Opinion Polls: Delphi's Polling Place

Hosted by Showtalk

Opinion polls on all subjects. Opinions? Heck yes, we have opinions - but we're *always* nice about it, even when ours are diametrically opposed to yours. Register your vote today!

  • 5012
    MEMBERS
  • 130408
    MESSAGES
  • 3
    POSTS TODAY

Discussions

118th US Congress Rules & Investigations   The Serious You: How Current Events Affect You

Started 2/11/23 by WALTER784; 40751 views.
In reply toRe: msg 45
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

3/2/23

Game’s Up! MAGA 20 Want the Receipts for $113 Billion in Taxpayer Dollars Laundered Through Kiev

By Richard Abelson
Feb. 23, 2023 9:15 am

The chairman of the House Oversight Committee James Comer (R-Ky) has written to Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, Secretary of State Antony Blinken and USAID Administrator Samantha Power to demand a full accounting of the $113 billion in taxpayer funds the Biden regime has provided to the corrupt regime in Kiev.
 
While National Security spokesman John Kirby claimed not to have seen “any signs” of corruption in Ukraine, Comer pointed out these claims “came one day after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky fired several top Ukrainian officials amid a corruption scandal.” Providing US taxpayer funds in a war zone “comes with an inherent risk of fraud, waste, and abuse,” Comer wrote, noting that “unrealistic timelines and expectations that prioritize spending quickly lead to increased corruption.”
 
DoD, State and USAID must now produce all documents related to US aid to Ukraine by March 8, 2023. The letter was signed by republican Representatives including Jim Jordan, Nancy Mace,  Andy Biggs, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Lauren Boebert and  Anna Paulina Luna.
 
Dear Secretary Austin, Secretary Blinken, and Administrator Power:
 
Warm Up Your Bedroom With Cozy Comforters And Covers From MyPillow (Now Up To 70% Off)
 
The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is conducting oversight of the federal government’s administration of U.S. taxpayer-funded assistance to Ukraine. Since Russia invaded Ukraine nearly a year ago, Congress has provided more than $113 billion for security, humanitarian, economic, and governance assistance. It is critical that government agencies administering these funds ensure they are used for their intended purposes to prevent and reduce the risk of waste, fraud, and abuse. The Committee seeks documents and information to understand how the Department of Defense (DOD), Department of State (State), and the U.S. Agency for International Development’s (USAID) are conducting oversight of these funds.
 
On January 25, 2023, U.S. National Security Council Coordinator for Strategic Communications, John Kirby claimed, “We have not seen any signs that our budgetary assistance has fallen prey to any kind of corruption in Ukraine,” and that all direct budgetary assistance, “goes through the World Bank.” Mr. Kirby continued, “I would go so far as to say the same on the security assistance side as well.” These claims came one day after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky fired several top Ukrainian officials amid a corruption scandal. Ukrainian government officials allegedly engaged in bribery, used government vehicles for personal use, and purchased inflated food supplies for Ukrainian forces. In response, President Zelensky named a new Minister of Defense. Based on Mr. Kirby’s remarks, however, the U.S. National Security Council appears unaware of this corruption scandal, heightening concerns that U.S. agencies are not conducting oversight of taxpayer assistance to Ukraine.
 
Providing security and humanitarian assistance for warfighting and reconstruction purposes comes with an inherent risk of fraud, waste, and abuse. The United States must identify these risks and develop oversight mechanisms to mitigate them. We learned from efforts in Afghanistan that the World Bank does not always have effective monitoring and accounting of funds, and often lacks transparency. We also learned that unrealistic timelines and expectations that prioritize spending quickly lead to increased corruption and reduced effectiveness of programs. As the United States continues to filter assistance through multilateral organizations with pressure to spend funds quickly, we must ensure proper protections are in place to prevent the misuse of funds.
 
To assist the Committee’s investigation into what is being done to prevent waste, fraud, and abuse of taxpayer funded assistance to Ukraine, please provide the following documents and information, covering the period February 24, 2022, to the present, as soon as possible, but no later than, March 8, 2023:
 
1. All documents and communications regarding strategies for end-use monitoring of weapons, equipment, direct budgeting assistance, and any other form of economic or security assistance for the Ukrainian people;
 
All documents and communications regarding any anti-corruption efforts in Ukraine, including but not limited to any documents and communications detailing plans to condition assistance on Ukraine’s anti-corruption efforts and how the U.S. is assisting Ukraine in developing an anti-corruption strategy;
All documents and communications regarding how much money has been disbursed for Ukrainian assistance and how much remains
...[Message truncated]
View Full Message
In reply toRe: msg 46
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

3/2/23

Probe Launched Into State Department Censorship of Conservatives

Katie Pavlich
February 23, 2023 3:00 PM

House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer announced an investigation into the State Department after it was revealed by the Washington Examiner the federal bureaucracy spent hundreds-of-millions in taxpayer dollars on censorship of conservative news outlets. 
 
“The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating reports that federal funds administered by the Department of State were used to suppress lawful speech and defund disfavored news outlets under the guise of combatting disinformation. The Committee is disturbed by recent reporting that taxpayer money ended up in the hands of a foreign organization running an advertising blacklist of organizations accused of hosting disinformation on their websites, including several conservative-leaning news organizations. The Committee seeks documents and a staff-level briefing to understand the scope of the Department’s use of federal funds for a taxpayer-funded censorship campaign,” Comer wrote in a letter to Secretary of State Antony Blinken Thursday. 
 
"We continue to be concerned by efforts across the federal government to censor the lawful speech of Americans and discredit legitimate criticism as mis-, dis-, or mal- information, whether through the creation of a ‘Disinformation Governance Board,’ or labeling dissenting opinions as threats to critical infrastructure," the letter continues. "The federal government should not be censoring free speech nor policing what news outlets Americans choose to consume. And taxpayer funds should never be given to third parties with the intent that they be used to censor lawful speech or abridge the freedom of the press." 
 
Comer is asking for a number of State Department documents to be provided and for a briefing from Blinken to Committee staff by March 3. He's asking documents be provided to "enable oversight of the Department’s administration of funds flowing to organizations working to censor lawful speech and suppress press freedoms."
 
1. All documents and communications regarding any grant or other funding administered by the Department or organizations funded by the Department used to suppress so-called mis-, dis-, or mal- information of individuals or news organizations within the United States from January 20, 2021 to the present;
 
2. All documents and communications regarding any grant or other funding administered by the Department or organizations funded by the Department issued to the Global Disinformation Index;
 
3. All documents and communications between any Department employee, contractor, grantee, and any other individual, whether within or outside the federal government, referring or relating to any efforts to suppress so-called mis-, dis-, or mal- information uttered or hosted by any individual or organization within the United States;
 
4. All documents and communications sufficient to show the identities of any Department employees, contractors, or grantees whose duties included, at any point, encouraging a third party to take action against any individual or organization within the United States uttering or hosting content considered mis-, dis-, or mal-information by the Department or organizations funded by the Department.

Probe Launched Into State Department Censorship of Conservatives (townhall.com)

FWIW

Showtalk
Host

From: Showtalk

3/2/23

They are getting right into it now.

WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

3/2/23

This is only the beginning. I'm waiting for the firework finale... after the investigation ends. 

FWIW

Showtalk
Host

From: Showtalk

3/2/23

The Blame Game.

WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

3/2/23

No game at all... it's multiple investigations into the wrongdoings of the Democrat party that will finally pin the tail on the donkeys!!!

FWIW

Showtalk
Host

From: Showtalk

3/2/23

No, the Republicans are exposing what happened and the Democrats are already pointing fingers.

WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

3/3/23

Showtalk said...

the Republicans are exposing what happened and the Democrats are already pointing fingers.

My father taught me about pointing fingers back when I was 8 years old... that was 57 years ago, but I still remember it vividly.

When you point a finger at somebody, you always have 3 of your other fingers pointing back at you! (* GRIN *)

Pointing fingers doesn't shift the blame... they just mistakenly think it does.

Remember when they pointed the finger at Trump for colluding with Russia? It's a failed tactic that they continue to use in hopes of expecting different results! (* CHUCKLE *)

The guilty party is guilty not because of finger pointing, but because of evidence showing who the real guilty part is... and pointing fingers won't change anything... except for what the liberal news media posts. 

FWIW

In reply toRe: msg 53
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

3/3/23

JUST IN: Ted Cruz And Merrick Garland Have Fiery Clash In Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing

FWIW

In reply toRe: msg 54
WALTER784
Staff

From: WALTER784

3/3/23

CONFIRMED: As We Suspected All Along, New Video Proves Capitol Police on January 6 Started Firing on the Innocent Crowd Without Warning and Against the Law, Injuring Numerous Individuals (SHOCKING VIDEO)

By Jim Hoft
Feb. 23, 2023 8:00 am

As we have reported all along, on January 6, 2021 the Capitol Hill Police began firing rubber bullets, gas canisters, flash grenades on the Trump supporters gathered around the US Capitol without warning.
 
In the hundreds of conversations we have had with January 6 attendees, political prisoners, and police abuse victims, they all say the same thing. Innocent people were attacked by police without warning.
 
This was an attack on the American people.
 
While FBI-Deep State operatives, like Ray Epps, were breaking through barriers and leading Trump supporters to the Capitol, police were readying to fire on them indiscriminately without warning.
 
Four Trump supporters died that day in the violence. Dozens more were injured. Two Trump supporters, Kevin Greeson and Benjamin Phillips, died immediately when police started firing on the crowd – without warning.
 
We have proof today that there were dozens if not hundreds of government operatives leading the crowd that day to the US Capitol in what can only be described as a planned attack.
 
Here is the police brutality evidence thread released by InvestigateJ6 earlier this week.
 
What led to the storming of the US Capitol on January 6th? #FollowTheTimeline
 
POLICE BRUTALITY evidence thread.
 
On January 6th at 1:13pm: Officer Thau and the DC Metropolitan Police arrived on the Capitol’s West Plaza.
 
Upon arrival, Thau frantically requests Capitol Police provide him with “blast munitions” to start throwing at the mostly peaceful crowd.
 
Thau repeatedly requests “blast munitions” from different supervisors on the ground for the next 10 minutes.
 
At 1:17pm, Thau orders Capitol PD ‘snipers nest’ to continue firing indiscriminately into the crowd.
 
He screams “let’s go, fucking shoot them!” “Shoot! Shoot! Shoot!”
 
At 1:22pm, Thau grabs a DC officer’s taser. He then rushes to the front line and proceeds to tase a random protestor who can be heard screaming in pain.
 
The crowd responds angrily to Thau’s offensive use of the weapon, yelling “what the fuck is wrong with you guys?!”
 
Blast and incendiary munitions arrive at 1:25pm.
 
From approx 1:25pm until 2:25pm, Capitol and DC police incite the crowd with an unrelenting barrage of grenades and mortars.
 
Trending: Another Credit Card Company To Begin Tracking Gun Sales In April – 57 Million Impacted By The Change
 
Protestor Kevin Greeson drops dead at 1:28pm. Witnesses allege he was killed by one of these grenades.
 
On January 6th at 2:02pm, protestor Derrick Vargo is pushed from a ledge on the NW staircase by a Capitol PD officer as he attempts to hang a Trump flag.
 
At 2:03pm, DC police first use their LRAD system (long range acoustic device), in violation of established protocol.
 
DC law requires police to give 3 separate warnings with the LRAD and an opportunity to disperse before using violence or munitions to clear a protest crowd.
 
The text images included here are from Jon Turley’s testimony on the clearing of the Pershing Park BLM protests outside the White House in 2020.
 
The attempted clearing of the West Plaza protest was evidently illegal according to case law highlighted in Turley’s 6/29/20 testimony. Oddly, Judge Emmet Sullivan, who wrote these rules, has not addressed this fact in his January 6th rulings and convictions.
 
The entirety of Turley’s remarkably relevant testimony can be found at
...[Message truncated]
View Full Message
TOP