Opinion polls on all subjects. Opinions? Heck yes, we have opinions - but we're *always* nice about it, even when ours are diametrically opposed to yours. Register your vote today!
14526 messages in 719 discussions
Latest 10/23/21 by WALTER784
3384 messages in 338 discussions
28232 messages in 1199 discussions
6473 messages in 337 discussions
6931 messages in 455 discussions
3090 messages in 251 discussions
7027 messages in 169 discussions
2919 messages in 1419 discussions
1010 messages in 97 discussions
3879 messages in 230 discussions
4120 messages in 164 discussions
7411 messages in 615 discussions
1866 messages in 103 discussions
8694 messages in 430 discussions
986 messages in 34 discussions
Showtalk said...By now, we all know what happened. We don’t know what will be done as a result of their findings going public. I think it will be buried.
Then please tell me how Obama, Joe Biden and Clinton were all involved!
Because none of us know that yet and Durham's investigation is NOT over... it's still ongoing to find out exact that... who was pulling the strings and what other corrupt politicians were involved!
There is still quite a lot we don't know so please don't saw we all know by now because that is just not so! We don't all know by know because it's been mostly hidden from us for close to 5 years. Only the tip of the iceberg has recently been released.
Durham will prosecute where prosecution is necessary. But as he's still investigating, we don't have the full story yet.
No, we don’t have official information on all of it, but it’s been discussed ever since it happened.
Showtalk said...No, we don’t have official information on all of it, but it’s been discussed ever since it happened.
That's the exact opposite of what you said in your last post to me with >>>By now, we all know what happened.<<<
But we don't. And you have just officially admitted that your last post was wrong too!
You are so argumentative. We know or we “know.” You argued other opinions on other subjects that weren’t proved but you like them so you believe them.
Showtalk said...You are so argumentative. We know or we “know.” You argued other opinions on other subjects that weren’t proved but you like them so you believe them.
Well, you said we know (or as you've now added, the quotation marks [we "know"]), when in fact we don't know. And if we don't know then we don't know, but you said we know anyway. Had you not said we know when we don't know I wouldn't have called you on that one.
But then you come back in your next post and then agree that we don't know but only after I called you on it!
If you were more accurate with your words, I wouldn't call you so much on them.
This is a fun, open forum where we can toss around ideas. I’m not going to be more careful with my words. Deal with it, LOL.
Showtalk said...Deal with it, LOL.
Showtalk said...The link you posted is about theft in 2007-2008. It says he lives in Israel?
Sorry, that was an older one. See the attachment here.
It's 27 pages long. Most indictments are only 1 ~ 2 or perhaps 3 pages max.
27 pages is quite damning to say the least and as such, I doubt this one will get swept under the rug.
He should be prosecuted for that. Will it happen?
Only the first page is viewable. I checked PACER and only the first page is viewable there too. IME, most indictments are several pages long simply because jurisdictions must be declared, along with party identification, etc. if you can get the remainder of the indictment, please post it.