(continuing on)

In face I ignored your spamming and erroneous accusations . . . instead addressing the context of my question to you -

https://forums.delphiforums.com/aususuk/messages/?msg=1083.460

"

Seems you don't know me very well . . . ya see I back BLM, back immigration, have assisted getting rid of racists and like for well over 40 yrs, recently assisted in getting rid of one of the parler folks that was a city police chief, etc. . . . for the last 5 yrs worked on getting rid of donnie boy and other left side politics, etc. . . .

As to the question asked of you - what seems so hard about addressing it . . . it should be pretty simple to address controlled immigration and the consequences of non controlled immigration . . . for example - one of the consequences of non-controlled immigration can often result in what amounts to squalor style camps akin to 3rd world refugee camps overwhelming the resources of a nation and available assistance from agencies like the WHO, UN, etc. . . . 

In other words - there is quite a bit involved for immigration to work well . . . and donnie boy damn sure screwed up on the southern border of the U.S. . . . as well in addition to curtailing many of the immigration/refugee programs that were in place in the U.S. when he became the occupant of the Oval Office . . . thankfully he is now gone and Biden is taking the steps ta get the U.S. back on track . . .

So, do you plan on addressing the question asked of you . . ."

It was interesting that while a favorite topic of yours is immigration . . . yet when I asked you about controlled immigration vs. non controlled immigration . . . apparently you didn't wish to discuss that aspect of immigration . . . instead continuing to spam me with articles about Latinos and the U.S.. . . to include a post about the Sanctuary Movement (as if I didn't know anything about it) until the forum host reminded you the thread is about Israel -

https://forums.delphiforums.com/aususuk/messages/?msg=1083.470

Oh, as to the SM I provided you an article regarding that -

https://forums.delphiforums.com/aususuk/messages/?msg=1083.471

"

8645 (RedBV) said...

(continuing on)

Of course you are. You're just trying to hijack this thread, just like you hijacked the other thread.

It's just how you operate. Trolling by exhaustion.

Not interested in anything that happened before Advil's post here.

My conversation with BM was over. Just ask Jennifer.

I chose to wash BM's mouth out with soap, and did so.

I got repremanded for it. Meh. That has nothing to do with you.

Take it up with Jennifer.

You came here 4 and a half days after my last post in that thread.

Any reference by you later to a conversation that had already ended is trolling, plain and simple.

You asked me a question.

I sought and received permission first from Jennifer to answer your question, and then I did so, despite your disengenousness.

Coalition of the Confused (delphiforums.com)

(continuing on)

Well anyway, at that point it seems you started realizing you might be in over your head . . . and you tried to run away from info that belied your accusations toward me and the question that had been asked of you . . . by you posting to me that the thread was about Israel . . . which was comical from you, lad . . . ya see given most every nation deals with immigration . . . my question also dealt with Israel . . . ya see most every nation faces the issue of controlled immigration vs. non controlled immigration . . . what with your more or less trying to present yourself as a knowledgeable person concerning immigration, figured you might like to discuss the conundrum of my question . . . in fact I offered to discuss the conundrum limited to Israel . . . it was interesting that in effect you ran from doing so . . . and subsequently even ran from discussing anything about Israel, even though I offered to you - that you pick a topic about Israel and lets discuss it . . .

Anyway, it seemed you no longer wished to discuss topics about Israel so I let it drop . . . but you carried on making accusations, etc.

Anyway I ignored your antics and introduced to everyone a topic concerning Israel - marriage in Israel . . . including an article concerning common law marriage in Israel -

https://forums.delphiforums.com/aususuk/messages/?msg=1083.512

https://forums.delphiforums.com/aususuk/messages/?msg=1083.513

It was interesting that suddenly you wanted to perhaps discuss this issue about Israel . . . relating some past incident, as if the info I has provided was supposedly in error . . . I pointed out that that what you related may have happened . . . that currently in Israel that was not the case -

https://forums.delphiforums.com/aususuk/messages/?msg=1083.515

Apparently that, that things had changed in Israel, didn't sit well with ya . . . so for the next several posts you tried a game concerning the quote feature provided by Delphi (it failed) . . .

Seeing that your game had failed you tried another angle over the articles I had introduced concerning marriage in Israel . . . in specific concerning common law marriage -

https://forums.delphiforums.com/aususuk/messages/?msg=1083.527

However, what you neglected to comprehend was that the provisions for common law marriage were specific to Israel . . . while you might dislike common law marriage in some other country, how it takes place, the benefits, pro's and cons, etc. that is irrelevant, lad . . . the topic was marriage in Israel . . .

You then tried to falsely claim I was supposedly tying to give legal advice about marriage . . . sorry, lad that was not the case at all . . . I simply provided the current state of marriage, to include common law marriage, in Israel . . . apparently you couldn't comprehend that each nation in the world sets its on standards for marriage . . . while you may not like whatever nation has put in place . . . unless your a citizen of whatever nation, it has no bearing on you, son . . . the simple fact is - each nation decides for itself . . . while the international community may dislike something - it is still whatever nations choice for citizens, etc., of their nation . . .

You then started spamming the thread with your erroneous legal claims, which ended up with the thread closed . . .

Oh, by the way . . . regarding the single question that I asked you - controlled immigration vs. non controlled immigration . . . you've never addressed it and your posted vid doesn't address it either . . .

So, my lad, now that the actual facts have been addressed maybe you'll cease your trolling of me and false erroneous claims . . . do I think you will . . . not at all, you've been trolling me in a number of forums over the last some months trying for some get back and expect you will continue doing so . . . oh well . . .

SquaddyB said...

You see, exactly what RedBV has just accused you of, is the exact same kind of thing that I had accused you of!

Really?

Interesting...

He's a loon far as myself is concerned . . . he is pretty much just another berry . . . wrapped around the axle over a specific thing . . . and anywhere he goes tries to hijack threads to that specific . . . never mind that whatever the thread is about or the topic at the time in the thread has nothing to do with his obsession . . .

8645 (RedBV) said...

(continuing on)

Well anyway, at that point it seems you started realizing you might be in over your head

I'm drowning under the weight of all your posts, that's for sure.

I don't actually have to actually read them to realize that.

8645 (RedBV) said...

he goes tries to hijack threads

This is hilarious.

Sigh . . . lying yer ass off doesn't help ya, son . . . it is real simple - you trolled me, made false accusations time and again . . . I've simply addressed the lies, etc., you've told . . . ya don't like it, there is a solution - stop trolling me and telling lies . . . because you want some get back over your games being addressed for what they are, your lies pointed out, etc. . . .

Jenifer (Zarknorph) said...

However, it seems a silly thing to be wasting time arguing over.

Of course. If he was no longer interested he could have simply said so in a single post. There was no reason for him to make more than a single post in this thread if he was no longer interested.

But his goal is to ruin this thread with walls and walls and walls of meaningless text, because the thread contains information that disturbs him, and which he seeks to hide, I suppose.

8645 (RedBV) said...

stop trolling me

I made a single post to you, containing actual information, not silly fluff, and that one post set you off on a trolling spree.

Now, you've successfully hidden the post, and destroyed the thread. 

Congratulations on your great victory.