Opinion Polls: Delphi's Polling Place
Hosted by Showtalk
Opinion polls on all subjects. Opinions? Heck yes, we have opinions - but we're *always* nice about it, even when ours are diametrically opposed to yours. Register your vote today!
- 4923
MEMBERS - 124187
MESSAGES - 13
POSTS TODAY
Discussions
In light of recent info are vaccines ... The Healthy You: Health and Fitness Polls
Started 10/24/22 by WALTER784; 27441 views.
Staff
From: WALTER784
Mar-5
White House Panics After Wuhan Lab Leak Story ID'd as 'Most Likely' Theory for COVID
BY VICTORIA TAFT
2:31 PM ON FEBRUARY 28, 2023
Even Joe Biden can remember this, which may explain why the White House is in a panic now: in April 2020, President Donald Trump claimed there was evidence that COVID-19 started in the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).
The response was predictable. Trump was lampooned in the media. The “intelligence community” (IC) immediately spread its tentacles to slap down the storytelling. This is the same “intelligence community” that said Hunter Biden’s laptop was fake Russian news, the Steele dossier was real, and that Trump was a Russian secret agent. And don’t even get us started on WMD in Iraq.
Trump was immediately laughed at and called a liar, and four reporters from the New York Times—Mark Mazzetti, Julian E. Barnes, Edward Wong, and Adam Goldman—dismissed Trump as a bully. Yet there was ample concern over the lab; there was so much evidence of problems at the site that it was easier to believe it leaked the bug than to believe it didn’t.
A state department cable warning of safety issues at the Wuhan lab was revealed in 2018—before COVID-19 became front-page news. In 2020, even The Washington Post’s Josh Rogin confirmed the concern over the problems at the lab.
In January 2018, the U.S. Embassy in Beijing took the unusual step of repeatedly sending U.S. science diplomats to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), which had in 2015 become China’s first laboratory to achieve the highest level of international bioresearch safety (known as BSL-4). WIV issued a news release in English about the last of these visits, which occurred on March 27, 2018. The U.S. delegation was led by Jamison Fouss, the consul general in Wuhan, and Rick Switzer, the embassy’s counselor of environment, science, technology, and health. Last week, WIV [removed] that statement from its website, though it remains archived on the Internet.
Here’s a look at what you see when you try to find the report on the WIV lab website.
The English version of the report is still available elsewhere on the internet, as Tucker Carlson of Fox News reported:
A top coronavirus researcher who worked with the Wuhan lab and is known as the Bat Lady claimed three years ago that the virus was “intentionally released.”
Indeed, the Wuhan lab itself bragged in 2014 that it had a breakthrough on bat coronaviruses—the kind of bat coronavirus that could “bind to a human receptor” and that would later somehow infect the world, according to former CDC head Dr. Robert Redfield.
In 2015, the lab became “China’s first laboratory to achieve the highest level of international bioresearch safety (known as BSL-4),” noted The Washington Post’s Rogin.
Then the media’s interest in the origin story of the COVID-19 virus went fallow until a few of the woke cubicle meerkats at The New York Times sniffed the air and attacked U.S. Sen. Tom Cotton for daring to put the Wuhan lab leak on their op-ed pages. Heads rolled, and apologies for the opinion piece proliferated. The Times‘s Alexandra Stevenson was assigned to deride the senator as a conspiracy theorist who pushed “fringe theories.” Stevenson intoned, “Scientists have dismissed suggestions that the Chinese government was behind the outbreak, but it’s the kind of tale that gains traction among those who see China as a threat.”
Fast forward to now, after confirmation in The Wall Street Journal that the COVID virus “most likely” came from the Wuhan lab. Reporters Michael R. Gordon and Warren P. Strobel reported that bioweapons experts at the Lawerence Livermore National Labs at the Department of Energy confirmed that the most likely explanation for COVID-19 was a lab leak. But what do bioweapons experts know?
The Energy Department now joins the Federal Bureau of Investigation in saying the virus likely spread via a mishap at a Chinese laboratory. Four other agencies, along with a national intelligence panel, still judge that it was likely the result of a natural transmission, and two are undecided.
After the DOE national lab report was reported exclusively in the Wall Street Journal, The Big Guy and his White House minions went into panic mode.
Biden National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan—who, along with singularly talentless Secretary of State Tony Blinken, brought you the spectacularly disastrous pullout from Afghanistan, the shrink-wrapped cash payoff to
...[Message truncated]
Staff
From: WALTER784
Mar-5
US hospitals lowered their standards of care to receive federal COVID money
Hospitals would receive bonus payment for each positive COVID-19 diagnosis and for each COVID-19 admission to the hospital.
Thu Jan 13, 2022 - 10:13 am EST
(AAPS) – Upon admission to a once-trusted hospital, American patients with COVID-19 become virtual prisoners, subjected to a rigid treatment protocol with roots in Ezekiel Emanuel’s “Complete Lives System” for rationing medical care in those over age 50. They have a shockingly high mortality rate. How and why is this happening, and what can be done about it?
As exposed in audio recordings, hospital executives in Arizona admitted meeting lower standards of care several times a week, with coordinated restrictions on visitation rights. Most COVID-19 patients’ families are deliberately kept in the dark about what is really being done to their loved ones.
The combination that enables this tragic and avoidable loss of hundreds of thousands of lives includes (1) The CARES Act, which provides hospitals with bonus incentive payments for all things related to COVID-19 (testing, diagnosing, admitting to hospital, use of remdesivir and ventilators, reporting COVID-19 deaths, and vaccinations) and (2) waivers of customary and long-standing patient rights by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).
In 2020, the Texas Hospital Association submitted requests for waivers to CMS. According to Texas attorney Jerri Ward, “CMS has granted ‘waivers’ of federal law regarding patient rights. Specifically, CMS purports to allow hospitals to violate the rights of patients or their surrogates with regard to medical record access, to have patient visitation, and to be free from seclusion.”
She notes that “rights do not come from the hospital or CMS and cannot be waived, as that is the antithesis of a ‘right.’ The purported waivers are meant to isolate and gain total control over the patient and to deny patient and patient’s decision-maker the ability to exercise informed consent.”
Creating a “National Pandemic Emergency” provided justification for such sweeping actions that override individual physician medical decision-making and patients’ rights. The CARES Act provides incentives for hospitals to use treatments dictated solely by the federal government under the auspices of the NIH.
These “bounties” must be paid back if not “earned” by making the COVID-19 diagnosis and following the COVID-19 protocol.
The hospital payments include:
A “free” required PCR test in the Emergency Room or upon admission for every patient, with government-paid fee to hospital.
Added bonus payment for each positive COVID-19 diagnosis.
Another bonus for a COVID-19 admission to the hospital.
A 20 percent “boost” bonus payment from Medicare on the entire hospital bill for use of remdesivir instead of medicines such as Ivermectin.
Another and larger bonus payment to the hospital if a COVID-19 patient is mechanically ventilated.
More money to the hospital if cause of death is listed as COVID-19, even if patient did not die directly of COVID-19.
A COVID-19 diagnosis also provides extra payments to coroners.
CMS implemented “value-based” payment programs that track data such as how many workers at a healthcare facility receive a COVID-19 vaccine. This would explain why many hospitals implemented COVID-19 vaccine mandates as they are paid more.
Outside hospitals, physician MIPS quality metrics link doctors’ income to performance-based pay for treating patients with COVID-19 EUA drugs. Failure to report information to CMS can cost the physician 4% of reimbursement.
Because of obfuscation with medical coding and legal wording, we cannot be certain of the actual amount each hospital receives per COVID-19 patient. But Attorney Thomas Renz and CMS whistleblowers have calculated a total payment of at least $100,000 per patient.
What does this mean for your health and safety as a patient in the hospital?
There are deaths from the government-directed COVID treatments. For remdesivir, studies show that 71–75 percent of patients suffe
...[Message truncated]
Staff
From: WALTER784
Mar-5
NHS Director confirms Hospitals lied about Cause of Death to create illusion of COVID Pandemic
BY THE EXPOSÉ
FEBRUARY 18, 2023
A class action lawsuit is ongoing and growing against Merck for its HPV vaccine, Gardasil. The law firm, Miller & Zois, is taking on legal cases in all 50 American states of victims who have suffered harm from the vaccine. They are looking at various types of Gardasil lawsuits, focusing on premature ovarian failure and premature menopause claims.
The MDL class action in the Western District of North Carolina was established in September 2022 with just over 20 cases. The plaintiffs are claiming that the Gardasil HPV vaccine caused them to develop auto-immune and/or neurologic disorders because Merck failed to properly research it before pushing it on the market.
In January, Miller & Zois announced that the number of cases had tripled with 60 active Gardasil lawsuits pending in the Gardasil class action MDL. The lawyers are expecting a large influx of new cases soon as previously filed claims clear the vaccine court process.
The stated purpose of Gardasil is to prevent a sexually transmitted disease which could possibly result in cervical cancer when the children are much older. But there is no true evidence that the vaccine actually works to prevent cancer, wrote medical researcher Brucha Weisberger. “It is a sham, and simply causes death and misery.”
In a detailed write-up about the lawsuit, Ronald Miller of Miller & Zois summarised the potential harms of the HPV vaccine:
New research has shown that Gardasil can induce and increase the risk of auto-immune diseases, and a host of other serious health complications including Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome, Neuropathy, and Fibromyalgia. Gardasil has also been linked to premature ovarian failure and infertility. What is even more unsettling, however, is that there is also evidence to suggest that rather than preventing cervical cancer, the Gardasil HPV vaccine may increase the risk of cervical cancer.
Gardasil HPV Vaccine Lawsuit, Lawsuit Information Centre, Ronald V. Miller Jr., 1 March 2023
Gardasil is a vaccine developed by Merck & Co. to prevent HPV (human papillomavirus), Miller & Zois explained on their website. Merck obtained approval for Gardasil in 2006 with deceptive research trials, which overstated the benefits and vastly understated the risks and side effects of the vaccine. Merck aggressively marketed Gardasil utilising scare tactics, false advertising, and political lobbyists to induce millions of parents to vaccinate their adolescent girls with Gardasil.
Now thousands of girls who received the Gardasil vaccine are experiencing severe adverse health consequences, and hundreds have died due to vaccine complications.
The following are excerpts from Miller & Zois’ Gardasil Lawsuit webpage.
Approval of the Gardasil Vaccine
Gardasil is a vaccine that is supposed to protect against HPV (human papillomavirus). HPV is a widespread viral infection passed through skin-to-skin contact. HPV is the most common sexually transmitted disease, and the majority of people will get HPV at some point in their life. Most HPV cases are entirely benign, but if left untreated, a very small percentage of HPV cases in women can eventually develop into cervical cancer.
Merck obtained a fast-track FDA approval for Gardasil in June 2006. At that time, Merck was still reeling from the billion-dollar losses incurred after being forced to pull its drug Vioxx off the market. Within Merck, Gardasil was described as the “holy grail” that would help the company replace the revenues lost from Vioxx. Executives at Merck often said that “HPV” stood for “Help Pay for Vioxx.”
During the fast-track approval process, Merck concealed material facts about Gardasil’s effectiveness, or lack thereof, and safety. Merck failed to perform complete and appropriate medical investigations and studies during the preapproval or post-approval stages.
The clinical trials Merck undertook did not even examine Gardasil’s potential to prevent cancer, rather, the trials only analysed whether Gardasil could prevent potential precursor conditions. Merck then submitted misleading data suggesting that these “precursor conditions” inexorably result in cancer.
Merck’s Deceptive Marketing Campaign to Push Gardasil
Both before and after the approval
...[Message truncated]
Staff
From: WALTER784
Mar-5
China’s CCP warns Elon Musk against sharing Wuhan lab leak report
PUBLISHED TUE, FEB 28 202310:53 AM EST | UPDATED TUE, FEB 28 20237:27 PM EST
KEY POINTS
- Chinese state-run media warned Tesla CEO Elon Musk that he was risking his relationship with China after he retweeted about the U.S. government’s “low-confidence” assessment that the Covid pandemic originated in a Wuhan laboratory.
- The warning comes ahead of a congressional hearing on China, and after the downing of a Chinese espionage balloon heightened tensions between Beijing and the U.S.
Chinese Communist Party warns Musk against pushing Wuhan Covid leak - WATCH NOW
A Chinese state-run newspaper issued a warning to Tesla CEO Elon Musk after he shared reporting on the U.S. Department of Energy’s “low confidence” assessment that the global Covid pandemic originated in a Wuhan laboratory.
CNBC’s Eunice Yoon reported Tuesday morning on the warning from the social media pages of the Global Times, the English-language subsidiary of the government-controlled People’s Daily. The Global Times warned Musk that he could be “breaking the pot of China” after the Tesla and Twitter CEO responded to tweets that asserted that the Covid pandemic originated in a Wuhan research laboratory.
The saying is akin to the idiom “to bite the hand that feeds you,” Yoon reported. Tesla has an expansive factory campus in Shanghai, and China is the electric vehicle manufacturer’s second largest market.
The Department of Energy concluded with “low confidence” that the Covid pandemic began in a Wuhan laboratory, but sources familiar with the matter stressed to NBC News that the conclusion was not viewed as hugely significant. The FBI reached a similar conclusion at a “moderate confidence” level in 2021.
The governing Chinese Communist Party has been highly sensitive to the matter, especially as it courts outside investment after months of zero-Covid lockdowns prompted nationwide protests, Yoon reported.
Musk wasn’t immediately available to comment.
— CNBC’s Eunice Yoon contributed to this report.
China's CCP warns Elon Musk against sharing Wuhan lab leak report (cnbc.com)
FWIW
Staff
From: WALTER784
Mar-5
Rand Paul Introduces Bill To Halt Funding For Hospitals Denying Care To The Unvaxxed
BY TYLER DURDEN
FRIDAY, FEB 17, 2023 - 03:26 AM
Senator Rand Paul has introduced legislation that would see federal funding stopped for health care facilities that choose to deny critical treatment to people who have chosen not to take COVID vaccines.
“No American should be denied access to critical care based on a personal medical decision, yet tragically, many hospitals and other medical facilities continue to discriminate against those unvaccinated for COVID-19,”?Paul said in a statement.
The Senator added that his bill titled The COVID-19 Vaccination Non-Discrimination Act “will protect the rights of vulnerable patients to make their own health care choices and ensure that federal taxpayer dollars do not support facilities that turn away patients based on their COVID-19 vaccination status.”
Paul points to a recent case where a 14-year-old girl was refused a kidney transplant by Duke University Hospital because her parents had chosen not to have her vaccinated.
The girl had already had a COVID-19 infection, had developed natural immunity, yet still the hospital refused to give her the critical care she needed.
Numerous hospitals across America are following the same ‘no jab, no transplant’ policy.
Two More Hospitals Demand Mandatory Vaccination Before Allowing Organ Transplants
Colorado’s UCHealth denied a woman who was in stage five renal failure a kidney transplant because she refused to take the jab.
A hospital in Cleveland also refused to a provide a 9-year-old boy a life-saving kidney transplant because his father hadn’t taken the COVID-19 vaccine.
Hospital Refuses to Give 9-Year-Old Boy Life Saving Kidney Transplant Because Father is Unvaccinated
A six-month-old baby boy in Tennessee with a heart defect was also initially denied a transplant because the parents refused to get him vaccinated, with medical ethics expert charging that the doctor involved was playing ‘COVID politics’.
A man in Boston was also denied a heart transplant because he was unvaccinated.
There are also similar shocking cases of children being denied critical transplants in multiple European countries, as well as the UK, purely because the parents had not had them vaccinated.
Senator Paul, a medical doctor himself further notes “There is no place in the medical profession for discrimination. The Hippocratic Oath demands that doctors care for their patients without prejudice and abstain from any intentional wrong-doing or harm. This bill will enshrine that basic principle in law.”
Representative Dan Bishop, who has introduced a companion bill in the House, also noted “There’s no reason that medical facilities should deny care to people based on their COVID-19 vaccination status, and there’s certainly no reason for institutions that do so to receive any federal funding.”
Without intervention such as Paul’s legislation, Americans could find themselves down the road where countries like New Zealand have ended up, with the ‘authorities’ threatening to take children away from parents who refuse to give them COVID vaccines.
“That Is Where Tyranny Starts”: New Zealand May Take Baby From Parents Demanding ‘Unvaccinated’ Blood For Heart Surgery
Rand Paul Introduces Bill To Halt Funding For Hospitals Denying Care To The Unvaxxed | ZeroHedge
FWIW
Staff
From: WALTER784
Mar-8
Horowitz: Major German paper reveals Pfizer fabricated clinical trials to cover up deaths
February 21, 2023
Daniel Horowitz
According to new provisional data from the Scottish government, there were 7,314 deaths registered in January 2023, an increase of 17.7% compared to the average of 6,212. For the second week of January, there were more deaths in Scotland than ever before, including during the peak of the pandemic. Concurrently, there were 4,159 births registered in January 2023, a decrease of 6.8% compared to the average of 4,463. In other words, between a dearth of births and a plethora of deaths, there were roughly 1,400 fewer souls, the equivalent of roughly 86,000 in the United States. This is long after COVID. Why is there zero concern?
What on earth will it take to pull these death shots from the market?
Die Welt, a paper based in the home country of Pfizer partner BioNTech, revealed last week in a long expose what many of us have long known. All those sudden deaths, heart attacks, and strokes we’ve been witnessing over the past two years were indeed observed during the Pfizer clinical trial that supposedly showed the shots to be 100% safe and effective. The company simply covered up the severe adverse events by kicking those participants out of the trial and/or suggesting without evidence that the deaths had nothing to do with the experiment.
Remember, the CDC announced a few weeks ago that it had finally study a potential association between the COVID shots and strokes. Well, it turns out the agency had the opportunity to study it already in 2020 before a single human being outside the trial was injected. “Patient no. 11621327” was more than a mere number. He was a human being found dead from a stroke in his apartment just three days after the second dose. Typically, with a novel product in trial, any death – even one not so sudden – makes the product suspect until it is proven innocent. Yet in this case, Pfizer simply dismissed the death as not related to the vaccine, just as the company did with Patient #11521497, who died 20 days later from cardiac arrest.
The article also provides more details on the Buenos Aires trial site, the largest one in the world, in which attorney Augusto Roux was severely injured with pericarditis and liver damage. Instead of being recorded as a severe adverse event, he was marked as having had COVID (even though he tested negative) and was summarily removed from the trial. Roux was on my podcast last July and told me Pfizer refused to help treat his injury because officials felt it had nothing to do with the vaccine, and insurance also refused to pay for treatment because the insurance company blamed it on him willingly joining the trial.
Die Welt reports that on Aug. 31, 2020, 53 of those in the trial in Buenos Aires were unblinded and removed from the trial against the protocol, which calls for this only “in emergencies” (unless this was indeed an emergency!). By the end of the second dose, a further 200 individuals were removed from the trial, meaning that overall, more than 250 of the original 1231 participants were terminated, thereby making the entirety of the data from the largest trial site irrelevant to use in the final trial results.
Overall, 21 participants in Pfizer’s phase 3 trial died, as compared to 17 in the control group before they were unblinded, which should have been a red flag before the shot ever took off. Pfizer claimed there was no evidence anyone died from the vaccine, but after it’s been revealed that a number of people in the trial suffered heart ailments and strokes, the company’s defense holds no water. Yet here we are, over two years later, and the shots are still on the market, promoted like manna from heaven, and even mandated in most hospitals and universities, including in red states. How is this not the top public policy issue of our day?
Consider the following from a public policy standpoint. Pfizer gets the government to pony up billions in taxpayer dollars for the shots, several billion more to promote, advertise, distribute, and mandate them on every human being alive – all while absolving Pfizer of liability. So how do we know the shots are safe? Who gets to monitor the clinical trial? The very manufacturer that was absolved of liability by the government! The Die Welt article even mentions that Pfizer pushed through a liability waiver on its contract not just for negligence, but also for "fraud or bad faith on the part of Pfizer itself."
Pfizer responded to the Die Welt reporter by asserting that, “Regulatory authorities around the world have approved our Covid-19 vaccine. These approvals are based on a robust and independent assessment of the scientific data on quality, safety, and efficacy, including the phase 3 clinical trial.” Sure, authorities guaranteed the company endless funding, marketing, mandates, and indemnity so that Pfizer would have no incentive to even release the true results of its trial, much less make the product better.
...[Message truncated]
Staff
From: WALTER784
Mar-8
Major German news outlet WELT reports on “many inconsistencies” in Pfizer covid “vaccine” approval study
Tuesday, February 21, 2023
by: Ethan Huff
(Natural News) WELT, one of the most popular news outlets in Germany, ran an exposé this week called “The many inconsistencies in the Pfizer approval study” that blows the lid on all the “incorrect documentation” and “many inconsistencies” in the documents that Pfizer and BioNTech submitted to governments to approve their messenger RNA (mRNA) Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines.”
There are “increasing doubts,” the article explains, about the data that was used in Pfizer’s phase 3 trials. And all the while, Pfizer is dodging these allegations and refusing to review its findings, even as people all around the world fall ill and die as a result of being injected.
Pfizer also conveniently failed to include the negative results of some trial participants in the submissions it made to government regulators. One such case involves a 36-year-old lawyer from Buenos Aires who after getting jabbed suffered a series of horrific side effects.
In addition to a painful and swelled arm, Augusto Roux developed nausea, difficulty swallowing, and a constant feeling of being hungover. His sense of smell also changed, as did the color of his stools – they turned white – and the color of his urine – it turned dark and later black.
All of this happened within two days of getting injected, prompting Roux to contact his test doctors for help. They noted that Roux suffered “Undesirable effect of toxicity level 1” in his notes.
Three weeks later, Roux received his second Pfizer dose, after which he developed shortness of breath, burning chest pain, nausea, and fever. His urine “turned like black cola” and he passed out, having to be rushed to Alemán Hospital where he tested “negative” for covid.
Brighteon.TV
In his discharge notes, Roux was given an “Adverse reaction to the coronavirus vaccine (high probability),” as well as computer tomograph imagery showing that he had developed pericardial effusion, or fluid buildup in the heart.
Over the next several months, Roux lost more than 30 pounds, developed liver problems, and his heart started beating irregularly. An American doctor named Gemma Torrell who had access to Roux’s medical records and questioned him determined that he likely suffered pericarditis, or inflammation of the heart, as a result of the jabs.
“All of this fits exactly with a clinical picture that the Paul Ehrlich Institute also has in its list of ‘rare side effects’ for mRNA vaccines,” reads an English translation of the WELD article.
Pfizer categorized Roux’s covid jab side effects as a “mental” problem
Roux’s case took a strange turn when he became the attorney for Fernando Polack, the study director in Buenos Aires and lead author of the Pfizer’s global phase 3 pivotal study. Through this, Roux gained access to his own file, which shocked him.
One would think that Roux’s horrible side effects would have been listed in Pfizer’s pivotal study papers, but this did not happen. Instead, Pfizer labeled Roux’s side effects as being “mental” in nature and having nothing to do with its mRNA injections.
“His medical history is not mentioned in the approval study from December 2020, and his case does not appear in later evaluations either,” WELD reported.
“In a summary of all study data for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as of
August 11, 2021, only one case of pericarditis was recorded among the vaccinated subjects. A man older than 55 is affected, it says. Augusto Roux is not mentioned.
Was he registered as a Covid case and therefore as an unvaccinated person?”
FWIW
Staff
From: WALTER784
Mar-8
Large meta-analysis finds that natural immunity is BETTER than covid vaccines at offering protection against re-infection
Tuesday, February 21, 2023
by: Lance D Johnson
(Natural News) During the initial lockdown phase of the covid-19 scandal, naturally-acquired immunity to SARS-CoV-2 was taboo – offensive and unmentionable. The population was trained to think, that through collective action, we could avoid infections forever through social distancing, paranoia, and totalitarianism. The public health orthodoxy brainwashed the population with social isolation, terror, and constraint — censoring medical treatments, nutrition and herbal medicine, while mocking natural immunity.
After the mRNA vaccine experiment was unleashed, governments did not recognize naturally-acquired immunity and falsely shamed healthy individuals for being the cause of a never-ending “pandemic.” Vaccine mandates and passports were used to segregate individuals from society. Individuals with natural immunity and individuals who could readily attain natural immunity were even told to take faulty experimental vaccines multiple times, or lose their freedoms.
Now, a new meta-analysis concludes that a naturally-acquired SARS-CoV-2 infection offers durable protection against re-infection and protects against severe disease from subsequent covid-19 variants. The meta-analysis consists of 65 studies from 19 different countries and is published in the Lancet. This has been known since early 2021, and even the World Health Organization admitted that 90-99 percent of individuals infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus develop detectable neutralizing antibodies.
Natural immunity remains high after 40 weeks
At 40 weeks, protection from re-infection from ancestral, alpha, and delta variants remained high at 78.6%. Most importantly, protection against severe disease remained high for all variants (90.2%) after 40 weeks. Meanwhile, the vaccine caused new health problems and its immunogenicity failed to hold up to the manufacturer’s initial promises. The immune depletion caused by the vaccine is so abysmal, new boosters are pushed every season, causing a grim cycle of sickness, viral mutation, and death.
Brighteon.TV
Natural immunity protected against re-infection to the omicron BA.1 variant 45.3% and 44.0% against omicron BA.1 symptomatic disease. Even though the unvaccinated more likely to get omicron than the other variants, it resembled the common cold for most. This is also why omicron hospitalizations occurred primarily in the “fully vaccinated.” The immunity from the vaccine and its boosters was insufficient.
The authors of the meta-analysis conclude: “Although protection from re-infection from all variants wanes over time, our analysis of the available data suggests that the level of protection afforded by previous infection is at least as high, if not higher than that provided by two-dose vaccination using high-quality mRNA vaccines (Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech), as documented by Nassereldine and colleagues, in our companion study.”
The value of natural immunity is even greater than what can be measured
In the meta-analysis, re-infection to a covid-19 variant was defined using a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test or rapid antigen test (90-120 days after a previously positive test and separated by four consecutive PCR negatives). Therefore, the results of the meta-analysis only include cases of natural immunity that were formally monitored using PCR or rapid antigen testing. The meta-analysis does not include millions of cases of naturally-acquired immunity that took place without these testing parameters in place.
Furthermore, the meta-analysis relies on testing programs that varied in scope and accuracy from country to country, due to the fact that different laboratories used different cycle thresholds, amplifying viral debris at various rates. Some cycle thresholds were calibrated so high, they may have turned up a false positive for re-infection or provided false evidence of a previous infection. Due to the limitations of testing programs and availability, and non-specific diagnostic criteria, the scientific integrity of this meta-analysis is lacking and may skew the full scope and durability of natural immunity in the population.
Amazingly, despite all these confounding variables, natural immunity still remained durable and long lasting in this meta-analysis. For the 40 weeks studied, natural immunity against re-infection remained very high for the pre-omicron variants, including the ancestral, alpha, beta, and delta variants.
The study, funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, debunks what Bill Gates wanted all along: long-standing lockdowns, forced masks and the experimental and ongoing vaccination
...[Message truncated]
Staff
From: WALTER784
Mar-8
This story goes back to May 2022 when Judicial Watch sued to get Pfizer records, but it shows Pfizer was aware of what the vaccines were doing back in Feb 2021. The HHS, CDC and WHO also seem to have known, but lied to the general public at large around the world:
Lipid nanoparticles in covid jabs “stick” to bodily organs, reveals Pfizer study
Tuesday, May 10, 2022
by: Ethan Huff
(Natural News) A Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch has revealed that clinical trial data directly from Pfizer shows that the company’s Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” contain lipid nanoparticles that “stick” to vital organs like the liver, adrenal glands, spleen and ovaries.
Judicial Watch obtained some 466 pages of records from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) containing data from biodistribution studies. Lipid nanoparticles, or LNPs, which are a key component of the Pfizer shot, were discovered all over the body anywhere from eight to 48 hours post-injection.
LNPs function as a delivery mechanism in the mRNA (messenger RNA) injection from Pfizer and BioNTech. Acuitas Therapeutics LNP technology is utilized in COMIRNATY, as the shot is now being called, according to a press release issued by Pfizer on Jan. 10, 2022. (Related: Israeli researchers found that the Pfizer shot destroys every system of the body.)
“A method of tracking where compounds of interest go in an experimental animal or human subject is called biodistribution,” reported Great Game India.
World Health Organization claims that LNPs have no risk, and thus don’t need to be studied
The Pfizer records also include a report approved in February of 2021 concerning the animal trials in which the distribution of these LNPs was evaluated in rat subjects. Under the “Pharmacodynamic Drug Interactions” section, the following is stated:
“Nonclinical studies evaluating pharmacodynamic drug interactions with BNT162b2 were not conducted as they are generally not considered necessary to support the development and licensure of vaccine products for infectious diseases (WHO, 2005).”
Brighteon.TV
When LNPs “with a comparable composition” to those used in the Pfizer shot were injected into rats as part of clinical trials, “total recovery (% of injected dose) of LNP outside the injection site was greatest in the liver and was much less in the spleen, adrenal glands, and ovaries,” the Pfizer report further states.
LNPs were observed to mainly distribute and accumulate in the liver, adrenal glands, spleen and ovaries with maximum concentration occurring within the first two days, according to the research.
Even so, no genotoxicity or carcinogenicity studies with BNT162b2 have been, or will be, conducted because according to the World Health Organization (WHO), the components of the vaccine constructs, including lipids and RNA, are not expected to have genotoxic, carcinogenic, or tumorigenic potential.
In the end, Pfizer declared that BNT162b2 is immunogenic in mice, rats, and nonhuman primates, and that “the toxicity studies support the licensure of this vaccine.”
The same goes for “boost immunizations,” or booster shots, according to Pfizer. Though the shot’s contents spread and accumulate throughout the body, the company says getting boosted is safe and effective.
“Vaccine-related microscopic findings at the end of dosing for BNT162b2 were evident in injection sites and surrounding tissues, in the draining iliac lymph nodes, bone marrow, spleen, and liver,” Pfizer researchers revealed.
Another report contained in the Pfizer documents, called “Pharmacokinetics Tabulated Summary,” further reveals that LNPs accumulate after 48 hours primarily in the lymph nodes, ovaries, small intestine, and spleen.
Once again, Pfizer wrote that no safety pharmacology studies were conducted based on these findings because guidelines from the WHO that were established back in 2005 do not require such because “they are not generally considered necessary to support development and licensure of vaccine products for infectious diseases.”
“The question to be asked is why would government institutions refuse in the first place to give information to the public regarding the safety of a product?” asked a reader at Great Game India.
...[Message truncated]
Staff
From: WALTER784
Mar-11
This article was from Oct 2022... see the next article more recently... the number of died suddenly young doctors has increased...
Why have so many young doctors died since COVID-vaccine rollout?
Physician urging medical association to investigate
By Art Moore
Published October 18, 2022 at 7:05pm
An alarming spike in the deaths of young Canadian doctors since the COVID-19 vaccine was mandated for health-care workers demands an investigation, a physician and cancer researcher told the Canadian Medical Association.
Dr. William Makis, a nuclear medicine physician with more than 100 peer-reviewed research publications, also called for an immediate end to COVID-19 vaccine mandates in Canadian health care, the Gateway Pundit reported.
"Our analysis shows Canadian doctor deaths under age 50 in 2022 will be 2-fold higher compared to 2019-2020," he wrote. "Shockingly, doctor deaths under age 40 are 5-fold higher, and doctor deaths under age 30 are 8-fold higher."
Makis noted that at the Canadian Medical Association-sponsored International Conference on Physician Health last week, a topic that was not discussed was "young Canadian doctors dying suddenly and unexpectedly after COVID vaccine rollout."
"On September 3, 2022, I wrote you a letter regarding the sudden and unexpected deaths of 32 young Canadian doctors since the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines, and I raised concerns about COVID-19 vaccines and vaccine mandates contributing to these sudden deaths," the medical scientist said. "The letter went viral on social media, it was viewed by millions of people worldwide, was translated into dozens of languages, and became the topic of numerous podcasts, media interviews, internet videos and news articles."
The CMA, he said, apparently doesn't share the "tremendous interest worldwide into what is killing Canada’s fully COVID-19 vaccinated young doctors."
Addressing CMA leaders Dr. Katharine Smart and Dr. Alika Lafontaine, he said "both of you failed or refused to respond to my letter, and you also failed or refused to respond to inquiries made by American philanthropist Mr.Steve Kirsch, as well as inquiries made by journalists."
"I am now providing you an update with information about 80 young Canadian doctors who died suddenly or unexpectedly since the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines," he wrote. "Four more doctors have died since my previous letter, and these unexpected deaths are accelerating. You cannot continue to ignore this."
Makis said he and his team have assembled a database of 1,638 Canadian doctor deaths during the period 2019-2022, with 972 of them from CMA's website. Our preliminary analysis of this extensive data suggests that Canadian doctor deaths under age 50 in 2022 will be 2-fold higher compared to the 2019-2020 average.
He also cited the recently announced the sudden deaths at Canada's prestigious McMaster University of three young fully COVID vaccinated medical residents this past summer, which he called "unprecedented."
"All Canadian medical students and residents were forced into unscientific, unethical, cruel and harmful COVID-19 vaccine mandates," Makis wrote.
"I implore you again to remember your Hippocratic Oath and your own CMA Code of Ethics, and call for an immediate halt to all COVID-19 vaccine mandates in Canadian healthcare."
Why have so many young doctors died since COVID-vaccine rollout? (wnd.com)
FWIW
TOP