BerrySteph said:

How is Korea to be re-united without bloodshed if KJU is not provided with a pension?

I agree that KJU will want to retain power - but we know what he does with it, so that power can only be symbolic.

Jenifer (Zarknorph) said:

I agree that KJU will want to retain power - but we know what he does with it, so that power can only be symbolic.

Korea can be re-unified with or without bloodshed - which do you prefer?

And it can happen sooner or later - which do you prefer?

Money being the root of all evil but in this case it will be investment in NK that will ultimately one release NK from its slavery .

The Giant NK army is jut another way of keeping them off the street and complaining ,in any standoff with the US they would be powerless

BM 

BerrySteph said:

Korea can be re-unified with or without bloodshed - which do you prefer?

That's a stupid question, and I'm insulted that you think I would prefer the former.

bml00 said:

Money being the root of all evil but in this case it will be investment in NK that will ultimately one release NK from its slavery .

Agree.

And wouldn't it be great to have a Trump Tower in Pyongyang!

Well, great for Trump at least.

Unlike some, I have no axe to grind with Trump , he is trying and it is better to have tried and failed than never try at all.

If getting a Trump Tower gets us a step closer to finding some arrangement with JKU who cares , small potatoes .

bm

Agree.

There would also be heavy scrutiny over the working conditions of the builders.

Jenifer (Zarknorph) said:

That's a stupid question, and I'm insulted that you think I would prefer the former.

Too bad that others have been less cautious than you, openly calling for the regime to fall in chaos and suffering.

We have a record of this, devastating Iraq and Syria with our interference.

There is a great deal of support for re-unification in South Korea - but they're a land under occupation, nobody dare speak out.