Confused malcontents swilling Chardonnay while awaiting the Zombie Apocalypse.
17250 messages in 761 discussions
Latest Sep-28 by CamGeary
Latest Sep-27 by ElDotardo
Latest Sep-8 by OSarge (mahjong54)
Latest Sep-7 by OSarge (mahjong54)
Latest Sep-2 by OSarge (mahjong54)
4885 messages in 208 discussions
Latest 12/30/21 by NISSY (NISSY2)
Latest Sep-26 by PTG (anotherPTG)
744 messages in 13 discussions
Latest Sep-7 by ElDotardo
What invented score board. If you object to the criteria I use, why be a passive-aggressive coward, Better to be specific and say what points you are objecting to, and we can have an honest discussion.
Sorry that you object to my objection that there be a criteria and score board, when we can just "have an honest discussion".
Seriously, you are so funny, when all formalizing a totally random sort of discourse on a forum.
I mean, sometime we get political, sometime righteously anrgy, sometimes funny, but being rated for our posts seems rather... petty.
G=G+1 non seq, considering none of your examples are applicable to my protocol as to why a "G" is assigned to a particular post.
Protocol...assigned to a post, and rated, even.
You and I are probably quite similar in political views. The essential differences being that you choose to have a standard of rating people, whereas, I choose to regard humans worth on a different standard.
Little hope for someone being 99, LOL and who still doesn’t know anything about the G point and most of the time doesn’t know wether he is coming or going!
I'm quite sure that he is "coming".... and delightful of attention.
Sadly, I am not mature enough to not go there in the advances of impropriety, and still wave the sword.
Wondering if he knows the real importance of the G spot, though.
G=G+1 because on one hand your post is obvious, but pointless since, even though I asked, you seem to be unable to define the differences because you don´t mention any standards. In this case my standard to which the "G" applies is a meaningless statement, in that it is an obvious given, while passive-aggressive implying that your, so far imaginary, standards are higher then mine. If this was not the implication why bother posting.
In this case my standard to which the "G" applies is a meaningless statement
Why. ..why...why... do you just keep torturing us with your "standards". I mean, really, is it necessary for you?
Why not ask yourself why you are trolling me with pointless posts. In these cases, I am merely responding to your posts which I find a waste of time even bothering to open. I do so because I am polite, and asume you have a need to express yourself and get a response. In case you have lost focus, the topic is a valid one, and not necessarily personal, it is "UK and Europe", the "G" is for your unwanted off topic comments.
your posts which I find a waste of time even bothering to open
Whatever, dude, you are so off-topic usually, if you wish to not fence with me, it is quite easy for you to put me on "ignore". I do gather that I have hurt your feelings, in our spats, and do apologize for the wounding.
*Have you seen a doctor yet?