Opinion Polls: Delphi's Polling Place
Hosted by Showtalk
Opinion polls on all subjects. Opinions? Heck yes, we have opinions - but we're *always* nice about it, even when ours are diametrically opposed to yours. Register your vote today!
- 5002
MEMBERS - 130167
MESSAGES - 5
POSTS TODAY
Discussions
118th US Congress Rules & Investigations The Serious You: How Current Events Affect You
Started 2/11/23 by WALTER784; 39909 views.
Staff
From: WALTER784
3/3/23
JUST IN: Ted Cruz And Merrick Garland Have Fiery Clash In Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing
FWIW
Staff
From: WALTER784
3/3/23
CONFIRMED: As We Suspected All Along, New Video Proves Capitol Police on January 6 Started Firing on the Innocent Crowd Without Warning and Against the Law, Injuring Numerous Individuals (SHOCKING VIDEO)
By Jim Hoft
Feb. 23, 2023 8:00 am
As we have reported all along, on January 6, 2021 the Capitol Hill Police began firing rubber bullets, gas canisters, flash grenades on the Trump supporters gathered around the US Capitol without warning.
In the hundreds of conversations we have had with January 6 attendees, political prisoners, and police abuse victims, they all say the same thing. Innocent people were attacked by police without warning.
This was an attack on the American people.
While FBI-Deep State operatives, like Ray Epps, were breaking through barriers and leading Trump supporters to the Capitol, police were readying to fire on them indiscriminately without warning.
Four Trump supporters died that day in the violence. Dozens more were injured. Two Trump supporters, Kevin Greeson and Benjamin Phillips, died immediately when police started firing on the crowd – without warning.
We have proof today that there were dozens if not hundreds of government operatives leading the crowd that day to the US Capitol in what can only be described as a planned attack.
Here is the police brutality evidence thread released by InvestigateJ6 earlier this week.
What led to the storming of the US Capitol on January 6th? #FollowTheTimeline
POLICE BRUTALITY evidence thread.
On January 6th at 1:13pm: Officer Thau and the DC Metropolitan Police arrived on the Capitol’s West Plaza.
Upon arrival, Thau frantically requests Capitol Police provide him with “blast munitions” to start throwing at the mostly peaceful crowd.
Thau repeatedly requests “blast munitions” from different supervisors on the ground for the next 10 minutes.
At 1:17pm, Thau orders Capitol PD ‘snipers nest’ to continue firing indiscriminately into the crowd.
He screams “let’s go, fucking shoot them!” “Shoot! Shoot! Shoot!”
At 1:22pm, Thau grabs a DC officer’s taser. He then rushes to the front line and proceeds to tase a random protestor who can be heard screaming in pain.
The crowd responds angrily to Thau’s offensive use of the weapon, yelling “what the fuck is wrong with you guys?!”
Blast and incendiary munitions arrive at 1:25pm.
From approx 1:25pm until 2:25pm, Capitol and DC police incite the crowd with an unrelenting barrage of grenades and mortars.
Trending: Another Credit Card Company To Begin Tracking Gun Sales In April – 57 Million Impacted By The Change
Protestor Kevin Greeson drops dead at 1:28pm. Witnesses allege he was killed by one of these grenades.
On January 6th at 2:02pm, protestor Derrick Vargo is pushed from a ledge on the NW staircase by a Capitol PD officer as he attempts to hang a Trump flag.
At 2:03pm, DC police first use their LRAD system (long range acoustic device), in violation of established protocol.
DC law requires police to give 3 separate warnings with the LRAD and an opportunity to disperse before using violence or munitions to clear a protest crowd.
The text images included here are from Jon Turley’s testimony on the clearing of the Pershing Park BLM protests outside the White House in 2020.
The attempted clearing of the West Plaza protest was evidently illegal according to case law highlighted in Turley’s 6/29/20 testimony. Oddly, Judge Emmet Sullivan, who wrote these rules, has not addressed this fact in his January 6th rulings and convictions.
The entirety of Turley’s remarkably relevant testimony can be found at
...[Message truncated]
Staff
From: WALTER784
3/3/23
Leaked FBI Memo Reportedly Shows Bureau, DOJ Targeting Catholics as ‘Violent Extremists’
BY RUSTY WEISS
FEBRUARY 13, 2023 AT 9:34AM
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and Department of Justice (DOJ) have come under increased scrutiny after a leaked memo reportedly shows the bureau warning that “radical traditionalist” Catholics pose an extremist threat.
Virginia Attorney General Jason Miyares was joined by 19 other attorneys general in sending a letter to the DOJ condemning an anti-Catholic internal memorandum that became public last week.
The memo, according to those AGs, “identifies ‘radical-traditionalist Catholic[s]’ as potential ‘racially or ethnically motivated violent extremists.’”
Kyle Seraphin, a former FBI special agent and federal whistleblower, obtained the document from a field office in Richmond, Virginia, and published it on the UncoveredDC website.
The memorandum attempts to discern between acceptable and unacceptable Catholic beliefs and practices while suggesting there are “radical traditionalists” who have the potential of being “racially or ethnically motivated violent extremists.”
FBI Labeling Catholics as Potential Violent Extremists?
Miyares condemned the memo as something one “would expect from Communist Cuba.”
“Anti-Catholic bigotry appears to be festering in the FBI, and the Bureau is treating Catholics as potential terrorists because of their beliefs,” the AGs wrote to FBI Director Christopher Wray and Attorney General Merrick Garland.
They accuse the bureau of deploying “alarmingly detailed theological distinctions to distinguish between the Catholics whom the FBI deems acceptable and those it does not.”
The AGs also suggest the FBI is embedding agents into Catholic churches, something seen prevalently in the so-called war on terror which resulted in numerous claims of entrapment for practicing Muslims.
“The FBI has been down this road before, having infiltrated countless mosques throughout the country in the wake of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks,” they write.
“The FBI disavowed this ignominious practice in 2008, and revised its internal guidelines in 2010 and 2013 to prevent its operatives from callously disregarding the religious liberty of American citizens.”
They state that revelations in the memo make it “very concerning indeed if the FBI had revived this practice against American Catholics.”
This is Becoming a Pattern
Following the publication of the leaked memo showing the targeting of Catholics as potential extremists, the FBI has been furiously trying to clean up the mess.
The bureau has since removed the document from its systems because it does not meet the “exacting standards of the FBI” and claims, according to Fox News, they are “no longer infiltrating the Catholic community.”
A) What standards? B) ‘No longer infiltrating’ suggests admission that it was previous practice. C) Not sure we’re buying it.
The Chicago Thinker managing editor Evita Duffy believes the memo is another example of the Biden administration targeting political enemies.
“This whole investigation is a pretext to persecute the political enemies of the left, and it’s a testimony to just how corrupt the FBI has become,” Duffy told Fox News.
This isn’t exactly an anomaly under this administration.
The White House and Attorney General Merrick Garland’s DOJ, you may recall, worked in tandem with the National School Boards Association (NSBA) to treat parents concerned about their children’s education like domestic terrorists.
A letter sent by the NSBA and coordinated with the White House and DOJ requested an investigation into whether or not confrontations from outraged parents regarding mask mandates or Critical Race Theory (CRT) curricula amounted to a violation of the Patriot Act.
The gr
...[Message truncated]
Staff
From: WALTER784
3/3/23
At first, parents at PTA meeting were declared domestic terrorists, now they're declaring Christians domestic terrorists.
Well, WE THE PEOPLE need to declare the DOJ and the FBI as domestic terrorists!!!
FWIW
Staff
From: WALTER784
3/8/23
This is a new interesting twist... use the Democrat rules against them!!!
DAVID BOSSIE: Dems Changed The Rulebook For Congressional Oversight. Now, Republicans Must Use It Against Them
House Oversight Committee Examines Free Speech In Social Media
DAVID BOSSIE PRESIDENT, CITIZENS UNITED
February 17, 2023 2:26 PM ET
During the previous Congress, the Democrat-controlled January 6 Select Committee ended decades of precedent and changed the rules when it comes to congressional oversight. Unfortunately for the Biden Administration, those newly-minted changes still apply now that Republicans are in control of the U.S. House of Representatives.
As the old saying goes, the toothpaste can’t be put back in the tube; the decision was made to break the system in order to make it easier to go after former President Donald Trump and Democrats must now live with it. New GOP Committee Chairs must be just as aggressive and utilize the new rules set by the J6 panel in their quest for answers from the least transparent administration in the history of our republic. (RELATED: JARED WHITLEY: Term Limits Aren’t All They’re Cracked Up To Be)
For two years, the Biden White House answered to no one — partisan hacks Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer were only interested in spending trillions upon trillions in taxpayer dollars, not questioning anything President Joe Biden and his cronies were up to. And it almost goes without saying at this point that their allies in the biased mainstream media would rather beat fake anti-Trump narratives to death than investigate Biden or Vice President Kamala Harris.
Going forward, Congressmen Jim Jordan, James Comer and anyone else holding a gavel should focus on running their own independent investigations. There’s no need to go hat in hand to the Department of Justice (DOJ).
Committees shouldn’t wait for DOJ to reject a document request or hide behind tried and tested excuses like “sorry, it’s an ongoing investigation so we can’t help you,” because those are dilatory tactics designed to obstruct congressional investigations. Instead, go straight to the source of the records being sought and get them yourself.
Subpoena the banks, subpoena the telecommunications companies, subpoena Big Tech and subpoena all the business associates. On the heels of the January 6 Committee, it’s literally impossible to issue too many subpoenas.
Everyone knows the Justice Department’s investigation of Hunter Biden is going nowhere. That’s the reason there was no special counsel appointed for the case despite the obvious need for one – so the Biden White House through the president’s hand-picked Attorney General Merrick Garland could control what happens.
The new rules of the game, thanks to Pelosi, Congressman Bennie Thompson and former Congresswoman Liz Cheney are as follows: issue subpoenas, conduct closed door depositions, release information to the press — and repeat. And thanks to the J6 Committee, no pressure should be felt to hold any hearings any time soon.
Thompson and Cheney ran their probe like a grand jury, so Republican chairs should follow suit. Furthermore, because of the new “Bannon-Navarro Doctrine,” individuals or entities who fail to comply with subpoenas for documents or testimony must be held in contempt of Congress and criminal referrals must be acted upon without delay.
When it comes to the Biden family corruption investigation, the American people have been hearing about Hunter’s infamous laptop for nearly three years now and deserve to know the truth.
So, go get the bank records and see what foreign countries the wire transfers are coming from because every American should know if the president is compromised due to his family’s lucrative overseas business entanglements.
If you think the Biden administration is honest enough to police itself, think again. And if you think the liberal corporate media’s going to ask any truly inconvenient questions of this president, you guessed wrong. Only hard-nosed congressional oversight can provide some much needed transparency.
Eventually hearings can be held but not on someone else’s timetable. Individuals like former Biden business associate Tony Bobulinski should be public witnesses for certain, but don’t fall into the swamp’s trap.
Playing by pre-January 6 Committee rules gets you newspaper headlines like “An inauspicious start to House GOP hearings” and coverage of bogus polls that manufacture results like “the public felt, by 56 percent to 36 percent, the newly created select subcommittee on the ‘wea
...[Message truncated]
Staff
From: WALTER784
3/8/23
Trump demands all January 6 prisoners are FREED because they were jailed or convicted over a 'giant lie': Calls for 'Unselect Committee' to be prosecuted after Tucker Carlson aired new footage from Capitol riot
'VIDEO FOOTAGE IS IRREFUTABLE!!!' says Trump on social media
'Nancy & Mitch were a disaster on Security,' says former president about Jan. 6
'The World can see what really went on during the January 6th events': Trump
By HARRIET ALEXANDER FOR DAILYMAIL.COM
PUBLISHED: 16:06 GMT, 7 March 2023 | UPDATED: 21:42 GMT, 7 March 2023
Donald Trump has called for releasing all January 6 prisoners after Tucker Carlson unveiled new footage, which he claims casts a fresh perspective on the 2021 unrest at the US Capitol.
'Congratulations to Tucker Carlson on one of the biggest “scoops” as a reporter in U.S. history,' wrote Trump on social media,
'The New Surveillance Footage of the January 6th Events sheds an entirely different light on what actually happened. The Unselect Committee was a giant SCAM, and has now unequivocally been stamped as CRIMINAL FABRICATORS OF THIS MOST IMPORTANT DAY... LET THEM GO FREE, NOW!'
Former President Donald Trump demands all prisoners convicted of crimes on January 6, 2021 released based on footage made avail by Speaker McCarthy and shown by Tucker Carlson
Former President Donald Trump claims then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell are to blame for security lapses on January 6, 2021.
In footage screened on his show Monday night, so-called QAnon Shaman Jacob Chansley was apparently seen being escorted into the Senate by Capitol police officers.
TRENDING
Kevin McCarthy: I don't regret giving Tucker Carlson Jan. 6 footage
Tucker Carlson shares new January 6 footage
Trump demands January 6 committee members are tried for TREASON
Carlson suggested that challenged the prevailing narrative that Chansley - jailed for four years over the incident - aggressively barged into the chamber.
On Tuesday morning, the former president claimed on Truth Social that Capitol rioters behind bars were 'convicted, or are awaiting trial, based on a giant lie.'
Chansley is seen being followed through the Capitol by a police officer
Chansley, with his bullhorn, is seen on January 6, 2021 inside the Capitol
'A radical left con job. Thank you to Tucker Carlson and Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy for what you have both done,' Trump continued.
'New video footage is irrefutable.'
After Carlson's showed air, Trump also called for the 'Unselect' January 6 committee to be prosecuted for being 'criminal fabricators' and said Nancy Pelosi and Mitch McConnell 'failed on security."
Also broadcast was footage of Capitol cop Brian Sicknick, who died shortly after the riot.
It was initially suggested Sicknick's death came as the result of being attacked with a fire extinguisher and pepper spray by rioters.
But a medical examiner later ruled he'd died of natural causes. And Carlson shared footage of Sicknick walking around the Capitol after the attack.
He appeared in good health, which the Fox News host said poured cold water on liberal outlets' insistence that the Capitol rioters had Sicknick's blood on their hands.
He also referenced Ray Epps, who was seen among the rioters urging them to storm the Capitol, yet was never charged - giving rise to the suspicion that Epps was an informant. Epps has denied working for the government.
On Monday, Carlson suggested Epps was lying.
'They were orderly and meek,' said Carlson of those who stormed the Capitol. 'These were not insurrectionists; they were sightseers.'
Carlson said they 'obviously revere the Capitol,'
...[Message truncated]
Staff
From: WALTER784
3/9/23
JUST IN: House Republican Leaders Hold Press Briefing After Tucker Carlson's Second Jan 6th Report
FWIW
TOP