Opinion polls on all subjects. Opinions? Heck yes, we have opinions - but we're *always* nice about it, even when ours are diametrically opposed to yours. Register your vote today!
8694 messages in 430 discussions
Latest 6/19/21 by Showtalk
3397 messages in 339 discussions
28269 messages in 1199 discussions
6474 messages in 337 discussions
6939 messages in 455 discussions
3090 messages in 251 discussions
7028 messages in 169 discussions
2930 messages in 1423 discussions
1010 messages in 97 discussions
3879 messages in 230 discussions
4127 messages in 164 discussions
7411 messages in 615 discussions
1866 messages in 103 discussions
14528 messages in 719 discussions
986 messages in 34 discussions
Everything has additives these days, unless you grew it yourself. And then of course when doing normal processing and cooking, you add additives although we often call them condiments.
when I saw steak was $33 a pound, I didn’t even consider it. Instead, I got a different type of meat for $4 a lb
Same here. I respond to high prices of one food kind with switching to something else.
People count on extras to take home as leftovers.
Usually condiments aren’t as harmful as secret additives. Supposedly subway head to change their bread recipe because it contained an ingredient also found in tires. They did and the bread became tasteless. They lost business over it.
Usually condiments aren’t as harmful as secret additives
Things like melamine to bulk up cereals, or formaldehyde to retard spoilage? (thinking of some of the stuff in Upton Sinclair's "The Jungle")
It sounds unappetizing. We need to read labels.
Both of those things are illegal to add to food, and both are actually toxic. But they have been used as additives in the bad old days. Melamine is used in the manufacture of countertops and not intended for ingestion. Formaldehyde of course is embalming fluid and is rather poisonous. Neither should be anywhere near food. But unfortunately, some unscrupulous characters have done unsavory things in the past and that is why we now have such a maze of regulatory red tape
Red tape is good if it saves lives.
Yeah, there is a correct amount of red tape to keep the worst people from exploiting unsuspecting consumers, desperate workers, etc.
Then there's an excess of red tape that merely hamstrings honest hardworking people with incomprehensible mazes and saps resources to deal with pointless regulatory compliance costs - often regulations written by clueless elite bureaucrats thousands of miles away who have never worked an honest day in their lives in an industry they know almost nothing about.
A classic example from the late 1970s. There was some federal regulatory type that was inspecting drilling rigs for some obscure safety measures that actually were less safe than some more innovative measures that companies were not allowed to do even though overseas, it had a better proven track record than the antiquated methods rigidly imposed in the US.
This dude really believed that you drill one kind of well and you get "regular". You drill another kind of well and you get unleaded. You drill yet another well and you get "premium" and finally another well produces diesel.
The frightening thing is the power this clueless bureaucrat had, the ability to totally shut down a drilling operation over almost anything petty.
And such a bureaucrat mindset was portrayed almost perfectly in the movie "Ghostbusters" where the EPA dude shut down the containment grid.