- As you know, the earliest plantations in the new world were in south and central america.
You seem confused ... as there is no such thing as 'the new world' ... our Lord created all land at the same time. Granted ... repopulation of the world after the flood took place first in Asia and later around the world, after it was divided for all times among the three sons of Noach our progenitor <with Noach invoking a curse on anyone who would take away someone elses land.> The earliest plantations were in the Caribbeans and South America. Large plantations were not set up in the USA until around 1800 after western europe ended slavery in their colonies. The USA set up large plantations in the lower south (Louisiana, Alabama, Missippi, etc.) and transferred indigenous Naitive Kus_ite Americans from the upper south (North Carolina, Virginia, Maryland, DC, Kentucky, etc.) to them by ships, with last slave ship arriving in in 1858. South Carolina, with a slave population of 4 times that of whites in the beginning only had about 3 plantations with 300 slaves or more. The majority of slaves in the USA were owned by the average families... not wealthy planation owners as the myth goes. Also, Celts (Negroes) from western europe were transported to work the plantations in the Caribbeans ... and this is also a well documented facts. All those blacks in the Caribbeans came from western europe -- not Africa, as Africans are not a ebony colored black-skinned people. Some Kus_ite are dark brown, but they lighten when removed from sunny hot regions.
- These europeans tried to enslave the indigenous peoples first, but many of them died from contacting diseases from the Euros. They tried indentured servants, but many of them died from natural diseases like malaria.
Nonsense ... the europeans deliberately exposed our ancestors to contagious diseases before they showed up with their soldiers to enslave what was left of our indigneous ancestral populations. Small pox was known by western europeans to reduce the population of a tribe by 40% ... which is why there is no surprise that smallpox and other diseases ravaged Africa when the western europeans arrived there first. No indentrued servants died from malaria in the USA because, malaria is not native here. And why wouldn't malaria wipe all the western euroepans as well? You make no sense. Or are you claiming that western europeans are immuned to malaria which is endemic to the southern part of western europe as well?
- Then they tried Africans, and even the indigenous peoples marveled at how healthy the Africans were. They seemed immune to malaria and to the diseases carried by the Euros, and this fact seemed intriguing to the natives.
Why would Africans be immune to malaria in the Americans but not immune to malaria in their own ancestral homealnds? You don't make any sense. And what diseases did the eurpeans carry that Africans are immune to? Measles? Everyone gets measles today and no one dies from mealses but the 'africans' according to media reports ... on the tens of thousands dying from measles today in Africa. And no one is immune from small pox ... which is what the europeans used to initially decimate our native population before they invaded with their army.
- Race mixing occuried for the simple sake of survival of the tribes. This was not an issolated phenomena.
Race mixing took place when whites faking it took wives of native Americans, as it was the custom of the people ... to get them to trust them before enslaving them. And we know, white males produce barren/sterile offsprings which cannot reproduce .... so there goes your lie about race mixing. Only under slavery did our ancestors mate with Negroes faking it as 'africans' .... Race mixing freely came with Shemites and Kus_ite(long time allies) intermarried freely throughout the Shemitic portion of the world.
- I would refer us all to Van Sertima's:THEY CAME BEFORE COLUMBUS. He says Africans came here as Explorers and sailors. That's a far cry from indentured servants and slaves.
We've all heard about this propaganda ... Calling our Kus_ite ancestors western european Negroes is a grave error on the part of this alleged expert. As the statue heads left in the Mexico, mistakenly called Olmecs, are of Kus_ite not the western european Negro faking it as 'africans' today. Kus_ite have long hair and are dark brown ... the european Negro has short hair that is sometimes red and is ebony-colored black- skinned at all times (using skin lighteners) and is of a completely different stature than the Kus_ite. And there are plenty of Kus_ite in the Americans and Africa and all through Asia to make the comparison between the immigrant eurpean Negro that now calls himself 'african' and the Kus_ite who built the first civilization the North Ameria.