I've read this more than 5 times trying to make logical sense of it, but in the end... all I see is illogic...

>>>The BBC has prioritized an accused rapist's pronoun preference over a victim's testimony, and the truth. A woman who was allegedly attacked and raped by a biological male who identifies as transgender referred to the individual as him, undoubtedly because that individual allegedly raped her with a body part that only belongs to males.<<<

BBC censors rape victim's testimony to avoid 'misgendering' accused rapist | The Post Millennial

FWIW

Now their ridiculous extremes have taken it too far.  They could call the accused a woman with male body parts.  Assuming they  want to maintain the new pronouns.