May 19, 2022

          "With official data now showing that the boosted have a higher risk of developing Covid-19 infection than the unvaccinated, and that the vaccinated have a much higher risk of death due to all causes than the unvaccinated, is it time to admit the Covid-19 injections kill more people than they save?"

           We point out yet again that the effects of these (non) vaccines are cumulative. The increased and increasing incidences of harm and death may only just be beginning. There is no way to know how bet it will become. These (non) vaccines are experimental, highly dangerous, and unlike anything that has ever been used before. And they want to use them on the entire so-called free world. WHY???

Official Data suggests the Covid-19 Injection is killing more people than it is saving

Across the world, death rates have also risen in tandem with COVID shot administration, with the most-vaccinated areas surpassing the least-vaccinated in terms of excess mortality and COVID-related deaths. With official data now showing that the boosted have a higher risk of developing Covid-19 infection than the unvaccinated, and that the vaccinated have a much higher risk of death due to all causes than the unvaccinated, is it time to admit the Covid-19 injections kill more people than they save?

According to U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data, more than 1 million excess deaths — that is, deaths in excess of the historical average — have been recorded since the COVID-19 pandemic began two years ago, and this cannot be explained by COVID-19. Deaths from heart disease, high blood pressure, dementia and many other illnesses rose during that time. “We’ve never seen anything like it,” Robert Anderson, CDC’s head of mortality statistics, told The Washington Post in mid-February 2022. According to University of Warwick researchers, “the scale of excess non-COVID deaths is large enough for it to be seen as its own pandemic.” A number of explanations have been offered, including the fact that lockdowns and other COVID restrictions discouraged or prevented people from seeking care. But another, less discussed factor may also be at play.

Across the world, death rates have risen in tandem with COVID shot administration, with the most-jabbed areas surpassing the least-jabbed in terms of excess mortality and COVID-related deaths. This flies in the face of official claims that the shots prevent severe COVID infection and lower your risk of death, be it from COVID or all causes.

Boosted? You’re Now at Highest Risk of COVID - Ever since the announcement that the COVID “vaccines” would be using novel mRNA gene transfer technology, I and many others have warned that this appears to be a very bad idea. Numerous potential mechanisms for harm have been identified and detailed in previous articles, and we’re now seeing some of our worst fears come to bear. “Fully vaccinated” individuals are both more likely to be infected with SARS-CoV-2 and more likely to die, whether from COVID or some other cause. ~~~~~~~ What’s more, people who got their last shot five months or more ago have the highest risk.

May 20, 2022 - CANADA

          ”until a precedent is set by the courts regarding the legality of vaccine mandates, the outcomes of such litigation is unknowable.”

            That is strictly a secondary consideration. Get this right everybody. There is a much greater consideration. What is the legality of vaccine mandates, when the substance under review does not stop the contraction or spread of the disease, and is therefore not a vaccine, and a drug that is experimental and dangerous, which is so new that its mid and long term effects CANNOT be known. Do you force people to take potential suicide drugs, that may harm or kill a person even 5, 10, or 20 years from now? LAWYERS - ARE YOU LISTENING?

Canadian oil giant faces dozens of lawsuits from employees fired over vaccine mandate

According to CTVNews, with CNRL being a massive oil producer with over 9,000 employees and a company valuation of more than $100 billion, some of the lawsuits filed by former employees are seeking damages that exceed $1 million due to the large sums of money workers lost out on when they were fired for refusing the experimental vaccine.

One plaintiff, Rick Ducharme, worked for CNRL for 15 years before being dismissed for taking a stance against the mandatory injection policy and told CTVNews that what his former employer has done to him is “beyond immoral.” “What they’ve done is cruel, they’ve punished a lot of people they should not have punished, there is a lot of people who are hurting from this and I wish they would’ve rethought their approach to this,” said Ducharme, adding that he “loved” his job and the company he worked for. According to Sarah Coderre, partner and co-founder of Bow River Employment Law, the success of such lawsuits is uncertain, and “Ultimately, it comes down to how the courts are going to view their vaccine mandates in the future.” ~~~~~~~

Coderre’s statements echo those of other Canadian employment lawyers such as Daniel Lublin, who in December said that until a precedent is set by the courts regarding the legality of vaccine mandates, the outcomes of such litigation is unknowable. Lublin did state, however, that “in my [20-year career], I have never seen a more fundamental shift in the way the world of workplace law is operating.”

“And I have never seen a more substantive, considerable change to employment rights, and it happened so quickly.” ~~~~~~~ While mandates have been popular among government and large employers during the COVID era, many?have consistently held that they are a gross assault on individual freedoms that’s unnecessary given COVID-19’s high survivability?among most groups, its now understood minimal risk of asymptomatic spread, and research indicating that post-infection natural immunity is far superior to vaccine-induced immunity.

May 20, 2022

"This is Beyond Shocking" - American Frontline Doctors on FDA Approval of Failed Ebola Drug Remdesivir By the FDA for “Treatment” of Covid-19 in Babies

The FDA recently reported that they had approved Remdesivir for the ‘treatment’ of COVID-19 in babies. America's Frontline doctors can’t believe what they are seeing.

On April 25, 2022, the failed Ebola drug Remdesivir was approved by the FDA for “treatment” of Covid-19 in babies as young as 28 days old and as small as seven pounds! This is the exact same drug that has been wreaking carnage throughout hospitals since Fauci and Company approved the rigid CARES Act hospital protocol, along with bonus payments for treatment of Covid-19 with Remdesivir.

This is beyond shocking. Repeatedly, Remdesivir has been shown to be completely ineffective at treating Covid-19 in adults (even WHO studies show this) and to have severe side effects, including multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), kidney failure and dialysis, and septic shock.

While studies of inexpensive and familiar early treatment meds continue to demonstrate safety and effectiveness, the same cannot be said about Remdesivir. What makes this plot even more sinister, is this failed drug has even been approved for babies and children who are displaying only mild symptoms of Covid-19!

As we at AFLDS have preached for over two years, children and infants are at statistically zero risk of death from Covid-19, and yet they now can legally be treated with what is essentially poison. This is one of the worst decisions of the corrupt FDA.

Remdesivir came on the scene in early 2020 as the answer to the feared COVID-19 pandemic.  We soon found out more about the drug.  In May 2020 we connected this drug to China and Dr. Fauci.