Enjoy Delphi Forums ad free!Click here.
Non-Jews- What's On Your Mind? -  The Cancel Culture & Social Credit Score (2416 views) Notify me whenever anyone posts in this discussion.Subscribe
 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member IconMay-17 6:01 AM 
To: All  (171 of 176) 
 11127.171 in reply to 11127.39 

May 17, 2022

           "Democrats are furious that conservatives may have a voice again on the platform."

Elon Musk being warned censorship cabal coming after him too

Elon Musk is in the process of taking over Twitter – changing it into a private company and, according to reports, re-establishing a level of speech for conservatives who essentially had been banned from the forum under its current corporate ownership.

But he's facing a big battle, big even for the richest man in the world, as he's estimated to be worth more than $200 billion, according to a new analysis published by Gateway Pundit, which itself was assaulted by the "gatekeepers" and "fact-checkers" in the social media world who have no tolerance for conservative thought.

The analysis noted that "Democrats are furious that conservatives may have a voice again on the platform." And so they're trying their same attack on Musk, trying to persuade advertisers to abandon the site, the analysis explained. Musk already has responded, demanding to know the source of the funding for the attacking organizations. and he's singled out several groups like the far-left Media Matters as being behind the assaults.

The analysis explained that Musk is reacting to the open warfare from: "left-wing organizations that are pressuring companies to boycott Twitter if Musk changes the social media firm’s content moderation policies," and "left-wing pressure groups are busy working to bankrupt Musk’s Twitter by pressuring businesses to pull their paid ads on the platform."

The Gateway Pundit, which has had its own battles against such assaults on its platform, said "The stated mission for these left-wing groups pressuring advertisers is to enact strict 'content moderation' policies that stifle free speech and are usually disproportionately enforced on conservatives."

The explanation continued, "One such group of several, NewsGuard, exists to facilitate bankrupting conservative media outlets by using ratings to generate a 'score' which they refer to as a media outlet's 'nutrition label' – which they then hand off to groups that are the attack dogs going after advertisers using that score. The process works like this: favored left-wing 'fact-checking' organizations obsessively rate 'false' even small issues on a conservative media site. There’s no real review or appeal process, and even on issues that are highly in dispute, the left-wing fact-check groups still rate something as 'false' that is in reasonable dispute. Those ratings, from multiple fact-check groups, are then collectively analyzed to create a 'score' for so-called 'disinformation.'

"Notably, mainstream outlets that push obvious frauds and falsehoods that fit the left-wing narrative machine, such as the Nick Sandmann incident or the Jussie Smollet hate hoax or the Bubba Wallace/NASCAR hate hoax or the Kamloops hoax among many others, are never penalized for their left-wing disinformation."

Once that "score" is assembled from leftist web sites, it is used to coerce social media organizations to suppress the links from the targets. Further, there are groups that "act like attack dogs pressuring companies that remain to drop conservative media altogether."

 
 Reply   Options 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member IconMay-25 7:24 AM 
To: All  (172 of 176) 
 11127.172 in reply to 11127.171 

May 25, 2022

          “Designed exclusively for Conservatives, TUSK allows you to get the news and information you want without the liberal bias… The TUSK browser allows you to determine the sources of your news and information.??”

           You won't need ME as much...and that is definitely a good thing.

Game Changer? New Web Browser Launches, Target Market Is Conservatives

Is there even leftwing bias in our web browsers? You bet there is. Regardless of the browser you’re currently using, chances are it’s pointing you towards the political left. The effort may be only a subtle nudge, barely noticeable to those who aren’t paying attention. Then again, it could be hitting you in the face like a sledgehammer.

But there’s a new web browser available for use. Its name is TUSK, its owner and designer has been heavily influenced by conservative figures such as Rush Limbaugh and Mark Levin, and as it says on its website, TUSK is:

“Designed exclusively for Conservatives, TUSK allows you to get the news and information you want without the liberal bias… The TUSK browser allows you to determine the sources of your news and information.??”

If you’re using Microsoft Edge, every time you open the browser or a new tab once the browser has been initiated, it will default to a newsfeed. You can adjust your settings for a multitude of preferences, but barring a heroic effort, you’re stuck with their newsfeed. Edge will politely include your local weather in the top left of the screen and provide a list of your most frequently visited sites for quick access. But below that is their newsfeed, and aside from perhaps a sport and human-interest story, the rest of the content will almost assuredly lean to the left, or perhaps the far-left.

The same can be said for the Chrome browser, or Mozilla Firefox, and other lesser-used browsers. Content they highlight will almost certainly point you toward leftwing news sources such as CNN, MSNBC, and the Huffington Post. But it’s not just the news feeds they use to force their propaganda down your throat, it’s also the “Search” functionality. Type in a topic in the “Search” field on Chrome, and which search engine controls the results? The openly leftist Google, of course. With Edge, the search engine is Bing which is owned and operated by Microsoft, which is just as left-leaning as Google. Big Tech is notoriously leftwing, and when we use their browsers and search engines, not only are we subjecting ourselves to consuming their narratives, we’re also putting money in their pockets.

According to Fox News, TUSK founder and CEO Jeff Bermant stated: “TUSK was developed with the idea of free speech, because if you go to other browsers and you go to their news feeds, you’ll find that its center left or it’s left and you weren’t getting the full story.”

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member IconJun-6 11:07 PM 
To: All  (173 of 176) 
 11127.173 in reply to 11127.20 

June 7, 2022

         "McMurtry previously said it’s “??pretty much assured that there’s probably 10 to 15 solid” cases against “large defendants...They announced their lawsuit against Mark Zuckerberg for calling Rittenhouse a “mass murderer” and to use his platform to censor any views that would take opposition to his mass murderer allegation.”

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/06/going-taking-court-kyle-rittenhouse-announces-lawsuits-facebook-founder-mark-zuckerberg-media-outlets-video/

“We’re Going to Be Taking Them to Court” – Kyle Rittenhouse Announces Lawsuits Against Facebook Founder Mark Zuckerberg and Media Outlets

In June Kyle Rittenhouse hired the lawyer who represented Covington Catholic student Nicholas Sandmann during his defamation cases to take on some high-profile companies and figures.

One potential target will be Facebook’s CEO Mark Zuckerberg, according to his lawyer Todd McMurtry.

McMurtry previously said it’s “??pretty much assured that there’s probably 10 to 15 solid” cases against “large defendants.”

On Monday night Kyle Rittenhouse and his attorney Todd McMurtry joined Tucker Carlson to discuss his defamation charges against Mark Zuckerberg and mainstream media outlets.

They announced their lawsuit against Mark Zuckerberg for calling Rittenhouse a “mass murderer” and to use his platform to censor any views that would take opposition to his mass murderer allegation.

In February, Rittenhouse told Tucker Carlson that they had some politicians and celebrities in mind for lawsuits.

“Well, right now, we’re looking at quite a few politicians, celebrities, athletes, Whoopi Goldberg’s on the list,” Rittenhouse said. “She called me a ‘murderer’ after I was acquitted by a jury of my peers. She went on to still say that.”

Kyle told Tucker tonight, “We’re going to be taking them to court.”

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member IconJun-13 4:11 AM 
To: Impeach Xo Bai Den!! (ducky1988) DelphiPlus Member Icon  (174 of 176) 
 11127.174 in reply to 11127.20 

June 13, 2022 - AUSTRALIA   

           According to local news agency The Age, the current investigation “shapes as a test case for freedom of speech and the force’s recently revised social-media policy, particularly for officers expressing religious or political opinions online.”

Australian policeman faces investigation for ‘thought crime’ after saying there are two genders

Sergeant Bruno Staffieri, a 62-year-old Christian who has served as a policeman for over 35 years,?was interviewed by officers from Professional Standards Command regarding online comments he made to an officer.“So you are doing tertiary education studying genders,” Staffieri wrote, “I’ll make it easy for you to pass … there are 2.”

Staffieri has been an outspoken opponent of the adoption and promotion of the LGBTQ agenda by the Australian government and police. According to local news agency The Age, the current investigation “shapes as a test case for freedom of speech and the force’s recently revised social-media policy, particularly for officers expressing religious or political opinions online.”

The present “offense” is not the first time Staffieri has sparred with officers over their support of the LGBTQ agenda. In June 2021, Victoria Police Deputy commissioner Neil Paterson reportedly posted on Yammer, the police internal messaging platform: “Victoria Police is proud to have been recognised as a silver employer at the 2021 Australian LGBTQ+ inclusion awards.”

In response, Staffieri reportedly posted, “Yes, I agree. Great achievement. But if the public knew how much time, effort and taxpayer dollars went into this, they would also be demanding why we didn’t get a gold.”

Likewise, Staffieri posted a comment on Facebook after an ABC News report on a teacher who founded a gay pride group for students at a school in western Sydney: “What a disgrace. Bad enough having gay, non-binary teachers, but to have them push their filth on students is a disgraceful crime. Why can’t we sack these teachers?”

Staffieri also faced investigation over public criticism of the Australian government’s decision to cancel the national celebrations of Australia Day and Anzac Day last year while allowing the Gay Pride March in St. Kilda to go forward.

 

 
From: Impeach Xo Bai Den!! (ducky1988) DelphiPlus Member Icon Posted by hostJun-13 10:20 AM 
To: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon  (175 of 176) 
 11127.175 in reply to 11127.174 

Sgt. Staffieri sounds like my kind of guy...

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member IconJun-19 4:37 AM 
To: WALTER784 DelphiPlus Member Icon  (176 of 176) 
 11127.176 in reply to 11127.20 

June 19, 2022   

            "so the BBC prioritized the assumed preferred pronouns of an anonymous accused rapist over the words of an anonymous woman speaking about being raped after being coerced by a biological male to believe that male was a lesbian."

           I had to read this line 5 times, and it is just too weird.

BBC censors rape victim's testimony to avoid 'misgendering' accused rapist

The BBC has prioritized an accused rapist's pronoun preference over a victim's testimony, and the truth. A woman who was allegedly attacked and raped by a biological male who identifies as transgender referred to the individual as him, undoubtedly because that individual allegedly raped her with a body part that only belongs to males. ~~~~~~~ In an article, the BBC saw fit to change the woman's words so that instead of referring to "him" she now referred to her rapist as "they." The BBC did this to protect the preferred pronouns of the alleged attacker, and to deprive the accuser's right to telling the actual truth about what happened to her.

The quote that was changed was from an anonymous lesbian, who wrote: "I was too young to argue and had been brainwashed by queer theory so he was a 'woman' even if every fibre of my being was screaming throughout, so I agreed to go home with him. He used physical force when I changed my mind upon seeing his penis and raped me."

 

First Discussion>>

Navigate this discussion: 1-10 11-20 21-30 ... 151-160 161-170 171-176
Adjust text size:

Welcome, guest! Get more out of Delphi Forums by logging in.

New to Delphi Forums? You can log in with your Facebook, Twitter, or Google account or use the New Member Login option and log in with any email address.

Home | Help | Forums | Chat | Blogs | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
© Delphi Forums LLC All rights reserved.