Opinion Polls: Delphi's Polling Place

Hosted by Showtalk

Opinion polls on all subjects. Opinions? Heck yes, we have opinions - but we're *always* nice about it, even when ours are diametrically opposed to yours. Register your vote today!

  • 4999
    MEMBERS
  • 129983
    MESSAGES
  • 33
    POSTS TODAY

Discussions

In light of recent info are vaccines ...   The Healthy You: Health and Fitness Polls

Started 10/24/22 by WALTER784; 49768 views.
Dee (DLAINEDEE)

From: Dee (DLAINEDEE) 

Jun-3

WALTER784 said...

Anthony Fauci, also is on screen claiming that when people submit to mandates to take the shots, they "become a dead end to the virus."

I guess he's right about that!  If you be dead, you won't be spreading anything.

I don't care what they say, I'll never take that shot, or any vaccine they try to push.  They are a death organization, and that's it.  They can never be trusted again, never.

Parents be warned!

 

WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784 

Jun-3

The last inoculation I had of any type was in 1980 when I got out of the Navy.

It was required when you were discharged from all branches of our military forces.

Since then, I haven't gotten a single flu, influenza or any other type of vaccine. Including for Covid. And I don't plan on getting any in the future either.

FWIW

In reply toRe: msg 551
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784 

Jun-4

Covid is over, and in its wake are six million avoidable deaths, 36 million “vaccine” deaths, and $1.8 trillion down the drain for useless masks and tests

05/17/2023
By Ethan Huff

The Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “pandemic” is finally over, and all we got was tens of millions of needless deaths and the loss of $1.8 trillion, which was wasted on face masks, PCR “testing” kits, and all sorts of other useless, tyrannical nonsense that destroyed what little remained of social cohesion and normalcy.
 
“Ballpark” figures compiled by Peter Halligan on his “Peter’s Newsletter” Substack show that covid, now that all is officially said and done, completely drained the economy of its lifeblood while callously ending the lives of millions upon millions of people in the name of “public health.”
 
One major elephant in the room as far as the death counts go is that people were mostly still alive until the launch of Operation Warp Speed. Once that happened and the injections started going into people’s arms, deaths began to skyrocket.
 
The data shows that as of Dec. 30, 2020, right as Operation Warp Speed was being launched, total deaths were still under two million. One year later in late 2021, however, the number of deaths recorded nearly tripled, reaching 5,488,817. And one year after that in December of 2022, the official death count ballooned to 6,714,164.
 
(Related: Remember back in 2021 at the height of covid when leftists on Twitter called for all unvaccinated people everywhere to be murdered?)
 
The official government covid protocols were all designed to KILL people, not save them
 
Clearly and undeniably, the injections are to blame for the sudden and massive increase in deaths as 2021 was beginning. Had the injections never been released, the death count would have been a whole lot less than what it became.
 
To claim, as the government, the pharmaceutical industry, and the media still do, that covid shots were “effective” in light of all this is preposterous – unless they mean effective at depopulating the planet to a substantial degree.
 
Even before the launch of the jabs, the death count would have been smaller still had tried-and-true remedies like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine been allowed – but they were not. Instead, patients were muzzled with ventilators and pumped up with remdesivir and other drugs, which in many cases resulted in death.
 
Just about everything on the official covid protocol, from ventilators to face masks to lockdowns to the jabs, resulted in more death, not less. Had covid been treated like just another normal flu season, all the death and destruction the world saw could have been avoided.
 
“Maybe as many as 85% of all deaths globally from C19 were preventable from May 2020 onwards,” Halligan reported, noting that ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine had already been proven to be safe and effective prophylactics that very same month.
 
“The decision NOT to use IVM / HCQ treatment protocols from May 2020 onwards cost around 6 million lives, globally.”
 
“Death by healer – iatrogenic death – from Remdesivir / Midazolam + morphine, ventilators, psychological and physical torture of the elderly and infirm in medical settings, failure to treat existing and emerging health conditions (non-C19), failure to prescribe anti-biotics (WHO advice) and so on are included in C19 deaths, rather than as murders.”
 
Halligan further broke down the numbers on the costs of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine versus the costs associated with everything that was pushed instead of these two safe and effective drugs, and the comparison is ghastly.
 
To truly save lives with these remedies would have cost substantially less what it cost society to do all those other horrific things, which left in their wake a mountain of dead bodies and the total absolution of civilization as we used to know it. Was it worth it?

Covid is over, and in its wake are six million avoidable deaths, 36 million “vaccine” deaths, and $1.8 trillion down the drain for useless masks and tests (vaccines.news)

FWIW

In reply toRe: msg 547
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784 

Jun-4

WALTER784 said...

But that doesn't mean those who took the Johnson & Johnson vaccine don't need ANOTHER.

The article I'm quoting from and replying to above said that... and I quoted it from the original article. It was posted on May 18, 2023. So they do away with the J&J vaccine that doesn't have the DNA contamination and are now saying those who got the J&J jab now need to get the DNA contaminated jab from Pfizer or Moderna?!?!?!?! Yeah... go figure!!!

And now, May 21, 2023... 3 days later, the following is reported:

DNA contamination and cancer-causing agent SV40 found in Pfizer’s covid injections

BY RHODA WILSON
MAY 21, 2023

It’s not just the spike protein and the mRNA that are a problem. Both Pfizer and Moderna covid injections also have DNA contamination and Pfizer’s covid injection contains SV40 promoters. 
 
Microbiologist Kevin McKernan pioneered research on testing some of the covid vaccine vials and discovered unacceptable levels of double-stranded DNA plasmids floating around.  This is DNA contamination.  He found the contamination in Pfizer and Moderna vials. 
 
During an interview with Peter Sweden, Sasha Latypova said that DNA contamination is “a huge problem because this is replication competent plasmid, it can then invade human cells, it can invade the bacterial cells that live in your gut. So, they go into the bacteria they replicate there, they replicate antibiotic-resistant genes…it can cause sepsis, it can cause cancer, all sorts of issues.”
 
The World Council for Health (“WCH”) stated that a red line has been crossed.  “DNA contamination of mRNA ‘vaccines’ poses a risk to everyone on the planet,” WCH said. “Replicable DNA, so-called plasmids, in both the monovalent and bivalent vaccines, which should not be there at all … We can only speculate how it will end, but what needs to happen today after the publication of the paper by McKernan et al (2023) is an immediate stop of the ‘covid-19 vaccine’ program.”
 
In Pfizer’s mRNA injection, McKernan also discovered Simian Virus 40 (“SV40”) promoters which are tied to cancer development in humans. He emphasised that the SV40 found is a viral piece, it is not the whole virus.  However, it still presents a risk of driving cancer.
 
SV40 or Simian Virus 40  was the 40th virus found in rhesus monkey kidney cells when these cells were used to make the polio vaccine. This virus contaminated both the inactivated polio vaccine (“IPV”) and the oral or “live” polio vaccine (“OPV”) developed by Dr. Albert Sabin. When it was discovered that SV40 was an animal carcinogen that had found its way into the polio vaccines, a federal law was passed in 1961 that required that no vaccines contain this virus.
 
Kanekoa The Great tweeted two audio/video transcripts.  One of a recent interview with McKernan explaining his discoveries and another of a Japanese professor expressing his concerns about these discoveries.  We have republished these transcripts below.
 
DNA Contamination and SV40 Discovered
 
McKernan joined Conservative Review with Daniel Horowitz on Friday to warn that there is no quality control in the manufacturing process of these vaccines. If his findings turn out to be widespread, it could portend an even greater risk for anaphylaxis, blood clotting, developing resistance to antibiotics, gene integration risk, and long-term production of spike protein within the body.  You can listen to an audio of the interview on Apple podcasts HERE.
 
During the interview, McKernan said:
 
“It’s in both Moderna and Pfizer. We looked at the bivalent vaccines for both Moderna and Pfizer and only the monovalent vaccines for Pfizer because we didn’t have access to monovalent vaccines for Moderna. In all three cases, the vaccines contain double-stranded DNA contamination. If you sequence that DNA, you’ll find that it matches what looks to be an expression vector that’s used to make the RNA…
 
“Whenever we see DNA contamination, like from plasmids, ending up in any injectable, the first thing people think about is whether there’s any E. coli endotoxin present because that creates anaphylaxis for the injected. And, of course, your viewers and listeners are probably aware there’s a lot of anaphylaxis going on, not only on TV but in the VAERS database. You can see people get injected with this and drop. That could be the background from this E. coli process of manufacturing the DNA…
 
“At least on the Pfizer side
...[Message truncated]
View Full Message
In reply toRe: msg 554
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784 

Jun-6

EcoHealth documents show the development of the covid virus/vaccine bioweapon and the plan to infect populations

BY RHODA WILSON
MAY 21, 2023

The debate as to what caused the covid-19 pandemic is still ongoing and is likely to be ongoing for some time.  Karen Kingston argues that the cause of the pandemic was a biological attack using so-called “bat vaccines” which are spike protein nanoparticles developed in a laboratory by EcoHealth Alliance.  The gene sequences for these “bat vaccines” were subsequently used in the FDA-approved Pfizer covid “vaccines” for humans.
 
“Residents of Wuhan and other cities of China, Italy and the United States, were victims of a coordinated nanoparticle bioweapon attack, a bioweapon attack using the same nanoparticles that are in all covid-19 mRNA vaccines. Most victims became infected with the nanoparticles via a direct aerosol attack, surface transmission, or food and beverage contamination,” Karen Kingston said.
 
Karen Kingston is a medical-legal advisor and biotech analyst with 25 years of experience. She’s internationally recognised as an expert on the harmful biological effects caused by mRNA gene editing technologies.
 
Throughout 2021 and 2022 she’s invested thousands of hours reviewing documents such as EcoHealth’s Alliance pitch to DARPA, peer-reviewed publications regarding the ground zero attacks in China, Italy, and the US, scientific publications and manufacturer’s documents regarding nanoparticle technologies, Pfizer’s private and government contracts, dozens of patents, nanoparticle and SynBio forecasting reports, and reviewed many DARPA communications regarding the current and future applications of nanoparticle technologies.
 
Using EcoHealth Alliance documents and peer-review publications, she detailed in a Substack article how covid-19 was a pre-planned global bioweapon attack that used aerosolised mRNA nanoparticles to cause a pandemic.
 
The following is based on the article ‘Was covid-19 Caused by a Biological Virus or mRNA Nanoparticles?’ by Karen Kingston originally published on 15 December 2022.  We have compiled the text below using extracts from Kingston’s article and adding our own text and resources for context.
 
In March 2023, the Russian military issued a statement that covid and many other recent pandemics were caused by artificial pathogens or synthetic viruses. These artificial pathogens are mRNA nanoparticles, the same mRNA nanoparticle technologies found in the covid-19 mRNA injections.
 
It’s important to understand that “gain-of-function viruses” are lipid nanoparticle technologies programmed with mRNA codes. mRNA is not a biosynthetic substance itself. mRNA are software codes. SARS-CoV-2 is not a virus, it’s a software code programmed into nanoparticles.
 
The mRNA codes in the covid “vaccines” are part of the software programs for the spike-protein-lipid-nanoparticle technology. After the nanoparticles hijack human cells the nanoparticles are able to genetically modify the cells with the programmed mRNA codes to turn human cells into toxic spike protein-producing factories.
 
mRNA nanoparticles can induce permanent, foreign, genetic mutations into a species’ genome. In a March 2022 interview with Glenn Beck, Dr. Robert Malone explains how mRNA nanotechnology is an entry point to the suite of nanotechnologies for purposes of making bio-digital, or mechanical, and non-human biological changes to the human genome. The modification of humans through forced biological and mechanical genetic mutations is also known as transhumanism or directed evolution.
 
mRNA | “Transhumanism, Is One of the Agendas of the World Economic Forum That’s Not Hidden, That’s Not a Conspiracy & They Talk About RNA Vaccines as an Entry Point. Opening That Space Ethically and Otherwise.” – Dr. Robert Malone
 
mRNA nanoparticle technology is used to induce irreversible autoimmune diseases in animals; and to create hybrid species, from viruses and bacteria to plants and animals, to humans and artificial intelligence (“AI”) hybrids.
 
In the hands of bad actors who have access to resources and infrastructure systems that all life forms depend on, mRNA lipid nanoparticles are capable of rendering any species extinct within a year, including human beings.
 
DARPA DEFUSE: A Co-Ordinated Bioweapon Attack in China and the United States
 
In September 2021, Drastic Research, an international network of scientists investigating the origins of the pandemic, expos
...[Message truncated]
View Full Message
In reply toRe: msg 555
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784 

Jun-11

Landmark class action lawsuits further expose startling corruption in COVID vaccine rollout

Class action lawsuits in Australia and the UK over the COVID shots are now getting started, so hopefully it’s only a matter of time before that house of cards comes crashing down, but that doesn’t mean we’re out of harm’s way yet.

Dr. Joseph Mercola
Sat May 20, 2023 - 7:46 am EDT

STORY AT-A-GLANCE
 
Drug companies have a legal responsibility to provide profits for their shareholders. They do not have a legal responsibility to give patients the best and safest treatment. But the biggest scandal is that those with the responsibility to uphold scientific integrity – academic institutions, doctors, medical journals – also collude with industry for financial gain.
 
Five hundred Australians have joined a class action lawsuit against the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), arguing the agency did not fulfil its duty to properly regulate the vaccines, which resulted in considerable harm to Australians.
 
Australians who have experienced a serious adverse event following COVID-19 vaccination are invited to register for this class action.
 
A similar class action is taking place in the U.K., where attorneys representing approximately 75 people injured by AstraZeneca’s shot, and family members of those killed by it, are suing the drug company.
 
There’s now overwhelming evidence showing that the COVID shots were a disaster from the start, and that regulatory agencies knew it but went ahead anyway. Now, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky is trying to rewrite history by giving provably false testimony before Congress.
 
(Mercola) — In the video below, Joe Rogan interviews cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra about Big Pharma’s control over research. What many don’t realize is that researchers who do peer-review of drug company-sponsored trials do not get access to the raw data. All they get is the drug company’s analysis of that data, which leaves the door wide open for manipulation and obfuscation.
 
As noted by Malhotra, “It’s not scientific, it’s not ethical… and it’s not democratic.” Most doctors, unless they’re involved in the peer review process, are not even aware of this, which is why they rarely ever question published science. Yet data analyses by Stanford professor Dr. John Ioannidis show that “the greater the financial interest in a given field, the less likely the research findings are to be true,” Malhotra says.
 
No one protects patients anymore
 
So, is the drug industry all about satisfying shareholders and increasing profits by any means, with no real regard for public health? Rogan wonders. Basically yes. As noted by Malhotra, drug companies have a legal responsibility to provide profits for their shareholders. They do not have a legal responsibility to give patients the best and safest treatment.
 
READ: Ex-Pfizer VP: COVID vax push a ‘supranational operation’ intended to ‘maim and kill deliberately’
 
But the biggest scandal here, Malhotra says, is that “those with the responsibility to uphold scientific integrity – academic institutions, doctors, medical journals – collude with industry for financial gain.” I would add that our regulatory agencies are also “on the take.” They’ve all been captured by industry, which leaves patients with no one to protect them from Big Pharma’s malfeasance.
 
Malhotra goes on to discuss Dr. Robert Hare, a forensic psychologist who developed the original DSM criteria for psychopathy, and how Hare noted that the way drug companies conduct business, as legal entities, fulfill the definition of psychopath: “Callous unconcern for the feelings of others, incapacity to experience guilt, deceitfulness and conning others for profit.”
 
Between 2003 and 2016, drug companies paid fines totaling $33 billion. Many of these cases involved the illegal marketing of drugs, scientific fraud, hiding data on harms, and the suppression of negative results. These fines never curtailed the behavior, however, because the fines were a drop in the bucket compared to the profits they made on these drugs. The fines were just considered the cost of doing business.
 
What is the net effect of pharmaceutical drugs?
 
While the drug industry has created crucial life-saving drugs, the big question we need to ask is “What is the net effect of them?”
...[Message truncated]
View Full Message
In reply toRe: msg 556
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784 

Jun-12

Pfizer Documents: “Report 71” Shows More Horrific Drug Industry Crimes Against Humanity

Article by Ethan Huff from Natural News cross-posted with permission.

BY ETHAN HUFF
May 22, 2023

Dr. Naomi Wolf of DailyClout.io has released new information from the Pfizer documents about musculoskeletal events of special interest, or AESIs, that we now know are linked to “vaccination” with Pfizer’s mRNA Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccine” series.
 
Dubbed “Report 71,” the latest drop from Dr. Wolf was put together by Dr. Barbara Gehrett, MD, Dr. Joseph Gehrett, MD, Dr. Chris Flowers, MD, and Loree Britt.
 
Ben Armstrong of “The Ben Armstrong Show” also covered Report 71, along with other pertinent information that you can hear more about in the video posted at his website.”
 
“Report 71 is about musculoskeletal adverse events of special interest, and it turns out that they affected 8.5 percent of the post-marketing dataset in Pfizer’s database, including four children and one infant,” Dr. Wolf revealed.
 
“Women were affected at a ratio of almost 4:1 over men, and you’ll remember that I’ve often said that joint pain is the number-one side effect in the Pfizer documents, but the CDC doesn’t mention it.”
 
This would explain why so many people these days are having to get shoulder, hip, or knee replacements, or why their ankles are giving out. This includes young, otherwise healthy people who got the Pfizer jab and are now suffering from joint paint, or are limping.
 
“The bottom line is there were 3,600 cases of musculoskeletal adverse events, 8.5 percent, the 3,600 patients reported 3,640 adverse events of this kind,” Dr. Wolf further explained. “Of these, 44 percent were classified by Pfizer as serious, and this is actually report 71.”
 
Pfizer only tracked AESIs from its covid jab for 90 days following initial U.K. release on Dec. 1, 2020
 
Report 71 of the Pfizer documents specifically lists the group of AESIs detected as including diagnoses for arthralgia (joint pain), arthritis (joint inflammation), arthritis of a bacterial nature, chronic fatigue syndrome, polyarthritis (inflammation of multiple joints), post-viral fatigue syndrome, and rheumatoid arthritis (an autoimmune and inflammatory disease).
 
Keep in mind that the figures and percentages unveiled by Dr. Wolf only include those cases that were reported to and tracked by Pfizer within the first 90 days of the jab’s release starting on Dec. 1, 2020, in the United Kingdom. Nearly two weeks later, the Trump administration launched Operation Warp Speed to bring the Pfizer jab to the U.S. as well.
 
We know from Report 71 that the time between the jab’s administration and the onset of AESIs ranged from less than 24 hours to up to 32 days. About half of the adverse events occurred within the first 24 hours after injection.
 
While adults were the primary victims, there were some children and babies who also became damaged, as Dr. Wolf mentioned. Keep in mind that at the time when Pfizer administered these jabs to children, its injection had not yet been approved for use in people under the age of 16.
 
By far, the most common AESI reported was arthralgia (joint pain), accounting for 97 percent of cases. This was followed by 70 cases of arthritis (2 percent), 26 cases of rheumatoid arthritis (less than 1 percent), and five other AESIs involving polyarthritis (less than 1 percent).
 
Amazingly, Pfizer’s conclusion from all this was that “[t]his cumulative case review does not raise new safety issues,” though the company promised to continue its “surveillance” efforts, the results of which would have not been released for nearly eight decades had Pfizer gotten its way to withhold such data from the public until after the current generation of people had already long since passed away.

Pfizer Documents: “Report 71” Shows More Horrific Drug Industry Crimes Against Humanity – America First Report

FWIW

In reply toRe: msg 557
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784 

Jun-12

Dr. Jessica Rose: “We’re under attack, seriously, it’s bad”

BY RHODA WILSON
MAY 23, 2023

“We’re under attack” and it’s time for us to start thinking about lawsuits and compensations Dr. Jessica Rose told the host of Pandemic Podcast Dan Astin-Gregory during a backstage discussion at the International Covid Summit.
 
Dr. Jessica Rose has a Post Doctorate in both Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, a PhD in Computational Biology and a Masters in Immunology, as well as a BSc in Applied Mathematics.
 
Referring to microbiologist Kevin McKernan’s research of covid “vaccine” vial contents, Dr. Rose said: “By accident [McKernan] got some expired vials of the bivalent product and he sequenced them … as the ball started rolling he started finding more and more … he found plasmid contamination in the vials.  He eventually ended up testing the monovalent, the Pfizer, the Janssen and the Moderna [vaccines].”
 
McKernan has published several articles on his findings under the pseudonym Anandamide on a Substack page titled ‘Nepetalactone Newsletter’.  You can browse and read his articles HERE.  At times they are fairly technical so Dr. Rose has tried to help us understand in a series of articles she has published on Substack HERE.
 
mRNA for use in injections is supposed to be “pure mRNA,” Dr. Rose explained. There is a five-step manufacturing process to manufacture the mRNA which begins with a circular DNA that encodes the spike protein.  This circular DNA is called a plasmid or expression vector. The fifth step is the purification step.  It also happens to be the most expensive step.  “The bottom line is,” Dr. Rose said, “[the circular DNA] is not supposed to be in [the final product, the injections] … at some point in the process something was not done correctly … I think it’s 25-30% of the nucleotides [McKernan found in the vials] were from the [circular] DNA” which is way above acceptable safety levels.
 
Pfizer has released an expression vector map that shows the individual components of the circular DNA.  One of the components is called a promoter. “The promoter that they say is in the Pfizer expression vectors is the T7 … [but Pfizer] hasn’t said anything about using … SV40 or CMV [promoters] … And Kevin found those,” Dr. Rose said. “He not only found promoters, but he also found enhancers.”
 
Additional follow up on DNA contamination of COVID-19 injectable products (there’s more coming too), Dr. Jessica Rose, 12 March 2023
 
But DNA contamination and SV40 in the covid injections are not the only problems.  The bacteria Escherichia coli, or E. coli for short, is used to replicate the DNA so there’s always the potential for lipopolysaccharide contamination. Lipopolysaccharides are bacterial toxins that can cause inflammation and health issues if they reach the bloodstream. “That can cause sepsis, toxic shock syndrome and anaphylaxis,” Dr. Rose explained.
 
Dr. Rose discussed the above with Dan Astin-Gregory backstage at the International Covid Summit III hosted at the European Parliament in Brussels from 2 to 4 May 2023.  You can watch their discussion below. 
 
Pandemic Podcast: Dr Jessica Rose | What’s in the vials that should NOT be in the vials, 15 May 2022 (22 mins)
 
Below is Dr. Rose’s presentation at the International Covid Summit III.  Dr. Rose’s deep dive into the US Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (“VAERS”) reports surrounding the adverse events profile of the covid injections has led her to make some remarkable discoveries in association with other doctors. Her presentation at the European Parliament briefly summarises those discoveries.
 
“There were more than enough safety signals in VAERS, even in January 2021 … Beyond a safety signal being detected … across all age groups … there were almost 700 deaths.  Once you surpass a certain number of deaths … it’s time to call the product off the market, to recall it,” she began.
 
You can find the slides for her presentation in her article: ‘My presentation to the Members of European Parliament’.

Dr. Jessica Rose: “We’re under attack, seriously, it’s bad” – The Expose (expose-news.com)

FWIW

In reply toRe: msg 558
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784 

Jun-12

EU Parliament COVID-19 Summit: “Covid-19 was an Act of Biological Warfare Perpetrated on the Human Race. It was a Financial Heist. Nature was Hijacked. Science was Hijacked” (VIDEO)

By Jim Hoft
May. 26, 2023 11:30 am

The EU Parliament held the International COVID-19 Summit III in Brussels, Belgium earlier this month.
 
In a recent address to the European Parliament, a US businessman specializing in patent auditing David Martin claimed that COVID-19 was not a natural occurrence but a calculated act of “biological warfare and a financial heist. Nature was hijacked, science was hijacked.”
 
In his presentation in front of the EU parliament, Martin argued that the pandemic we said happened in the last few years did not overnight, citing sources in the public domain.
 
According to him, the coronavirus was first identified in 1965 and serves as a model pathogen. In addition, they learned that coronaviruses can be modified.
 
“But in 1966, the very first CoV coronavirus model was used as a transatlantic biological experiment in human manipulation. And you heard the date 1966. I hope you’re getting the point of what I’m saying. This is not an overnight thing. This is actually something that’s been long in the making. A year before I was born, we had the first transatlantic coronavirus data-sharing experiment between the United States and the United Kingdom.”
 
According to Martin, “Later we started learning how to modify a coronavirus by putting them in animals such as dogs and pigs,” and this led to the development of the first coronavirus spike protein vaccine by the US pharmaceutical giant Pfizer in 1990.
 
However, the medical community and pharmaceutical companies quickly learned that the vaccines were ineffective.
 
“Because the coronavirus is a malleable model, it mutates,” Martin said. “Every medical publication concluded that coronaviruses escape vaccines because it modifies and mutates too rapidly for a vaccine to be developed.”
 
More from the Standard:
 
In 2002, a university in North Carolina initiated a study to develop an “infectious replication defective,” which Martin interpreted as “a weapon to target individuals, but not have collateral damage.”
 
Characterizing the project as having “mysteriously preceded SARS by a year,” Martin said the coronavirus that caused the highly deadly infection was not from China and that it was “engineered” instead of naturally occurring.
 
On Covid-19, Martin said the coronavirus – named as SARS-CoV-2 by the World Health Organization – was poised for human emergence in 2016, with a preview about an “accidental or intentional release of a respiratory coronavirus” from a laboratory in Wuhan.
 
He said the purpose of the coronavirus “release” was to boost global acceptance on universal vaccination.
 
Explaining the common concern among the medical industry, Martin said: “Until an infectious crisis is very real, present and at the emergency threshold, it is often largely ignored.
 
“To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis, we need to increase the public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures, such as the pan-influenza, or pan-coronavirus, vaccine. A key drive is the media and the economics will follow the hype.
 
“We [pharmaceutical firms] need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issue. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process,” he said.
 
Martin claimed that the United States “intentionally released” the Covid-19 coronavirus in Wuhan, China, with the goal of causing a global pandemic in order to increase public support for vaccines.
 
“This whole story started in 1965 when we decided to hijack a natural model and decide to start manipulating it. Science was hijacked when the only questions that could be asked were questions authorized under the patent protection of the CDC, the FDA, the NIH, and their equivalent organizations around the world,” he said.
 
WATCH:

EU Parliament COVID-19 Summit: "Covid-19 was an Act of Biological Warfare Perpetrate
...[Message truncated]
View Full Message
In reply toRe: msg 559
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784 

Jun-12

mRNA Covid-19 “Vaccines” Linked to Increased Risk of Vaginal Bleeding: Study

BY ZACHARY STIEBER
May 24, 2023

Women vaccinated with the Pfizer or Moderna COVID-19 vaccines are at higher risk of vaginal bleeding, according to a new study.
 
One or more doses of the messenger RNA shots increased the risk of the bleeding in women aged 12 to 74, Swedish researchers reported in the study, published on May 3 by the British Medical Journal.
 
Adjustments to the data resulted in the removal of some of the heightened risks, but even after adjustments, younger women were still more likely to experience bleeding after the first and third doses and older women were more likely to suffer from the issue after the first, second, and third doses.
 
A number of studies, primarily based on self-reporting of symptoms, have identified menstrual irregularities and bleeding as potential side effects of the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines. People have also filed reports to various reporting systems, such as the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, and Israeli officials found signs that Pfizer’s vaccine causes menstrual issues.
 
The Swedish researchers sought to examine the risks among the vaccinated by examining national data that covers every woman aged 12 to 74 in the country. After excluding women who had a history of certain conditions such as menstruation disorders and women living at special care facilities, the study population was 2.94 million. Cases were only included if they were diagnosed at a hospital or another health care facility.
 
Researchers plugged the data into a model that compared the person-time among the unvaccinated, including individuals who later received a vaccine, to the vaccinated. The top-level results were reported, as were numbers broken down by dose and age group, with the population divided into younger women (aged 12 to 49) and older women (50 to 74).
 
Increased Risks
 
Prior to adjustment, women of all ages in the population were found to be at higher risk of vaginal bleeding following vaccination. The younger women were also at a heightened risk of menstrual disturbance, defined as being diagnosed with “absent, scanty and rare menstruation” or “excessive, frequent and irregular menstruation.”
 
After adjusting for covariates such as marital status and days in the hospital, the risks were removed for some doses and diminished for others.
 
Adjustments almost entirely removed the menstrual disturbance risk, for example, though women were still found at increased risk within seven days of dose one. The risks of bleeding for the younger women were also reduced, though still present within seven days of doses one and three.
 
An increased risk of bleeding was still present for older women following the adjustments, with a hazard ratio of 1.28 within seven days of a third shot and 1.25 between eight and 90 days following a third dose.
 
Hazard ratios of one mean there’s no evidence of a negative effect or benefit, while ratios above one indicate an increased risk of an adverse effect. The adjusted results mean vaccinated older women were about 25 percent more likely to experience the bleeding after a third dose, and about 15 percent more likely after any dose.
 
The increased risk was seen with both Pfizer and Moderna’s vaccine, according to a stratified analysis of the data.
 
Pfizer and Moderna did not respond to requests for comment.
 
Conclusions
 
Dr. Rickard Ljung of the Swedish Medical Products Agency and his co-authors acknowledged the increased risks among the vaccinated but downplayed the findings.
 
“We observed weak and inconsistent associations between SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and healthcare contacts for postmenopausal bleeding, and even less consistent for menstrual disturbance, and premenstrual bleeding,” they wrote. SARS-CoV-2 is a name for the COVID-19 virus.
 
“Extensive adjustment for confounding attenuated most risk estimates. The patterns of association are not consistent with a causal effect. These findings do not provide any substantial support for a causal association between SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and healthcare contacts related to menstrual or bleeding disorders,” the researchers added.
 
Ljung told The Epoch Times in an email that the increased risk of vaginal bleeding
...[Message truncated]
View Full Message
TOP