POLITICS -  It's Going To Blow Up On Mueller (9738 views) Notify me whenever anyone posts in this discussion.Subscribe
 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon10/31/18 7:06 AM 
To: All  (32 of 612) 
 9333.32 in reply to 9333.31 

October 31, 2018

        "Sources told The Daily Mail that Whitey Bulger was about to out people in the FBI, specifically FBI officials of the informant program."

        As this article notes, Robert Mueller was deeply involved with Bulger, also see this post: 8906.1 ALSO, and compounding the conspiracy possibilities: Is it a coincidence that Bulger is murdered in prison at the same time that Mueller is being accused of rape in 2010? See the post to follow this post.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/10/mueller-connected-boston-mobster-whitey-bulger-killed-in-prison-as-he-was-about-to-out-fbi-officials/

Mueller-Connected Boston Mobster Whitey Bulger Killed in Prison… As He Was About to Out FBI Officials

Legendary Boston mobster Whitey Bulger was killed in prison overnight on Tuesday.

89-year-old Boston mob boss James ‘Whitey’ Bulger was killed in prison by a ‘fellow inmate with mafia ties’ shortly after he was transferred to a West Virginia federal prison. Bulger was reportedly wheeled away from security cameras and beaten with a lock in a sock and also had his eyes gouged out.

Sources told The Daily Mail that Whitey Bulger was about to out people in the FBI, specifically FBI officials of the informant program.

Via The Daily Mail:

Boston gangster James ‘Whitey’ Bulger Jr. has been killed behind bars shortly after he was transferred to a federal prison in West Virginia. He was 89.

Bulger was found dead overnight on Tuesday at USP Hazelton, a high-security prison with an adjacent minimum security satellite camp in Bruceton Mills.

It emerged in Bulger’s 2013 trial that he had served as an FBI informant as far back as 1975, though he always denied the claim.

Law enforcement sources tell DailyMail.com that Whitey had been talking about outing people in the FBI – people in the top echelon of the informant program.

The sources said he hadn’t even been processed at the West Virginia facility when he was killed. But someone who knew he was being transferred put the word out – the killer had to know he was coming.

The Whitey Bulger-Robert Mueller connection:

MUELLER’S MINIONS HELPED MOBSTER WHITEY BULGER ELIMINATE MOB COMPETITORS, says Congressman Louie Gohmert

In May, Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) published a 48-page report called “Robert Mueller Unmasked” to expose the Special Counsel’s decades of corruption.

In the extensive report, Gohmert covered Mueller’s shady past of helping mobster Whitey Bulger by eliminating mob competitors.

The Boston Globe noted Robert Mueller’s connection with the Whitey Bulger case in an article entitled, “One Lingering Question for FBI Director Robert Mueller.” The Globe said this:

“[Mike] Albano [former Parole Board Member who was threatened by two F.B.I. agents for considering parole for the men imprisoned for a crime they did not commit] was appalled that, later that same year, Mueller was appointed FBI director, because it was Mueller, first as an assistant US attorney then as the acting U.S. attorney in Boston, who wrote letters to the parole and pardons board throughout the 1980s opposing clemency for the four men framed by FBI lies. Of course, Mueller was also in that position while Whitey Bulger was helping the FBI cart off his criminal competitors even as he buried bodies in shallow graves along the Neponset…”

Mueller put people in prison for crimes they did not commit:

...[Message truncated]

 
 Reply   Options 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon10/31/18 7:10 AM 
To: All  (33 of 612) 
 9333.33 in reply to 9333.31 

October 31, 2018

        "What we know: The woman is a “very credible witness.” Her story are corroborated. The incident happened in 2010 in New York City. The woman is a professional....On Thursday, November 1, at the Rosslyn Holiday Inn at noon, we will reveal the first of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's sex assault victims."

          Note that word "victims." It is PLURAL!   Remember, according to the Democrats the woman MUST be believed. 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/10/breaking-report-exclusive-documents-special-counsel-and-former-fbi-director-robert-mueller-accused-of-rape-by-very-credible-witness/

**EXCLUSIVE DOCUMENTS** : Special Counsel and Former FBI Director Robert Mueller Accused of Rape By ‘Very Credible Witness ‘

Special Counsel Robert Mueller was accused by a very credible witness today of rape at the St. Regis Hotel in New York City in 2010.

A formal press conference is scheduled for Thursday at noon in Washington DC.

Rreporter Jack Burkman tweeted this out today.

The Gateway Pundit obtained a copy of the charges.

What we know: The woman is a “very credible witness.” Her story are corroborated. The incident happened in 2010 in New York City. The woman is a professional.

We will post the document shortly.

The Mueller apologists are already trashing the accuser — and don’t even know who she is!

STAY TUNED — WE KNOW WHAT THE LIBERAL MEDIA IS REPORTING ON THIS
THERE IS MUCH MORE TO COME….

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon11/2/18 6:34 AM 
To: All  (34 of 612) 
 9333.34 in reply to 9333.32 

November 2, 2018

         "the FBI concealed from the FISA court the fact that the dossier was paid for by the Democratic National Committee and Clinton’s campaign...confirmed the FBI was aware when it submitted the dossier as evidence that Steele was biased against Trump and that Ohr’s wife worked for the company that produced it. But that information was withheld from the FISA court."

https://www.wnd.com/2018/10/meadows-investigate-fbi-for-being-weaponized-by-obama/

Meadows: Investigate FBI for being 'weaponized' by Obama

Did bureau lie to spy on members of Trump campaign?

The words “FBI investigation” have struck terror in the heart of many a wrong-doer over the years.

Now, however, it could mean an investigation OF the FBI.

Specifically, whether its interaction with the secret court that must approve surveillance operations constituted illegal acts.

The chairman of the House Freedom Caucus, Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., is asking the head of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to determine whether the FBI engaged in misconduct, such as lying, to surveil members of President Trump’s 2016 campaign.

“As the Presiding Judge of the FISC … you are privy to information which could potentially verify or contradict our understanding of abuses of the FISA process,” he wrote to Judge Rosemay Collyer.

“Ultimately, to protect the integrity of the process, we believe such an investigation is necessary,” he said.

“We write to encourage you to investigate the possibility FISA has recently been weaponized for political means.”

The court issued warrants several times to spy on Trump campaign volunteer Carter Page.

But the House Intelligence Committee found that the FBI and the Justice Department used the so-called “dossier” of unsubstantiated opposition research as primary evidence to obtain the warrant.

The dossier was created by an ex-British spy on the payroll of a company funded by Hillary Clinton’s campaign.

Meadows is on a congressional task force investigating the FBI review of “possible collusion” between the campaign and Russia.

No evidence of collusion has been found, and the only convictions that have come from Robert Mueller’s special counsel’s office have been on procedural counts.

Daily Caller News Foundation reported Republicans so far are focusing on the FBI’s requests for four FISA warrants against Page issued from October 2016 to June 2017. To obtain the warrants, the FBI was required to provide probable cause that the target of the warrant was acting as an agent of a foreign power.

In his letter to Collyer, Meadows said the dossier contained “hearsay evidence” and other Republicans have noted that much of its contents were unverified at the time the FBI cited it in its FISA applications. The dossier’s author, Christopher Steele, claimed Page met secretly with two sanctioned Russians in 2016 and was the Trump campaign’s “back channel to the Kremlin.”

No evidence has been made public that supports the accusations.

Meadows wrote: “Over the course of our congressional task force’s review into certain investigative and prosecutorial decisions made by the FBI and broader Department of Justice surrounding the 2016 elections, concerns have mounted related to the veracity of information presented before the FISC.”

Part of the problem is that the FBI concealed from the FISA court the fact that the dossier was paid for by the Democratic National Committee and Clinton’s campaign. Meadows said the obvious concern is that the court “may not have lived up to the Constitution’s protections against unreasonable searches and seizures.”

WND reported in August that Bruce Ohr, a former top Justice Department official at the center of the anti-Trump dossier scandal, confirmed the FBI was aware when it submitted the dossier as evidence that Steele was biased against Trump and that Ohr’s wife worked for the company that produced it.

But that information was withheld from the FISA court.

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon11/4/18 7:48 AM 
To: All  (35 of 612) 
 9333.35 in reply to 9333.34 

November 4, 2018

        “Based on our investigation and open source information, the FISC may have not lived up to the Constitution’s protections against unreasonable searches and seizures in approving U.S. citizens targeted without probable cause,” Meadows wrote. “We write to encourage you to investigate the possibility that FISA has recently been weaponized for political means.”

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/413854-silence-of-the-lambs-the-deafening-quietude-of-the-fisa-court-and-john

Silence of 'the lambs': The deafening quietude of the FISA court and John Roberts

Two years ago this month, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) issued a warrant authorizing the FBI to spy on Carter Page, a former foreign policy adviser to President Trump. The stated suspicion was the nominee’s campaign was colluding with Russia.

The issuance of a so-called FISA warrant was momentous and unprecedented, permitting a Democratic-run Justice Department to obtain communications inside the duly-elected GOP nominee’s campaign during its final weeks before the election.

Since that time, we have learned much about the evidence — or lack thereof — that supported the warrant.

We know, for example, the primary evidence was a dossier created by British intelligence operative Christopher Steele, but the court wasn’t told his work was directly paid for by Trump's rival, Hillary Clinton, and the Democratic Party.

Instead, the FBI used this footnote in its warrant application to describe who hired Steele: “The FBI speculates that the identified U.S. person was likely looking for information that could be used to discredit” the Trump campaign. That’s hardly complete or forthcoming.

We also know that when the Steele dossier was submitted, it had not been fully vetted for accuracy, despite a requirement that all FISA evidence be verified. Some of the dossier’s claims later were found to be inaccurate.

We’ve painfully learned of blatant bias inside the investigation. Steele told senior Department of Justice (DOJ) official Bruce Ohr he was desperate to keep Trump from being elected president. Two of the FBI’s leads on the case, Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, were having an affair and texting each other about finding “an insurance policy” designed to "stop" Trump.

The FBI lovebirds even communicated they were applying “hurry the F up” pressure to try to rush the FISA warrant through the court before Election Day.

We recently learned that the FBI’s initial justification for opening the Trump-Russia collusion case — the belief that another campaign aide, George Papadopoulos, might have colluded with Moscow — quickly fell apart when Papadopoulos told an FBI informant he didn't collude and would consider such activity treasonous.

Finally, the House intelligence committee dug up evidence that Steele and the FBI engaged in leaks with the news media about the Russia investigation, then used some of those articles to support its FISA application. That is a practice known as circular intelligence, where single-source reporting is made to look multi-sourced.

There are more exculpatory pieces of evidence I could detail but these alone make a compelling case that the initial FBI and DOJ representations to the court were, at best, flawed and, at worst, desperately biased and driven by an election clock.

And that begs the question: What do the FISC judges and Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, the ultimate judicial disciplinarian, think about what happened?

After all, the FISC issued not one but four warrants allowing the FBI to monitor Page for nearly nine months into Trump’s presidency.

This week, Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), the conservative firebrand who, along with Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), has driven the once reluctant House leaders to dig for much of the aforementioned evidence, sent his own missive to U.S. District Judge Rosemary Collyer. She is chief judge of the FISC.

His letter asked the obvious question: As a separate and equal pillar of government from Congress and the executive branch, does the judiciary have concerns with the FBI’s and DOJ’s conduct?

“Based on our investigation and open source information, the FISC may have not lived up to the Constitution’s protections against unreasonable searches and seizures in approving U.S. citizens targeted without probable cause,” Meadows wrote. “We write to encourage you to investigate the possibility that FISA has recently been weaponized for political means.”

It is not unprecedented for the usually secretive court to speak. In recent years, it has released documents — usually self-reported violations from DOJ and the FBI — so the public can see when the process has been abused.

Now, it is possible that the court has taken some action in the Russia case, such holding a show-cause hearing behind closed doors, to question the FBI. But if it hasn’t, Meadows’ letter is designed to smoke out a response.

The FISC is one of the only courts in America where the accused gets no representation, and the public gets no visibility. For that reason, the DOJ and FBI are supposed to be held to a higher standard of making sure judges see “the good, the bad and the ugly.”

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon11/27/18 6:24 AM 
To: All  (36 of 612) 
 9333.36 in reply to 9333.35 

November 27, 2018

         “They can put me in prison the rest of my life. I am not going to sign a lie,” Corsi said in a brief telephone call with CNN. Asked what Mueller office will do next if he does not agree to the plea deal, Corsi replied, “I don’t know.”

https://www.breitbart.com/crime/2018/11/26/corsi-reject-plea-sue-mueller/

Report: Jerome Corsi Rejecting Plea Deal, Plans to Sue Mueller

Former Infowars D.C. bureau chief Jerome Corsi will reject a plea agreement offered by the special counsel and fire back with a criminal complaint, accusing Robert Mueller of “Gestapo” tactics in attempting to pressure the author into pleading guilty to one count of perjury.

“They can put me in prison the rest of my life. I am not going to sign a lie,” Corsi said in a brief telephone call with CNN. Asked what Mueller office will do next if he does not agree to the plea deal, Corsi replied, “I don’t know.”

Corsi told NBC producer Anna Schecter that a plea agreement would involve the author of pleading guilty to one count of perjury. “I’d rather sit in prison and rot for as long as these thugs want me to,” he told Schecter.

Instead of accepting a plea deal, OAN’s Emerald Robinson reports Corsi will file a criminal complaint against Mueller with acting Attorney General Mathew Whitaker.

As reported Friday, Corsi revealed that he has been negotiating a potential plea but declined to comment further on the matter. He said on a YouTube show earlier this month that he expected to be charged with lying to federal investigators, though he said at the time that he was innocent of wrongdoing.

Mueller’s team questioned Corsi as part of an investigation into Stone’s connections with WikiLeaks. American intelligence agencies have assessed that Russia was the source of hacked material released by WikiLeaks during the 2016 election that damaged Hillary Clinton’s campaign. Mueller’s office is trying to determine whether Stone and other associates of President Donald Trump had advance knowledge of WikiLeaks’ plans.

It is unclear whether the charges against Assange are related to Mueller’s investigation, but WikiLeaks was singled out in an indictment last summer against a group of Russian intelligence officers accused of carrying out the wide-ranging hack of Clinton’s campaign and other Democratic organizations.

It is also not known whether any plea by Corsi signals a new raft of charges by the special counsel — or merely that investigators are aggressively pursuing cases against people they believe made false statements to investigators. Mueller has brought such cases against four others, including former national security adviser Michael Flynn.

Corsi has said he cooperated with the probe for about two months after he received a subpoena in August. As part of that cooperation, he turned over two computers and a cell phone and provided the FBI access to his email accounts and tweets.

But he said earlier this month that talks with investigators recently had “blown up.”

“I fully anticipate that in the next few days, I will be indicted by Mueller,” he said.

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon11/28/18 8:03 AM 
To: All  (37 of 612) 
 9333.37 in reply to 9333.36 

November 28, 2018

           "The Phony Witch Hunt continues, but Mueller and his gang of Angry Dems are only looking at one side, not the other. Wait until it comes out how horribly & viciously they are treating people, ruining lives for them refusing to lie. Mueller is a conflicted prosecutor gone rogue."

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/11/trump-unleashed-president-lashes-out-at-criminal-mueller-gang-and-corrupt-witch-hunt/

President Trump tweeted out a thread questioning the witch hunt’s validity, the far left hacks in the gang, and the fact that Mueller HAS STILL NOT INSPECTED the DNC server that was supposedly “hacked” by Russia.

God bless our president.

The Phony Witch Hunt continues, but Mueller and his gang of Angry Dems are only looking at one side, not the other. Wait until it comes out how horribly & viciously they are treating people, ruining lives for them refusing to lie. Mueller is a conflicted prosecutor gone rogue. The Fake News Media builds Bob Mueller up as a Saint, when in actuality he is the exact opposite. He is doing TREMENDOUS damage to our Criminal Justice System, where he is only looking at one side and not the other. Heroes will come of this, and it won’t be Mueller and his terrible Gang of Angry Democrats. Look at their past, and look where they come from. The now $30,000,000 Witch Hunt continues and they’ve got nothing but ruined lives. Where is the Server? Let these terrible people go back to the Clinton Foundation and “Justice” Department!

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon11/29/18 6:35 AM 
To: All  (38 of 612) 
 9333.38 in reply to 9333.37 

November 29, 2018

        "And the American public knows enough not to trust the liberal mainstream media to report anything remotely honest and truthful in the current political climate."

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/11/hah-liberal-heads-explode-president-trump-retweets-image-of-top-democrats-including-obama-hillary-holder-huma-mueller-behind-bars/

HAH! Liberal Heads Explode! President Trump Retweets Image of Top Democrats Including Obama, Hillary, Holder, Huma, Mueller Behind Bars

Image result for trump retweets dems in jail

What’s not to love?
President Trump TRULY is a man of the people – and he knows what the public is thinking.

** And the public does not understand how Barack Obama can spy on the Trump Campaign for months without any repercussions.


** The public does not understand how Hillary Clinton can pay for a bogus anti-Trump dossier and the FBI can use that opposition hit piece to spy on the opposing candidate?
 

** The public does not understand how crooked cop Robert Mueller can be charged to investigate Russian “collusion” in the 2016 election and he can ignore the Clinton and Obama operations and focus on Donald Trump and his campaign who had ZERO relationships with the Russian regime.

And the American public knows enough not to trust the liberal mainstream media to report anything remotely honest and truthful in the current political climate.

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon11/29/18 6:40 AM 
To: All  (39 of 612) 
 9333.39 in reply to 9333.38 

November 29, 2018

        "The President said he is waiting for the perfect time to declassify the Carter Page FISA docs because if he already did, it would have been yesterday’s news."

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/11/trump-threatens-to-declassify-devastating-carter-page-fisa-docs-and-other-records-from-muellers-probe/

Trump Threatens to Declassify “Devastating” Carter Page FISA Docs and Other Records From Mueller’s Probe

President Trump told the New York Post in an Oval Office interview Wednesday that he will declassify documents that will be ‘devastating’ for the Deep State and Democrats if they harass him with more probes.

The President said he is waiting for the perfect time to declassify the Carter Page FISA docs because if he already did, it would have been yesterday’s news.

“If they go down the presidential harassment track, if they want go and harass the president and the administration, I think that would be the best thing that would happen to me. I’m a counter-puncher and I will hit them so hard they’d never been hit like that,” Trump told the New York Post.

President Trump previously issued an immediate declassification order of the Carter Page FISA docs and other pertinent Russia records.

Trump then reversed his order after foreign allies begged him to keep the documents under wrap.

The President also told the New York Post Wednesday that his lawyer Emmet Flood advised him to wait to declassify the documents in order to use it as political leverage.

“He [Emmet Flood] didn’t want me to do it yet, because I can save it,” Trump said.

The president also pushed back on the notion that all the Justice Department documents should eventually be released for the sake of transparency.

“Some things maybe the public shouldn’t see because they are so bad,” Trump said, making clear it wasn’t damaging to him, but to others. “Maybe it’s better that the public not see what’s been going on with this country.”

The President may be gearing up to go after Obama’s criminal administration–but it’s all about timing.

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon11/30/18 5:39 AM 
To: All  (40 of 612) 
 9333.40 in reply to 9333.39 

November 30, 2018

                 “These are not crimes that had been committed prior to his appointment, they’re crimes that were committed as the result of his appointment...In the end, I don’t think Mueller’s going to come up with very much, in terms of criminal conduct, that existed before he was appointed, and that’s pretty shocking,”

https://www.breitbart.com/video/2018/11/29/dershowitz-rips-mueller-for-false-statement-prosecutions-theyre-crimes-that-were-committed-as-the-result-of-his-appointment/

Dershowitz Rips Mueller for ‘False Statement Prosecutions’ — ‘They’re Crimes That Were Committed as the Result of His Appointment’

Thursday, Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz called into Fox News Channel to react to the breaking news of Donald Trump’s former lawyer, Michael Cohen, reaching a plea agreement with FBI special counsel Robert Mueller to plead guilty for lying to congressional committees as part of the investigation into Russian collusion in the 2016 election.

Dershowitz slammed the special counsel for having to “resort to false statement prosecutions,” arguing it shows Mueller “didn’t start with very much” to begin his investigation.

”I think the weakness of Mueller’s substantive findings are suggested by the fact that he has to resort to false statement prosecutions, which really shows that he didn’t start with very much, and that the very fact that he’s conducting an investigation has created these crimes,” Dershowitz told Bill Hemmer. “These are not crimes that had been committed prior to his appointment, they’re crimes that were committed as the result of his appointment, and that raises some questions about the role of special prosecutors in creating crimes, or creating opportunities for crimes to be committed.”

“In the end, I don’t think Mueller’s going to come up with very much, in terms of criminal conduct, that existed before he was appointed, and that’s pretty shocking,” added Dershowitz.

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member Icon12/3/18 9:04 AM 
To: All  (41 of 612) 
 9333.41 in reply to 9333.40 

December 3, 2018

           "And he told the agent that Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz recognized his whistleblower status, the lawyer said....The lawyer called the raid an “outrageous disregard” of whistleblower protections."

           This looks to me like the FBI desperately trying to get hold of the originals on documents that will hurt the Deep State in court. Copies can still be used against the Deep State, but I do not think they are quite as effective as the originals. I welcome any other viewpoints, because I can't think of anything else that even begins to make sense.

https://www.wnd.com/2018/11/fbi-raids-home-of-whistleblower-on-clinton-foundation/

16 FBI agents raid whistleblower's home

Case involves Clinton Foundation, Russia-Uranium One deal

The FBI raided the home of a whistleblower who possessed documents showing federal officials failed to investigate potential criminal activity regarding former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the Clinton Foundation and the Russian company that purchased Uranium One, according to the whistleblower’s lawyer.

The Daily Caller News Foundation reported 16 agents arrived at the Union Bridge, Maryland, home of Dennis Nathan Cain, a former FBI contractor, on the morning of Nov. 19.

The lawyer, Michael Socarras, told the Daily Caller that Cain had turned the documents over to the Department of Justice’s inspector general, and both the House and Senate Intelligence committees

The raid was permitted by a court order signed Nov. 15 by federal magistrate Stephanie A. Gallagher in the U.S. District Court for Baltimore.

Socarras said the FBI rummaged through Cain’s home for six hours, even after the whistleblower handed over the documents.

The delivered documents allegedly show that then-FBI Director Robert Mueller failed to investigate allegations of criminal misconduct pertaining to the Russian company, Rosatom, and to other Russian government entities attached to Uranium One, the Daily Caller said.

Clinton Cash author Peter Schweizer was the first to report the alleged "pay for play" scandal surrounding the Russians’ purchase of a company that controlled one-fifth of U.S. uranium reserves while Hillary Clinton was secretary of state. Schweizer found that nine foreign investors in the Uranium One deal gave $145 million to the Clinton Foundation, and the New York Times confirmed in an April 2015 story Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million to the Clinton Foundation.

“The bureau raided my client to seize what he legally gave Congress about the Clinton Foundation and Uranium One,” Socarras told the Daily Caller.

The lawyer called the raid an “outrageous disregard” of whistleblower protections.

Socarras said the special agent who led the raid charged that Cain possessed stolen federal property.

Bureau spokesman Dave Fitz told the Daily Caller he had no comment other than to acknowledge that on Nov. 19, the FBI “conducted court authorized law enforcement activity in the Union Bridge, Maryland area.”

Cain informed the agent while he was at the door that he was a recognized protected whistleblower under the Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act. And he told the agent that Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz recognized his whistleblower status, the lawyer said.

Socarras said Cain further told the FBI agent the documents had been properly transmitted to the Senate and House Intelligence committees as permitted under the whistleblower act.

Horowitz had a member of his staff physically take the documents to the House and Senate Intelligence committees, Socarras said.

“For the bureau to show up at Mr. Cain’s home suggesting that those same documents are stolen federal property, and then proceed to seize copies of the same documents after being told at the house door that he is a legally protected whistleblower who gave them to Congress, is an outrageous disregard of the law,” the lawyer said.

 

Navigate this discussion: 1 2-11 12-21 22-31 32-41 42-51 52-61 ... 592-601 602-611 612
Adjust text size:

Welcome, guest! Get more out of Delphi Forums by logging in.

New to Delphi Forums? You can log in with your Facebook, Twitter, or Google account or use the New Member Login option and log in with any email address.

Home | Help | Forums | Chat | Blogs | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
© Delphi Forums LLC All rights reserved.