CURRENT EVENTS - Keeping Track Of The Corona Virus (203244 views)

From:	WEBELIAHU	Oct-2 4:28 AM
To:	All	(6217 of 6474)

10301.6217 in reply to 10301.6197

October 2, 2023 - #1 of 3

"The use of mRNA in the food supply is controversial for good reason — no one knows what the long-term consequences will be...and they have plans to develop additional mRNA vaccines for fish and other biotechnology products targeting additional shrimp viruses and other pathogens."

https://expose-news.com/2023/09/14/mrna-vaccines-now-headed-for-shrimp/

mRNA Vaccines Now Headed for Shrimp.

~~~~~~~ ViAqua says challenge tests show its RNA-based formulation improved shrimp survival against WSSV, but at what cost? The use of mRNA in the food supply is controversial for good reason — no one knows what the long-term consequences will be. RNA Vaccines Coming for Shrimp - ViAqua is using RNA interference (RNAi) particles, provided as a feed supplement, to manipulate gene expression in shrimp, one of the most widely consumed forms of seafood worldwide. In a 2022 proof of concept study that used a polyanhydride nanoparticle delivery platform to deliver RNA to shrimp orally, it’s stated: ~~~~~~~

… In aquaculture systems, the concept of RNAi-based vaccines has been championed for several reasons: (a) RNAi works as an antiviral immune response in shrimp; (b) it is pathogen-specific; and (c) it generates a long-term protective immune response.” The study found that the “nanovaccine” was about 80% effective in protecting against WSSV in shrimp, when administered via reverse gavage to “mimic an oral route.” ViAqua has brought the potential for oral delivery to the next level, with plans to begin producing its RNAi capsule products in India in 2024.5 Shai Ufaz, ViAqua’s chief executive officer, stated:

“Oral delivery is the holy grail of aquaculture health development due to both the impossibility of vaccinating individual shrimp and its ability to substantially bring down the operational costs of disease management while improving outcomes … We are excited to bring this technology to market to address the need for affordable disease solutions in aquaculture.”

Can Shrimp Be Vaccinated? - Shrimp lack an adaptive immune system, the type that “remembers” exposures to infectious agents so it can mount a better response the next time it comes around. Because of this, it’s long been assumed that shrimp cannot be vaccinated. According to the Global Seafood Alliance: “Scientific literature on shrimp has often adopted terms and approaches from mammalian immunology, but not always in a correct way. Such is the case in the use of the term “vaccination” in crustaceans. The principle of vaccination is based on two key elements of the immune system: specificity and memory. These two properties are not recognized in the immune systems of shrimp and other invertebrates.”

However, while shrimp don’t have adaptive immunity in the traditional sense, it’s becoming clear that they do have some defense against viruses, which is only beginning to be understood. In 2008, researchers with Australia’s University of Queensland explained, “There is mounting evidence for specific immune memory in crustaceans, including shrimp,” adding: “It has been widely assumed that no such adaptive systems exist in invertebrates, thus vaccines have not been routinely developed and used in shrimp aquaculture. Invertebrates were considered to rely solely on an innate immune system characterized by generalized immune responses to conserved molecular structures of invading pathogens such as bacteria and fungi. ~~~~~~~

However, what is becoming more apparent is that the diversity and sophistication of innate responses in invertebrates is far greater than previously assumed. The invertebrate immune response to viruses is particularly poorly understood.” ViAqua’s RNAi product claims to “enhance resistance to viral infections” in shrimp, and they have plans to develop additional mRNA vaccines for fish and other biotechnology products targeting additional shrimp viruses and other pathogens. But shrimp pathogens of one kind or another are virtually guaranteed to persist in the intensive aquaculture farms where many shrimp are raised. Further, the risks of tinkering with shrimp genetics are completely unknown.

Reply Options

From:	WEBELIAHU	Oct-2 4:31 AM
To:	All	(6218 of 6474)

10301.6218 in reply to 10301.6217

From the Archives - May 1, 2023 - #2 of 3

"Pork producers have been using customizable mRNA-based “vaccines” on their herds since 2018, without telling the public...The pushback by Big Ag lobbyists against this bill to require industry transparency on this important issue has been enormous, and one potential reason for that is because they’d have to admit that all sorts of foods may have been vaccinated with mRNA vaccines, have genetic modifications, or be modified to serve as vaccinations for humans."

To the Jews. Aren't you glad you've been keeping kosher?

https://expose-news.com/2023/04/18/secretly-pigs-vaccinated-with-mrna-injections/

Swines in the USA have been secretly “Vaccinated” with mRNA injections for years; now they’re coming for the Cattle

Just a few years ago, the idea that our food supply might be used for gene therapy to further a trans-humanist agenda would have sounded crazy. Yet today, globalists openly admit that is their intent. Has Big Ag already kick-started the plan by injecting pigs and cows with mRNA gene therapy?

Pork producers have been using customizable mRNA-based “vaccines” on their herds since 2018, without telling the public. All customized mRNA “vaccines” are untested. Only the mRNA platform itself has been approved.

According to the American National Cattlemen’s Beef Association: “There are no current mRNA vaccines licensed for use in beef cattle in the United States.” However, a lobbyist for the association claims to have “double-vaccinated” his own herd with an mRNA “vaccine” against bovine respiratory disease.

Iowa State University began trialling an mRNA “vaccine” against bovine respiratory syncytial virus 1 October 2021. Missouri House Bill 1169 would require the labelling of products that can alter your genes. Big Ag lobbyists strongly oppose it.

Within days, alternative media was abuzz with this story and Renz started making the rounds sharing evidence that shows the US government has been working on the integration of vaccines into foods for at least two decades. In an 2 April 2023, interview with Naomi Wolf, PhD, Renz said: [Bill] Gates, the WHO [World Health Organization], a ton of these universities: they’re all talking about including mRNA vaccinations as part of the food. They’re going to modify the genes of these foods to make them mRNA vaccines.

Industry Doesn’t Want You to Know What They’re Doing - The pushback by Big Ag lobbyists against this bill to require industry transparency on this important issue has been enormous, and one potential reason for that is because they’d have to admit that all sorts of foods may have been vaccinated with mRNA vaccines, have genetic modifications, or be modified to serve as vaccinations for humans.

Not only might this destroy Big Ag, but it would also seriously impact any surreptitious attempts by Big Pharma to use the food supply as a tool to distribute vaccines unbeknownst to consumers. In short, Renz suspects the globalists’ trans-humanist agenda is being secretly pushed forward using gene therapy in food production.

Reply Options

From:	WEBELIAHU	Oct-2 4:33 AM
To:	All	(6219 of 6474)

10301.6219 in reply to 10301.6218

From the Archives - June 8, 2023 - #3 of 3

"Among many other stipulations, the bill would have required all beef derived from Missouri cattle to include labels detailing vaccines cattle received throughout their life. HB1169 also would have applied to commodities produced using GMO corn and soybeans."

Beef Company CEO: “I’ll Shut Down the Company Before We Ship a Single Bag With mRNA-Injected Meat”

Quickly but quietly, Big Pharma and various state governments are working to inject beef and dairy cattle with mRNA “vaccines.” The practice has been happening with pork since 2018 and beef is next on the agenda.

Jason Nelson, CEO of Whole Cows, has been watching the developments closely. His Texas company, which specializes in shelf-stable freeze-dried meat for long-term storage, has vowed to never allow gene therapied cattle to enter the food supply through their products

“I’ll shut down the company before we ship a single bag of mRNA-injected meat,” he said. “That’s why we’re growing as quickly as possible so we can achieve the buying power to produce large amounts. We’re relatively small now but we want to have a surplus of tens of thousands of bags of beef by 2024.”

The pushes for both transparency and to halt the push for mRNA-jabbed beef have hit roadblocks recently. In Missouri, a bill that would have forced labeling of beef injected with mRNA vaccines was stalled in committee. According to Todd Neeley at DTN:

A bill at the center of a vaccine controversy in the state of Missouri was voted down in a committee of the state’s house of representatives this week. The Missouri House Committee on Emerging Issues voted 10-4 against HB1169 on Wednesday, effectively ending the bill’s chance for passage in the current session.

Among many other stipulations, the bill would have required all beef derived from Missouri cattle to include labels detailing vaccines cattle received throughout their life. HB1169 also would have applied to commodities produced using GMO corn and soybeans.

Unfortunately, cattle and rancher associations across the nation have ignored concerns from both consumers and producers. Currently, most state rancher associations are either silent on the issue or in favor of advancing Big Pharma’s agenda.

“Our goal at Whole Cows is to give the people healthy, natural, delicious proteins they can eat today or store for decades,” Nelson continued. “We can’t fulfill that promise if the beef has been tainted, so we’re taking every step necessary to keep the jabs away from our cattle.”

Reply Options

From:	WEBELIAHU	Oct-2 4:35 AM
To:	All	(6220 of 6474)

10301.6220 in reply to 10301.6219

Vaccine Skeptics Join Forces With Antimask Advocates - WSJ

Reply Options

From:	WEBELIAHU	Oct-2 4:37 AM
To:	All	(6221 of 6474)

10301.6221 in reply to 10301.6220

October 2, 2023

I find this very interesting. It is as if South Korea is preemptively shielding itself against the massive lawsuits that will be coming as it is determined that cancer, for example, is only a secondary cause of death, but that the primary cause are the non-vaccines that destroyed the body's natural immunity and ability to fight off diseases, thereby allowing cancers, and everything else, to run rampant in the body. The vast majority of deaths would come long AFTER 90 days, perhaps years after, sometimes decades later. Would this maneuver work in shielding the South Korean government? I doubt it.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/09/south-korea-compensate-eaths-90-days-after-covid/

SAFE AND EFFECTIVE: South Korea to COMPENSATE Deaths 90 Days After Covid Shot

Families to all people who have died within 90 days of receiving a covid-19 vaccination will be compensated by the government. The country of South Korea has announced that they will be compensating the families of ALL people who die within 90 days of covid vaccination, regardless if the vaccination itself has been confirmed to be the cause of death. Families of people who have died will be eligible to get up to $22,500 in compensation money.

Well, this is pretty telling…“Korea was able to achieve a higher inoculation rate compared with the rest of the world because people trusted the state and went to get vaccinated…In this regard, it is the state’s responsibility to tackle the blind spot in helping out those who fell victim to the vaccination policy.” said Rep. Park Dae-chul of the ruling government party.

And here is something very interesting I found when it comes to side effects that we don’t really get to hear about in the mainstream media here. Turns out that South Korea has recognized 11 different types of side effects caused by the covid shots! This includes anaphylaxis, myocarditis and pericarditis. They also list another 15 symptoms like Bell’s Palsy and uterine bleeding as potential side effects of the shot. South Korea has had 96,000 complaints from people who have reported side effects from the shots, and nearly 30% of those complaints have been accepted by the government.

Do you realize what this means? It means that governments are well aware of the side effects from the shots. Remember how people who questioned the safety of the shots were called “crazy conspiracy theorists”? Already last year doctors were sounding the alarm after a mysterious rise in excess deaths. Not only that, but we have also been seeing a mysterious collapse in birth rates after the roll out of the mRNA shots.

Reply Options

From:	WEBELIAHU	Oct-2 5:48 AM
To:	All	(6222 of 6474)

10301.6222 in reply to 10301.6221

October 2, 2023

I must keep pointing out that myocarditis is only one of MANY potential ills from the (non) vaccines. They can cause damage of all sorts, and in many ways, and the ills may manifest themselves immediately, or years from now, or even decades from now. Once a (non) vaccine is taken, in can NEVER be untaken, and precautions are then in order for the rest of a person's life. Also, as these (non) vaccines are cumulative and progressive, the more doses a person accepts, the greater the risk he assumes.

https://expose-news.com/2023/09/14/cdc-c19-jab-risk-heart-disease-13200-percent/

CDC Study confirms COVID-19 Vaccination increases risk of suffering Autoimmune Heart Disease affecting the Heart by over 13,200%

This means Covid vaccination increases the risk of suffering myocarditis, an autoimmune disease causing inflammation of the heart, by 13,200%.

The study, conducted by researchers from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) as well as from several U.S. universities and hospitals, examined the effects of vaccination with products manufactured by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna.

The study’s authors used data obtained from the CDC’s VAERS reporting system which were cross-checked to ensure they complied with CDC’s definition of myocarditis; they also noted that given the passive nature of the VAERS system, the number of reported incidents is likely to be an underestimate of the extent of the phenomenon.

1626 cases of myocarditis were studied, and the results showed that the Pfizer-BioNTech product was most associated with higher risk, with 105.9 cases per million doses after the second vaccine shot in the 16 to 17 age group for males, and 70.7 cases per million doses after the second shot in the 12 to 15 age group for males. The 18 to 24 male age group also saw significantly higher rates of myocarditis for both Pfizer’s and Moderna’s products (52.4 and 56.3 cases per million respectively).

The study found that the median time to symptom onset was two days, and that 82 percent of cases were in males, consistent with previous studies. Around 96 percent of affected people were hospitalised, with most treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; 87 percent of those hospitalised had resolution of symptoms by time of discharge.

At the time of data review, two reports of death in people younger than 30 years of age with potential myocarditis still remained under investigation and were not included in the case counts.

Among the reported symptoms were: chest pain, pressure, or discomfort (89%), shortness of breath (30%), abnormal ECG results (72%), and abnormal cardiac MRI findings (72%).

The study’s authors noted that myocarditis following vaccination appeared to resolve more swiftly than in typical viral cases; however, given that vaccination is no longer considered a reliable way in which to avoid COVID infection, it is unclear whether this has any specific relevance to the cost-benefit analysis of COVID vaccination, especially considering the low risk of complications following coronavirus infection for the age group most at risk for heart-related complications following vaccination.

Given the plethora of studies confirming a link between vaccination and myocarditis, the CDC has commenced active surveillance of adolescents and young adults to monitor their progress following heart-related incidents after vaccination. Long-term outcome data, however, are not yet available.

In the meantime, the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology advise that people with myocarditis should refrain from competitive sports for three to six months, and only resume strenuous exercise after normal ECG and other test results are obtained. In addition, they advise that further mRNA vaccine doses should be deferred.

Reply Options

From:	WEBELIAHU	Oct-3 4:49 AM
To:	All	(6223 of 6474)

10301.6223 in reply to 10301.6197

October 3, 2023

"Facebook took it upon themselves to immediately remove the post and label it as “misinformation”...[Facebook] finally responded to confirm that they were in fact wrong, the investigation was entirely correct."

https://expose-news.com/2023/09/14/facebook-confirms-covid-19-vaccines-destroy-immune-system/

Facebook confirms COVID-19 Vaccines destroy the Immune System & cause a new form of AIDS

Back in August 2022, The Expose published an exclusive in-depth investigation into five months’ worth of official UK Government released by the UK Health Security Agency that confirmed each Covid-19 “booster” dose provides a very short-lived temporary boost to the immune systems of the vaccinated population before decimating their immune systems much more rapidly than had already been seen in people who had received two doses of the Covid-19 vaccine.

In short, we discovered that official UK Government data strongly suggests that the Covid-19 vaccinated population are developing some new form of Covid-19 vaccine-induced acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. That investigation was shared by a reader on Facebook on the same day that we published the article, and Facebook took it upon themselves to immediately remove the post and label it as “misinformation”. However, the reader who shared our article disputed Facebook’s censorship and on the 27th of October they finally responded to confirm that they were in fact wrong, the investigation was entirely correct, and that the readers Facebook post is now back on the highly censored social media platform.

So now that Facebook has confirmed what The Expose has been trying to tell the wider public for over a year, we have included the full original investigation below so that you can share this article far and wide. ~~~~~~~ For our investigation we analyzed 5 of these published Vaccine Surveillance Reports containing data from August 16th 2021 to January 2nd 2022, in order to get a clear picture of the effect the Covid-19 vaccines are having on the immune systems of the vaccinated population, and this is what we found… ~~~~~~~ Pfizer claims that its Covid-19 mRNA injection has a vaccine effectiveness of 95%. They were able to claim this because of a simple calculation (f u ll details of which can be viewed here) performed on the number of infections confirmed amongst the vaccinated group and the not-vaccinated group during the earliest stages of the still ongoing clinical trials. Now, thanks to a wealth of data published by the UK Health Security Agency we are able to use the same calculation that was used to calculate 95% effectiveness of the Pfizer vaccine, to calculate the real-world effectiveness of the Covid-19 vaccines, and the data, unfortunately, paints an extremely concerning picture. ~~~~~~~ The real-world effectiveness of all available Covid-19 vaccines combined was as low as minus-47% in the 60-69 age group, and as high as +66% in the under 18 age group between August 16th and September 12th 2021. ~~~~~~~ However, just look at how the tables turn just one month later. ~~~~~~~ The real-world effectiveness of all available Covid-19 vaccines combined was as low as minus-109% in the 40-49 age group, and as high as +89% in the under 18 age group between September 13th and October 10th 2021. The only other age group that the vaccine was showing to have positive effect at this point was 18-29. What’s concerning here though is how far the real-world effectiveness of the vaccine has fallen in all age groups, but especially the 40-49 age group which fell from a real-world effectiveness of minus-36% to minus-109%. The fact that the real-world effectiveness of the vaccines had surpassed the minus-100% barrier suggests that not only were the vaccines failing, but they were also completely decimating the immune system of the recipients. This makes the next Vaccine Surveillance report frightening reading. (Click on the link for more.)

Edited October 4, 2023 7:40 am by WEBELIAHU

Reply Options

From:	WEBELIAHU	Oct-3 4:50 AM
To:	All	(6224 of 6474)

10301.6224 in reply to 10301.6223

Don't politicise vaccination — it's too important

Reply Options

From:	WEBELIAHU	Oct-3 4:51 AM
To:	All	(6225 of 6474)

10301.6225 in reply to 10301.6224

October 3, 2023

"The irony is that all of these new variants only seem to be affecting the "fully vaccinated" while the unvaccinated remain healthy. Dr. Robert Malone says this is due to "leaky" vaccines, meaning previous COVID jabs caused these new variants to form and spread."

https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-09-13-fda-rogue-eua-covid-jabs-no-emergency.html

On the 22nd anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) decided to grant approval for the latest Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) "booster" shots from Pfizer and Moderna, which will soon be available at a drug store or health clinic near you.

Even though there is no public health emergency to necessitate the move, the FDA decided to award "emergency use authorization" (EUA) for the shots to be injected into children and babies between the ages of six months and 11 years. All people 12 years of age and older, meanwhile, are approved to take the shots once they become available.

We covered the distinction between approval and EUA in past articles, but to sum it up again: Approval means a drug is allowed on the market indefinitely while EUA only grants temporary use of a drug during a public health "crisis."

Since there is no public health crisis, it is unclear what criteria the FDA used as justification to issue approval and EUA to these new booster shots other than a few random media articles talking about "hospitalizations," and of course the constant rhetoric from the Biden regime about new "cases."

COVID "vaccines" are causing these new variants to develop and spread - The claim is that new variants such as "Kraken" and "Eris" are making people sick. And since these variants are not covered by past COVID booster shots, they will have to be tackled by these newest ones.

The irony is that all of these new variants only seem to be affecting the "fully vaccinated" while the unvaccinated remain healthy. Dr. Robert Malone says this is due to "leaky" vaccines, meaning previous COVID jabs caused these new variants to form and spread. Dr. Malone and many others warned during COVID 1.0 that injecting people with these shots in the middle of a "pandemic" was a really bad idea because doing so could spawn the creation of new mutant viruses. This appears to be what is happening, just as he said it would.

Rather than stop injecting people with COVID shots and wait until the virus burns itself out naturally, Big Pharma continues to produce jab after jab, which is creating variant after variant, which is making people sicker and sicker – but at least the drug industry can rake in some more profits, eh? But wait – did not fake president Joe Biden declare COVID to be over back on May 11? He did, but the FDA is choosing to interpret this declaration in its own special way by delaying the declaration, clearly on behalf of pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer and Moderna that want more money.

The FDA has spent a lot of time tweaking its guidance and provisions to ensure there is always an "emergency" going on that necessitates the release of more "vaccines." By the look of it, the FDA could theoretically do this forever, resulting in a never-ending conveyor belt of new COVID jabs to be released seasonally just like annual flu shots.

Reply Options

From:	WEBELIAHU	Oct-3 4:53 AM
To:	All	(6226 of 6474)

10301.6226 in reply to 10301.6225

October 3, 2023

"The same study also, unfortunately, proves the destruction of the immune system is only going to get worse, not better."

https://expose-news.com/2023/09/15/pfizer-proves-c19-jab-destroys-immune-system/

Pfizer mistakenly proves original COVID Vaccine destroys the Immune System after publishing Study for new Omicron Jab

We have been sold an antivaccine as a vaccine. Official Government and Pfizer statistics prove that the “old” Pfizer COVID injection destroys the immune system at a rate greater than 1% per day. Now, the newly published study for Pfizer’s new bivalent COVID vaccine, to combat both the original strain and Omicron, prove the old Covid-19 vaccine had a minus-44% negative efficacy after just 30 days. The same study also, unfortunately, proves the destruction of the immune system is only going to get worse, not better. ~~~~~~~

From this information we shall now prove that the original vaccine shots destroy the immune system at a rate of 44% per month. We have known that the vaccines in effect cause VAIDS. But we had not realized how quickly they do that until now… ~~~~~~~ These results lay bare what the Expose has been demonstrating from government infection hospitalization and death figures all over the world, many of which have now stopped publishing the relevant figures because they were worsening by the week and clearly displaying how lethal the vaccines are.

The original Pfizer vaccine not only had no efficacy against Omicron. It also progressively destroyed your immune system at the rate displayed above. It was an anti-vaccine against Omicron. It never had any positive effect on Omicron antibody levels. Furthermore, 30 days after your Pfizer booster shot (30 ug of vaccine against Wuhan Hu1) you would have had 44% fewer antibodies against Omicron than you had before you took the booster according to Pfizer’s own figures. It was NEVER an immunity booster. It was always an immunity disruptor, an immunity compromiser, an immunity nullifier, an immunity degrader, an immunity reducer. It was an incredibly effective immunity destroyer.

Within 30 days of taking your Pfizer booster, you lost 44% of your first level (antibody) immune response against the original Omicron variant BA1. That is why the infection rates in the vaccinated were so much worse than the infection rates in the unvaccinated for Omicron.

We no longer need government figures to see this. Because Pfizer has gone and done it for us. Their figures clearly show that the original vaccine causes a new form of Vaccine Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (VAIDS) at an alarmingly fast rate of over 1% per day. They were so keen to show the world how effective their new shots were, that they overlooked the fact that their data also proved how anti-effective their old shots were. ~~~~~~~

Their immune system can no longer produce ANY antibodies to Omicron. Jeremy interviewed several of them who confirmed that the COVID vaccines are useless for them. The government did not pay for them to discover that they had zero antibodies after 5 or 6 vaccinations. They had to have private testing done, which they paid for themselves, in order to find that out. The solution for them is a drug called Evushield, which is a monoclonal antibody concoction. It literally gives them the antibodies that their immune system can no longer make. It is the Covid equivalent to antiretrovirals for AIDS. The MHRA authorised the drug in March for immuno-compromised people. But you cannot get it on the NHS and you need 2 shots at £800 per shot. Many cannot afford it. So much for the NHS caring about the health of this country. ~~~~~~~

Conclusion - We have been sold an anti-vaccine for Omicron as a vaccine for Omicron and Pfizer’s own figures now show it. ~~~~~~~ If you want to cause no damage to your immune system then do not put any spike proteins or spike protein-producing vaccines into your body. There is a great new study from Harvard, John’s Hopkins, Oxford, Edinburgh, California and other Universities showing that for every 1 person whom the vaccines saved from hospitalization (according to government figures), 18-98 people suffered serious life-altering adverse reactions.

Reply Options

Navigate this discussion: 1-6 7-16 17-26 ... 6197-6206 6207-6216 6217-6226 6227-6236 6237-6246 ... 6447-6456 6457-6466 6467-6474

Adjust text size:

Welcome, guest! Get more out of Delphi Forums by logging in.

New to Delphi Forums? You can log in with your Facebook, Twitter, or Google account or use the New Member Login option and log in with any email address.