Opinion Polls: Delphi's Polling Place

Hosted by Showtalk

Opinion polls on all subjects. Opinions? Heck yes, we have opinions - but we're *always* nice about it, even when ours are diametrically opposed to yours. Register your vote today!

  • 4706
    MEMBERS
  • 107340
    MESSAGES
  • 24
    POSTS TODAY

Discussions

WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

May-27

Yep... at the Sec of State level corruption to say the least...

And then there is this too:

HUGE EXCLUSIVE: Voting Systems Used Across the Country Have Functionality to Create Ballots and Fill Them Out – Why Are They Allowed?

By Joe Hoft
Published May 12, 2022 at 7:00am

This week auditors in New Mexico uncovered a number of material issues in their work to date.  One item that we learned is that the voting system is able to fill out ballots.  Combined with what we knew some time ago, this is devastating. 
 
This past week auditors in New Mexico identified that the voting systems used in the counties under review have the ability to fill in ballots.  This was noted in the presentation before officials in Otero County, New Mexico.  We then learned earlier today that a prior New York state investigation identified malicious code that could do this.
 
In addition to this breaking news, TGP identified other system issues within the voting systems.  According to the Dominion website, its election system has the ability to print ballots.
 
The feature is explained in the Dominion Voting Systems manual on page 30:
 
4. Alternatively, if allowed by your jurisdiction, use the Automated Test Deck application. This application, available from Dominion Voting, can automatically generate the appropriate test decks and expected results totals.
 
Georgia purchased the “Automated Test Desk” option according to its procurement document reported at its website.  See the following procurement document – see page 59:
 
Automated Test Deck Creation – The creation of automated, comprehensive test decks is an optional service provided by Dominion to assist customers in conducting Logic & Accuracy testing. Using the Election Day database, a series of pre-marked ballots are generated based on a computer algorithm designed to provide the highest assurance of system accuracy. When scanned these decks create known outcomes that can be compared with tabulated results. The elimination of error due to mistakes in hand-marking provides a higher degree of
confidence in test results.”
 
There is also evidence that Philadelphia precincts had this option from Dominion also, see page 89.  And Michigan also, see page 37.
 
The more we investigate and uncover information related to the voting machines and systems used in the 2020 Election, the more that we realize that they never should have been used.  How secure is a voting system from wrongdoing that has functionality in it that allows individuals to create ballots and then fill them out?

HUGE EXCLUSIVE: Voting Systems Used Across the Country Have Functionality to Create Ballots and Fill Them Out - Why Are They Allowed? (thegatewaypundit.com)

FWIW

Showtalk
Host

From: Showtalk

May-27

Given all the things wrong with voting machines, why aren’t they banned?  Even if nothing went wrong, the possibility means they aren’t trustworthy.  Don’t we all want to know our elections are as honest as they can be?  I don’t see why this is even in question anymore. 

WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

May-27

Absolutely... 

Dominion and other voting related machines should never ever be used in any future election.

But... it seems to be used by some states in the primary 2022 election and perhaps in the Nov 2022 elections as well, but they should be totally banned.

Otherwise, we can never have another fair election again.

FWIW

Showtalk
Host

From: Showtalk

May-27

We need to watch how this plays out.

WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

May-27

Call for forensics audits in all counties of all States that continue to use Dominion!

FWIW

WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

May-29

We need to watch every election moving forward from now on.

Did you know that Illinois continues to count ballots received after the election date? And will continue doing so unless this lawsuit is won!!!

MAY 25, 2022
JUDICIAL WATCH

Judicial Watch Files Federal Lawsuit against Illinois to Stop Counting of Ballots Received After Election Day – Plaintiffs Include Member of Congress

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today it filed a federal lawsuit against Illinois on behalf of Congressman Mike Bost and two other registered Illinois voters to prevent state election officials from extending Election Day for 14 days beyond the date established by federal law (Rep. Michael J. Bost, Laura Pollastrini, and Susan Sweeney v. The Illinois State Board of Elections and Bernadette Matthews (No. 1:22-cv-02754)).
 
Judicial Watch argues that Illinois election law violates federal law, which defines Election Day as “the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November of every even-numbered year.” The complaint states:
 
Despite Congress’ clear statement regarding a single national Election Day, Illinois has expanded Election Day by extending by 14 days the date for receipt and counting of vote-by-mail ballots.
 
Judicial Watch points out that the current Illinois election law allows vote-by-mail ballots received up to 14 days “after the polls close on Election Day” to be counted as if they were cast and received on or before Election Day. Illinois law also provides that “[e]ven vote-by-mail ballots without postmarks shall be counted if received up to 14 calendar days after Election Day if the ballots are dated on or before Election Day.”
 
Judicial Watch’s lawsuit notes:
 
The Board … advised that the number of ballots received after Election Day through November 17, 2020, could materially affect the unofficial election results.
 
***
 
[Illinois’ own data indicates that] Illinois received 266,417 vote-by-mail ballots statewide during the period from November 3rd through November 17th.
 
***
 
[M]ost of the 266,417 vote-by-mail ballots were received after Election Day, which would mean that as many as 4.4% of votes cast in 2020 were received after Election Day. [Emphasis in original]
 
Judicial Watch argues that holding voting open for 14 days past Election Day violates the constitutional rights of voters and candidates:
 
By counting untimely and illegal ballots received after Election Day and diluting Plaintiffs’ timely cast and received ballots, Defendants, acting under color of Illinois law, have deprived and are depriving Plaintiffs of rights protected under the First Amendment and 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
 
“We are supposed to have an Election Day, not Election Weeks – or months. Illinois’ 14-day extension of Election Day beyond the date set by Congress is illegal, violates the civil rights of voters, and encourages fraud,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.
 
In a separate Judicial Watch election lawsuit against Illinois, a federal court ruled in June 2021 that the lawsuit could proceed against Illinois officials for denying public access to Illinois’ voter registration database.
 
In February 2022, Judicial Watch settled its lawsuit against North Carolina and two of its counties after the North Carolina removed over 430,000 ineligible names from the voter rolls.
 
In March 2022, a Maryland court ruled in favor of Judicial Watch’s challenge to Maryland’s Democratic legislature “extreme” congressional redistricting gerrymander.
 
For more than 25 years, Judicial Watch has been known for its aggressive, leading-edge use of public records laws and lawsuits, as well as taxpayer, civil rights and whistleblower protection litigation to fight government corruption. Judicial Watch is a national leader in voting integrity and voting rights. As part of this effort, Judicial Watch assembled a team of highly experienced voting rights attorneys who stopped discriminatory elections in Hawaii, and cleaned up voter rolls in California, Ohio, Indiana, and Kentucky, among other achievements.
 
Christine Svenson, Esq., of Svenson Law Offices in Palatine, Illinois, is assisting Judicial Watch with the lawsuit.

...[Message truncated]
View Full Message
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

May-29

EXCLUSIVE: DEMOCRATS IMPLICATED — Georgia Ballot Traffickers Were Using Democrat Officials’ Offices as Stopping Points During Ballot Drop Runs

By Jim Hoft
Published April 4, 2022 at 3:59pm

In late January film producer Dinesh D’Souza released the trailer for his upcoming movie “2000 Mules.”
 
True the Vote has been working with Dinesh D’Souza to create this bombshell movie that uses footage and tracking data they obtained of ballot boxes in key states across America used to steal the election in 2020.
 
100 Percent Fed Up added this on the investigation in January —
 
Using commercially available geo-tracking cell phone data, True the Vote was able to take footage from drop boxes across America in key states like Georgia and others to track over 2,000 ‘mules” wearing gloves and disguises to stuff ballot boxes.
 
In early January The Gateway Pundit reported to our readers that our organization agreed to hand over exclusive video from a major battleground state to True the Vote for their ballot trafficking investigation in the 2020 election.
 
The Gateway Pundit shared never before seen ballot dropbox surveillance video, 24 Terabytes of footage, with the election integrity group in their ongoing investigation.
 
Special thanks to Patty McMurray at 100 Percent Fed Up for her assistance in this agreement.
 
The investigation is ongoing. The movie is set for a spring release.
 
That brings us to today.
 
On Sunday Turning Point USA Founder and President Charlie Kirk was in St. Louis and joined Joe Hoft from The Gateway Pundit and Real Talk 93.3 to discuss the 2020 election and related topics.
 
During the interview, Charlie Kirk says he spent time with Dinesh D’Souza the producer of “2000 Mules.” Charlie then dropped this bomb.
 
Charlie Kirk: You have the surveillance video that Dinesh is using in his upcoming movie where people are coming out of the car with piles of ballots. Illegal. You cannot do that in Georgia. Stuffing them into ballot boxes funded by Mark Zuckerberg… Coming night after night after night, the same guys. They’re wearing latex gloves on camera, after they put the ballots in the drop boxes they take off the latex gloves because they don’t want fingerprints on the ballots and they take pictures of every ballot. And you’ll see this video footage. I had a six-hour meeting with Dinesh D’Souza and I saw all the evidence for myself. I was really skeptical at first and we dove into it. And I was blown away at how the sophisticated technology they used to be able to track these people using cellphone technology because your cellphone is letting off a ping every 3 to 5 seconds. You can go buy those pings off of certain geographic areas… They saw that some of these mules would visit these drop boxes every night. And then go to Stacey Abrams’ headquarters and then go back to the drop boxes.
 
This is a huge development that implicates the Democrat Party directly and Stacey Abrams in particular in the ballot trafficking operations in the state of Georgia.
 
Carson's Over-The-Counter Memory Drug Triples Memory...
Dentists Shocked: Basic Vitamin Stops Teeth Falling Out & Rebuild Gums
We later confirmed from a second source that a second Democrat office in the state of Georgia was also used as a stop for the dozens of ballot traffickers in the state.
 
Later this afternoon we reached out to True the Vote founder and president Catherine Engelbrecht who is spearheading this investigation.  Catherine told us,
 
“We cannot confirm anything about organization names right now by advice of counsel.  But we can confirm that two of the addresses were among a data set of those we reviewed.”
 
Catherine also said there are a number of investigations taking place right now.
The pieces are starting to fall into place.
 
God willing, the truth will be exposed to the American people.

EXCLUSIVE: DEMOCRATS IMPLICATED -- Georgia Ballot Traffickers Were Using Demo
...[Message truncated]
View Full Message
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

May-29

If I donated $1 million to any GOP candidate... what would happen to me? Now read this...

George Soros Drops $1 Million Into Stacey Abrams’ Campaign for Georgia Governor

By Joe Hoft
Published May 8, 2022 at 9:00am

This really should surprise no one.  George Soros donated a million dollars to Stacey Abrams’ campaign for governor.
 
While Americans are limited to the amount of money they can donate to a political candidate, billionaires like George Soros do whatever they want.  Townhall reported:
 
Billionaire George Soros donated $1M to Stacey Abrams’ gubernatorial campaign just a few days after she qualified to run in March. He donated the funds through a super PAC. Soros made the donation through Democracy PAC II to One Georgia, Abrams’ leadership PAC…
 
…There are limits to how much an individual or business can contribute to a candidate. Leadership PACs get around those limits. They can raise as much money as they can for a candidate. This year Soros is giving his super PAC, Democracy PAC II, $125M to sway elections across the country. He is contributing to both Democrat groups and candidates in the 2022 midterm election cycle. Democracy PAC II is run by his son.
 
The reason this is no surprise is that Abrams is closely connected to the leaders of the Democrat Party. After she was the Georgia House Minority Leader she landed a position on creepy John Podesta’s Center for American Progress in 2018.
 
Abrams was heavily involved in the 2020 Election.  She made a lot of money the past couple of years, too.

George Soros Drops $1 Million Into Stacey Abrams' Campaign for Georgia Governor (thegatewaypundit.com)

FWIW

Showtalk
Host

From: Showtalk

May-29

We have one National Election Day. States each have one primary election day.  My state has always had vote by mail, and they must be postmarked before and received by a given date. 

Showtalk
Host

From: Showtalk

May-29

Goergia has supposedly cleaned up their voting process.

TOP