Coalition of the Confused
Hosted by Jenifer (Zarknorph)
Confused malcontents swilling Chardonnay while awaiting the Zombie Apocalypse.
- 1242
MEMBERS - 62758
MESSAGES - 0
POSTS TODAY
Discussions
Israel 2 Africa and the Middle East
From: el gringo (ramseylurker)
8/14/21
Uncle Albert,
Would you please edit your post to match mine.
I misspoke.
Obviously, I meant to say that slacker is like a cousin to me, not a brother.
Thank you, Uncle Albert.
From: Jenifer (Zarknorph)
8/15/21
8645 (RedBV) said:calling him lad or son is simply showing him the like derision of him that he shows me . .
In other words, tit for tat. He goads you, you goad him right back.
You call me "full of shit", then freely admit you do it to get under his skin in the very next sentence.
Just because you outright refuse to accept the evidence I have presented to you, in no way means I 'failed'.
You troll him just as much as he trolls you.
Just because other people post "Yawn" as a single word response to a post, doesn't mean they're not douchebags for doing it.
- Edited August 15, 2021 2:30 am by Jenifer (Zarknorph)
From: Jenifer (Zarknorph)
8/15/21
8645 (RedBV) said:Also, Godwin's Law applies here, and the penalty is ridicule. Are you now trying to claim that when someone posts what is similar and or akin to . . . that the poster who does so is now not subject to ridicule and the like, eh Jen . . .
Just to clarify, you do know what Godwin's Law is?
From: Jenifer (Zarknorph)
8/15/21
8645 (RedBV) said:You owe some folks an apology, Jen . . .
You're the one fucking up my forum.
From: Jenifer (Zarknorph)
8/15/21
The topic is Israel.
Not cattle rustling in South America (or wherever).
No hijacking.
From: 8645 (RedBV)
8/15/21
8645 (RedBV) said:calling him lad or son is simply showing him the like derision of him that he shows me . .
In other words, tit for tat. He goads you, you goad him right back.
You call me "full of shit", then freely admit you do it to get under his skin in the very next sentence.
That is because you are full of shit and have failed . . . speaking to someone with derision is not goading or trolling . . .
Just because you outright refuse to accept the evidence I have presented to you, in no way means I 'failed'.
That is because you have no evidence . . . it's simply amazing that you are trying to defend that troll . . . .
You troll him just as much as he trolls you.
Just because other people post "Yawn" as a single word response to a post, doesn't mean they're not douchebags for doing it.