab mandates

Around 2,000 people gathered in silent protest against COVID jab mandates in Alberta’s capital of Edmonton on Sunday at a rally preceded by testimony from doctors who spoke about the ill effects they have witnessed from the injections.

“In my practice, you know, lately I’ve seen many people injured by vaccines. It is really sad, you see these people there they come, visit you regularly and they’re just doing their duty for the government, you know, and they’re just following orders and they come in and they get injured and it’s sad,” Alberta physician Dr. Chris Gordillo said at the Silent Protest for Albertans Against Vaccine Mandates.

“I’ve seen strokes, I’ve seen Bell’s palsy, I’ve seen a heart attack, blood clots, I’ve seen breathing disorders where people just cannot breathe after they’ve had these vaccines. I’ve seen people with autoimmune disease where it’s acted up afterwards. It’s just insane. And, you know, I think more of us need to speak up.”

Gordillo practices family medicine in nearby Spruce Grove, Alberta, and is one of many doctors opposed to COVID vaccine mandates being imposed at the hands of Alberta Health Services (AHS).

AHS recently announced that they will extend until November 30 a mandate that all of its workers be fully vaccinated with the COVID shots.? Once the mandate takes effect, it will impact thousands of doctors,  nurses, and other healthcare workers.

Gordillo called out government COVID jab mandates as “tyranny” and said he has had patients “crying in my office because they have to decide whether to get this jab or whether to keep their job.”

“And it’s so sad because, you know, if you’re getting a vaccine not for your health but for your job, that’s a sign of tyranny,” Gordillo said.

Speaking at the silent protest along with Gordillo were a concerned parent, a nurse, a firefighter, a pastor, and a first nations elder.

Joining the other speakers was Dr. Daniel Nagase, who was recently blacklisted by Alberta Health Services for treating his COVID patients with ivermectin.

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon11/9/21 6:25 AM 
To: All  (2550 of 3678) 
 10301.2550 in reply to 10301.2549 

November 9, 2021

        "While there are many other problems with vaccine passports, if officials insist upon them, at the very least these should be immunity passports rather than vaccine passports: this model has already been implemented in several European countries."

Is this why the CDC ignores natural immunity, pushes vaccines instead?

The science on the efficacy and durability of natural immunity is now overwhelming. Yet the CDC continues to recommend lifting restrictions on the vaccinated but not those who have recovered from COVID and have superior natural immunity.

Vaccine mandates across the country likewise ignore natural immunity simply because the CDC is ignoring it. Those promulgating vaccine mandates feel no need to actually address the science on this question; instead, they simply fall back on the CDC’s recommendation that everyone—regardless of immunity status—get vaccinated.

There are many political reasons the CDC continues to ignore the scientific evidence on this issue. Here is a sampling of the reasons, which are neither compelling nor grounded in scientific findings:

Public health officials worry that acknowledging natural immunity will lead people to deliberately try to get infected with COVID rather than getting vaccinated. The obvious response to this worry is that the natural immunity question is not about whether people should try to acquire natural immunity by deliberately getting infected; nobody is suggesting this. It is about the level of immunity afforded to those who have already recovered from COVID as compared to immunity from the vaccine.

Public health officials worry that establishing whether a potential vaccine recipient has already had COVID is too inefficient and cumbersome: officials downplay anything that might slow the efficiency of vaccination campaigns or complicate the simplistic “needle in every arm” public messaging.

The response to this worry is likewise straightforward. Vaccination centers need not take on the burden of testing prior to vaccination; simply place the burden of proof on the vaccine recipients. Some people with prior infection may still want the vaccine; as long as they are provided accurate information regarding risks and benefits of vaccines in this population, they are free to get vaccinated.

For those with natural immunity who consider their individual risks and benefits and decide to decline vaccination, policies can specify that it’s their responsibility to establish prior immunity. Simply provide the option to them of presenting previous positive PCR test results, or obtaining antibody testing or a T-cell test (which remains positive after antibodies inevitably decline). While there are many other problems with vaccine passports, if officials insist upon them, at the very least these should be immunity passports rather than vaccine passports: this model has already been implemented in several European countries.

Public health officials worry that acknowledging natural immunity will amount to admitting the failure of their prior policies, which were implemented to slow or halt the spread of the virus. The two most basic numbers in immunology are incidence and prevalence: the former designates the rate of new cases over a given period of time, whereas the latter designates the rate of overall cases for a given period of time.

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon11/9/21 6:27 AM 
To: All  (2551 of 3678) 
 10301.2551 in reply to 10301.2550 

November 9, 2021

       "This is why, in the U.K., the "fully vaccinated are suffering far higher rates of infection that the unvaccinated, and it is getting worse by the day." (Read this entire article.)

The science behind why kids should not get (and don't need) the COVID shot

Most of us know by now — despite the efforts of the legacy media and the Biden administration to hide the fact — that the China virus poses virtually zero risk to kids. The vast majority of children who contract it will come down with no more than the sniffles, if they show any symptoms at all. ~~~~~~~~~~~

The Original Antigenic Sin

It turns out that the human immune system is not capable of an infinite number of responses to an infinite number of viruses. Rather, the strongest response to influenza viruses is produced by the body’s first exposure to the disease, which usually occurs in childhood.

But it is not only that subsequent immune responses to the influenza are weaker, which they are. That would be concerning enough. The problem is that the first childhood infection primes the immune system to respond to subsequent infections with antibodies to the original strain. The “original antigenic sin,” in other words, causes the immune response to miss the target.

The authors of a 2005 Nature Medicine article define the “original antigenic sin” as follows: “After exposure to a new but cross-reacting antigenic variant, such individuals may respond by producing antibodies that are primarily directed at antigens characterizing influenza viruses encountered during earlier epidemics.”

In other words, their bodies are producing antibodies to the variant they were first exposed to in childhood, rather than to the variant that is currently circulating in the population and to which they have now been exposed.

Think about that in the context of the China Virus. This is a novel coronavirus that no one on the planet has ever before encountered. Nor are they fully exposed to it when they are vaccinated with the mRNA vaccine, only to its spike protein. ~~~~~~~~

So why in the world is the FDA saying that it is a good idea to vaccinate all children in the U.S. from 5 to 11 years of age? ~~~~~~~~~

The brilliant Alex Berenson sums it up best: “The most dangerous things to do, at this point, would be to vaccinate children. The virus is not a threat to them, and if they are infected by the new forms of SARS-2 that are sure to emerge every winter, we will begin to establish — through them and the as yet unvaccinated — the layered immunity that is the only way of coming to terms with SARS-2 in the longer term.”

So take your kids out of public school, if you have to. Move to a state that has banned vaccination mandates, as Florida has, if you have to. Home school, if you have to. Do whatever it takes, but protect your children from these vax mongers who are putting power and profits ahead of the best interests of children. And the rest of us.

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon11/10/21 5:16 AM 
To: All  (2552 of 3678) 
 10301.2552 in reply to 10301.2551 

November 10, 2021

         I am seeing many articles like this from around the world, and I intend to post more of them. We have been saying here for a VERY long time that all of the focus has been on the near term effects of the vaccines, and not the long term effects. We have been saying that it is beyond criminal to vaccinate the world with experimental drugs like none we have ever seen, with zero long term observation or study. Well...the long term effects are only just beginning to show themselves. We can pray they won't be too bad, hopefully they won't be.

ERs Are OVERRUN With People Suffering From 'Sudden Cardiac Arrest'

Emergency rooms across the United States are filling up with people suffering from major health issues, unlike during the height of the “pandemic” when hospitals were empty and devoid of any human life.

 

The scene being painted is in stark contrast to where emergency departments were at the start of the pandemic. Except for initial hot spots like New York City, in spring 2020 many ERs across the country were often eerily empty. And even in New York City, despite KHN's claims, the hospitals were empty.

COVID isn’t overwhelming the health system either.  Patients are showing up to the ER sicker than before the pandemic, their diseases more advanced and in need of more complicated care. The mainstream media is blaming it on people putting off care during the hoax scamdemic to avoid getting the common cold they relabeled COVID-19.

Could it be something else though? Could it be:

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon11/10/21 5:19 AM 
To: All  (2553 of 3678) 
 10301.2553 in reply to 10301.2552 

November 10, 2021

       "Dershowitz again turned to the issue of COVID and the Supreme Court, saying “the court is going to have to decide a new issue, and that concerns a disease that can be fatal but oftentimes isn’t,”

        That is not the only issue Mr. Dershowitz. These vaccines are chemical soups, not live virus vaccines that use a person's natural immunity, as were those in the past. These chemical soup vaccines have not been observed and studied long term to see what their latent effects will be, unlike virus vaccines of the past. These "so-called" vaccines neither protect a person from contracting the disease, nor prevent the spread of the disease, unlike virus vaccines of the past. We knew, after much study, that the vaccines of the past would not ultimately cripple or kill large percentages of those who received them. We do NOT know this about THESE vaccines.

'Full Adjudication': Dershowitz Talks 'Ideological Political Exemption' From Vax Mandate

There should be “full adjudication” by the United States Supreme Court before anyone makes a final decision on whether to enforce COVID-19 vaccination mandates — including whether religious and/or ideological political exemptions are valid reasons for refusing to be vaccinated. So says Harvard constitutional law professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz. Joe Biden was unavailable for comment.

During an appearance on Newsmax TV's "Saturday Report," the famed attorney talked about potential exemptions from the vaccines, including a relevant court ruling on Friday.

Incidentally, California’s first in the nation COVID-19 vaccination mandate for kids ages 12 and over allows students and staff to opt out for religious or ideological reasons — but don’t celebrate too soon, Californians opposed to the vax based on personal beliefs: a key (Democrat, of course) lawmaker says he may push legislation to eliminate the personal belief exemption.

Dershowitz again turned to the issue of COVID and the Supreme Court, saying “the court is going to have to decide a new issue, and that concerns a disease that can be fatal but oftentimes isn’t,” also pointing out that COVID is a communicable disease vs. diseases that are not.

Meanwhile, as we reported Friday, a year-long study found that people inoculated against COVID-19 are just as likely to spread the delta variant of the virus to contacts in their household as those who haven’t had been vaccinated.

“Vaccination alone is not enough to prevent people from being infected with the delta variant and spreading it in household settings,” said Ajit Lalvani, a professor of infectious diseases at Imperial College London who co-led the study.

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon11/10/21 5:20 AM 
To: All  (2554 of 3678) 
 10301.2554 in reply to 10301.2553 

Creative homeowners change their Halloween skeleton display every day in  October | GMA

 

Navigate this discussion: 1-4 5-14 15-24 ... 2525-2534 2535-2544 2545-2554 2555-2564 2565-2574 ... 3655-3664 3665-3674 3675-3678
Adjust text size:

Welcome, guest! Get more out of Delphi Forums by logging in.

New to Delphi Forums? You can log in with your Facebook, Twitter, or Google account or use the New Member Login option and log in with any email address.

Home | Help | Forums | Chat | Blogs | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
© Delphi Forums LLC All rights reserved.