Opinion Polls: Delphi's Polling Place
Hosted by Showtalk
Opinion polls on all subjects. Opinions? Heck yes, we have opinions - but we're *always* nice about it, even when ours are diametrically opposed to yours. Register your vote today!
- 4999
MEMBERS - 129982
MESSAGES - 32
POSTS TODAY
Discussions
Fair Elections/Voter Fraud The Serious You: How Current Events Affect You
Started 11/11/21 by WALTER784; 301058 views.
Staff
From: WALTER784
May-8
'Massive in scale': State officials admit 2020 election contaminated with ineligible voters
'What struck me was the sheer numbers'
By Bob Unruh
Published April 23, 2023 at 10:56am
The truth about the failings in the 2020 presidential election is coming out – gradually.
After all of the complaints about unsecure voting procedures, voting system failures and outside and unacceptable election influences during the 2020 vote, Democrats still contend it was more or less a perfect election.
The evidence shows otherwise.
While it doesn't involve millions, or even thousands, of votes, a case in Wisconsin has documented actual dirt in the vote there.
According to a report from the Thomas More Society, which has been investigating reports of election problems since the event, one county clerk in Wisconsin reviewed about 1,000 names from the state's list of people that a court had declared incompetent to vote.
And 95 of them voted in 2020.
Erick Kaardal, Thomas More Society special counsel, has been at the forefront of the election integrity investigations from the project’s inception.
"What struck me was the sheer numbers," he explained. "When the allegations of shenanigans occurring in Wisconsin nursing homes surfaced with the 2020 election, the potential for nursing home and assisted living resident voter manipulation, abuse, and fraud, was massive in scale. There are over 91,000 nursing home residents in the State of Wisconsin. From forty to fifty percent of these residents suffer from varying degrees of dementia."
WND is now on Trump's Truth Social! Follow us @WNDNews
While the numbers in such cases likely would make no difference in a national election, what is known about that is that legacy and social media corporations worked together, at the FBI's request, to suppress accurate reporting about the Biden family's international business scheming, revealed on a computer Hunter Biden abandoned at a repair shop.
A Media Research Center poll showed had that information been routinely reported, Joe Biden almost certainly would have lost the election.
Further, there was the undue influence from the $400 million plus that Mark Zuckerberg handed out through foundations to local officials, who often used it specifically to recruit voters from Democrat districts.
The legal team explained, "From the onset of Thomas More Society’s Election Integrity Initiative in 2022, there has been glaring evidence of an ongoing problem with ineligible voters casting ballots. This issue, which first came to light in nursing homes shortly after the 2020 election, has finally been acted upon by election officials in Dane County, Wisconsin.
"In spring 2022, attorneys from the Thomas More Society filed multiple complaints with the Wisconsin Election Commission on behalf of family members of people under court orders deeming them incompetent to vote. Each case involved a voter residing in a nursing home, who had been declared 'incompetent' yet, according to the state voter database WisVote, had cast ballots in multiple elections despite their ineligibility."
The organization said Dane County Clerk Scott McDonell did a review of about 1,000 names from the state’s list of people that a court had declared as incompetent to vote and found 95 examples of someone who voted after being added to the 'no vote' list."
"We are pleased that Dane County has acknowledged the problem, and we reiterate County Clerk Scott McDonell’s call for the Wisconsin legislature to fix a broken system – and ensure that the Wisconsin Election Commission does their job of enforcing the state’s election laws," Kaardal said.
FWIW
Staff
From: WALTER784
May-9
Kari Lake bombshell: State supreme court reverses its own major decision
Orders hearing on signature verification issue
By Jack Davis, The Western Journal
Published May 5, 2023 at 5:40pm
Arizona’s Supreme Court delivered a slap on the wrist to Republican Kari Lake’s attorney on Thursday while demanding one of Lake’s core concerns finally get attention.
The good news-bad news ruling came as part of Lake’s effort to show that misconduct impacted the 2022 election for the governor of Arizona to the point where the victory of Democrat Katie Hobbs over Lake should be thrown out.
Although Lake has lost most of her court appeals, in March, Arizona’s Supreme Court directed a lower court to hold a hearing into Lake’s allegation that Maricopa County did not follow its signature verification process in the 2022 election.
That has not yet happened, but it will now.
As noted by Just the News, the court ordered on Thursday "that the trial court shall forthwith conduct such proceedings as appropriate to resolve" the allegations regarding signature verification.
In trying to cut to the core of the ruling, Rasmussen Reports tweeted, "Apparently upwards of 300,000 mail ballots in Maricopa County Arizona will now be checked for missing or mismatched signature issues in a race that has captured international attention and is divided by less than 15,000 'votes.'”
Arizona’s Supreme Court on Thursday also rejected a request from those Lake is suing to be recompensed for attorney’s fees.
As noted by Newsweek, Lake and her legal team were reprimanded for their choice of words by the court, which sanctioned her attorneys and imposed a $2,000 fine.
35,563 ballots she had claimed were added to Maricopa County's total votes cast. Lake had framed her contention as an "undisputed fact."
Arizona Chief Justice Robert Brutinel said on Thursday that the claim cannot be proven, and Lake's lawyers were in the wrong for violating state and court conduct rules that bar false statements.
"Not only is that allegation strongly disputed by the other parties, this Court concluded and expressly stated that the assertion was unsupported by the record, and nothing in Lake's Motion for Leave to file a motion for reconsideration provides reason to revisit that issue," the court order fining Lake’s lawyers $2,000 read.
"Although Lake may have permissibly argued that an inference could be made that some ballots were added, there is no evidence that 35,563 ballots were and, more to the point here, this was certainly disputed by the Respondents. The representation that this was an 'undisputed fact' is therefore unequivocally false,” the order read.
Brutinel said he accepts there is "attendant hyperbole" from political campaigns, "[b]ut once a contest enters the judicial arena, rules of attorney ethics apply,” according to Axios.
Kurt Olsen, one of Lake's two attorneys on the case, was not downcast at the ruling.
"We respectfully disagree with the Court’s holding but look forward to presenting our case at trial," he said.
Lake's contention is that because Maricopa County's signature verification process is flawed, the outcome of the election is tainted.
A report from Just the News indicates that the technology employed by Maricopa County might not be very effective at catching fraudulent signatures. The report said Maricopa County uses a service called Verus Pro that is part of the software offered by Runbeck Election Services, which has a contract with the county.
At that point, differences emerged. Maricopa County said signatures are verified using “calling, mailing, texting and emailing the voters.”
The site said it was told by a county representative: “Maricopa County does not use Verus Pro for signature verification.”
However, Just the News said former Arizona Assistant Attorney General Jennifer Wright gave the site a copy of a contract effective last July between Maricopa County and Runbeck.
Signatures sent to Runbeck “are assigned a score based
...[Message truncated]
Host
From: Showtalk
May-9
Assuming they can get a fair evaluation, she has won. If they review ballots but their equipment can’t detect fraud, then she loses everything.
Staff
From: WALTER784
May-9
Signature verification is the biggest point.
The rest... we'll have to wait and see!
FWIW
Staff
From: WALTER784
May-10
VIDEO: “Multiple Voter Records Found!” – Maricopa County Voter’s Provisional Ballot Wrongfully NOT COUNTED After Check-In Finds DEAD VOTER (Roughly 8000 Uncounted Ballots Remain in Arizona)
By Jordan Conradson
Apr. 25, 2023 8:15 am
A new video of an Election Day failure in Maricopa County confirms that some Election Day voters were disenfranchised with canceled voter registrations and forced to cast provisional ballots that were never counted.
The Gateway Pundit reported that voting machine failures and tabulation issues led to massive and unprecedented voter disenfranchisement at the polls.
Voting machines and printers suddenly stopped working at nearly 60% of voting centers the moment the polls opened on election day. Republican voters were forced to wait in extremely long lines, turned away from the polls, or told to deposit their ballots in the questionable “box 3” for misread ballots.
These issues were present ALL DAY at some locations on the day when Republicans turned out to vote at a ratio of 3:1 over Democrats. This was clearly an intentional act aimed at Republican candidates who were soaring in the polls.
Conservatives Are Looking For Ways To Boycott and Move Spending Away From Woke Corporations -- Here Is One Way To Do It
As The Gateway Pundit reported, at Least 517 voters – Nearly DOUBLE the margin of victory In Abe Hamadeh’s Attorney General race – left the long lines in Maricopa County after the polls closed on election day.
Also, more than 2,500 provisional ballots were rejected in Maricopa County due to voter registration cancellations or polling location check-in failures. These rejected ballots overwhelmingly targeted Republican voters.
The Gateway Pundit recently reported that The Mohave County Superior Court ordered Oral Arguments on May 16 in response to Abe Hamadeh’s Motion for New Trial in his lawsuit contesting the closest race in Arizona history.
Hamadeh is requesting that the Judge “allow the parties to inspect all ballots that failed to record a vote in the attorney general race (known as an “undervote”) in all 15 counties to confirm that the machines properly and appropriately counted every vote in the attorney general race.” Roughly 8,000 provisional ballots remain across the state, and Hamadeh believes they will overturn the election for Attorney General.
In the video below from a Maricopa County voting location, a woman is experiencing problems checking into her voting location. After scanning the voter’s driver’s license, a message on the screen said, “Multiple voter records found! Please raise your hand for assistance.” When a poll worker scanned their access card, a voter registration for somebody else, who reportedly died in another state in 2020, appeared on the screen. One person is heard saying, “So he’s using your driver’s [license].
Arizona Daily Independent reports that “the voter was forced to cast a provisional ballot which she later learned was rejected. At no time did she receive a notice from any government entity that her voter registration had lapsed, was compromised, or was canceled for any reason.”
Abe Hamadeh tweeted the numbers for provisional ballots in Maricopa County that disproportionately affected Republican voters. 48% of the 2,510 rejected ballots in Maricopa County belonged to Republican voters.
Maricopa County Provisional Ballots that were ACCEPTED: Republican — 1,171 // (39%) Democrat — 834 // (28%) Other/No Party — 900 // (31%)
Maricopa County Provisional Ballots that were REJECTED because the government claims they were not registered to vote: Republican — 1,204 // (48%) Democrat — 670 // (26%) Other/No Party — 636 (24%)
“It’s simple. If the judge allows us to inspect and count the ballots – we win,” said Abe previously.
Additionally, as the Gateway Pundit reported shortly after the November 8 General Election, an election judge told us that two Democratic voters were registered to vote just days before Election Day, using out-of-state driver’s licenses in at least one polling location in Chandler, Arizona. One voter was allowed to register after she “indicated she had only been in the valley for a few weeks.” They told us that after their inspector, Ronda Owens, called the election hotline, both voters were “suddenly” registered to vote on regular ballots and not provisionally.
...[Message truncated]
Host
From: Showtalk
May-10
My stat has been mishandling provisional ballots for years. They are only counted if an election is close, so if some e is forced to use one it may never even count.
Staff
From: WALTER784
May-10
All ballot cast should be counted, regardless of whether the race is close or not... including provisional ballots.
Otherwise, that's voter suppression and a form of voter fraud.
FWIW
Staff
From: WALTER784
May-10
Then get everybody who had their ballots put into the provisional box stand up and call fraud. For those who have the time, ensure they stay on premise to ensure that every ballot in the provisional box is counted.
If they don't, take the election officials (all of them) to court in a civil lawsuit for election fraud and ensure the provisional ballots are finally counted!
FWIW
Staff
From: WALTER784
May-11
MUST READ: The ERIC False Narrative
By Jim Hoft
Apr. 27, 2023
After 7 states dumped the Leftist-controlled ERIC, its supporters started selling a false narrative that there are no alternatives to ERIC.
What does ERIC do? It claims to find people who move from one state to another. It claims to find dead voters.
So what? That’s not where the fraud is. Election fraud, 85% or more – is baked into mail-in ballot voting.
As Banks Fail and Americans Scramble to Protect Retirement Accounts With Physical Gold and Silver, A Faith-Based Company Shows Them How
What does ERIC do to fight mail-in ballot fraud?
Election fraud from people living in two locations is less than 1% of all election fraud. Election fraud is overwhelmingly – think 85% – from mail-in ballots tied to people who do not regularly vote.
The big stuff – at-scale election ballot fraud is sovereign – election commissions at the county or state or both levels are in on it. Election commissions commit election fraud or submissively acquiesce while someone else does it for them.
ERIC doesn’t check for that!
Anyone recall ERIC reporting that in Arizona thousands of zip codes changed days before the 2022 election – when mail-in ballots were going out? Or that people older than Julius Caesar still vote in several ERIC states?
ERIC is a system that by definition is blind to over 85% of the current fraud in election rolls – yet it remains the core election fraud system for two dozen states!
85% of election fraud comes from mail-in ballots and ERIC does not address that ocean of fraud!
When a Secretary of State clings to a system blind to the overwhelming percentage of fraud, they are acquiescing to voter fraud and lying to their citizens.
ERIC is a convenient black box protecting Secretaries of State and Governors from challenges about fixing election fraud. Since ERIC owned the moniker “cleaning voter rolls,” hapless politicos for years said “we clean voter rolls with ERIC.”
“We clean voter rolls with ERIC” – said at the same time everyone knows ERIC couldn’t find a fake mail-in ballot operation if it had a lighthouse attached to it.
The politician pays ERIC to clean voter rolls, is immunized from pressure to run a clean election while Leftists gin up fake mail-in ballot scams operating in plain sight – safe in the knowledge ERIC won’t report it.
Ever wonder why Leftists, who fight taking dead people off voter rolls because maybe they might resurrect, support ERIC with such passion?
ERIC doesn’t test for mail-in ballot fraud – and that’s where the votes are!
Doubt me?
We have the data for states AFTER ERIC cleaned their voter rolls.
Unlike ERIC, we are real-time.
Unlike ERIC, we compare property tax rolls and other databases against voter rolls and find what ERIC missed – which is more than they find.
Like the 4,000 registered voters in Nevada living in vacant lots and hotels.
Or the 107,000 changes to a county’s election database days before the Arizona election.
Perhaps one might be interested in the 40,000 inactive voters in Missouri who voted?
Maybe the 41 registered voters in the Branson, Missouri hotel?
How about the Harris County, Texas voters registered in jail?
The Fractal team found all of these – and thousands more, AFTER ERIC cleaned voter rolls.
You are being sold a fake narrative, that ERIC is cleaning voter rolls.
...[Message truncated]
TOP