Opinion Polls: Delphi's Polling Place

Hosted by Showtalk

Opinion polls on all subjects. Opinions? Heck yes, we have opinions - but we're *always* nice about it, even when ours are diametrically opposed to yours. Register your vote today!

  • 5141
    MEMBERS
  • 136872
    MESSAGES
  • 4
    POSTS TODAY

Discussions

In light of recent info are vaccines ...   The Healthy You: Health and Fitness Polls

Started 10/24/22 by WALTER784; 125724 views.
In reply toRe: msg 636
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784 

8/9/23

Global Alarm: Governments now believe there’s a link between COVID-19 Vaccines, Antibody-Dependent Enhancement & Immune System Degradation

BY THE EXPOSÉ
JULY 19, 2023

Since late 2021, official Government reports have indicated the Covid-19 vaccine severely damages the immune system with the potential to cause some new form of Covid-19 vaccine-induced acquired immunodeficiency syndrome among people who have received multiple injections.
 
The claims were furiously denied by the mainstream establishment despite the fact it was their data that blatantly outlined this was the case. But rather than prove otherwise most Government agencies just decided to stop publishing the damning data instead.
 
However, almost two years later, the authorities have quietly decided to begin an investigation into Covid-19 vaccine induced Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome and Antibody-Dependent Enhancement after scientists around the world, including many from Harvard and Yale, were forced to admit a debilitating suite of problems have been appearing hours, days or weeks after a Covid-19 vaccine has been administered.
 
But they have thus far decided to dub the condition ‘Long Vax’ in an attempt to trivialize the deadly consequences of Covid-19 vaccination and give more credence to the alleged condition ‘Long Covid’ which is otherwise known as hypochondria.
 
Harvard & Yale Scientists investigate “new” condition linked to Covid-19 Injections
 
Official Government released evidence proves that COVID-19 vaccines have harmed millions of people and killed countless others.
 
For instance, data from the Office of National Statistics in the UK has shown for over a year that the vaccinated population in England and Wales are significantly more likely to die than the unvaccinated population per 100,000 population.
 
Source
 
This is most likely why the country has been suffering significant excess deaths against the five-year average week after week.
 
Source
 
But despite this, the world is now gearing up for yet another new round of “boosters”. And like all vaccines, those targeting the alleged Covid-19 virus can cause deadly and debilitating side effects in many people.
 
According to the establishment and scientists at Harvard and Yale, these include cases of abnormal blood clotting and heart inflammation. Both of these have been known about since early 2021, with a huge rise in myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) being recorded among younger males.
 
But now scientists at Harvard and Yale are conducting research on what they claim is a newly identified condition they are absurdly referring to as ‘Long Vax’ and are even claiming the chronic symptoms resemble the made-up disease referred to as “Long Covid”.
 
Source
 
Source
 
Source
 
The new study has materialised due to the quietly announced wider acceptance of the sinister consequences of Covid-19 vaccination among the mainstream medical and scientific community.
 
“You see one or two patients and you wonder if it’s a coincidence,” says Anne Louise Oaklander, a neurologist and researcher at Harvard Medical School. “But by the time you’ve seen 10, 20,” she continues, trailing off. “Where there’s smoke, there’s fire.”
 
According to researchers “Long Vax” may steam from an immune system overreaction to the spike (S) protein the body is instructed to make once the mRNA contained in the Covid-19 injections invades the body cells.
 
A spike protein that scientists and doctors assured the public was “harmless” when they decided to conduct the largest experiment on humankind in history following the emergency use authorisation of the Pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 injections.
 
“I’m persuaded that there’s something going on” with these side effects, Harlan Krumholz, a cardiologist at Yale University says. “It’s my obligation if I truly am a scientist, to have an open mind and learn if there’s something that can be done.”
 
...[Message truncated]
View Full Message
In reply toRe: msg 637
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784 

8/9/23

The EUA only issued supposed "vaccine" is not as safe as they claimed... and they finally admit it!!!

CDC confirms COVID Vaccination caused shocking 338x increase in Cancers & AIDS-Associated Diseases

BY THE EXPOSÉ
JULY 20, 2023

Official data made available by the U.S. Government and Centers for Disease Control strongly suggests that fully vaccinated Americans may be developing Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome or a similar disease that is decimating the innate immune system.
 
But they are not alone, because further data made available by the UK Government and the Government of Canada suggests the vaccinated population in both of these respective countries are also developing the debilitating condition.
 
It’s a common misconception that Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) is only caused by the HIV virus. This simply isn’t true.
 
Acquired (or secondary) immunodeficiency is one of the major causes of infections in adults. These immunodeficiency disorders affect your immune system partially or as a whole, making your body an easy target for several diseases and infections. (Source)
 
When immunodeficiency disorders affect your immune system, your body can no longer fight bacteria and diseases. (Source)
 
Several factors in the environment can cause secondary immunodeficiency disorders. ‌(Source)
 
Some common ones are:
 
Radiation or chemotherapy, which can lead to a secondary immunodeficiency disorder known as neutropenia
 
Infections due to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) can result in acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS)
 
Leukaemia, a cancer that begins in the cells of the bone marrow that can lead to hypogammaglobulinemia—a type of secondary immunodeficiency
 
Malnutrition, which affects up to 50% of populations in underdeveloped countries and leaves people vulnerable to respiratory infections and diarrhoea
But some of the less common causes include Drugs or medications. (Source)
 
So it’s perfectly possible for a medication or drug to cause acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, and data published by the U.S Government and Centers for Disease Control (CDC) strongly suggests the Covid-19 injections should be added to the list.
 
For months on end, official data coming out of both the UK and Canada has strongly insinuated that the vaccinated population are developing a new form of AIDS. This is because the Covid-19 injections are proving to have a real-world negative effectiveness, implying that they are causing damage to the natural immune system.
 
Here’s a table showing the case rates per 100,000 by vaccination status in England from week 51 of 2021 to week 12 of 2022 –
 
Source
 
The case rates per 100k were highest among the triple vaccinated population over these 3 months, except for the 18-29-year-olds in the week 3 report only, and the under 18’s in all 3 months.
 
Now that we know the case rates we can use Pfizer’s simple vaccine effectiveness formula to calculate the real-world Covid-19 vaccine effectiveness among the triple vaccinated.
 
Unvaccinated Case Rate – Vaccinated Case Rate / Unvaccinated Case Rate x 100
 
This is nowhere near the claimed 95% effectiveness by Pfizer, is it?
 
However, vaccine effectiveness isn’t really a measure of a vaccine, it is a measure of a vaccine recipient’s immune system performance compared to the immune system performance of an unvaccinated person.
 
Using the case rates provided by UKHSA, we can also calculate the immune system performance, here’s a chart showing how they stack up –
 
You can read our full investigation of the UK data here.
 
Data from the Government of Canada also shows much of the same. Here’s a chart showing the real-world Covid-19 vaccine effectiveness across Canada against infection, hospitalisation and death –
 
You can read our full investigation on
...[Message truncated]
View Full Message
In reply toRe: msg 638
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784 

8/9/23

Pfizer and Moderna Face Legal Action in Australia Over Alleged Failure to Obtain Necessary “Genetically Modified Organisms” Licenses in COVID-19 Vaccines

By Jim H?ft
Jul. 21, 2023 7:15 am

A lawsuit was filed in Australia’s Federal Court on July 6, 2023, accusing pharmaceutical giants Pfizer and Moderna of dealing with Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) without the requisite licenses. The court case, identified as Julian Fidge v. Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd & Anor, marks a milestone in the ongoing global discourse around the risks of the experimental COVID-19 vaccines.
 
From the news release:
 
“To paraphrase a line about the devil:
 
.. the greatest trick Pfizer and Moderna ever pulled was to convince the world their products don’t enter the nucleus, and alter chromosomal DNA, forever
 
With a heavy heart I can now share with you the new legal proceedings we launched on 6 July, naming Pfizer and Moderna as the Defendants; our planet’s new IG Farbens producing a more subtle Zyklon B (said with respect to those affected by the latter).
 
The Letters of Demand we sent to Pfizer, Moderna, the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator, and the TGA, contain an abundance of references referring to the long established science surrounding the real dangers these transfection products were always known to pose to humanity.”
 
The lawsuit led by Julian Gillespie LLB, B Juris, with instructing solicitor Katie Ashby-Koppens argue that the vaccines developed by Pfizer and Moderna, including both monovalent and bivalent vaccines, are or contain GMOs, and “that they have failed to apply for the necessary licenses.”
 
Central to this argument is the assertion that the lipid nanoparticle (LNP) -modRNA and -modDNA complexes present in the vaccines fulfill the Australian legal definitions of a genetically modified organism, pursuant to the Gene Technology Act 2000 (GT Act).
 
“In a nutshell: the LNP-modRNA complexes produced by Pfizer and Moderna satisfy Australian legal definitions for being properly deemed Genetically Modified Organisms, or GMOs. Almost identical legal definitions are found in many other countries, including the EU. There are over four decades of science acknowledging how easily synthetic and natural RNA can integrate with genomic DNA.
 
The subsequent discovery by Kevin McKernan of grossly excessive synthetic DNA contamination in the vials of both companies only makes a very bad situation much worse, as that modDNA also satisfies the same legal definitions for being yet another form of GMO, while possessing superior traits for effectively undergoing genomic integration, and DNA disregulation.
 
In Australia it is a serious criminal offence to ‘deal’ with GMOs without a GMO licence first being granted by the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator.”
 
Both Pfizer and Moderna have been accused of a ‘willful blindness’ to the legislative requirements. The lawsuits accuse the companies of bypassing the necessary processes to seek a GMO license from the Australian Office of the Gene Technology Regulator (OGTR) before pursuing provisional approval from the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA).
 
AstraZeneca, another vaccine producer, is cited as a contrast, having properly sought a GMO License before seeking TGA approval for its COVID-19 vaccine.
 
“This constituted a gross and heinous failure by Australia’s Gene Technology Regulator, assisted by the Secretary of Health not pausing to ask whether these drugs were not always meant to be first regulated by the OGTR, prior to being possibly cleared to proceed to apply for provisional approval with the TGA.
 
This utter failure by GMO regulators occurred about the globe when the C19 drugs were hustled to the front of approval ques, where now thanks to their transparent failures we can thank them for ensuring the Human Genome has been irreparably poisoned.”
 
The lawsuit seeks an urgent injunction against Pfizer and Moderna to prevent any further ‘dealings’ with their products in Australia, which would effectively stop further vaccinations. Further to that, it also seeks to investigate what health officials and regulators knew about these products when they first came up for approval.
 
“If we can achieve that we can then start asking the real questions of what Brendan Murphy and his army of highly paid PhDs knew when Pfizer and Moderna first ‘came a knockin’, w
...[Message truncated]
View Full Message
In reply toRe: msg 639
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784 

8/12/23

Ed Dowd Drops Bombshell Data: Hematological (Blood-Related) Claims Up 522% Above Trend in 2022 (VIDEO)

By Guest Contributor
Jul. 24, 2023 11:00 am

“We were looking for data like this, and we found it in the UK Personal Independence [Payment] (PIP) system,” announced former Blackrock portfolio asset manager Edward Dowd (@DowdEdward) on the Dr. Drew show. “We need the help of the medical community and the regulators to explain what’s going on because it’s alarming.”
 
Dowd then presented a slide showing yearly PIP clearances (payments) by body system, using different metrics for 2020, 2021, and 2022.
 
“And you can see, I’ll point out hematological (blood-related) … that’s up 522% in 2022. And I want to say this is versus trend. It’s not versus 2021 or 2020. It’s versus a trend that we analyzed from 2016 to 2019. So it’s a percent increase over trend. And the trends were stable — and then this exploded.”
 
Dowd continued to explain the chart in more detail.
 
“And you can see, if you look at this chart, [increased claims in] different body systems started off slowly in 2020, picked up speed in 21, and just exploded in 2022. So something is going on that is detrimental to the population of the UK,” he concluded.
 
Here are some of the worrisome numbers of increased claims above trend in 2022:
 
Hematological – up 522%
Auditory – up 121%
Cardiovascular – up 121%
Dermatological – up 138%
Endocrine, metabolic, and thermoregulation – up 156%
Gastrointestinal – up 145%
Genito-urinary – up 143%
Immune – up 115%
Musculoskeletal – up 93%
Neurological – up 107%
Oncology – up 35%
Psychiatric – up 124%
Respiratory – up 93%
Visual – up 80%
 
“These numbers are just crazy percentage-wise,” Dowd remarked.
 
“We can convert these things to what’s called Z scores or standard deviations.”
 
Dowd explained how a three-standard deviation happens 0.3% of the time. “In Wall Street, that’s a big deal.” “Sometimes we see extreme six-standard deviation events, and that’s kooky,” he added. But alarmingly, the increase in hematological (blood-related) claims equates to a 61 standard deviation. “That’s like the probability of a black hole appearing near the earth, and we get sucked in in two years. It’s not something that is likely to occur mistakenly,” Dowd remarked.
 
Dowd ended by commenting, “61 standard deviations is lights out, black swan event, something’s gone off the rails. It’s so many zeros and so unlikely to happen by accident that it has to be explained. And that’s what we’re calling on the medical community to explain this. That’s it.”
 
The full interview between Doctors Drew Pinsky, Kelly Victory, and former Blackrock portfolio manager Ed Dowd is available in the video below:
 
Ed Dowd Reveals New “Bombshell” Data That Looks Like A Cover Up w/ Dr. Kelly Victory – Ask Dr. Drew

Ed Dowd Drops Bombshell Data: Hematological (Blood-Related) Claims Up 522% Above Trend in 2022 (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Guest Contributor

FWIW

In reply toRe: msg 640
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784 

8/12/23

Dr. Peter McCullough: mRNA “Vaccines” Contain Tumor Gene Promoter SV40 and Inhibit Tumor Suppressors

BY BELLE CARTER, NATURAL NEWS
July 23, 2023

Renowned American cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough recently warned against the mRNA Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines when he appeared on a Brighteon.TV show, as they were found not only to contain a cancer-promoting virus, they are also weaponized to inhibit tumor suppressor genes.
 
A preprint study done by microbiologist Kevin McKernan came out amid news on skyrocketing cancer cases worldwide. It concluded that copy DNA or complementary DNA (cDNA), is coming off of Escherichia coli (E. coli) as part of the manufacturing cDNA is found in high concentrations contaminating these vials.
 
“And Jeff, you can’t believe it. But you know, one of the sequences is SV40 [simian vacuolating virus 40], which is a known tumor gene promoter,” McCullough told “Prather Point” host Jeffrey Prather. “To make matters worse, you can’t believe that spike protein is produced in abundance.” He went on to say that the S1 and S2 segments look like they interfere with two tumor suppressor systems, the p53 tumor suppressor protein and BRCA, or the BReast CAncer gene.
 
This just means that “our ability to keep cancer cells in check is lost,” the esteemed doctor explained. “So, we have a situation now, which is the data started coming together, these messenger RNA shots promote cancers and inhibit their immune suppression.
 
He believes, even though it’s not conclusive, that these vaccines are causing the surge in cancer cases across the world. “However, there’s no other explanation that in every country that is mass vaccinated, the rates are skyrocketing,” McCullough said. (Related: DIRTY SHOTS: DNA contamination and cancer-causing agent SV40 found in mRNA vaccines.)
 
The most recent finding is clearly possible especially since studies, research, and a lot of probes have proven that spike is the most pathogenic protein in history. It was found to damage the heart and brain, and cause blood clots, as well as other damage.
 
The economy is tanking and a “Digital Dollar” is in the works. Don’t procrastinate. Move wealth and retirement funds to physical precious metals and/or a self-directed IRA with America First companies who aren’t helping Democrats, the WEF, or the CCP. Here are four such companies who can help you immediately.
 
“The messenger RNA causes heart damage via the spike protein, neurologic damage like stroke and intracranial hemorrhage, neuropathy, Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) and proven to cause blood clotting. The spike protein is found in blood clots larger than we’ve ever seen before, not responsive to blood thinners and they don’t seem to dissolve. And then lastly, immunologic problems like multi-system inflammatory disorder,” he said.
 
The heart doctor emphasized how important it is to discuss these issues since 75 percent of Americans took a shot and in the United States, 94 percent of the jab-takers took the mRNA vaccines.
 
McCullough challenges Dr. Hotez in a COVID-19 vaccine debate
 
McCullough has been a persistent voice in encouraging against the mRNA vaccines since they started being rolled out. On “One America News,” he challenged scientist and pediatrician Dr. Peter Hotez to debate about the dangers of the injections.
 
“Debate is really part of scientific advancement. I communicated with Joe Rogan over the weekend. Remember, I had been on his show in 2021 and I set all the records for views there. I have more citations in the National Science in Medicine than Hotez. I am a bit senior to him academically, but I would be happy to go on Rogan with Hotez and just sit down as two academic doctors and review the safety data on the vaccines,” he said.
 
Back in June, podcaster Joe Rogan set off a Twitter storm after he challenged Hotez to debate presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. McCullough volunteered to face the vaccine scientist as Kennedy could be busy in his campaign.
 
“Robert F. Kennedy is doing a terrific job but he is not a doctor, he is running for president. I think he can focus on his presidential campaign and let me and others in the world of high academics work this out. I think America would benefit greatly from a scientific interchange,” he said.
 
He, as always, stressed that the bottom line is that the vaccines aren’t safe as there has been unprecedented injuries, disabilities, and even death.
 
...[Message truncated]
View Full Message
In reply toRe: msg 641
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784 

8/13/23

Swiss study: heart injuries from COVID vaccine 3000x higher than thought

DAVID STROM 10:01 AM
July 26, 2023

It is a small study, but a very disturbing one.
 
We keep being told that injury to the heart from the COVID vaccine is very rare, but a study done in Basel Switzerland indicates that the rate of subclinical myocarditis after the COVID vaccine is hardly rare at all.
 
In fact, in a study with only 777 participants with a median age of 37--all medical professionals getting the COVID vaccine–the incidence of elevated cardiac enzymes 3 days after injection was pretty substantial, at almost 3%.
 
The CDC did a study and from that, they claimed the rate was 0.001%, or one out of 100,000.
 
2.8% is a lot higher than 0.001%. Another 0.3% had “probable myocarditis,” putting the total at over 3%. That is 3000 times higher than the US government claimed. 
 
In this small study, nobody had serious complications, but with a myocarditis complication rate of 3%, you would have to expect that giving out hundreds of millions of doses is a pretty risky proposition.
 
I think we all knew that already, but this study seems to put the nail in the coffin of “vaccine injuries are super rare” from COVID-19 shots.
 
Oops. Who could have guessed?
 
One oddity was that the rate of myocarditis among the participants was heavily weighted toward women, not men. That could be an artifact of the sample, or it could indicate that women are more likely to get a complication, but the complications are more likely to be serious among men.
 
One reason the researchers posit for the vast difference between their results–which are based upon blood tests looking for cardiac enzymes in all participants–and the commonly asserted claim that vaccine-induced myocarditis is rare is that the only cases that are diagnosed without looking specifically for it are severe.
 
In other words, most people don’t go to the doctor until there is a serious problem, so many people suffer from myocarditis without ever getting diagnosed.
 
This suggests that there is a very large group of people who were afflicted but never treated. This in most cases would not be a huge problem, as the inflammation resolves on its own, but in some cases, actual damage to the heart was done without it ever being caught.
 
Another variable, not mentioned, is that myocarditis complications are more common in young men, and this study skewed both female and middle-aged professionals. Given the cohort studied, one would expect them to be not entirely representative of the population as a whole. They are likely wealthier, healthier, and moderately older than the population as a whole.
 
In any case, this study sheds quite a light on just how deceptive the CDC, the FDA, and NIAID have been about vaccine safety. And also how intentionally ignorant they have chosen to be. This was not a complicated study to do. The researchers chose a cohort easy to recruit, tested them both before and after vaccination to create a baseline and comparison, and analyzed the data.
 
Easy peasy. Not even that costly. If you wanted to know the actual numbers of people with heart damage post-vaccine, this was an easy-to-construct and interpret study, and you can get results very quickly.
 
Why didn’t our public health officials do it then? Why did it take a hospital in Switzerland to come up with the idea and execute it? In 2023, no less.
 
Being off by a factor of 3000 is more than an oops. It is a very big deal.

Swiss study: heart injuries from COVID vaccine 3000x higher than thought – HotAir

FWIW

In reply toRe: msg 642
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784 

8/13/23

Shocking ONS Report: COVID Vaccinated 18-39 Age Group at 91% Higher Death Risk than Unvaccinated Peers in UK

BY THE EXPOSÉ
JULY 26, 2023

Official figures published by the UK’s Office for National Statistics show that deaths per 100,000 among double vaccinated 18-39-year-olds were on average 91% higher than deaths per 100,000 among unvaccinated 18-39-year-olds between January 2021 and January 2022.
 
This means it can no longer be denied that the Covid-19 vaccines are deadly because even the official Government published figures prove it.
 
The Office for National Statistics is the UK’s largest independent producer of official statistics and the recognised national statistical institute of the UK. It is responsible for collecting and publishing statistics related to the economy, population and society at national, regional and local levels.
 
Its dataset on deaths in England by vaccination status between January 2021 and January 2022 can be found here. It contains a large amount of data on age-standardised mortality rates for deaths by vaccination status between 1 January 2021 and 31 January 2022.
 
Table 2 of the dataset contains data on the monthly age-standardised mortality rates by vaccination status by age group for all deaths in England. The following table shows an example of how the numbers are presented in the dataset –
 
What immediately catches the eye when looking at this data is the mortality rate per 100,00 person-years among 18-39-year-olds in the month of January 2021. The figures show the death rate among the unvaccinated in this month was 67.7 deaths per 100,000 person-years. Whilst the death rate among the partly vaccinated (at least 21 days ago) was 119.9 deaths per 100,000 years.
 
This shows that vaccinated 18-39-year-olds were more likely to die in January 2021, suggesting the Covid-19 injections increased the risk of death or played a part in causing death. So we dug further and extracted all the figures on 18-39-year-olds for each month between January 2021 and January 2022, and this is what we found –
 
The above chart shows the monthly age-standardised mortality rates by vaccination status for all-cause deaths, per 100,000 person-years among adults aged 18 to 39 in England. The green line is the mortality rate among the unvaccinated, which while fluctuating has remained pretty stable throughout.
 
The other lines however represent different vaccination statuses, and they are extremely concerning. The orange, yellow, and pink lines represent mortality rates within 21 days of receiving a first, second or third dose. And they reveal that the risk of death increases significantly immediately after vaccination.
 
This may explain why figures found in ‘table 4’ of the same ONS dataset reveal 41,449 people died within 21 days of vaccination in England between 1st Jan 21 and 31st Jan 22 –
 
But the most concerning figures are the mortality rates among those vaccinated at least 21 days ago, which you can see more clearly in the following chart –
 
Around June 2021, there is a cross over from those who’ve received one dose to those who’ve received two doses in terms of the increased mortality rate against the unvaccinated. This obviously tallies with when each injection was administered to this age group. But what’s most concerning here is that the second injection seems to make things much worse in terms of the risk of death.
 
In January 2021 the mortality rate per 100,000 person-years among the unvaccinated equated to 67.7. This then fell month on month to 33.1 in May, before increasing again in June to 44.8. The same however cannot be said for those who had received a single dose at least 21 days prior to their death.
 
In January 2021 the mortality rate per 100,000 person-years among the partly vaccinated equated to 119.9. Meaning the mortality rate was 77% higher than the mortality rate among the unvaccinated. This then fell to 68.3 deaths per 100,000 in February, before climbing to 90.1 in March, then 108.8 in April.
 
This means at this point the mortality rate among the partly vaccinated was 193.3% higher than the mortality rate among the unvaccinated. But not long after following the second dose being administered things get even worse.
 
The highest mortality rate among the double vaccinated (at least 21 days ago) occurred in September 2021, with 125.9 deaths per 100,000 person-years. In the same month, the mortality rate among the unvaccinated equated to 46.8. Meaning the double vaccinated mortality rate was 169% highe
...[Message truncated]
View Full Message
In reply toRe: msg 643
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784 

8/15/23

'It's Murder': Remdesivir Victims Decry FDA's Shocking New Move

July 28, 2023
By Stella Paul

Remdesivir may be the most despised drug in American history, earning the nickname Run Death Is Near for its lethal record during COVID.  Experts claimed that it would stop COVID; instead, it stopped kidney function, then blasted the liver and other organs.  Now this reviled destroyer of kidneys has been approved by the FDA for COVID treatment of kidney patients.  Does anybody else feel as if the FDA is shoving its power in our faces and laughing at us?
 
I've been joining online support groups for people who lost loved ones to the Remdesivir Protocol — a nightmarish sequence in which a patient is isolated in the hospital, bullied into taking Remdesivir, ventilated, and then sedated to death.  Thousands of Americans were killed this way, possibly hundreds of thousands.
 
These support groups are a deeply somber business.  Grieving faces fill the screen of people who lost a parent, spouse, sibling, or child.  Some speak with icy anger; some choke back sobs as they tell of the deadly abuse inflicted on their loved ones, shattering their families forever.
 
I asked them what they thought of the FDA's decision to approve Remdesivir for people with severe renal impairment, including dialysis.  "Morally, how can you do that?" Joyce Wilson said.  "It's a death sentence.  They didn't care if people had kidney issues or not.  My husband went into the hospital in kidney distress.  They exacerbated it with Remdesivir.  Then they ventilated him, and he died."
 
"This is absurd," Tracy Bird told me.  "The FDA can no longer be trusted with any drug under any circumstances.  It's all conflicts of interest.  My husband Jeff had strong kidney function when he went in the hospital.  They gave him Remdesivir, and three days later, he was in kidney failure."
 
"My daughter's story is no different than anyone else's," Denise Fritter said.  "Jamie was 36 and looking forward to getting married.  The hospital refused to consider any other modalities of treatment for her.  They insisted on Remdesivir.  Then they put her on a vent and murdered her.  I think the FDA is using Remdesivir to fulfill their own agenda."
 
Cheri Martin, who lost her husband Steven to the protocol, chimed in with thoughts on the agenda: "They're going to use this decision as a way to clean house of renal patients and people on dialysis.  It's saving a ton of money for Medicare over the next twenty years."
 
 "I can't believe the FDA would approve this," MaryLou said.  "My son was 37 years old.  He went into the hospital with two blood clots, but his kidneys were functioning.  They gave him Remdesivir, and in twelve hours, his kidneys stopped working, and his organs began to fail.  We never saw him open his eyes again."
 
Michelle Conway said, "I took my husband to the E.R., and the next day, they told me he was going on Remdesivir.  I said absolutely not.  I wanted him on other treatments, but they refused all of it.  They isolated him and told him he had to have Remdesivir or he'd die, and he agreed.  I got to watch his last rites over a video conference.  I know he was murdered by Remdesivir."
 
A woman I'll call Maya joined the support group for the first time to share her story.  She's a survivor of the hospital protocol, and there aren't many of those.  "I refused Remdesivir, and I refused the ventilator.  But they find other ways to take you out.  The doctors were pissed at me.  They called my husband to pressure him.  They fear-monger you with all these lies.  And they pull your loved ones away from you.  I was all by myself trying to make decisions."
 
The discussion often turned to the weird carelessness and indifference to standard medical procedures in the hospitals during COVID.  "Multiple times in my husband's record, it said he was not a candidate for Remdesivir," Lisa said.  "They gave it to him anyway, and he went into renal failure and died."
 
"The Remdesivir fact sheet clearly states that it may cause kidney and liver failure.  And that's exactly what happened to my husband Richard," Michelle Strassburg said.  "They're doubling down on this preposterous decision.  I'm at a loss for words."
 
"It's so important that in their own literature of Remdesivir, they state that it's supposed to be given early," Catherine said.  "Yet
...[Message truncated]
View Full Message
In reply toRe: msg 644
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784 

8/15/23

There are numerous graphs and charts included in the link at the bottom:

The Pfizer Effect: Europe’s 63,060% increase in Child Deaths following EMA approval of Covid Vaccine proves it is 100% Safe & Effective

BY THE EXPOSÉ
JULY 27, 2023

In the scorching summer of 2021, a momentous decision swept across Europe, sparking a whirlwind of emotions among parents, who had fallen for the 24/7 propaganda, eagerly awaiting a ray of hope for their children.
 
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) had finally granted emergency use approval for the use of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine in children aged 12 to 15.
 
Relief and elation surged through the hearts of countless naive parents who saw this as a beacon of protection against the alleged pandemic.
 
Yet, the winds of fortune took an unexpected turn as the vaccine rollout for children commenced. Startling reports emerged, revealing a distressing surge in excess deaths among the young ones across the continent. The sense of optimism quickly faded among the thousands of families affected and was replaced by a grim reality that cast a shadow over the hopes of many.
 
Tragically, the statistics paint a haunting picture, with a staggering 63,060% surge in excess deaths among children aged 0 to 14 by the twenty-second week of 2023. These numbers whisper a chilling tale of consequences that were foreseen by many silenced and heavily censored voices.
 
Back in 2020, as the establishment desperately sought to fast track the use of mrna technology disguised as a vaccine against the alleged pandemic, COVID-19 injections were still in the embryonic stages of development, treading a precarious path toward regulatory approval.
 
To hasten their availability, regulatory agencies like the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) invoked emergency use authorizations (EUAs), granting a temporary lifeline to these novel and dangerous vaccines.
 
These EUAs acted as regulatory mechanisms, permitting the usage of medical products in dire circumstances, such as a pandemic, even before they completed the rigorous journey of full regulatory approval.
 
It was an unprecedented measure taken in the face of an unprecedented crisis. But the alleged Covid-19 pandemic had proven to not be a threat to children, making future decisions by these regulatory bodies extremely questionable and possibly criminal.
 
One crucial reason why mRNA vaccines had not been widely employed in the general population until December 2020 was the specter of Antibody-Dependent Enhancement (ADE).
 
This phenomenon haunted the corridors of scientific discourse, raising concerns that vaccination with mRNA vaccines could potentially exacerbate the disease, rendering those inoculated more susceptible to its clutches.
 
History had already witnessed a chilling episode of ADE during the development of a dengue fever vaccine. Initial trials indicated promise, displaying protection against the virus for those unscathed by prior infections.
 
Sadly, in individuals who had encountered a different strain of the virus before, the vaccine seemed to amplify the risk of severe illness, a grim testament to the treacherous nature of ADE.
 
Similar tales emerged from numerous animal studies, where potential “vaccines” instigated lung inflammation and other adverse effects upon subsequent exposure to the virus. The vaccine-induced immune response, rather than neutralizing the virus, wrought havoc on lung tissue, leaving a trail of unintended consequences.
 
Additionally, the ominous specter of Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease (VAED) loomed large during respiratory virus vaccine trials, including those against coronaviruses.
 
For instance, trials for a respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine illuminated a disconcerting pattern: vaccinated infants faced an increased risk of hospitalization and more severe respiratory illness upon encountering the virus.
 
The immune response triggered by the vaccine, rather than safeguarding against the virus, seemed to trigger an overreaction of the immune system, exacerbating the disease’s symptoms.
 
Respiratory viruses, such as coronaviruses and RSV, had long been recognized as grave threats to vulnerable populations, especially infants and the elderly.
 
However, the alleged SARS-CoV-2 virus, supposedly r
...[Message truncated]
View Full Message
In reply toRe: msg 645
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784 

8/15/23

They wanted to hide the facts about the ineffectiveness of the so-called vaccine while simultaneously mandating everybody get the jab!!!

SMOKING GUN: CDC altered definition of “breakthrough” COVID infections following emails about “vaccine failure”

07/26/2023
By Ethan Huff

Recently unearthed documents show that the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) quietly altered the definition of Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “cases” in people who have been “vaccinated” so as to lower the official number of cases classified as “breakthrough.”
 
At the start of 2021, the official CDC definition for a breakthrough covid case was someone who tested “positive” seven or more days after receipt of a primary injection series. On Feb 2, 2021, that definition was changed to only include cases detected at least 14 days after the primary injection series.
 
“We have revised the case definition,” admitted Dr. Marc Fisher, head of the CDC’s Vaccine Breakthrough Case Investigation Team, in a letter he sent to his colleagues at the time.
 
As to the reason for the sudden and unexpected change, it was redacted from said documents, meaning the government does not want the public to know why the change was made.
 
“CDC made the change to the definition of a breakthrough infection time period due to the most current data that showed that the 14-day period was required for an effective antibody response to the vaccines,” is the reason that spokesman Scott Pauley gave in an emailed response to The Epoch Times, which obtained the redacted documents.
 
“That, in combination with the data showing that many cases of COVID-19 were incubating for up to two weeks before becoming symptomatic, required the change to refine the time period to eliminate cases where exposure happened before the vaccination response would be effective.”
 
(Fact Check: The CDC is a private corporation disguised as a federal public health agency.)
 
Dr. Harvey Risch says there’s “no cogent rationale” for CDC changing definition of “breakthrough” covid case
 
Such an explanation does not cut it for Dr. Harvey Risch, professor emeritus of epidemiology at the Yale School of Public Health. In a statement, Risch said that there is “no cogent rationale” for excluding early post-injection covid cases whether they occurred within seven days or within 14 days.
 
“With either of these delays, CDC addressed what is the theoretical best that the vaccination could achieve,” Risch said.
 
“If the vaccines don’t work for the first seven or 14 days or increase risk of getting Covid-19 during that period, that is part of what happens when they are deployed in a population.”
 
What the CDC should have done, according to Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, a professor of health policy at Stanford University, is focus more on advising the public that the “fully vaccinated” were not as protected immediately after injection as the government had been, and still is, claiming.
 
“Rather than playing games with the definition of breakthrough cases, [the CDC should have told] recently vaccinated vulnerable older people that they were at higher risk for being infected during that period,” Bhattacharya said.
 
Conveniently, the CDC’s change from seven days for 14 days ended up excluding a large number of post-jab breakthrough cases, which created an over-inflated metric for jab effectiveness. In other words, by making the change, the CDC made it appear as though Fauci Flu shots are more effective than they actually are.
 
In early 2021, one of the documents shows, there were 37 breakthrough cases of covid, 34 of which immediately ended up not being counted after the CDC made the change because the cases occurred within the first week of when the patients got jabbed.
 
Dr. Fisher further confirmed that the remaining three cases were also not counted in the end because they happened within 13 days of completion of a primary series. This is how the CDC covered up the fact that covid jabs do not provide any tangible protection against covid.
 
The CDC is one of the most distrusted federal agencies in America.

SMOKING GUN: CDC altered definition of
...[Message truncated]
View Full Message
TOP