Opinion polls on all subjects. Opinions? Heck yes, we have opinions - but we're *always* nice about it, even when ours are diametrically opposed to yours. Register your vote today!
6299 messages in 415 discussions
Latest Sep-23 by BWArtist
1384 messages in 105 discussions
Latest Sep-19 by BWArtist
12159 messages in 705 discussions
Latest 3/27/18 by Bike (URALTOURIST1)
Latest Sep-13 by BWArtist
Latest Sep-2 by Cstar1
Latest Aug-27 by Carol Ann (Knit_Chat)
1755 messages in 180 discussions
2797 messages in 209 discussions
2560 messages in 207 discussions
508 messages in 43 discussions
920 messages in 93 discussions
3137 messages in 197 discussions
2224 messages in 97 discussions
4738 messages in 472 discussions
1088 messages in 80 discussions
4589 messages in 345 discussions
6732 messages in 448 discussions
This is a hot button issue but SURE, and only if specifically trained and cleared, the manner of carriage or stowage of weapons to be determined by competent local authority.
Not every Tom, Jane or Whoever should be handed a gun nor required to carry or have one, that is carrying the idea to absurdity. Way too many folks are simply unable to do much more than walk and chew gum as it is so having to discriminate target environments, take potentially life threatening actions or act as a person in any real authority is something that should be reserved to those capable of such actions in a reliable and consistent manner.