CURRENT EVENTS -  Keeping Track Of The Corona Virus (56579 views) Notify me whenever anyone posts in this discussion.Subscribe
 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon11/9/21 6:23 AM 
To: All  (2548 of 3763) 
 10301.2548 in reply to 10301.2386 

November 9, 2021

        "Any cursory review of terminology, mechanisms of action, literature review, or VAERS data should lead a physician to conclude that this gene therapy, never widely used in humans without incurable conditions, with limited data, and more morbidity and mortality than any true vaccine, should be avoided like a true plague."

The complicated vaccine game resisting physicians must play

We are living in a game come to life.  As with any game, there are rules.  But sometimes in life, if you want to survive, you learn how to game the game. We no longer live in your grandfather's world, where medical care was physician-directed.  Increasingly, control is in the hands of an opposition force comprising hospital administrators, insurance executives, lawyers, and elected and unelected government officials.  Physicians are now mostly cogs on the medical wheel, where the cogs are rapidly being worn out.

On top of Medicare compliance, insurance precertification, and time-wasting electronic records, we have foisted upon us a "vaccine."  Any cursory review of terminology, mechanisms of action, literature review, or VAERS data should lead a physician to conclude that this gene therapy, never widely used in humans without incurable conditions, with limited data, and more morbidity and mortality than any true vaccine, should be avoided like a true plague.

When it comes to COVID-19 injections, many physicians have fallen like dominoes and gotten stabbed in the deltoid due to hospital staff requirements, increasingly being justified by the supposed FDA approval of a product currently unavailable.  Obtaining a medical or religious exemption has been a fool's errand.  To many, succumbing to gene therapy appeared to be the best short-term solution.

The truth is that hospital administrations care about "vaccine" effectiveness as much as they do about its morbidity and mortality, which means they care not one whit.  How could they if they reviewed the government-created reporting system that presently tallies more than 17,000 deaths and 500,000 adverse reactions in less than one year?  What they actually care about is the hospital's image; continued billing of government, insurers, patients; and their salaries.  And why shouldn't they?  They control the hospital board, which pays them, and the medical staff that generate the hospital's income.

Critically, what it all boils down to is compliance, and what hospital administrations want is documentation.  Therein lies the nature of the game.  The sophisticated physician recognizes that, recognizes that this is all a game, like cat and mouse, or raising stakes in poker.

Some physicians will not play the game according to hospital rules, so their resistance is to play an outside game, giving up their association with the hospital.  That's fair.  They are adults and should be able to control their lives.  If what leaves one's body is a personal decision, so too should be what enters it.  

Not all physicians, however, can or want to play that outside game.  They cannot if they are hospital-employed.  To play the outside game requires terminating their position and to some will be akin to patient abandonment.  They know that when they hear "Your papers," it will be without the "please," the statement being a demand: your arm or your job.

 
 Reply   Options 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon11/9/21 6:24 AM 
To: All  (2549 of 3763) 
 10301.2549 in reply to 10301.2405 

November 9, 2021

       “I’ve seen strokes, I’ve seen Bell’s palsy, I’ve seen a heart attack, blood clots, I’ve seen breathing disorders where people just cannot breathe after they’ve had these vaccines. I’ve seen people with autoimmune disease where it’s acted up afterwards."

        Those "afterwards" are short term afterwards. We haven't seen the long term afterwards yet, but they are coming. Maybe they won't be too bad, but maybe they will devastate life as we know it in the free world. They do not know. These vaccines are unlike any vaccines ever created, they are experimental, and they are WAY too new. The idea of vaccinating the world with these is beyond suicidal...it is, in my opinion, homicidal. If you shoot a gun into a crowd, not knowing if it will hit someone or miss everyone, what happens if someone is hit and dies. The shooter is charged with murder...right?

Tyrannical COVID agenda violates every law of the land: Canadian doc blasts jab mandates

Around 2,000 people gathered in silent protest against COVID jab mandates in Alberta’s capital of Edmonton on Sunday at a rally preceded by testimony from doctors who spoke about the ill effects they have witnessed from the injections.

“In my practice, you know, lately I’ve seen many people injured by vaccines. It is really sad, you see these people there they come, visit you regularly and they’re just doing their duty for the government, you know, and they’re just following orders and they come in and they get injured and it’s sad,” Alberta physician Dr. Chris Gordillo said at the Silent Protest for Albertans Against Vaccine Mandates.

“I’ve seen strokes, I’ve seen Bell’s palsy, I’ve seen a heart attack, blood clots, I’ve seen breathing disorders where people just cannot breathe after they’ve had these vaccines. I’ve seen people with autoimmune disease where it’s acted up afterwards. It’s just insane. And, you know, I think more of us need to speak up.”

Gordillo practices family medicine in nearby Spruce Grove, Alberta, and is one of many doctors opposed to COVID vaccine mandates being imposed at the hands of Alberta Health Services (AHS).

AHS recently announced that they will extend until November 30 a mandate that all of its workers be fully vaccinated with the COVID shots.? Once the mandate takes effect, it will impact thousands of doctors,  nurses, and other healthcare workers.

Gordillo called out government COVID jab mandates as “tyranny” and said he has had patients “crying in my office because they have to decide whether to get this jab or whether to keep their job.”

“And it’s so sad because, you know, if you’re getting a vaccine not for your health but for your job, that’s a sign of tyranny,” Gordillo said.

Speaking at the silent protest along with Gordillo were a concerned parent, a nurse, a firefighter, a pastor, and a first nations elder.

Joining the other speakers was Dr. Daniel Nagase, who was recently blacklisted by Alberta Health Services for treating his COVID patients with ivermectin.

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon11/9/21 6:25 AM 
To: All  (2550 of 3763) 
 10301.2550 in reply to 10301.2549 

November 9, 2021

        "While there are many other problems with vaccine passports, if officials insist upon them, at the very least these should be immunity passports rather than vaccine passports: this model has already been implemented in several European countries."

Is this why the CDC ignores natural immunity, pushes vaccines instead?

The science on the efficacy and durability of natural immunity is now overwhelming. Yet the CDC continues to recommend lifting restrictions on the vaccinated but not those who have recovered from COVID and have superior natural immunity.

Vaccine mandates across the country likewise ignore natural immunity simply because the CDC is ignoring it. Those promulgating vaccine mandates feel no need to actually address the science on this question; instead, they simply fall back on the CDC’s recommendation that everyone—regardless of immunity status—get vaccinated.

There are many political reasons the CDC continues to ignore the scientific evidence on this issue. Here is a sampling of the reasons, which are neither compelling nor grounded in scientific findings:

Public health officials worry that acknowledging natural immunity will lead people to deliberately try to get infected with COVID rather than getting vaccinated. The obvious response to this worry is that the natural immunity question is not about whether people should try to acquire natural immunity by deliberately getting infected; nobody is suggesting this. It is about the level of immunity afforded to those who have already recovered from COVID as compared to immunity from the vaccine.

Public health officials worry that establishing whether a potential vaccine recipient has already had COVID is too inefficient and cumbersome: officials downplay anything that might slow the efficiency of vaccination campaigns or complicate the simplistic “needle in every arm” public messaging.

The response to this worry is likewise straightforward. Vaccination centers need not take on the burden of testing prior to vaccination; simply place the burden of proof on the vaccine recipients. Some people with prior infection may still want the vaccine; as long as they are provided accurate information regarding risks and benefits of vaccines in this population, they are free to get vaccinated.

For those with natural immunity who consider their individual risks and benefits and decide to decline vaccination, policies can specify that it’s their responsibility to establish prior immunity. Simply provide the option to them of presenting previous positive PCR test results, or obtaining antibody testing or a T-cell test (which remains positive after antibodies inevitably decline). While there are many other problems with vaccine passports, if officials insist upon them, at the very least these should be immunity passports rather than vaccine passports: this model has already been implemented in several European countries.

Public health officials worry that acknowledging natural immunity will amount to admitting the failure of their prior policies, which were implemented to slow or halt the spread of the virus. The two most basic numbers in immunology are incidence and prevalence: the former designates the rate of new cases over a given period of time, whereas the latter designates the rate of overall cases for a given period of time.

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon11/9/21 6:27 AM 
To: All  (2551 of 3763) 
 10301.2551 in reply to 10301.2550 

November 9, 2021

       "This is why, in the U.K., the "fully vaccinated are suffering far higher rates of infection that the unvaccinated, and it is getting worse by the day." (Read this entire article.)

The science behind why kids should not get (and don't need) the COVID shot

Most of us know by now — despite the efforts of the legacy media and the Biden administration to hide the fact — that the China virus poses virtually zero risk to kids. The vast majority of children who contract it will come down with no more than the sniffles, if they show any symptoms at all. ~~~~~~~~~~~

The Original Antigenic Sin

It turns out that the human immune system is not capable of an infinite number of responses to an infinite number of viruses. Rather, the strongest response to influenza viruses is produced by the body’s first exposure to the disease, which usually occurs in childhood.

But it is not only that subsequent immune responses to the influenza are weaker, which they are. That would be concerning enough. The problem is that the first childhood infection primes the immune system to respond to subsequent infections with antibodies to the original strain. The “original antigenic sin,” in other words, causes the immune response to miss the target.

The authors of a 2005 Nature Medicine article define the “original antigenic sin” as follows: “After exposure to a new but cross-reacting antigenic variant, such individuals may respond by producing antibodies that are primarily directed at antigens characterizing influenza viruses encountered during earlier epidemics.”

In other words, their bodies are producing antibodies to the variant they were first exposed to in childhood, rather than to the variant that is currently circulating in the population and to which they have now been exposed.

Think about that in the context of the China Virus. This is a novel coronavirus that no one on the planet has ever before encountered. Nor are they fully exposed to it when they are vaccinated with the mRNA vaccine, only to its spike protein. ~~~~~~~~

So why in the world is the FDA saying that it is a good idea to vaccinate all children in the U.S. from 5 to 11 years of age? ~~~~~~~~~

The brilliant Alex Berenson sums it up best: “The most dangerous things to do, at this point, would be to vaccinate children. The virus is not a threat to them, and if they are infected by the new forms of SARS-2 that are sure to emerge every winter, we will begin to establish — through them and the as yet unvaccinated — the layered immunity that is the only way of coming to terms with SARS-2 in the longer term.”

So take your kids out of public school, if you have to. Move to a state that has banned vaccination mandates, as Florida has, if you have to. Home school, if you have to. Do whatever it takes, but protect your children from these vax mongers who are putting power and profits ahead of the best interests of children. And the rest of us.

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon11/10/21 5:16 AM 
To: All  (2552 of 3763) 
 10301.2552 in reply to 10301.2551 

November 10, 2021

         I am seeing many articles like this from around the world, and I intend to post more of them. We have been saying here for a VERY long time that all of the focus has been on the near term effects of the vaccines, and not the long term effects. We have been saying that it is beyond criminal to vaccinate the world with experimental drugs like none we have ever seen, with zero long term observation or study. Well...the long term effects are only just beginning to show themselves. We can pray they won't be too bad, hopefully they won't be.

ERs Are OVERRUN With People Suffering From 'Sudden Cardiac Arrest'

Emergency rooms across the United States are filling up with people suffering from major health issues, unlike during the height of the “pandemic” when hospitals were empty and devoid of any human life.

 

The scene being painted is in stark contrast to where emergency departments were at the start of the pandemic. Except for initial hot spots like New York City, in spring 2020 many ERs across the country were often eerily empty. And even in New York City, despite KHN's claims, the hospitals were empty.

COVID isn’t overwhelming the health system either.  Patients are showing up to the ER sicker than before the pandemic, their diseases more advanced and in need of more complicated care. The mainstream media is blaming it on people putting off care during the hoax scamdemic to avoid getting the common cold they relabeled COVID-19.

Could it be something else though? Could it be:

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon11/10/21 5:19 AM 
To: All  (2553 of 3763) 
 10301.2553 in reply to 10301.2552 

November 10, 2021

       "Dershowitz again turned to the issue of COVID and the Supreme Court, saying “the court is going to have to decide a new issue, and that concerns a disease that can be fatal but oftentimes isn’t,”

        That is not the only issue Mr. Dershowitz. These vaccines are chemical soups, not live virus vaccines that use a person's natural immunity, as were those in the past. These chemical soup vaccines have not been observed and studied long term to see what their latent effects will be, unlike virus vaccines of the past. These "so-called" vaccines neither protect a person from contracting the disease, nor prevent the spread of the disease, unlike virus vaccines of the past. We knew, after much study, that the vaccines of the past would not ultimately cripple or kill large percentages of those who received them. We do NOT know this about THESE vaccines.

'Full Adjudication': Dershowitz Talks 'Ideological Political Exemption' From Vax Mandate

There should be “full adjudication” by the United States Supreme Court before anyone makes a final decision on whether to enforce COVID-19 vaccination mandates — including whether religious and/or ideological political exemptions are valid reasons for refusing to be vaccinated. So says Harvard constitutional law professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz. Joe Biden was unavailable for comment.

During an appearance on Newsmax TV's "Saturday Report," the famed attorney talked about potential exemptions from the vaccines, including a relevant court ruling on Friday.

Incidentally, California’s first in the nation COVID-19 vaccination mandate for kids ages 12 and over allows students and staff to opt out for religious or ideological reasons — but don’t celebrate too soon, Californians opposed to the vax based on personal beliefs: a key (Democrat, of course) lawmaker says he may push legislation to eliminate the personal belief exemption.

Dershowitz again turned to the issue of COVID and the Supreme Court, saying “the court is going to have to decide a new issue, and that concerns a disease that can be fatal but oftentimes isn’t,” also pointing out that COVID is a communicable disease vs. diseases that are not.

Meanwhile, as we reported Friday, a year-long study found that people inoculated against COVID-19 are just as likely to spread the delta variant of the virus to contacts in their household as those who haven’t had been vaccinated.

“Vaccination alone is not enough to prevent people from being infected with the delta variant and spreading it in household settings,” said Ajit Lalvani, a professor of infectious diseases at Imperial College London who co-led the study.

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon11/10/21 5:20 AM 
To: All  (2554 of 3763) 
 10301.2554 in reply to 10301.2553 

Creative homeowners change their Halloween skeleton display every day in  October | GMA

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon11/10/21 5:23 AM 
To: All  (2555 of 3763) 
 10301.2555 in reply to 10301.2554 

November 10, 2021

        "the criticism derives mostly from the fact that Israel has agreed to recognize the Sputnik vaccine, despite the fact that the World Health Organization has not yet done so."

        Just a thought: IF the WHO were working with the Chinese to kill or incapacitate as many people in the free world as possible, and I am not saying they are doing this, they would not want to recognize the Sputnik vaccine, because the Sputnik vaccine is probably much safer?

        I point out that LIKE the Chinese vaccine, the Russian Sputnik Vaccine IS A LIVE VIRUS vaccine, and is not a chemical soup like the Pfizer, Moderna, J&J, and AstraZeneca vaccines. Why do the communist countries, China and Russia, get live virus vaccines, like a flu vaccine, while the enemies of the Communist countries get chemical soup vaccines? Just asking.

Health Ministry officials against recognition of Sputnik coronavirus vaccine

Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett's recent decision to recognize the Russian "Sputnik" vaccine has infuriated several Health Ministry officials, Yediot Aharonot reported.

The decision was announced following a meeting last Friday between Bennett and Russian President Vladimir Putin.

According to Yediot Aharonot, the criticism derives mostly from the fact that Israel has agreed to recognize the Sputnik vaccine, despite the fact that the World Health Organization has not yet done so.

The decision was made as part of a list of changes to Israel's policies regarding foreigners who wish to enter the country, set to go into effect on November 1.

Under the new policy published Thursday by the Health Ministry, those who received the Sputnik vaccine will undergo a serological test upon arrival in Israel, and will be allowed to exit quarantine immediately following the receipt of a positive serological result (and a negative PCR).

"Since when is a serological test a sign that a person was vaccinated?" Professor Galia Rahav, Head of Infectious Disease at Sheba - Tel Hashomer Hospital, queried.

"The World Health Organization has not approved the Sputnik and no one knows what's happening there. I think we need to discuss this in-depth and examine what is really behind this vaccine."

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon11/10/21 5:27 AM 
To: All  (2556 of 3763) 
 10301.2556 in reply to 10301.2392 

November 10, 2021

71 out of 75 Districts in Uttar Pradesh, India - Its Most Populated State - Reported No Covid-19 Cases in 24 Hours After Implementing Ivermectin Protocol

The 33 districts in Uttar Pradesh, India have now become free from COVID-19 the government announced last month. The recovery rate has increased up to 98.7% proving the effectiveness of IVERMECTIN as part of the “Uttar Pradesh Covid Control Model.” Of course, the media won’t mention that Ivermectin is being used for the treatment of COVID-19.

This state has an estimated population of 241 million people in 2021 and has the highest population in India.  This is almost two-thirds of the United States population in 2021 and yet it is now a COVID-19 free nation.

So what could the United States be doing wrong? Let’s ask Dr. Fauci.

Last August, the government of UP issued a notification to have Ivermectin (12 mg) tablets. The Dialogue reported:

“The government notification reads, “Doctors are advising to take ivermectin 12 mg to contain the impact of pandemic. This medicine is quite effective in protecting from covid-19. Therefore, we appeal each and every citizen to have this tablet.”

The notification then goes on to explain the dosage: For positive patients isolated at home (one tablet per day for three days and for primary and secondary contacts (one tablet each on the first and 7th day).”

Uttar Pradesh is the leading state in India to use Ivermectin as early and preventatively in all family contacts. And this state has one of the five lowest COVID cases of all states in India despite having only a low vaccination rate.

Only about 20% of adults in Uttar Pradesh are fully vaccinated and only about 32 million got their second dose out of 241 million people. Uttar Pradesh has the lowest vaccine coverage as of now in all states in India.

Despite having the lowest vaccination rate, at least 71 out of 75 districts in Uttar Pradesh reported zero fresh Covid-19 cases on October 19th and 42 districts continued to remain Covid-free.

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon11/10/21 5:28 AM 
To: All  (2557 of 3763) 
 10301.2557 in reply to 10301.2411 

November 10, 2021

         “Although vaccines remain highly effective at preventing severe disease and deaths from COVID-19, our findings suggest that vaccination is not sufficient to prevent transmission of the delta variant in household settings with prolonged exposures,”

        Here is what they fail to say, and they almost always fail to say this. If you contract COVID, the effects are usually very mild, and in a week it's over. If you contract COVID, and you have not been vaccinated, then for the rest of your lives you will have superior natural immunity protection, plus memory cells, such as t-cells, which will remember if COVID ever strikes again.

       If you take a vaccine, you will have to worry about possible latent effects that could be debilitating or lethal, and can strike any time for the rest of your lives. The FDA usually takes 10 to 15 years of observation and study before they approve a vaccine. These vaccines have only been observed and studied for about 1 year. Long term negative effects are not known, and CANNOT be known at this time.

Vaccinated just as likely to spread delta variant within household as unvaccinated: study 

People who have received COVID-19 vaccinations are able to spread the delta variant within their household despite their vaccination status just as easily as unvaccinated individuals, a new study published on Friday shows.

According to the study published in The Lancet Infectious Diseases journal, people who contracted COVID-19 had a similar viral load regardless of whether they had been vaccinated. The study further found that 25 percent of vaccinated household contacts contracted COVID-19. while 38 percent of unvaccinated individuals were diagnosed with the disease.

“Although vaccines remain highly effective at preventing severe disease and deaths from COVID-19, our findings suggest that vaccination is not sufficient to prevent transmission of the delta variant in household settings with prolonged exposures,” the study said.

In contrast, researchers noted that the vaccination was more effective at curbing transmission of the alpha variant within the household, at between 40 and 50 percent.

 

Navigate this discussion: 1-7 8-17 18-27 ... 2528-2537 2538-2547 2548-2557 2558-2567 2568-2577 ... 3738-3747 3748-3757 3758-3763
Adjust text size:

Welcome, guest! Get more out of Delphi Forums by logging in.

New to Delphi Forums? You can log in with your Facebook, Twitter, or Google account or use the New Member Login option and log in with any email address.

Home | Help | Forums | Chat | Blogs | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
© Delphi Forums LLC All rights reserved.