ShowBiz

Hosted by Showtalk

Everything ShowBiz: TV, Film, People, Books and News for over 25 years!

  • 12396
    MEMBERS
  • 117481
    MESSAGES
  • 0
    POSTS TODAY

Discussions

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle   People

Started Nov-28 by Showtalk; 344 views.
Showtalk
Host

From: Showtalk

Nov-28

Showtalk
Host

From: Showtalk

Nov-28

Does this mean Suits is over?

In reply toRe: msg 1
Showtalk
Host

From: Showtalk

Nov-28

In reply toRe: msg 3
Showtalk
Host

From: Showtalk

Nov-28

Meghan Markle's parents 'will both be at' her wedding

Thomas Markle, 73, who is currently living in Mexico, met his future son-in-law in January, but it has not yet been confirmed whether or not he will walk his daughter down the aisle.

Tony W. (TONYW1)

From: Tony W. (TONYW1)

Nov-28

The most recent article I could find (Nov 13) says that if Suits returns for an eighth season, Patrick J. Adams and Meghan Markle would not be part of it.

Showtalk
Host

From: Showtalk

Nov-28

There goes the show.  They are the best part.  I also heard they may make a spinoff instead using Jessica as the lead in Chicago.

RGoss99

From: RGoss99

Dec-3

Stupid puff piece, evidence of why countries which seem to need a monarchy are backward, out of date, and immature democracies.

Besides - in the reporter´s enthusiasm lotsof mistakes were incuded examples.

Windsor <<CHAPEL>> is not a church, it is just a chapel, does not have a parish or regular services.

It is hardly a cathedrel and not as big as it looks. The eastern 1/3 of its lenght is a morturary chapel not accessible to the wedding, which will take place, in the center choir 1/3 mostly invisible to the guests in the western 1/3 blocked by thearch supporting the organ. The choir itself is only half as wide as the structure, bound by knights´choir stalls with aisles on both sides.  this means that in terms of a normal church wedding, the ceremoney will be viewed by at most 100 people.

As the groom is only 5th in line for the throne, and not a lord, his marriage would not jutify the use of the Abby for EIIR or Wales in St Paul´s cathedrals while would hold over 1000.

Other error, the Church of England does not support divorsed person´s second marriages. So Charles and the Duchess of York´s marriage was in the city hall of Westminister (note not a part of London as mentioned in the article), not within the walls of Windsor, and certainly not in St George´s chapel.

The fact that the press has a need to inflate its dtails, is itself a symptom of a process in decline. 

The fact that the British royal family changed its name from Hanover to Windsor was a political move since the family of German origin was at the time with Germany. The same goes for the Duke of Edinburgh´s family name changed from the German, Battenburg to Montbaton.

Showtalk
Host

From: Showtalk

Dec-3

It’s not your country or your leader, so why do you sound so angry?  

Welcome the Gooss normal diatribe for everything American (of which he claims to be a citizen) and the machinations of almost anything not Socialist Majorcan in nature.

Showtalk
Host

From: Showtalk

Dec-3

LOL. I have noticed.  The Royal system has worked for England for a long time.  Who are we to denounce it?  If their citizens want a change, it’s up to them, not us.  We left the monarchy after the Revolution.  He does not like fairytales, which is what this is.

TOP