Opinion Polls: Delphi's Polling Place

Hosted by Showtalk

Opinion polls on all subjects. Opinions? Heck yes, we have opinions - but we're *always* nice about it, even when ours are diametrically opposed to yours. Register your vote today!

  • 5087
    MEMBERS
  • 133056
    MESSAGES
  • 0
    POSTS TODAY

Discussions

In light of recent info are vaccines ...   The Healthy You: Health and Fitness Polls

Started 10/24/22 by WALTER784; 84763 views.
In reply toRe: msg 377
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784 

3/11/23

Because of propaganda churned out by corporate media some people still live in fear of “the virus”

BY RHODA WILSON
FEBRUARY 21, 2023

In the USA, the covid “vaccine” requirement affecting an estimated 10 million healthcare workers was enforced on 20 February 2022.  One year later, it is the last remaining major mandate from Joe Biden’s sweeping attempt to boost national vaccination rates.
 
On Sunday, Yahoo News published an article about covid vaccine mandates being still in place in healthcare settings.  Citing the example of a nursing home in Missouri, the article describes the daily testing for covid that healthcare workers continue to endure.  The article goes on to state that “only the healthy are allowed in to care for virus-free residents.”
 
So, what does “healthy” mean? A negative covid test?  A test which has been widely recognised for not being able to detect infection or diagnose illness.  What if a person tests negative for covid but has another infection or illness? Is that person “healthy”? It sounds less like a health measure and more like obedience training.
 
As The Awake Epidemiologist points out, the continuing covid mandates in healthcare settings are a reminder of what happened in universities and colleges regarding “vaccine” mandates and exemptions last year.
 
One of the most nonsensical aspects of continuing covid “vaccine” mandates in American universities and colleges in 2022 was that students, faculty and staff who survived the mandates the year before – that is, were fortunate enough to be granted religious and/or medical exemptions – had to reapply for an exemption in 2022.  There is no rational explanation for why an exemption would expire.
 
The requirement to renew exemptions was therefore more likely to be an exercise in obedience or perhaps to wear down the morale of the individual.
 
So, this recent yahoo article caught my eye:
 
That quote sounded a lot like a very good Brownstone Institute article referring to university vaccine mandates. Keep that link handy, I’ll refer back to it.
 
So, I start reading this yahoo article, thinking it might mention something like the science cited in the aforementioned Brownstone article, or something about the struggles in the healthcare industry after countless people lost their jobs because they refused the vaccine mandate. Some of that is kinda, sorta in there. But there is also a lot wrong with this reporting.
 
Let’s start with the sentence in the second paragraph: “Only the healthy are allowed in to care for virus-free residents.”. The text then goes on to describe how employees are required to do an antigen test DAILY to work. There’s problem #1. “Antigen test negative” does NOT equal “Healthy”. People can be unhealthy for a variety of reasons, for example, carrying bacteria or viruses that don’t show up on a covid antigen test. But also, people can be perfectly healthy and non-infectious but test positive for an antigen test. The fact that healthcare facilities are still doing this testing is preposterous.
 
Then the article goes on to talk about how important vaccines are for preventing outbreaks. Sorry, that’s complete BS. Read the cited articles in the Brownstone article, where many scientific studies show that vaccination does not prevent transmission, nor does it prevent infection. Outbreaks are started by healthy people that test negative. How in the hell is the media still getting away with reporting these lies, when even yahoo will occasionally report on circumstances of “outbreaks” caused by a bunch of test-negative, healthy, fully vaccinated people?!?!?!?
 
Let’s not forget the recent study by the illustrious Cleveland Clinic showing that the incidence of covid-19 infection actually increases with the number of injections.
 
But the thing that really makes me mad is the demonisation of people who had religious exemptions from the vaccine. The Warrenton Declaration goes into a lot of detail about why vaccine mandates (as well as other covid restrictions) are a violation of sincerely held religious beliefs. Free exercise of religious beliefs is protected by the Bill of Rights. I suppose that doesn’t prevent the media from demonising them (which is an important point relevant for Christians and other believers, but that’s another point for another day). But blaming religious people for outbreaks is not okay, both morally and scientifically.
 
So, if you are wondering why people are still living in fear of this virus, this is why. The media push
...[Message truncated]
View Full Message
In reply toRe: msg 378
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784 

3/11/23

US defense dept contracted with Chinese Communist Party to deploy COVID vaccine against citizens

‘The current war is the war of the global governments (plural)’ who ‘are partners and co-investors into 'joint ventures' against us, people of the world’ deploying ‘prohibited biowarfare agents for killing and injuring their own civilian population,’ researcher Sasha Latypova wrote.

Patrick Delaney
Mon Feb 20, 2023 - 11:20 pm EST

(LifeSiteNews) — U.S. government documents reveal that the Department of Defense (DoD) partnered with a pharmaceutical company linked to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in developing and distributing the Pfizer / BioNTech “biological warfare agents marketed as ‘Covid-19 vaccines,’” according to a prominent researcher.
 
“It is curious that the US DoD awarded $10 billion … to a venture whose substantial equity (and IP) holder is the Chinese Communist Party,” wrote Sasha Latypova in a December 28 substack article.
 
Latypova is a former pharmaceutical executive with more than 25 years’ experience in the industry specializing in research and development. She has been a source of several important bombshell reports over the last year.
 
Lamenting that this association with the CCP had not received broader attention in the media and elsewhere, Latypova demonstrated how government officials sought to conceal this relationship through redactions in documents released to the public as a result of Freedom of Information (FOIA) lawsuits.
 
Including the image of one heavily redacted text concealing the name of a third party to an agreement with Pfizer and BioNTech for the “co-development and distribution” of a “coronavirus vaccine,” Latypova announced, “I know what is in the redacted part of the above paragraph and it was not hard to figure out.”
 
“Fosun Pharmaceuticals,” she stipulated, is the redacted entity. The sentence thus reads, “Fosun Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer and BioNTech entered into an agreement for the co-development and distribution (excluding China) of a potential mRNA-based coronavirus vaccine … ”
 
She confirmed this assertion with another document dated March 16, 2020, from BioNTech announcing that corporation’s “strategic alliance” with Fosun for development and commercialization of the gene-based injections.
 
Therefore, “Pfizer-BioNTech is really a 3-party R&D alliance: Fosun-Pfizer-BioNTech, and by ‘party’ I mean that one of the three is the Chinese Communist Party,” Latypova wrote. “Fosun is a huge Chinese conglomerate that owns a large number of global companies, and its chairman, Guo Guangchang, is a very high ranking member of the CCP.”
 
Cited by Forbes as being worth over $4 billion, Guangchang is a member of at least three organizations associated with the CCP, including the 12th Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference that under the supervision and direction of the CCP provides consultation and advisory input to CCP legislative bodies.
 
Latypova, who grew up in the Soviet Union, further clarified this point in an email correspondence with LifeSiteNews, stating, “In China, every large employer, especially in something strategic like biopharma sector, is controlled by the CCP.” The case was the same “in the Soviet Union, where each workplace had a ‘partorg,’ a representative supervisor from the Communist party, or a whole department of them.”
 
Other documents describe a global “pharmacovigilance” agreement for data sharing established among the three parties, with a fourth party, the Israeli Ministry of Health, added on January 6, 2021. As summarized by Latypova, these parties agree to “count the bodies and share the data with each other.”
 
In earlier presentations, the former co-founder of multiple research organizations who retired at a relatively young age reported on how the COVID-19 “vaccines” were fully produced, controlled, and distributed by the DoD, which managed to classify them not as medicines or pharmaceuticals but as “COVID countermeasures” under the authority of the military. This means they are not required to comply with U.S. law governing the manufacturing quality, testing, effectiveness, safety, and labeling of drugs or other medical products.
 
Yet even though these “countermeasures” did not fall under the regulatory and monitoring authority of the FDA and CDC, these agencies orchestrated a “fake theatrical” public relations performance giving the impression to an unsuspecting population that these standard safeguards
...[Message truncated]
View Full Message
In reply toRe: msg 379
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784 

3/11/23

Pancreatic cancer rates skyrocket as Covid jabs and boosters send toxic spike protein prions into vital organs, including the pancreas, fueling turbo cancer

Sunday, February 19, 2023
by: S.D. Wells

(Natural News) An alarming trend in cancer rates skyrocketing for perfectly healthy people has garnered major attention, even in reports published in peer-reviewed medical journals. What is being termed “turbo cancer” since the Covid vaccines hit the market may be the prime culprit of this disastrous increase in deadly cancer cases, including those of the pancreas, which has the lowest rate of survival of all cancers. Women under 55 years of age, mainly black women, are especially being targeted by pancreatic cancer, according to a report in the Gastroenterology journal recently, and scientists seem befuddled.
 
Pancreatic cancer cases increasing, causing more than 3% of all cancer deaths in USA
 
Of course, smoking, alcohol, and sugar abuse add to the chaos of cancer developing in the human body, and lifestyle changes can certainly make a difference in reducing the chances of ever having to fight that fight, but the medical journals consistently leave out a major factor over the past three years, regarding carcinogens in the blood stream. Spike proteins are the latest source of “feed” for cancer cells, and they’re being produced in the human body by the billions, thanks to mRNA “technology.”
 
Turbo cancer is the term for cancer cells, specifically T-cell lymphoma, that progress so rapidly, that they show up on PET/CT scans for cancer patients just days after getting the Covid Pfizer mRNA booster shot. According to a seasoned medical doctor in British Columbia, Dr. Charles Hoffe, the turbo-effect of spreading cancer cells through the lymph nodes can travel to the pancreas, feeding off spike proteins (prions) that lodge there.
 
Brighteon.TV
 
The mRNA so-called “vaccines” (gene therapy injections) literally TURN OFF genes that fight cancer (P-53 genes), that are also referred to as the “guardians of the genome.” Dr. Hoffe is warning the world that the majority of Covid-vaccinated patients could experience critical health damage, including deadly pancreatic cancer, that accelerates exponentially due to the Covid jabs. Why?
 
The toxic spike proteins are recognized by the human immune system as enemies, foreign particles, created to resemble a deadly virus. The body is simply fooled by the mRNA RNA-changes, and is trying to attack those spike prions that have traveled throughout the body to cleansing organs, including the ovaries, brain, and yes, the pancreas. Hence all the new cases of severe inflammation.
 
Pancreatic cancer is a near death sentence, with only an 11% survival rate 5 years after diagnosis, then come the Covid clot shots
 
According to the American Cancer Society, once someone is diagnosed with pancreatic cancer, they only have about a ten percent chance they’ll survive five more years, even with treatment (which usually involves more chemicals than the ones that caused it in the first place). The medical industrial complex is experimenting on humans with a gene-editing “treatment” that modifies human DNA to produce certain immune cells that can recognize and attack tumor cells. Yet, only four percent of pancreatic cancer patients even have the correct “mutation that responds to this treatment,” as documented in the New England Journal of Medicine.
 
Here’s a caveat. What most conventional doctors and oncologists don’t tell their patients suffering from pancreatic cancer is that only five percent of the cells are actually tumor cells, and the rest are the microenvironment. This is of prime importance because the spike proteins from Covid jabs actually impede oxygen flow to the vital organs due to their hyper-coagulation ability, as we’ve seen with the long, rubbery vascular clots removed during autopsies of the Covid vaccinated.
 
In other words, the pro-coagulant effects of pancreatic cancer precisely mimic the pro-coagulant effects of the spike protein. So, according to these studies, there’s microvascular destruction, cell suffocation, vascular blockage, and turbo cancer being induced by the Covid clot shots. The spike protein is literally inducing the phenotype of pancreatic cancer, adding to the chaos and possibly explaining the sharp rise in pancreatic cancer cases since the Covid mRNA clot shots have been administered. The microenvironment in the pancreas is being severely disrupted and manipulated for the worse, and this accounts for 90 percent of the development of cancer and the spread of existing cancer. Go figure.
 
Dr Rakesh Jain (Harvard Medical School) talks about how the influence of a tumor’s microenvironment is key to its progression and resistance to treatment.
...[Message truncated]
View Full Message
In reply toRe: msg 380
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784 

3/11/23

Covid is a pandemic of the wealthier highly vaccinated nations

BY RHODA WILSON
FEBRUARY 19, 2023

Covid is a pandemic of the wealthier highly vaccinated nations
BY RHODA WILSON ON FEBRUARY 19, 2023 • ( 12 COMMENTS )
 
A preprint study published in November 2022 revealed that the higher the countrywide covid vaccination rate the higher the covid deaths. 
 
The study analysed participants from 108 countries using data from 9 worldwide websites with the aim to determine if there are any correlations between the percentage of countrywide covid deaths per population by the countries’ per cent vaccinated.
 
The study also found the higher the covid testing and more stringent the covid measures, the higher the covid deaths.  In contrast, the higher the use of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, the lower the covid deaths.
 
Covid is a pandemic of wealthier and higher vaccinated nations.
 
THIS preprint analysis of 108 countries is apparently close to being peer-reviewed. Its summary findings are important and may come as a surprise to those who have not been carefully monitoring the data as it emerged and reading the research, much of which only appeared on Substack.
 
Key Findings
 
Higher countrywide covid-19 vaccination rates »» higher covid-19 deaths per country population. [statistically significant to 1% confidence level]
Higher country healthcare costs per capita »» higher covid-19 deaths per country population. [statistically significant to 1% confidence level]
Higher annual income per capita »» higher covid-19 deaths per country population. [statistically significant to 1% confidence level]
Higher countrywide covid-19 testing »» higher covid-19 deaths per country population. [statistically significant to 1% confidence level]
Higher country covid response stringency (mandates, masking, social distancing, curfews, quarantine, business/school closings, banning or limiting public gatherings, lockdowns, travel ban, contact tracing, and PCR testing) »» higher covid-19 deaths per country population. [statistically significant to 5% confidence level]
Higher countrywide hydroxychloroquine use »» lower covid-19 deaths per country population. [statistically significant to 10% confidence level]
Higher countrywide ivermectin use »» lower covid-19 deaths per country population. [not statistically significant]
Since these papers have a habit of disappearing from public servers, here is a copy for download:
 
Global-Covid-19-Pandemic-Outcomes-A-failed-StrategyDownload
 
Commentary
 
It would seem that there was only a covid pandemic in countries that were rich enough for their government’s ill-conceived interventions to have a material impact on mortality and to shun the cheapest, safest and most widely available early treatments.
 
Every single policy not only failed to mitigate death from the virus but evidently made the situation worse. All social distancing policies, zealous testing and, worst of all, the subjection of populations to participate in a mass medical experiment without proper consent, resulted in increased mortality.
 
Is it only with the benefit of hindsight that we now know this? Absolutely not. The evidence was clear within weeks of every intervention, hampered only by the untimely provision of the necessary data by the public “authorities” and the illegitimate censorship of “misinformation” by the mainstream media.
 
Further reading: Covid-19: The Evidence revisited – summer 2022, HART Group, 10 November 2022
 
Will you now hold all of those responsible accountable for these failures?
 
It starts by making it clear to your local MP. And it escalates from there…

Covid is a pandemic of the wealthier highly vaccinated nations – The Expose (expose-news.com)

FWIW

In reply toRe: msg 381
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784 

3/12/23

mRNA in blood after 28 days

FWIW

In reply toRe: msg 382
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784 

3/12/23

Rates of serious adverse events in mRNA covid “vaccine” clinical trials follow spike in disabilities following jab rollout

Wednesday, February 22, 2023
by: Ethan Huff

(Natural News) Ed Dowd’s Phinance Technologies has released a new analysis comparing the rate of reported serious adverse events caused by Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” in clinical trials to the rate of disabilities reported following the launch of Operation Warp Speed by the Trump regime.
 
It turns out that disabilities in the United States spiked immediately after the first messenger RNA (mRNA) injections were unleashed, which corresponds to high rates of serious adverse events during Big Pharma’s clinical trials for the experimental injections.
 
“When looking at changes in disabilities on a wider time frame (since 2008) we observe that the disability rates rose or fell from month to month but tended to be relatively stable over time,” Phinance Technologies reported.
 
“… the change in behaviour since early 2021 is clearly an abnormal occurrence with high level of statistical significance. It happens to be highly correlated to the cumulative Covid-19 vaccine rollout, but we cannot state that the correlation is statistically meaningful as it is based on a cumulative plot with obvious autocorrelation.”
 
Rate of estimated serious adverse events underreported by a factor of 2.6
 
Phinance Technologies did compile evidence showing that the most likely cause behind the rise in disabilities is, in fact, covid injections that were rushed to market at warp speed with inadequate and conflicted safety and efficacy testing.
 
Brighteon.TV
 
The group modeled the expected rise in disabilities due to the jab rollout by using rates of serious adverse events obtained via the safety analyses conducted by Pfizer and Moderna as part of their clinical trials.
 
“Our results provide a stronger case for establishing a causal relationship between disabilities and the Covid-19 vaccines,” tweeted Dowd, along with a link to his group’s analysis – see below:
 
“The time series of SAEs that were computed based on the rates estimated during the mRNA clinical trials are shown to be of the same magnitude as the rate of increase in disability rates in the 16-64 Civilian Labor Force.”
 
The recorded rise in disabilities post-Operation Warp Speed is substantially higher than the estimated rate of serious adverse events, which Phinance Technologies says are underreported by about 2.6 times.
 
“… the coincidence of the rise in disabilities with the start of the Covid-19 vaccination rollout in conjunction with the similar magnitude of the rate of SAEs (from the clinical trials) & changes in disabilities (from the BLS data) leads to a stronger case for asserting causation,” Dowd further tweeted.
 
“We believe that a comprehensive investigation needs to be performed, either in the form of new phase III clinical trials for at least a 3-year period, or a programme of forensic autopsies in a large sample of deceased individuals where the Covid-19 vaccines were not suspected as a co-factor for cause of death.”
 
The bottom line is that there were plenty of safety signals early on in clinical trials to show that covid injections are dangerous at best, but government regulators ignored them while handing a get-out-of-jail free card to the criminal drug companies behind them.
 
“The trials should have been halted,” one report states about Dowd and his team’s findings.

Rates of serious adverse events in mRNA covid “vaccine” clinical trials follow spike in disabilities following jab rollout – NaturalNews.com

FWIW

In reply toRe: msg 383
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784 

3/12/23

WHO claims vaccines among the “most successful and cost-effective public health interventions” despite high vaccine mortality rates

Wednesday, February 22, 2023
by: Ramon Tomey

(Natural News) The World Health Organization (WHO) is claiming that vaccinations are among the “most successful and cost-effective public health interventions” – a sentiment that did not quite sit well with many.
 
On its official website, the global health body lauded vaccinations – disguised under the less-threatening “immunization” – as “one of modern medicine’s greatest success stories.”
 
The WHO’s endorsement of vaccinations also extends to that of the injection for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19). But Patrick Tims, staff writer for NaturalHealth365, begged to differ.
 
“The widely accepted narrative is that public health interventions are economically efficient and a net positive for the human condition. Yet we know this narrative is a pure lie, given the fact that the [COVID-19 vaccine] has caused hundreds of thousands of deaths,” he wrote.
 
Tims further cited information from the WHO’s webpage about COVID-19, which claimed that getting injected with the clot shots “provide strong protection against serious illness, hospitalization and death. Moreover, the global health body cited “some evidence” that getting the vaccine will make it less likely for people to pass the virus on to others.
 
“The WHO wants you to blindly accept that the decision to get injected is a public service that will eventually halt the spread of this deadly virus,” he pointed out, reminding people that the COVID-19 vaccines ultimately “do not protect against infection nor prevent transmission.”
 
Brighteon.TV
 
In fact, the COVID-19 shots actually cause more harm than good – as evidenced by the reports of serious adverse reactions following injections. Most prominent among them are the blood clots and the cardiac inflammation frequently linked to the mRNA vaccines.
 
COVID shots are actually the “most successful and cost-effective” depopulation measure
 
To back up his point, Tims cited a Dec. 28, 2022 report by the Daily Expose regarding deaths in England caused by the COVID-19 vaccine. The report zoomed in on a July 6, 2022 report by the U.K. Office for National Statistics (ONS) that broke down deaths based on age and COVID-19 vaccination status from January to May of that year.
 
The report found that Britons 18 to 69 years old who were injected with at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine reported the highest mortality rates from January to May. Among the 70- to 79-year-old cohort, those injected with two doses or more reported the highest mortality. For those above 80 years of age, those injected with at least one shot of the COVID-19 vaccine reported higher mortality rates than unvaccinated individuals in the cohort. (Related: U.K. government says vaccinated are dying at a rate 286% higher than unvaccinated.)
 
Moreover, the mortality rate of unvaccinated individuals across all cohorts never went beyond the 50 percent mark for the five months reported.
 
The Expose mentioned that based on the ONS report, “the COVID-19 vaccines are proving to be deadly, with the vaccinated experiencing significantly higher mortality rates than the unvaccinated in every age group.”
 
“These alarming figures quietly published by the [British] government, cannot be ignored. It is crucial that we address the dangers of these vaccines and take action to protect ourselves and our loved ones,” the outlet noted.
 
Tims also put in his two cents on the report, saying that Downing Street’s “shocking admission” about the deaths caused by the COVID-19 vaccine would conflict with the WHO’s statements.
 
“If you were to force officials from the U.K. to sit in a room with representatives from WHO to discuss the safety and efficacy of the COVID shots, you would witness quite the cognitive dissonance play out,” he wrote.
 
“As soon as you embrace that idea that you’ve been lied to, you’ll begin to question the WHO’s endgame. How can a supposedly charitable organization turn a blind eye to the negative health consequences of the COVID shots? Critical thinkers rightfully question whether the COVID shots are a means to a nefarious end that will never be fully revealed t
...[Message truncated]
View Full Message
In reply toRe: msg 384
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784 

3/12/23

Hiding a Disturbing Truth: UK Gov. refuses to include Child Deaths in overdue report after last report proved COVID Vaccinated Children were 137x more likely to die than Unvaccinated Children

BY THE EXPOSÉ
FEBRUARY 23, 2023

Just hours before Boris resigned as the UK’s Prime Minister, a shocking report on deaths by vaccination status was quietly released by the UK Government.
 
The report, which the Government had hoped to sweep under the carpet due to the timing, revealed that vaccinated children were an alarming 4423% or 45 times more likely to die of any cause than unvaccinated children.
 
But what was even more shocking, was proof that vaccinated children were 13,633% or 137 times more likely to die of Covid-19 than unvaccinated children. The report’s findings were nothing short of disturbing and raised serious concerns about the safety and effectiveness of vaccinations.
 
The UK Government had promised to publish a report on deaths by vaccination status in September 2022, but the release was delayed due to the Census, which showed that the population of the UK was larger than previously thought.
 
However, the report was finally published five months later, on February 21st, 2023. The report should have provided information on deaths among vaccinated children as young as 5 years old, but surprisingly, the UK Government decided to only include data for persons aged 18 and above.
 
This decision is questionable, given the previous report’s shocking findings on mortality rates among vaccinated 10 to 14-year-olds, and the fact children as young as five had been given the Covid-19 vaccine during the time frame covered in the report.
 
The fact that the report is five months overdue and the Government excluded data on vaccinated children strongly suggests that they have something to hide.
 
Especially when you couple this with the fact the UK Government paused the Covid-19 vaccine roll-out to 5 to 11-year-old children in August 2022 following a 22% increase in deaths.
 
This revelation is alarming and raises serious questions about the UK Government’s transparency and commitment to public health.
 
What is the UK Government trying to hide, and why are they not providing the public with all the information they need to make informed decisions about their health and the health of their children?
 
On the 21st of February 2023, a UK Government agency, known as the Office for National Statistics (ONS), published data on deaths by vaccination status in England up to 31st December 2022.
 
The overdue dataset from the ONS is titled ‘Deaths by Vaccination Status, England, 1 April 2021 to 31 December 2022‘, and it can be accessed on the ONS site here, and downloaded here
 
We are still analysing the new report and have so far ascertained that the triple+ vaccinated accounted for 9 in every 10 Covid-19 deaths between April 1st 2021 and December 31st 2022, and 92% of Covid-19 deaths throughout the whole of 2022.
 
But we are unable to work out the effect the vaccine has had in regards to mortality among children because the UK Government has chosen to questionably not include the data.
 
This new report is five months overdue so the Office for National Statistics (ONS) has had plenty of time to include as much data as possible, but it is in fact the least detailed report published to date.
 
The previous report on deaths by vaccination status was published on the 7th of July, and it sadly revealed horrific mortality rates among COVID vaccinated children compared to unvaccinated children as young as 10.
 
The following chart shows the mortality rates by vaccination status per 100,000 person-years among children aged 10 to 14 in England for the period 1st January 2021 to 31st May 2022, according to the figures provided by the ONS in the report published July 7th 2022 –
 
In regard to Covid-19 deaths, the ONS revealed that the mortality rate among unvaccinated children aged 10 to 14 equated to 0.31. But in regards to one-dose vaccinated children, the mortality rate equated to 3.24 per 100,000 person-years, and in regards to triple vaccinated children, the mortality rate equated to a shocking 41.29 per 100,000 person-years.
 
These figures revealed that unvaccinated children were much less likely to die of Covid-19 than children who were COVID vaccinated.
...[Message truncated]
View Full Message
In reply toRe: msg 385
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784 

3/12/23

UPDATE: Florida Doctor Removed from Hospital Board Meeting After Testifying on the Effectiveness of Ivermectin to Treat Covid (VIDEO)

By Jim Hoft
Feb. 22, 2023 11:15 am

On Tuesday, a Florida family medicine doctor was kicked out of the board meeting reportedly after testifying about the effectiveness of Ivermectin to treat COVID-19.
 
Dr. John Littell, who served in the U.S. Army for seven years and is a 25-year board-certified family physician, was removed from the Sarasota Memorial Hospital Board Meeting after providing testimony on the efficacy of Ivermectin.
 
The results of an internal examination into how Sarasota Memorial Hospital handled patient care during the peak of the COVID-19 epidemic were shared with the public on Tuesday afternoon, Herald-Tribune reported.
 
“The direction we gave the staff was this report should be related to those things: how did the hospital respond to the pandemic, not to get into the weeds of (federal Centers for Disease Control) protocols, or the (National Institutes of Health), comments from Dr. Fauci (Anthony Fauci, former chief medical advisor to Presidents Donald Trump and Joe Biden), pros and cons, the difference between the Biden administration and the Trump administration,” Hospital Board Chairman Tramm Hudson said. “We can’t control that, that’s not what we’re looking at.
 
It can be recalled in 2021, Dr. Littell said that he had successfully treated about 3,000 COVID-19 patients with the human version of Ivermectin.
 
Wesh reported:
 
It’s a bold statement from a local doctor who says he’s treated around 3,000 patients with ivermectin and has seen its positive results. Littell has been a family physician since 1990, practicing in Kissimmee and Ocala. Littell says he’s got a target on his back for being so outspoken about ivermectin – but feels it’s the right thing to do for his patients.
 
“I have to say this bluntly but carefully – I’ve already been suspended from one hospital and fined $500 for ultimately doing the right thing for the patient. But the bottom line is hospitals are not allowing us to provide optimal care,” Littell said.
 
Littell says ivermectin was lifesaving during the delta variant because of its anti-inflammatory and anti-blood clotting properties.
 
“It was preventing that cytokine storm, which is when you have inflammation throughout the whole body that leads to kidney failure and leads to respiratory failure,” Littell said.
 
One of Littell’s patients Stacie Morales, a recently retired nurse, got COVID-19 last summer. She decided against getting the vaccine for personal reasons. When her oxygen was low, she called Littell instead of going to the hospital where she worked at the time.
 
“I didn’t like the protocols that they had for COVID. And my oxygen being that low, there’s a good chance I would have been intubated,” Morales said. “I’ve been with Dr. Littell for over 20 years. So my faith was in my doctor. And plus my own research. Within two hours, I was starting to breathe better. My oxygen had gone all the way down to 80. So at this point, then I could see right away in two hours, it was starting to come up.”
 
On Tuesday, Dr. Littell shared with the board members how he saved lives during the pandemic.
 
Unfortunately, they didn’t agree with what they heard, and Dr. Littell was asked to leave.
 
Watch his speech below:
 
After Dr. Littell’s speech, he was escorted by police to leave the board meeting.
 
According to AP, Dr. Littell was removed from the meeting after “he approached a member of the board as the meeting took place, which a spokesperson said presented a safety risk.”
 
Epoch Times reported:
 
A few minutes later, Fiorruci said there were doctors on staff at SMH who wouldn’t speak up because of fear of retribution. Littell approached the dais to whisper his thanks to her.
 
That’s when police officers rapidly approached him, told him he had to leave the property, and escorted him out.
 
After four hours, hospital board members voted 7-2 to adopt the report’s findings. Fiorruci was one of two board members who voted against accepting the report.
 
“I guess I violated protocol,” Littell told The Epoch Times outside the boardroom. “I have to confess, I’ve never been to a hospital board meeting ever.”
 
He was surprised, he said, that police officers walked him out, “as though I’m some kind of a criminal. And all I did was speak my mind.”

UPDATE: Florida Doctor Removed from Hospital Board Meeting After Testifying on the Effectiveness of Ivermectin to Treat Covid (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit

FWIW

  • Edited March 12, 2023 4:12 am  by  WALTER784
In reply toRe: msg 386
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784 

3/12/23

While you were distracted by the Nicola Bulley Tragedy, the UK Gov. quietly published a report confirming the Vaccinated account for 9 in every 10 COVID Deaths over the past TWO Years

BY THE EXPOSÉ
FEBRUARY 22, 2023

Official figures quietly published by the UK Government reveal that the fully/triple/quadruple vaccinated population has accounted for 9 in every 10 Covid-19 deaths in England over the past two years and 92% of Covid-19 deaths throughout the entirety of 2022.
 
On the 21st of February 2023, a UK Government agency, known as the Office for National Statistics (ONS), published data on deaths by vaccination status in England up to 31st December 2022.
 
The overdue dataset from the ONS is titled ‘Deaths by Vaccination Status, England, 1 April 2021 to 31 December 2022‘, and it can be accessed on the ONS site here, and downloaded here.
 
Table 1 of the latest dataset contains figures on the mortality rates by vaccination status for all-cause deaths, deaths involving Covid-19, and deaths not involving Covid-19. And it is here that we are able to ascertain the vaccination status of everyone who has died of Covid-19 since the beginning of April 2021 up until the end of December 2022.
 
Here’s how the ONS presents the figures for the month of October 2022 –
 
As you can see from the above, the vast majority of Covid-19 deaths occurred among those who had received three or more doses of the Covid-19 injection during that month. But this isn’t an anomaly.
 
So we took the figures provided by the ONS and have produced the following chart showing Covid-19 deaths per month by vaccination status in England between 1st April 2021 and 31st December 2022, a period of 21 Months –
 
The above chart proves that the Covid-19 injections are not effective.
 
May 2021 saw the lowest number of Covid-19 deaths, with 205 among the vaccinated population and just 84 among the unvaccinated population. But fast forward a year and we find Covid-19 deaths increased by 450%, with 1,494 among the vaccinated and just 96 among the unvaccinated.
 
Surely if the Covid-19 injections were effective we would expect to see deaths decreasing year on year, not increasing?
 
Instead, what we find from the data is that Covid-19 deaths among the unvaccinated population have become almost negligible, while deaths among the vaccinated population have become more significant as time passes.
 
For instance, between April 1st and December 31st 2021, there were 17,150 Covid-19 deaths, 13,116 of which were among the vaccinated, and 4,034 of which were among the unvaccinated. This means 76.5% of Covid-19 deaths were among the vaccinated, whilst 23.5% of deaths were among the unvaccinated.
 
Then between April 1st 2022 and December 31st 2022, there were 17,161 Covid-19 deaths, which is only an increase of 11 deaths.
 
But the difference is, just 970 of those deaths were among the unvaccinated, whilst 16,191 were among the fully vaccinated.
 
This means we’ve gone from 76.5% of Covid-19 deaths being among the vaccinated and 23.5% of deaths being among the unvaccinated in 2021, to 94% of Covid-19 deaths being among the vaccinated and just 6% of deaths being among the unvaccinated in 2022.
 
The following chart shows the overall number of deaths by vaccination status between 1st April 2021 and 31st December 2022 –
 
In all, there were 45,191 Covid-19 deaths in England between 1st April 2021 and 31st December 2022, and 38,884 of those deaths were among the fully vaccinated population, while just 6,307 deaths were among the unvaccinated population.
 
This means the fully vaccinated population have accounted for 86% / 9 in every 10 Covid-19 deaths over the past twenty-one months.
 
Unfortunately, the mass Booster campaign in winter 2021 did absolutely nothing to alleviate the huge number of deaths among the vaccinated population.
 
In all honesty, the data suggests that the booster campaign actually made things worse, as you can see in the following chart showing the total number of Covid-19 deaths by vaccination status throughout 2022 –
 
In all, there were 28,041 Covid-19 deaths in England between 1st January 2022 and 31st December 2022
...[Message truncated]
View Full Message
TOP