Opinion Polls: Delphi's Polling Place

Opinion polls on all subjects. Opinions? Heck yes, we have opinions - but we're *always* nice about it, even when ours are diametrically opposed to yours. Register your vote today!

5088
MEMBERS
133187
MESSAGES
61
POSTS TODAY

Discussions

Climate Change farce... The Serious You: How Current Events Affect You

Started 9/8/22 by WALTER784; 45969 views.

Msg 309 of 368 to Showtalkshowtalk

In reply toRe: msg 308

Staff

From: WALTER784

Aug-29

The activists & politicians all push that it's the carbon dioxide that's destroying the earth.

This is from 7 years ago, but it is still just as valid today and might help explain their delusion.

FWIW

Msg 310 of 368 to WALTER784WALTER784

In reply toRe: msg 309

Host

From: Showtalk

Aug-29

Money…power…headlines

Msg 311 of 368 to Showtalkshowtalk

In reply toRe: msg 310

Staff

From: WALTER784

Aug-29

Yep, and that is just as true today as it was 7 years ago when that video was made.

FWIW

Msg 312 of 368

In reply toRe: msg 311

Staff

From: WALTER784

Sep-1

<...>With the world population sitting at 8,057,937,765, that would mean we only have to kill off 4,028,968,883 people to become carbon neutral! World Population Clock: 8.1 Billion People (LIVE, 2023) - Worldometer (worldometers.info)

Greenpeace co-founder: Achieving ‘net zero’ emissions means ‘at least 50% of the population would die’

Andreas Wailzer
Thu Aug 17, 2023 - 4:52 pm EDT

(LifeSiteNews) — Greenpeace Co-Founder Patrick Moore has said that achieving “Net Zero” carbon emissions globally would lead to “at least 50 percent of the population” dying.

“If we actually did it, my point would be that if we actually achieve net zero, at least 50 percent of the population would die of hunger and disease,” Moore said in a recent interview with BizNewsTv.

“And no doubt about it, because of just one thing, which is nitrogen-based fertilizer, which won two Nobel Prizes,” he continued. “One for developing the process of combining natural gas with nitrogen in the atmosphere to make ammonia. And the other one, the other Nobel Prize, was for the person who scaled it up to an industrial level.”

Moore stated that “at least 50 percent of the population depends on nitrogen fertilizer for its existence today.”

“And there’s people trying to ban it. And the Netherlands and Sri Lanka have already made these kinds of moves.”

READ: Dutch farmers’ strategy to fight Net Zero policies may have evolved beyond protests

“So it is truly a death wish in disguise,” he continued. “And the disguise is to save the earth. Which doesn’t need saving, particularly.”

Moore mentioned the World Economic Forum (WEF) and its founder Klaus Schwab as being among the people who are pushing the “Net Zero” agenda, saying that “I think they are our enemies.”

“Not just our enemies, but the Earth’s enemies.”

READ: How the World Economic Forum response to ‘climate change’ is virtually the same as their COVID approach

CO2 is good for the environment, Moore argues

Moore argued that having higher CO2 levels in the atmosphere is beneficial for the environment because “life is made with carbon.”

“They’ve created a false narrative about CO2, which is actually the staff of all stuff of all life,” he said. “It is the most essential part of life. That’s why organic chemistry is the chemistry of carbon.”

Moore furthermore asserted that life on earth could flourish with much higher levels of CO2 in the atmosphere than the current 417 parts per million (ppm).

“The life that is here now could flourish in 4000 ppm CO2, which is ten times what it is [now], even after we’ve put all this CO2 into it,” he said. “I don’t think that there [are] enough fossil fuels to get it back to 4000 [ppm] because most of it’s locked up in rocks, in limestone, and in chalk and marble and dolomite.”

Moore expressed his discontent with framing fossil fuels as a “dirty” source of energy, since “putting CO2 back into the environment where it came from in the first place is one of the most important things that has happened in the history of life on Earth.”

“It’s a stupid thing that they’ve been able to get away with calling fossil fuels dirty. Because our food is grown in dirt, it’s ‘dirty,’” Moore said regarding the way words are used to paint certain types of energy in a negative light.

Making the case for nuclear energy

Moore argued that the only way to reduce reliance on fossil fuels without many people starving would be to transition from so-called “renewables” like solar and wind to nuclear energy.

He said that fossil fuels should be mainly used for heavy machinery like “tractors and farm machinery,” while most other things could be

...[Message truncated]

View Full Message

Msg 313 of 368 to WALTER784WALTER784

In reply toRe: msg 312

Host

From: Showtalk

Sep-1

They can say whatever they want to but it’s not practical. I don’t see them lining up to be the first to die to save the planet, so until they are, they should back off and leave people alone. I have no problem with people wanting to follow any crazy ideas on their own but when they try to compel others to behave as they want them to, they are going against the very principles of freedom in our country.

Msg 314 of 368 to WALTER784WALTER784

In reply toRe: msg 312

From: Dee (DLAINEDEE)

Sep-1

Net Zero means death for the planet. These people are psychopaths, dying for their cause is just fine as long as they take out no less then 6 billion of us. The elite at the very top, they want to get the population down to 500 million.

They are banning fertilizer and nitrogen, which without those very little will grow. They are blocking out the sun, which means nothing will grow. Without co2 nothing will grow. They are destroying farmers, and buying up their land, which in then end means mass starvation.

Depopulation at its finest.

Edited September 1, 2023 3:43 pm by Dee (DLAINEDEE)

Msg 315 of 368 to Showtalkshowtalk

In reply toRe: msg 313

Staff

From: WALTER784

Sep-1

Showtalk said...
They can say whatever they want to but it’s not practical.

Too many people don't realize that and still think that it's possible.

Whether they were brainwashed, provided with misinformation, too stupid to understand or just believe anything the liberal news media says... is unknown. Perhaps all of the above?!?!?, doesn't matter... but they still believe it.

Showtalk said...
I don’t see them lining up to be the first to die to save the planet, so until they are, they should back off and leave people alone.

CHUCKLE... Yep... the best way to lead is by example... LMAO... so get up there and show us all how to depopulate yourselves!!! (* SNORT *)

Showtalk said...
I have no problem with people wanting to follow any crazy ideas on their own but when they try to compel others to behave as they want them to, they are going against the very principles of freedom in our country.

I would say a good majority agree with you. Sadly however, the minority are the ones pushing this farce and the liberal news media are trying to make it bigger than what it is!

But it's all about depopulation.

FWIW