The above poll options were all included in a Rasmussen poll.

www.rasmussenreports.com

COVID-19: Democratic Voters Support Harsh Measures Against Unvaccinated

While many voters have become skeptical toward the federal government's response to the COVID-19 pandemic, a majority of Democrats embrace restrictive policies, including punitive measures against those who haven't gotten the COVID-19 vaccine.

Read more from www.rasmussenreports.com

People don't like to be had, so they are angry that some of us are still free.  

Voted 7 but really 1 and 7. I'm for making things as tough as possible on the vaccinated without actually throwing them into jail, although Canada's charter does have a provision for this if necessary. Quebec is doing it the right way, take away vices, they tied alcohol and pot purchase directly to vaccination status, thousands got their first dose after that, now there's going to be a significant fine for being unvaccinated, that will likely be a charter challenge but our system of jurisprudence could take years to render a judgement and enact injunctive relief so thousands more will get vaccinated, a necessary trade off in my opinion.

Apparently so.

That is the difference between a free society and one that is restricted.

I agree, "I am for making things as tough as possible on the vaccinated without actually throwing them in to jail."  

LOL!!!!  I know it's a type-o but you vaccinated wouldn't like it if we were trying to put restrictions on you. 

I was shocked that 30% want to remove children from their parents.  Of course, Rasmussen had to ask the questions so someone thought these were all decent poll questions.

I read a LOT about the Nazi regime.  It is scary that some of what is happening today echoes some of what was going on then.   The idea of removing children of the home of unvaccinated is in the same vein of removing disabled people and children from homes.  

I don't doubt the reported results of the poll, but I do question the "likely to vote R or D" simply from personal opinion.  Ive been polled when younger and if I felt the poll was tilted, or sometimes just to be obstinate, I would answer the opposite of which party I would support on the one issue.  So in this particular case I would answer the poll questions with my D tendencies favoring some type of accountability on vaccine refusal, but claim to be R on who I would likely support.  I suspect it's my debate history which often  required I "defend" a theory or position that was the opposite of how I felt IRL.