Opinion Polls: Delphi's Polling Place

Hosted by Showtalk

Opinion polls on all subjects. Opinions? Heck yes, we have opinions - but we're *always* nice about it, even when ours are diametrically opposed to yours. Register your vote today!

  • 4593
    MEMBERS
  • 102034
    MESSAGES
  • 66
    POSTS TODAY

Discussions

Do you agree with the decision to move Major League Baseball from Atlanta to Den   The Pleasure Seeking You: Entertainment & Sports

Started 4/6/21 by Showtalk; 3797 views.
The_Rock (JABRONI256)

From: The_Rock (JABRONI256) 

4/7/21

WALTER784 said:

But what I find most interesting is: MLB requires photo ID to pick up tickets from Will Call, but boycotts Georgia for voter ID law The league did not respond to multiple requests for an explanation of its photo ID policy for ticket retrieval. https://www.foxnews.com/us/mlb-photo-id-tickets-georgia-voter-law

False equivalency, a sports ticket to a major league event can be hundreds of dollars, you don't want people claiming tickets that aren't their's, voting on the other hand is a free activity, you're not paying for a chad.

WALTER784

From: WALTER784 

4/7/21

The_Rock (JABRONI256) said...

False equivalency, a sports ticket to a major league event can be hundreds of dollars, you don't want people claiming tickets that aren't their's, voting on the other hand is a free activity, you're not paying for a chad.

Nope... your false equivalency is a false equivalency.

An ID is an ID is an ID and is required for many things.

A photo ID is required for the following:
1. To purchase alcohol
2. To purchase cigarettes
3. To open a bank account
4. To apply for food stamps
5. To get welfare
6. To get Medicaid/Social Security
7. To receive unemployment
8. To rent or buy a house
9. To drive, buy or rent a car
10. To get on an airplane
11. To get married
12. To purchase a gun
13. To adopt a pet
14. To rent a hotel room
15. To apply for a hunting license
16. To apply for a fishing license
17. To buy a cell phone
18. To enter a casino
19. To pick up a subscription
20. To hold a rally or protest
21. To give blood donations
22. To buy an "M" rated video game
23. To buy nail polish at CVS
24. To purchase certain cold medicines
25. To enter State and Federal buildings
26. To pick up MLB tickets

So why shouldn't an ID be required to vote?

Just one good reason would be fine!

FWIW

 

  • Edited April 7, 2021 11:58 am  by  WALTER784
Showtalk
Host

From: Showtalk 

4/7/21

I saw an interview series and the Atlanta Black community is quite upset about it.  It’s very easy for us to say it no big deal.  It’s not so easy for those losing income to agree with it. In fact, they are quite angry.

Showtalk
Host

From: Showtalk 

4/7/21

Colorado has more restrictive voting laws than Atlanta.  They aren’t taking about that.

Showtalk
Host

From: Showtalk 

4/7/21

Sheer hypocrisy since Colorado requires voter IDs. This is a manufactured, fake crisis that hurts people.

Showtalk
Host

From: Showtalk 

4/7/21

It’s also required to vote in Denver where they moved the games.

WALTER784

From: WALTER784 

4/7/21

Showtalk said...

Colorado has more restrictive voting laws than Atlanta.  They aren’t taking about that.

Yep... and not only that, but Atlanta is predominantly Black where as Colorado is predominantly White... so go figure.

This whole woke thing backfired on the Democrats big time...

And now they have to eat the crow Joe talked about!

FWIW

  • Edited April 7, 2021 1:08 pm  by  WALTER784
Showtalk
Host

From: Showtalk 

4/7/21

But the media isn’t talking about kids in cages, sleeping on cement floors.

WALTER784

From: WALTER784 

4/8/21

Conservative news media is... liberal news media is not!

When liberal media don't report something... that's because they want to cover it up!

FWIW

WALTER784

From: WALTER784 

4/8/21

Maybe Coke Should Be Cancelled for Its Nazi Past

Woke Coke seems less concerned with selling sugar water these days than selling Americans on the idea that whites are not worthy of respect or equal protection under the law.  A few weeks ago, a whistleblower revealed Coca-Cola’s discriminatory employee training program equating racism with “whiteness.”  In a series of online work assignments, Coke goes so far as to instruct its white employees to, “try to be less white.”  How does one “be less white”?  Coke answers that explicitly: by being less “oppressive,” “arrogant,” “certain,” “defensive,” and “ignorant,” and being more “humble” and “break[ing] with white solidarity.”  For Coke, judging people based on the color of their skin is not only tolerated but also company policy. 

If the company’s “de-whitening” efforts weren’t sufficient proof that Coca-Cola prioritizes a person’s skin color over a person’s talents and individual character, it drove the point home with a letter sent to its outside legal counsel demanding that law firms assign attorneys representing the Coca-Cola Company based, not upon the quality of lawyers’ work, but rather upon lawyers’ racial classification.  Going forward, Coke will penalize and reduce its fees to law firms unable to hit certain racial quotas.

Now Coca-Cola’s CEO is joining other race hucksters to claim that sensible voter ID laws meant to curb fraud in Georgia’s elections should be seen as nothing short of white Americans’ attempt to disenfranchise black voters — a loaded accusation not based in reason or analysis of the law’s merits but rather in raw emotionalism intended to pit one group of Americans against another. 

Surely a company that regurgitates nasty racial stereotypes against whites so effortlessly while seeking to eliminate them from its workforce doesn’t really believe white people can ever scrub all that icky whiteness away for good, no matter how many rounds of re-education they are forced to endure.  As Coca-Cola’s training materials suggest, racism is just part of whites’ DNA.  Perhaps the company could have saved future employees a lot of trouble by simply hanging a sign on its front door reading, “No Uppity Whites Allowed.”

Racial stereotypes, racial classifications and quotas, explicitly racist indoctrination — why is Coca-Cola so obsessed with discriminating against people based on the color of their skin rather than evaluating all of the individual characteristics that make each person a unique member of the human race?  Perhaps racism is in the company’s own DNA, not at all different from the way the beverage company judges white Americans as racists for historical injustices in which they claimed no part. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2021/04/maybe_coke_should_be_cancelled_for_its_nazi_past.html

FWIW

TOP