Shmooze Central -  Surprise!!! Men & Woman Are Different (7287 views) Notify me whenever anyone posts in this discussion.Subscribe
 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member IconAug-30 9:01 AM 
To: WALTER784 DelphiPlus Member Icon  (454 of 553) 
 1358.454 in reply to 1358.453 

August 30, 2021

        "The deputy chief claimed that the cost to replace standard patrol vehicles with rainbow versions “is quite minimal,” and argued that “the impact of seeing the rainbow is so huge.” 

UK police roll out rainbow-colored squad cars to combat ‘hate crime,’ promote LGBT agenda 

The ideological move by the UK police has sparked backlash, even among the communities they seek to appease.
Cash-strapped police blow £750 giving just TWO cop cars special paint job  for gay pride events to prove they're 'open-minded'
UK police are facing widespread criticism after introducing a fleet of rainbow-colored patrol vehicles into the streets in an effort to confront “hate crime” and “give confidence” to LGBT people. 

Julie Cooke, deputy chief constable of the Cheshire Police as well as the National Police Chief’s Council lead for LGBT issues, said the cars will be used for “normal policing patrol” in order to “show the community that we want you to come forward.” 

“If something is happening that you know isn’t right we absolutely want you to come forward,” she said. 

Cooke said the cars will still bear their police insignias, but decals will also feature “the rainbow side of things.” 

The deputy chief claimed that the cost to replace standard patrol vehicles with rainbow versions “is quite minimal,” and argued that “the impact of seeing the rainbow is so huge.” 

But the “impact” may be perceived differently by different groups. 

~~~~~~~~~~~~

“The police are supposed to apply the law without fear or favour and yet their adoption of LGBT insignia is telling various religious minorities and in fact anyone who opposes gender ideology that they will be treated with contempt,” Farrow said. 

While Cooke said the rainbow colors are “there to give confidence to our LGBT+ community” as well as “other underrepresented groups,” Farrow argued that “Far from inspiring confidence, the sight of the LGBT rainbow flag evokes a sense of dread and undermines important public confidence in the police, who can no longer be seen as impartial.” 

 
 Reply   Options 

 
From: WALTER784 DelphiPlus Member IconAug-30 9:26 AM 
To: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon  (455 of 553) 
 1358.455 in reply to 1358.454 

If I see that thing coming towards me... I'm running as fast as I can...

I don't want the LGBTQ squad to catch me what so ever!!!

FWIW

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member IconAug-31 8:22 AM 
To: WALTER784 DelphiPlus Member Icon  (456 of 553) 
 1358.456 in reply to 1358.455 

August 31, 2021

         “Rather than allow a child equal access to a safe school environment, the Gloucester School Board decided to fight this child for five years in a costly legal battle that they lost,”

          What about the rights of the girls who do not want to give any kind of born boy equal rights to their bathroom. Parents, take your children out of that school and homeschool, or better yet, move out of Virginia.

Virginia School Board Pays Trans Former Student $1.3 Million in Bathroom Policy Settlement

Virginia’s Gloucester Country School Board is paying $1.3 million in a settlement with a trans former student who was upset that they couldn’t use the bathroom that corresponded with their “gender identity.”

Gavin Grimm, who was born a biological female, was told in 2014 that they could not use the boys bathroom at school.

After sparking outrage from liberals with a media blitz, Grimm was permitted to use a separate bathroom — but they claimed in a lawsuit the next year that it was “alienating” and “humiliating.”

Grimm, who is represented by the ACLU and ACLU of Virginia, filed the lawsuit as a sophomore at Gloucester County High School in June 2015.

“Rather than allow a child equal access to a safe school environment, the Gloucester School Board decided to fight this child for five years in a costly legal battle that they lost,” Grimm said in a statement via the ACLU. “I hope that this outcome sends a strong message to other school systems, that discrimination is an expensive losing battle.”

Grimm won the lawsuit in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit and the Supreme Court declined to hear the case after the school board attempted to appeal. The case was the first time a federal court decided that trans students can use whatever bathroom they want under Title IX, which will effect other cases across the country.

 

 
From: WALTER784 DelphiPlus Member IconAug-31 9:47 AM 
To: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon  (457 of 553) 
 1358.457 in reply to 1358.456 

Just one step closer to Sodom and Gomorrah!

Now all States will use this case to further their liberal agendas as well.

Is there any way we can sue the Supreme Court for NOT stepping in and allowing this injustice of our justice system to be so corrupted as we are watching today?

FWIW

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member IconAug-31 6:25 PM 
To: WALTER784 DelphiPlus Member Icon  (458 of 553) 
 1358.458 in reply to 1358.457 

        United States Supreme Court Justices can be impeached by the House, tried by the Senate, and removed through a conviction.

 

 
From: WALTER784 DelphiPlus Member IconAug-31 10:10 PM 
To: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon  (459 of 553) 
 1358.459 in reply to 1358.458 

WEBELIAHU said...

United States Supreme Court Justices can be impeached by the House, tried by the Senate, and removed through a conviction.

Good to know... then that's one of the higher priority items to follow through with after 2022 take back of both House and Senate!

FWIW

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member IconSep-5 7:40 AM 
To: WALTER784 DelphiPlus Member Icon  (460 of 553) 
 1358.460 in reply to 1358.459 

September 5, 2021

        "Under the guise of requiring information to be “medically accurate,” the bill suggests that if any information is not in conformity with the pro-abortion, pro-LGBT, and HIV-normalizing curriculum, it will be disallowed.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/illinois-gov-signs-bill-indoctrinate-kids-pro-abortion-pro-lgbt-sexual-education/

Illinois gov. signs bill to indoctrinate kids with pro-abortion, pro-LGBT ‘sexual education’ 

On August 27, Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker (D) signed a pro-abortion, pro-LGBT “sex-ed” bill – Senate Bill 818 – that includes teaching students how to procure an abortion, obtain transgender hormones, and access HIV drugs.

“Modernizing our sex education standards will help keep our children safe,” claimed Pritzker, adding that the radical new sex-ed curriculum will “deliver the bright future our kids deserve.”

The “bright future,” according to the new curriculum, titled the National Sex Education Standards, includes teaching kindergarteners about “gender identity,” telling third-grade children about “the role of hormone blockers on young people who identify as transgender,” and informing sixth-graders about “pregnancy options,” such as abortion. 

The bill, which states that the curriculum “may not” promote any “religious doctrine,” will require teachers to give students information on how to access abortion clinics, seek out hormone drugs, and get on PrEP (a dangerous, often ineffective pill used to have unprotected sex without contracting HIV).  

Despite barring the invocation of religious doctrine, the bill states the new instructions are required to be free of bias against race, cultural background, and religion. 

The bill also prohibits bias against “sexual behavior” and “HIV status.” 

Under the guise of requiring information to be “medically accurate,” the bill suggests that if any information is not in conformity with the pro-abortion, pro-LGBT, and HIV-normalizing curriculum, it will be disallowed.

 

 
From: WALTER784 DelphiPlus Member IconSep-5 8:45 AM 
To: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon  (461 of 553) 
 1358.461 in reply to 1358.460 

It's totally sick and perverted to say the least.

America is going to hell in a hand basket!

FWIW

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member IconSep-6 5:43 AM 
To: WALTER784 DelphiPlus Member Icon  (462 of 553) 
 1358.462 in reply to 1358.461 

September 6, 2021

       “I don't think parents need the government to step in and tell them how they should shop for their children."

        Don't be silly. You live in California. Of course you need the government telling you how to shop.

https://news.yahoo.com/california-seeks-gender-neutral-displays-233350493.html

California seeks gender neutral displays in large stores

California could soon force large department stores to display some child products in gender neutral ways after the state Legislature passed a bill on Wednesday aimed at getting rid of traditional pink and blue marketing schemes for items like toys and toothbrushes.

The bill would not outlaw traditional boys and girls sections in department stores, but it would require retailers to have a gender neutral section to display “a reasonable selection” of items “regardless of whether they have been traditionally marketed for either girls or for boys.”

The bill would only apply to department stores with 500 or more employees, so most small businesses would be exempt. It also wouldn't apply to clothes, just toys and “childcare items,” which include hygiene and teething products.

The state Senate passed the bill Wednesday, sending it back to the Assembly for a procedural vote before it heads to Gov. Gavin Newsom's desk. If it becomes law, California would become the first state to require these sections in stores, according to the office of Assemblyman Evan Low, the bill's author.

This is at least the third time California lawmakers have tried to pass this bill, with previous versions failing to pass in 2019 and 2020. Low, a Democrat from Campbell, said the measure was inspired by a 10-year-old girl named Britten whose mother works in his legislative office.

“Britten asked her mom while shopping why certain things in a store were ‘off limits’ to her because she was a girl, but would be fine if she was a boy,” Low said. “Thankfully, my colleagues recognized the pure intentions of this bill and the need to let kids be kids.”

Some large retailers are already rethinking how they display their products. Target Corp., with 1,914 stores across the United States, announced in 2015 it would stop using some gender-based signs in its stores.

The California Retailers Association declined to comment on the bill Wednesday. Formal opposition has come from a number of conservative groups. State Sen. Melissa Melendez, a Republican from Lake Elsinore, voted against the bill, saying she would “recommend we let parents be parents.”

“Unlike the author, I actually have children, five of them to be exact, and I can tell you it is very convenient for parents,” she said. “I don't think parents need the government to step in and tell them how they should shop for their children."

~~~~~~~~~~~~

While the law will require large department stores to comply, penalties for not doing so would be light. Starting in 2024, prosecutors could seek fines of up to $250 for first offenses and up to $500 for second offenses. Those would be civil, not criminal, penalties. Stores could also end up having to pay for reasonable attorney's fees and costs.

 

 
From: WALTER784 DelphiPlus Member IconSep-6 8:48 AM 
To: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon  (463 of 553) 
 1358.463 in reply to 1358.462 

Sounds like more Pelosi style drunk on power legislation if you ask me.

FWIW

 

Navigate this discussion: 1-3 4-13 14-23 ... 434-443 444-453 454-463 464-473 474-483 ... 524-533 534-543 544-553
Adjust text size:

Welcome, guest! Get more out of Delphi Forums by logging in.

New to Delphi Forums? You can log in with your Facebook, Twitter, or Google account or use the New Member Login option and log in with any email address.

Home | Help | Forums | Chat | Blogs | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
© Delphi Forums LLC All rights reserved.