Non-Jews- What's On Your Mind? -  The Cancel Culture & Social Credit Score (2050 views) Notify me whenever anyone posts in this discussion.Subscribe
 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon3/18/21 11:29 AM 
To: All  (35 of 171) 
 11127.35 in reply to 11127.34 

Banned By Amazon

Dr. Seuss is not canceled — but six of his books are being shelved over  racist images - MarketWatch

Still For Sale At Amazon

Hitler's 'Mein Kampf' Surges in E-Book Sales - ABC News

 
 Reply   Options 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon3/24/21 5:00 AM 
To: All  (36 of 171) 
 11127.36 in reply to 11127.34 

25 GIFs Only Reading Addicts Will Appreciate - For Reading Addicts

 

 
From: WALTER784 DelphiPlus Member Icon3/29/21 10:37 AM 
To: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon  (37 of 171) 
 11127.37 in reply to 11127.32 

Please introduce me to one Black who doesn't do or doesn't have anything in the Yes column! Then I might believe it's racist! (* GRIN *)

Until then... those who think it's racist are the racist ones!

FWIW

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon3/30/21 8:58 AM 
To: All  (38 of 171) 
 11127.38 in reply to 11127.33 

March 30, 2021

        “Attempting to persuade (the girl) to abandon treatment for gender dysphoria; addressing (the girl) by his birth name; referring to (the girl) as a girl or with female pronouns whether to him directly or to third parties; shall be considered to be family violence under s. 38 of the Family Law Act.”

https://www.dailywire.com/news/father-arrested-jailed-for-contempt-after-referring-to-his-daughter-as-she

Father Arrested, Jailed For Contempt After Referring To His Daughter As ‘She,’ Voicing Dissent In Interviews

On Tuesday, the father of a biological girl who believes she is a boy turned himself into a Canadian court and was subsequently taken to jail after the Attorney General of British Columbia issued an arrest warrant for contempt after the father had insisted on referring to his daughter as his “daughter” and used the pronouns “she” and “her.”

Robert Hoogland, from Surrey, British Columbia, has a 14-year-old daughter. In February 2019, the Supreme Court of British Columbia, Canada ordered that the girl receive testosterone injections without obtaining parental consent. “The court also declared that if either of her parents referred to her using female pronouns or addressed her by her birth name, they would be considered guilty of family violence,” The Federalist noted.

When she was in seventh grade, the girl’s school urged the girl to see psychologist Dr. Wallace Wong, who recommended the girl should begin taking cross-sex hormones at 13. Hoogland cited his daughter’s alleged history of mental health issues and refused to give permission. Doctors at BC Children’s Hospital decided the girl should receive testosterone injections.

Hoogland, disturbed by the possible effects of the hormone therapy, objected, but one of the doctors informed him that the girl’s consent was enough for her to begin receiving the hormones. Hoogland responded by seeking an injunction to stop the treatment, but Justice Gregory Bowdenruled in February 2019 that the girl was “exclusively entitled to consent to medical treatment for gender dysphoria,” adding, “Attempting to persuade (the girl) to abandon treatment for gender dysphoria; addressing (the girl) by his birth name; referring to (the girl) as a girl or with female pronouns whether to him directly or to third parties; shall be considered to be family violence under s. 38 of the Family Law Act.”

Hoogland reacted, “The government has taken over my parental rights. They’re using (the girl) like she’s a guinea pig in an experiment … Is BC Children’s Hospital going to be there in 5 years when she rejects [her male identity]? No they’re not. They don’t care.”

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon3/30/21 8:58 AM 
To: All  (39 of 171) 
 Featured Message11127.39 in reply to 11127.33 

March 30, 2021

        “Attempting to persuade (the girl) to abandon treatment for gender dysphoria; addressing (the girl) by his birth name; referring to (the girl) as a girl or with female pronouns whether to him directly or to third parties; shall be considered to be family violence under s. 38 of the Family Law Act.”

https://www.dailywire.com/news/father-arrested-jailed-for-contempt-after-referring-to-his-daughter-as-she

Father Arrested, Jailed For Contempt After Referring To His Daughter As ‘She,’ Voicing Dissent In Interviews

On Tuesday, the father of a biological girl who believes she is a boy turned himself into a Canadian court and was subsequently taken to jail after the Attorney General of British Columbia issued an arrest warrant for contempt after the father had insisted on referring to his daughter as his “daughter” and used the pronouns “she” and “her.”

Robert Hoogland, from Surrey, British Columbia, has a 14-year-old daughter. In February 2019, the Supreme Court of British Columbia, Canada ordered that the girl receive testosterone injections without obtaining parental consent. “The court also declared that if either of her parents referred to her using female pronouns or addressed her by her birth name, they would be considered guilty of family violence,” The Federalist noted.

When she was in seventh grade, the girl’s school urged the girl to see psychologist Dr. Wallace Wong, who recommended the girl should begin taking cross-sex hormones at 13. Hoogland cited his daughter’s alleged history of mental health issues and refused to give permission. Doctors at BC Children’s Hospital decided the girl should receive testosterone injections.

Hoogland, disturbed by the possible effects of the hormone therapy, objected, but one of the doctors informed him that the girl’s consent was enough for her to begin receiving the hormones. Hoogland responded by seeking an injunction to stop the treatment, but Justice Gregory Bowdenruled in February 2019 that the girl was “exclusively entitled to consent to medical treatment for gender dysphoria,” adding, “Attempting to persuade (the girl) to abandon treatment for gender dysphoria; addressing (the girl) by his birth name; referring to (the girl) as a girl or with female pronouns whether to him directly or to third parties; shall be considered to be family violence under s. 38 of the Family Law Act.”

Hoogland reacted, “The government has taken over my parental rights. They’re using (the girl) like she’s a guinea pig in an experiment … Is BC Children’s Hospital going to be there in 5 years when she rejects [her male identity]? No they’re not. They don’t care.”

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon4/1/21 9:33 AM 
To: All  (40 of 171) 
 11127.40 in reply to 11127.39 

April 1, 2021

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/minnesota-cinderella-theater-production-cancelled-cast-98-cast-white/

Minnesota “Cinderella” Theater Production Cancelled After 98% of Cast Was White

The Chanhassen Dinner Theater in Minnesota canceled “Cinderella” this year after 98% of the cast was white. They will run “Footloose” instead.

TwinCities.com reported:

Chanhassen Dinner Theatres has scrapped plans to stage Rodgers and Hammerstein’s “Cinderella” and will instead make its next production “Footloose.”

The company announced the news Monday, citing its “ongoing commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion. … Our hope in beginning the production process again with a new title will allow us to put into practice an intentional process based on the work we have been doing towards equity and inclusivity.”

In an interview, artistic director Michael Brindisi said the decision had nothing to do with the show’s content and that he’s not ruling out staging “Cinderella” at some point in the future.

The show came into question after Brindisi looked at the cast.

“It was 98 percent white,” he said. “That doesn’t work with what we’re saying we’re going to do.”

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon4/1/21 9:37 AM 
To: All  (41 of 171) 
 11127.41 in reply to 11127.40 

Cinderwokella

OUT!

Southampton Mayflower's Cinderella panto postponed to 2021 | Panto | Stage  Chat

IN!

NEWS: Rodger and Hammerstein's Cinderella Heading to Disney Plus – Love  London Love Culture

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon4/6/21 9:02 AM 
To: WALTER784 DelphiPlus Member Icon  (42 of 171) 
 11127.42 in reply to 11127.20 

April 6, 2021

        "Justice Thomas noted that Trump had 89 million followers when he was banned in January, and said that the owners of the platforms have too much power."

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/04/supreme-court-justice-clarence-thomas-says-social-media-companies-not-right-ban-protected-speech/

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas Says Social Media Companies Do Not Have Right to Ban Protected Speech

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has said that the Supreme Court will soon have “no choice but to address” how speech is controlled by a few private social media platforms.

Justice Thomas wrote about the power of social media company’s to censor people as the court decided not to review an appeals court ruling that Donald Trump violated the First Amendment by blocking some Twitter users when he was president.

“Today’s digital platforms provide avenues for historically unprecedented amounts of speech, including speech by government actors. Also unprecedented, however, is control of so much speech in the hands of a few private parties,” Thomas wrote. “We will soon have no choice but to address how our legal doctrines apply to highly concentrated, privately owned information infrastructure such as digital platforms.”

Justice Thomas noted that Trump had 89 million followers when he was banned in January, and said that the owners of the platforms have too much power.

“Although both companies are public, one person controls Facebook (Mark Zuckerberg), and just two control Google (Larry Page and Sergey Brin),” Thomas wrote.

Politico reports that “Thomas’ opinion amounts to an invitation to Congress to declare Twitter, Facebook and similar companies ‘common carriers,’ essentially requiring them to host all customers regardless of their views. At the moment, the companies have sweeping authority to take down any post and to suspend or terminate any account.”

“It seems rather odd to say that something is a government forum when a private company has unrestricted authority to do away with it,” the justice wrote. “Any control Mr. Trump exercised over the account greatly paled in comparison to Twitter’s authority, dictated in its terms of service, to remove the account ‘at any time for any or no reason.’ Twitter exercised its authority to do exactly that.”

The Politico report continues on to note that “Thomas also suggested that the social media firms could be subject to regulation as public accommodations, although they are already covered by state and federal anti-discrimination laws. The justice didn’t elaborate much on that argument, but he hinted that the platforms’ First Amendment rights could be limited much as business owners can be forced to accept customers regardless of race or religion.”

“Thomas said a major protection for internet firms, known as Section 230, underscores the role of social media companies as common carriers. He also argued that some courts are abusing that provision to immunize “bad-faith” decisions to remove content posted by third parties.”

 

 
From: WALTER784 DelphiPlus Member Icon4/6/21 9:19 AM 
To: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon  (43 of 171) 
 11127.43 in reply to 11127.42 

Good... we have one in our corner... what about the other 8?

This one is quite old too so what happens after he passes away?

Will our Justice department also be doomed to the same fate as the rest of our government agencies?

FWIW

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon4/6/21 9:28 AM 
To: WALTER784 DelphiPlus Member Icon  (44 of 171) 
 11127.44 in reply to 11127.43 

He's only 72. Breyer is 82.

 

Navigate this discussion: 1-4 5-14 15-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 ... 145-154 155-164 165-171
Adjust text size:

Welcome, guest! Get more out of Delphi Forums by logging in.

New to Delphi Forums? You can log in with your Facebook, Twitter, or Google account or use the New Member Login option and log in with any email address.

Home | Help | Forums | Chat | Blogs | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
© Delphi Forums LLC All rights reserved.