Sand_Grain

The world in a Sand Grain

Hosted by Sand_Grain

Current debate about contemporary life, ancient historical issues, and just about everything in between in different languages

  • 1119
    MEMBERS
  • 43891
    MESSAGES
  • 0
    POSTS TODAY

Discussions

Why Are We in Ukraine?   Discussions

Started 27/10/22 by Apollonius (Theocritos); 11221 views.
maxi4

From: maxi4

18-Apr

" Joe Biden is the most corrupt politician America has seen in a century."

Really? Any facts to back that up, pal? Come on, just one or two.

maxi4

From: maxi4

18-Apr

Ah, remember the war in Iraq, stud? That was a war.

Bwahahahahahahahahahaha!

Jagoff.

Bolomco

From: Bolomco

20-Apr

Too many wars to track and comprehend what is going on…

“The object of waging a war is always to be in a better position in which to wage another war.” 

– George Orwell

drl0lip0p

From: drl0lip0p

22-Apr

That is logically true....   thumbsup 

War attractions is more divisions and more wars. 

In reply toRe: msg 69

... If Milley’s assessment is correct, and given that the Ukrainian position is more tenuous than was generally thought in October and November, then a successful Ukrainian southern offensive seriously threatening Crimea is unlikely. In the south, Russia is well dug in and will have considered a final-battle-of Kursk scenario: Sag in the center, then envelop the Ukrainian forces, which – at 80,000, at most – will quickly need to re-form.

There is a proviso: To give the much-ballyhooed southern offensive a chance, Ukraine and its closest allies, the US and UK, would need to take down the Kerch Bridge to cut off Russian mainland access to Crimea. Were that to involve long-range NATO artillery, a Russian red line might well be crossed.

For several reasons, Ukraine may choose instead to launch a central front offensive from the region north of Bakhmut and east of Kramatorsk in the direction of Lysychansk and Luhansk. Wagner Group head Prigozhin has warned of that and may well have the right instinct about it. Russian forces north of the Donbass salient would be cut off and would either have to flee to the homeland or surrender.

It would not be the recovery of Crimea touted by Zelensky and State’s Victoria Nuland, but it would probably keep Western support for Ukraine alive.

Unless hardnosed military advice to the White House has some effect, we are entering into the most dangerous phase not just of this war, but of any period since November 1983, when a nuclear war almost started because the Russians interpreted NATO’s too-realistic exercise Operation Able Archer as a ruse to disguise a nuclear first strike. The lunatic ideologues at the US Department of State, who demand regime change and the break-up of Russia, will see to that.

maxi4

From: maxi4

23-Apr

So we should end our aid to the Ukraine and watch them die and fall under Putin's spell? Is that the world you'd like to see, pal? Today Ukraine, tomorrow Kazakhstan. See where this is going, chief?

maxi4

From: maxi4

23-Apr

Jesus, pal. Do you have a job or is this crap what you do all day long?

Myra (MKratz)

From: Myra (MKratz)

24-Apr

The Russian government and its force is not what most of the Populations' desires. 

Myra (MKratz)

From: Myra (MKratz)

24-Apr

Your evil words is not what most of the members here are into the same desolation as you are.

maxi4

From: maxi4

24-Apr

What's so evil about telling the truth?

TOP