Confused malcontents swilling Chardonnay while awaiting the Zombie Apocalypse.
17250 messages in 761 discussions
Latest 11/2/20 by Jenifer (Zarknorph)
9342 messages in 66 discussions
Latest Nov-22 by smmheart1
5031 messages in 115 discussions
Latest Nov-21 by A Kid by any other name... (Kidmagnet)
750 messages in 15 discussions
Latest Oct-29 by ElDotardo
So, I was looking for something online that could be transposed from the song "Tweedledee, Tweedledum", into a Twitter Dee Twitter Dum thing about Trump, but happenstance brought me to this.. um... unusual piece of artistry that made me laugh.
The outfits and the terrible dancing from the audience made me want to poke my eyes out.
I could not watch it all, but I got enough references to understand.
In what century or decade was this asynchronic video made?
When ever it was, if it appeared on my screen, I would have changed the channel.
The key Trump message is his use of the word "appear", because he is not interested in facts just things that "appear" to support him and his message. Not even qualified to stand up for his imaginary facts that get shot down via fact checking. My personal rule regarding posts here, what ever one´s source, if one does not disassociate oneself fom it, they own it.
Trump likes to use the term "graphics", also, when explaining to his team how to gloss over his misdeeds or words. "The graphics have to be changed" on that one, as he regrets what he said.
BTW, your "personal rules" don't belong here. You can tell us your thoughts, and engage in conversation without imposing.
G=G+1, but only for your BTW as I will deal with the first part without the OT rider attached. When it comes to my "personal rules" they only apply to those addressing posts to me, from people who already have been informed that they are unacceptable. If you find one or more of these personal rules inappropriate here, why can´t you seem to give an example of one of these and show how they are out of line here? This
When using he word "also" the reader would expect to find a clear indication of two different things.
You say 2Trump likes o use the term "grafics", also...
Question is "also" here a substitute for a full stop ending the end of a thought.
If so, I would expect an example of Trump´s use of "graffics".
If not, there needs to be a bridge to the other part of the sentence.
You gave an example, but without a context, how can we know that he regrets something, or is just backpeddling because he has met some resistence.
By observing Trump´s misuse of vocabulary, I would not be surprised that when he uses tis word his concept is quite differet then we or the dictionar might use it.