Enjoy Delphi Forums ad free!Click here.
POLITICS -  Voter Fraud - What Is Ballot Harvesting (15287 views) Notify me whenever anyone posts in this discussion.Subscribe
 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member IconNov-16 7:19 AM 
To: All  (1229 of 1290) 
 9605.1229 in reply to 9605.1207 

November 16, 2021 - MICHIGAN

        "Today, when Rep. Maddock opened his mail, he discovered an incredible and rare endorsement from President Trump for Michigan’s next Speaker of the House position. The endorsement was hand-written on a copy of the Detroit News article from yesterday and was signed by President Trump."

Trump Jumps Into MI State Politics...Endorses Pro-Forensic Audit Conservative "Mad Dog" Matt Maddock As Michigan's Next House Speaker

The Left despises him. The media fears him, so they manufacturer fake stories about him and his wife. Moderates in his own party, who have no idea what true conservatism looks like, would like to see him canceled. But Matt “Mad Dog” Maddock, undeterred, keeps fighting.

Together, with his beautiful, strong, conservative wife, Meshawn Maddock, co-chair of the MI GOP, they’re an unstoppable force.

100 Percent Fed Up – Yesterday, the Detroit News reported about Matt Maddock’s desire to become the next MI Speaker of the House. Guided by his conservative principles, Rep. Matt Maddock is one of only a handful of MI Republican lawmakers who called for a forensic audit of Michigan’s November 2020 election. A forensic audit of the election is a top priority for the majority of Republicans in the state, but unfortunately, it’s not so popular with spineless Republicans in leadership roles who are more worried about their next job than representing the citizens who elected them.

Yesterday, the Detroit News reported about Matt Maddock’s desire to become the next MI Speaker of the House. 

Today, when Rep. Maddock opened his mail, he discovered an incredible and rare endorsement from President Trump for Michigan’s next Speaker of the House position. The endorsement was hand-written on a copy of the Detroit News article from yesterday and was signed by President Trump. ~~~~~~~~~~~

Why is President Trump’s endorsement so important for the role of Speaker in the Michigan State House? The answer is simple; President Trump is tired of faux conservative lawmakers who have abysmal records when it comes to following through on campaign promises, something that President Trump takes very seriously.

 
 Reply   Options 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member IconNov-17 8:01 AM 
To: All  (1230 of 1290) 
 9605.1230 in reply to 9605.1207 

November 17, 2021

Dr. Linda Lee Tarver: "I Know There Was Fraud - This Administration is Wicked. They Have Left People to Die - The Election Should Be Decertified"

Dr. Linda Lee Tarver is a former Michigan Civil rights commissioner, Community affairs Director and Election Integrity Liason. Dr. Tarver has documented the history of rampant voter fraud in Michigan and specifically in Detroit for AT LEAST 25 YEARS!

In December 2020 before a Michigan Senate committee, Dr. Tarver called for a forensic audit of the entire election here in Michigan. Dr. Tarver called the election process in Michigan a “hot mess” that has been going on for decades.

Tarver told the committee that she has seen ballot harvesters come in to deliver a stack of 75 ballots at a time to the elections office and set them on the counter. ~~~~~~~~~~~~

Dr. Linda Lee Tarver: What we saw in 2020 was not new. I know there was fraud. I would dare to have anyone tell me I am not an election integrity expert in Michigan. I am…

There are bodies buried all over the place… We have to get some backbone.  People have been afraid.  And they have been scared.  They have been maligned.  They have been afraid to be called racist.  They have gone along to get along.  And I will tell you my scripture says you cannot coexist with the wicked.  You cannot align with the wicked.  And we have wicked. 

I put “let’s go Brandon” in (on her name).  I’m a Christian girl.  But I will tell you that’s how I feel about the current resident of our United States.  He’s a wicked man and his administration is wicked.   They has left people to die.  And it is consequences of elections.  So anyone out there who might be a keyboard warrior today.  We are in a fight.  And we expect you to be in the fight with us.  And at the end of the day we can’t ensure anything except we will be fighting for our freedom, for our country to take it back.

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member IconNov-18 8:18 AM 
To: All  (1231 of 1290) 
 9605.1231 in reply to 9605.1207 

November 18 - GEORGIA

         "A Georgia election worker shared the following about what ‘no stub’ means in the ballot request: These ballots were purposely missing tabs which are needed to keep track of the ballots."

More Georgia 2020 Corrupt Election Acts Revealed - 770,000 Ballots Ordered Shortly Before the 2020 Election Are Missing - Where Did They Go? ~~~~~~~~

Today Moncla reports that these million ballots ordered from Runbeck were ordered with “no stubs” as shown here:

A Georgia election worker shared the following about what ‘no stub’ means in the ballot request: These ballots were purposely missing tabs which are needed to keep track of the ballots.

Moncla then uncovers:

Mr. Sterling claimed that the ballots were ordered to serve as a backup plan in case the machines couldn’t be properly logic and accuracy tested before the election, as required by Georgia law. However, we reported that couldn’t have been the reason because the ballots were ordered after early voting had already begun. Our contention was basically that the machines were already being used at the time of the order; therefore, testing couldn’t have been the issue. ~~~~~~~~~~

We know Fulton County ordered 1,058,210 “Emergency” ballots. Fulton County and Gabriel Sterling affirm the reason that the ballots were ordered, and both claim they were never needed. They are now planning to destroy those ballots, but for some reason only have 284,901 to destroy. Which begs the question: Where are the missing 773,309 ballots?

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member IconNov-21 6:54 AM 
To: All  (1232 of 1290) 
 9605.1232 in reply to 9605.1227 

November 21, 2021 - PENNSYLVANIA

        "The videos are part of a larger lawsuit that will break the Pennsylvania voter fraud scandal wide open."

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/11/update-delaware-county-pennsylvania-lawsuit-going-blow-roof-off-democrat-voter-fraud-state/

Delaware County Pennsylvania Lawsuit Is Going to Blow the Roof Off of the Democrat Voter Fraud in the State

An election whistleblower in Delaware County, Pennsylvania released video evidence of the destruction of election data, documents, and equipment by election officials in the 2020 presidential election on Wednesday night.

The videos show election officials admitting to each other that their actions were illegal, even “a felony.” But the officials decided to destroy the election evidence anyway. In one video James Allen, the Director of Elections Operations is seen in a backroom telling officials to destroy evidence knowing it was a felony.

in another video, Tom Gallager, a lawyer for Delaware County, is seen destroying election tapes — a felony.

~~~~~~~~~~~

The videos are part of a larger lawsuit that will break the Pennsylvania voter fraud scandal wide open.

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member IconNov-22 4:22 AM 
To: All  (1233 of 1290) 
 9605.1233 in reply to 9605.1232 

November 22, 2021

        Even in liberal New York the politicians are out of touch with their voters, who actually seem to WANT their elections to be fair. 

New York Voters Reject Democrats’ Push for Election Changes

In one of the bluest states in the nation, voters soundly rejected proposed changes to election law that congressional Democrats are trying to impose nationally. 

New York state voters voted “no” on Democrat-supported amendments to the state Constitution, pitched as “voting rights” measures, that would have expanded absentee voting, allowed same-day voter registration, and changed the rules on drawing legislative districts. 

Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives this year have passed four bills that were variations of their initial bill, HR 1, dubbed the “For the People Act.” The measures would ban most state voter ID laws, allow same-day voter registration, expand ballot harvesting, and require unelected commissions instead of elected legislators to draw congressional districts. 

Already, New York is among 15 states that don’t have laws requiring voters to show identification at the polls. The other measures rejected by state voters, however, would have moved the Empire State even closer to the vision laid out in national Democrats’ HR 1. 

In each case, including this week, filibusters by Senate Republicans blocked Democrats’ election bills—and each time Democrats claimed the GOP was blocking the will of the people. 

The three New York ballot measures put that Democrat claim to the test, as state voters decisively defeated all three measures despite the party’s strong advantage in voter registration. Polling by the Honest Elections Project shows the Democrats’ goals for nationalizing elections and nullifying state voting laws are unpopular. 

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member IconNov-23 7:33 AM 
To: All  (1234 of 1290) 
 9605.1234 in reply to 9605.1233 

November 23, 2021 - FULTON COUNTY, GEORGIA

       "It’s clear that the Fulton County voting machines and systems were not L&A tested until after early voting. This means there was no check or verification on how the machines were programmed. It’s important to understand that the majority of all votes for the 2020 general election were cast on the untested machines during early voting (314,985 out of 523,000), making this a very serious problem."

Majority of Early Voting in Fulton County Done on Untested Machines

Kevin Moncla at UncoverDC reports:

Most states have laws that require voting equipment to be tested before each election to ensure they are functioning properly. This process is called Logic and Accuracy Testing “L&A” (or sometimes LAT) and is supposed to be open to the public. Every machine is analyzed through a systematic procedure to make sure the machines record and count votes accurately. They also check that the software on each machine is the proper, certified version and hasn’t been tampered with or manipulated.

In late September of 2020, two counties in Georgia were performing their L&A testing. Both discovered a problem in that the voting machines were not showing the second column of senate candidates. The counties reported the issue to the Secretary of State, who then directed elections officials across the state to cancel L&A testing until the problem could be fixed.
 

A few days later, on September 30th, a corrected version of the software was distributed to all counties in the state. Because the remedy required changes to the software, the new version had to be installed on every one of the state’s 30,000 machines before the L&A testing could be performed. With less than two weeks before the start of advanced/early voting on October 12th, there wasn’t enough time to schedule and adequately notice the public. The legally required L&A testing had to be completed before advanced/early voting.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

It’s clear that the Fulton County voting machines and systems were not L&A tested until after early voting. This means there was no check or verification on how the machines were programmed. It’s important to understand that the majority of all votes for the 2020 general election were cast on the untested machines during early voting (314,985 out of 523,000), making this a very serious problem. There’s also another issue:

The L&A testing should only be performed by county election officials. It is equally important and unacceptable that Dominion was contracted to perform L&A testing of their own equipment. The mandated testing process was not designed to rely upon third-party vendors’ self-verification.

Not only was testing of voting machines completed way after early voting started in Fulton County, Georgia, but this work was done by outsiders (Dominion) which never should have occurred.

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member IconNov-24 7:49 AM 
To: All  (1235 of 1290) 
 9605.1235 in reply to 9605.1234 

November 24, 2021 - WISCONSIN

BIG NEWS: Wisconsin Senate Committee Subpoenas Absentee Ballots and Voting Machine Records from City of Madison from 2020 Election

A Wisconsin Senate Committee has subpoenaed absentee and voting machine records from the City of Madison, Wisconsin.  The immediate response from Madison’s mayor is to not provide the items requested.

According to Channel 3000:

A Wisconsin Senate committee has issued a subpoena for Madison election records as part of an ongoing investigation into the 2020 election.

State Republicans announced plans for their own investigation in late October after the non-partisan Legislative Audit Bureau shared a report outlining inconsistent administration of election law based on surveys of ballots from around the state. The LAB’s report did not identify any cases of widespread fraud.

The subpoena — issued by the Senate Committee on Elections, Election Process Reform and Ethics and signed by Senate Majority Leader Devin LeMahieu (R-Oostburg), Senate President Chris Kapenga (R-Delafield) and committee chair Senator Kathleen Bernier (R-Chippewa Falls) — calls for the city to turn over all physical absentee ballot certificates for the November 2020 General Election and the results of tests on electronic voting machines used for the election.

The mayor of Madison immediately denied the request.  She shared that the Senate can have copies of the records requested but not the original ballots.  Of course, we’ve seen this stalling technique from other localities as well.  The problem with copies is that if they are not made at a certain level of precision, they are no good for forensic analysis.

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member IconNov-25 7:36 AM 
To: All  (1236 of 1290) 
 9605.1236 in reply to 9605.1235 

November 25, 2021 - WISCONSIN

            This is the first time that charges against people at high levels of state government have actually been submitted concerning the nationwide voter fraud of 2020. May this be a trend that will soon be snowballing throughout the country. Arizona charges should be coming very soon now, in my opinion.  

https://www.lawenforcementtoday.com/sheriff-announces-criminal-charges-against-election-commission/

Sheriff announces criminal charges being filed against almost every member of the election commission in the battleground state of Wisconsin

The sheriff of Racine County has announced that they are filing criminal charges against five of the six members of the Wisconsin Election Commission (WEC).

In a release issued on their Facebook page, Sheriff Schmaling said that the charges have been referred to the Racine County District Attorney, Patricia Hanson. 

The Sheriff’s Office has called on state attorney general Josh Kaul to launch an investigation into what they called illegal directives issued by the WEC, most specifically, the directive to not use the Special Voting Deputy process as required by state statute 6.875. 

In part, the Facebook post stated: 

“Based upon the failure of Attorney General Josh Kaul to initiate a statewide investigation, I have forwarded charging recommendations to the Racine County District Attorney’s Office for their review. The recommended charges are for Commissioners Margaret Bostelmann, Julie Glancey, Ann Jacobs, Dean Knudson, and Mark Thomsen.”

The recommended charges are the same for each commissioner, and include:

• Misconduct in Public Office in violation of Wis. Stat. § 946.12(2) (Felony)
• Election Fraud – Election Official Assisting with Violations in violation of Wis. Stat. § 12.13(2)(b)7 (Felony)
• Party to the Crime of Election Fraud – Receive Ballot Non-Election Official in violation of Wis. Stat. § 12.13(3)(n) (Misdemeanor)
• Party to the Crime of Election Fraud – Illegal Ballot Receipt in violation of Wis. Stat. § 12.13(3)(p) (Misdemeanor)
• Party to the Crime of Election Fraud – Solicit Assistance in violation of Wis. Stat. § 12.13(3)(s) (Misdemeanor)
The reasons for the recommended charges were clearly explained during the October 28, 2021, news conference and in the supporting documentation.”
 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 
The sheriff also highlighted several other residents who family members identified as not being capable of voting, but having ballots cast in their names. Of the 42 residents who voted, 9 of them are believed by family to have been incapable of voting and were taken advantage of by the staff who were “assisting” with the vote. 
 

Yet, it seems that every time a case like this is presented, the mainstream media chalks it up as debunked “conspiracy theory,” despite the mountains of evidence to the contrary. And it appears that no one in the MSM was immune. 

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member IconNov-26 8:32 AM 
To: All  (1237 of 1290) 
 9605.1237 in reply to 9605.1236 

November 26, 2021 - WISCONSIN

       "Democrats at the Wisconsin Capitol, on the other hand, are promising not to sit down with the state’s special elections investigator...Kleefisch’s lawsuit comes as lawmakers in Madison have three open investigations into WEC and the 2020 vote."

Wisconsin GOP gubernatorial candidate sues state election commission over drop boxes

The Republican frontrunner for governor wants the Wisconsin Supreme Court to rule on election drop boxes, voting in nursing homes, and moving polling places before Election Day.

Democrats at the Wisconsin Capitol, on the other hand, are promising not to sit down with the state’s special elections investigator.

Former Lt. Gov. (2011-2019) and 2022 gubernatorial contender Rebecca Kleefisch filed a lawsuit on Monday.

She’s asking the court to set rules for ballot dropboxes, which she says are not allowed under state law. She’s also asking the court to “correct” the Wisconsin Elections Commission on other election laws and on the process to change those laws.

“Wisconsinites are sick and tired of unelected bureaucrats intentionally ignoring the law. The lawsuit forces WEC to clean up their act prior to administering the 2022 election,” Kleefisch said in a statement.

The lawsuit specifically asks the court to remind WEC that commissioners must follow the state’s rulemaking process if they intend to change or interpret election laws in the state.

WEC offered guidance last fall that changed how absentee ballots could be collected at dropboxes, as well the now infamous order to keep special voting deputies out of nursing homes and instead have staffers fill out ballots for elderly voters. Kleefisch’s suit also says WEC cannot change, close, or consolidate polling places within 30 days of an election, a practice WEC allowed local election managers to perform last spring.

Kleefisch’s lawsuit comes as lawmakers in Madison have three open investigations into WEC and the 2020 vote.

 

 
From: WEBELIAHU DelphiPlus Member IconNov-28 6:08 AM 
To: All  (1238 of 1290) 
 9605.1238 in reply to 9605.1237 

November 28, 2021

      “According to former Washington Secretary of State Kim Wyman (R), Washington is a “voter intent” state by law. This means that voters are not disenfranchised if they mark a ballot differently than directed. When voter intent can be discerned, the vote will be counted.”

      Determining voter intent: Johnny Carson GIFs | Tenor

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/11/video-washington-state-election-official-caught-video-says-writing-name-napkin-can-count-ballot/

Washington State Election Official Caught on Video – Says Writing a Name on a Napkin Can Count as a Ballot

A recent election review training in Seattle, Washington has revealed several unbelievable voter procedures – including accepting a candidate’s name that is written on a napkin as a write-in ballot – which has left many people questioning how the state could possibly conduct free and fair elections with such lax measures in place.

Video of the training session that was posted online shows King County election officials reviewing examples of ballots that were filled out incorrectly, and it turns out they will accept just about anything as a valid vote.

In one example of a mail-in submission that was shown by the officials, a voter in Seattle’s most recent election sent in an envelope with no ballot, but included a newspaper clipping of Democratic candidate Lorena Gonzalez. Unbelievably, officials said that if the person who submitted the clipping had just circled the candidate’s name it would have been tallied in the final vote total.

~~~~~~~~~~~~

After showing the example to the trainees, one woman asks for clarification from the speaker by comparing the newspaper clipping to a voter sending in a napkin that’s been filled out with a candidate’s name and information about the race. Without skipping a beat the election official confirmed that yes, a napkin would be a proper replacement for a ballot, saying “that would be enough and we would count that as a vote.”

Another trainee can’t believe what he just heard so he questions the speaker about the rule in the elections manual that she is referencing to say napkins and newspaper clippings can be substituted for an official ballot. He points out how the “write-in in the wrong place” rule specifically states that the write-in needs to be “elsewhere on the ballot” and doesn’t say anything about napkins or any other item that can be changed in place of the ballot itself.

From the Post Millennial:

“According to former Washington Secretary of State Kim Wyman (R), Washington is a “voter intent” state by law. This means that voters are not disenfranchised if they mark a ballot differently than directed. When voter intent can be discerned, the vote will be counted.

Biden recently appointed Wyman to work in the White House and lead the Department of Homeland Security’s efforts to “protect future elections from foreign and domestic interference.”

Combine that ambiguous state law with mail-in ballots, and it equals a recipe for rigged elections for years to come.

 

Navigate this discussion: 1-8 9-18 19-28 ... 1209-1218 1219-1228 1229-1238 1239-1248 1249-1258 ... 1269-1278 1279-1288 1289-1290
Adjust text size:

Welcome, guest! Get more out of Delphi Forums by logging in.

New to Delphi Forums? You can log in with your Facebook, Twitter, or Google account or use the New Member Login option and log in with any email address.

Home | Help | Forums | Chat | Blogs | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
© Delphi Forums LLC All rights reserved.