Opinion Polls: Delphi's Polling Place

Hosted by Showtalk

Opinion polls on all subjects. Opinions? Heck yes, we have opinions - but we're *always* nice about it, even when ours are diametrically opposed to yours. Register your vote today!

  • 5140
    MEMBERS
  • 136828
    MESSAGES
  • 24
    POSTS TODAY

Discussions

In light of recent info are vaccines ...   The Healthy You: Health and Fitness Polls

Started 10/24/22 by WALTER784; 125501 views.
In reply toRe: msg 676
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784 

Oct-4

CDC Study confirms COVID-19 Vaccination increases risk of suffering Autoimmune Heart Disease affecting the Heart by over 13,200%

BY THE EXPOSÉ
SEPTEMBER 14, 2023

A study conducted by the US Centers for Disease Control and Food and Drug Administration has shown that the risk of myocarditis following mRNA COVID vaccination is around 133x greater than the background risk in the population.
 
This means Covid vaccination increases the risk of suffering myocarditis, an autoimmune disease causing inflammation of the heart, by 13,200%.
 
Source
 
The study, conducted by researchers from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) as well as from several U.S. universities and hospitals, examined the effects of vaccination with products manufactured by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna.
 
The study’s authors used data obtained from the CDC’s VAERS reporting system which were cross-checked to ensure they complied with CDC’s definition of myocarditis; they also noted that given the passive nature of the VAERS system, the number of reported incidents is likely to be an underestimate of the extent of the phenomenon.
 
1626 cases of myocarditis were studied, and the results showed that the Pfizer-BioNTech product was most associated with higher risk, with 105.9 cases per million doses after the second vaccine shot in the 16 to 17 age group for males, and 70.7 cases per million doses after the second shot in the 12 to 15 age group for males. The 18 to 24 male age group also saw significantly higher rates of myocarditis for both Pfizer’s and Moderna’s products (52.4 and 56.3 cases per million respectively).
 
Source
 
The study found that the median time to symptom onset was two days, and that 82 percent of cases were in males, consistent with previous studies. Around 96 percent of affected people were hospitalised, with most treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; 87 percent of those hospitalised had resolution of symptoms by time of discharge.
 
At the time of data review, two reports of death in people younger than 30 years of age with potential myocarditis still remained under investigation and were not included in the case counts.
 
Among the reported symptoms were: chest pain, pressure, or discomfort (89%), shortness of breath (30%), abnormal ECG results (72%), and abnormal cardiac MRI findings (72%).
 
The study’s authors noted that myocarditis following vaccination appeared to resolve more swiftly than in typical viral cases; however, given that vaccination is no longer considered a reliable way in which to avoid COVID infection, it is unclear whether this has any specific relevance to the cost-benefit analysis of COVID vaccination, especially considering the low risk of complications following coronavirus infection for the age group most at risk for heart-related complications following vaccination.
 
Given the plethora of studies confirming a link between vaccination and myocarditis, the CDC has commenced active surveillance of adolescents and young adults to monitor their progress following heart-related incidents after vaccination. Long-term outcome data, however, are not yet available.
 
In the meantime, the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology advise that people with myocarditis should refrain from competitive sports for three to six months, and only resume strenuous exercise after normal ECG and other test results are obtained. In addition, they advise that further mRNA vaccine doses should be deferred.
 
Source
 
In conclusion, the study’s authors note that the risk of myocarditis after receiving mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines was increased across multiple age and sex strata and was highest after the second vaccination dose in adolescent males and young men, and that this risk should be considered in the context of the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination.

CDC Study confirms COVID-19 Vaccination increases risk of suffering Autoimmune Heart Disease affecting the Heart by over 13,200% – The Expose (expose-news.com)

FWIW

In reply toRe: msg 677
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784 

Oct-4

FDA GONE ROGUE: How can the government approve even more “emergency use authorization” COVID jabs when there’s NO REAL EMERGENCY?

09/13/2023
Ethan Huff

On the 22nd anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) decided to grant approval for the latest Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) "booster" shots from Pfizer and Moderna, which will soon be available at a drug store or health clinic near you.
 
Even though there is no public health emergency to necessitate the move, the FDA decided to award "emergency use authorization" (EUA) for the shots to be injected into children and babies between the ages of six months and 11 years. All people 12 years of age and older, meanwhile, are approved to take the shots once they become available.
 
We covered the distinction between approval and EUA in past articles, but to sum it up again: Approval means a drug is allowed on the market indefinitely while EUA only grants temporary use of a drug during a public health "crisis."
 
Since there is no public health crisis, it is unclear what criteria the FDA used as justification to issue approval and EUA to these new booster shots other than a few random media articles talking about "hospitalizations," and of course the constant rhetoric from the Biden regime about new "cases."
 
COVID "vaccines" are causing these new variants to develop and spread
 
The claim is that new variants such as "Kraken" and "Eris" are making people sick. And since these variants are not covered by past COVID booster shots, they will have to be tackled by these newest ones.
 
The irony is that all of these new variants only seem to be affecting the "fully vaccinated" while the unvaccinated remain healthy. Dr. Robert Malone says this is due to "leaky" vaccines, meaning previous COVID jabs caused these new variants to form and spread.
 
Dr. Malone and many others warned during COVID 1.0 that injecting people with these shots in the middle of a "pandemic" was a really bad idea because doing so could spawn the creation of new mutant viruses. This appears to be what is happening, just as he said it would.
 
Rather than stop injecting people with COVID shots and wait until the virus burns itself out naturally, Big Pharma continues to produce jab after jab, which is creating variant after variant, which is making people sicker and sicker – but at least the drug industry can rake in some more profits, eh?
 
But wait – did not fake president Joe Biden declare COVID to be over back on May 11? He did, but the FDA is choosing to interpret this declaration in its own special way by delaying the declaration, clearly on behalf of pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer and Moderna that want more money.
 
The FDA has spent a lot of time tweaking its guidance and provisions to ensure there is always an "emergency" going on that necessitates the release of more "vaccines." By the look of it, the FDA could theoretically do this forever, resulting in a never-ending conveyor belt of new COVID jabs to be released seasonally just like annual flu shots.
 
"So, basically, the FDA administrative bureaucracy self-determined that they could continue to bypass their normal (already lax) procedures for evaluating vaccine purity (including lack of adulteration), potency, safety and efficacy pretty much for as long as their hearts desire, at least until November 07, 2023," writes Dr. Malone on his Substack about what the FDA is up to – be sure to read the full article to learn more.
 
The FDA is acting well outside the bounds of its jurisdiction. Learn more at FDA.news.

FDA GONE ROGUE: How can the government approve even more “emergency use authorization” COVID jabs when there’s NO REAL EMERGENCY? – NaturalNews.com

FWIW

In reply toRe: msg 678
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784 

Oct-4

So now, FDA has admitted that Covid-19 jabs do cause an increase in heart related incidents.

And they admitted that Ivermectin does work.

And now, they're confirming that Hydroxychloroquine also works. 

Too bad they didn't mention this in 2021 or 2022 or earlier this year. It took them until Sept 2023 to come out with the truth!!! Too late for over 600,000 patients!

Mayo Clinic Website Now Says Hydroxychloroquine CAN Be Used to Treat COVID-19 Patients, Previously Claimed It Was Not Effective

By Anthony Scott
Sep. 24, 2023 7:15 am

The Mayo Clinic which has been touted by many as the best hospital system and medical research center in the United States, recently made an interesting update on their website regarding the drug Hydroxychloroquine.
 
In the new update on their site, it now says “Hydroxychloroquine may be used to treat coronavirus (COVID-19) in certain hospitalized patients.”
 
Previously the Mayo Clinic claimed Hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine were “malaria drugs authorized for emergency use by the FDA during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the FDA withdrew that authorization when data analysis showed that the drugs are not effective for treating COVID-19.”
 
Per Mayo Clinic:
 
Here’s Mayo Clinic’s previous stance on the drug:
 
President Trump was one of the most notable figures to take Hydroxychloroquine after he tested positive for Covid-19.
 
Shortly after he announced he was taken Hydroxychloroquine a cardiologist from the Mayo Clinic by the name of Dr. Michael Ackerman told NBC that he was disturbed Trump never mentioned that hydroxychloroquine has side effects
 
However, when it came to talking about Covid-19 vaccines and their link to young athlete’s dying, Dr. Ackerman called it “junk science.”

Mayo Clinic Website Now Says Hydroxychloroquine CAN Be Used to Treat COVID-19 Patients, Previously Claimed It Was Not Effective | The Gateway Pundit | by Anthony Scott

FWIW

Showtalk
Host

From: Showtalk 

Oct-4

That was a vicious and dangerous mistake.

WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784 

Oct-4

Had Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin been allowed to be prescribed in 2020 onwards, hundreds of thousands of lives could have been saved. 

We only have the NIH, FDA, Health Department and Fauci to thank for radicalizing them into a demon killing machine!

And we now have virtually no government organization which we can trust any more!!!

FWIW

In reply toRe: msg 1
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784 

Oct-4

Has anybody changed their mind since they last voted?

In light of recent info are vaccines worse than Covid? (See next post for details)
       
Yes  
15 votes (52%)
I don't know    
5 votes (17%)
No    
9 votes (31%)
 

29 people have voted so far

FWIW

Showtalk
Host

From: Showtalk 

Oct-4

No but I’m also not sold on the boosters.

WALTER784 said:

Neither of us had any serious symptoms, but my wife's symptoms were slightly worse than mine.

That virus is constantly mutating, so the severity will depends on the particular strain. There have been some confirmed asymptomatic outbreaks, that were discovered only when someone developed symptoms and then actually conducted a test that came back positive.

People aren't dying from it now the way they did 3 years ago, because less virulent strains are now circulating.

Each infection or immunization is like whack-a-mole. A vaccine that targets one strain is generally pretty effective - for that strain. Another strain is likely to sneak past the defenses, but the disease is likely to be far less severe because the immune system is already primed to react to something similar.

At some point there is a curve of diminishing returns, but, there is also no such thing as a zero risk situation. The odds of a serious vaccine reaction are not huge, although if one gets an unlucky roll of the dice, that can be really bad. The odds of a life threatening bout with Covid appears to still be a bit higher if one has certain risk factors, and each new strain reveals a new facet of what it can attack.

This late in the game, it's a lot like sitting down at the gaming table in a casino. Odds are in favor of the house. You'll probably get Covid eventually unless you have an unusual immune system. So far I've been heavily exposed at least twice to confirmed cases, but never tested positive.

And I've had some recent "tired and run-down" days the past couple of weeks. I wonder if I've actually had a couple of mild cases of Covid that weren't tested for, that developed after the usual post-exposure window came and went.

WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784 

Oct-9

$1,661.87 in cats (ROCKETMAN_S) said...

WALTER784 said:

Neither of us had any serious symptoms, but my wife's symptoms were slightly worse than mine.

That virus is constantly mutating, so the severity will depends on the particular strain. There have been some confirmed asymptomatic outbreaks, that were discovered only when someone developed symptoms and then actually conducted a test that came back positive.

In my case, it was the same strain. My vaccinated (2 vaccines & 2 boosters) wife got it at work and brought it home and infected me (unvaxed). So, it was the same strain as I got it from her. But her symptoms were slightly worse. Still not bad, but worse than mine even though she was vaxed and I wasn't!

Recently, here in Japan, there have been more influenza, flu and other cases than Covid. 

FWIW

 

Showtalk
Host

From: Showtalk 

Oct-9

Yes, I wonder if it’s possible to have it and really be symptom free.

TOP