It is everybody elses fault as usual .

The defence of KJU or Assad or Saddam or Eichmann or the Nazis would be enough proof of that .

BM

No one has claimed responsibility yet.

Who would?

www.abc.net.au

Kabul maternity clinic death toll rises to 24, as anxious relatives await news of loved ones - ABC News

Afghan officials raise the death toll from a militant attack on a maternity hospital in Kabul to 24, including mothers, nurses and two babies - a tragedy that has left families and medical workers in shock.

Read more from www.abc.net.au

Good Morning from Tel Aviv,

Afghanistan is a dark place in which many groups are involved , some attacks are deliberate some are mistakes some are deliberately left in the grey area as warnings

I promise You they know who carried out the attack

BM

Jenifer (Zarknorph) said:

A maternity clinic is the scene of a horrific attack where two newborn babies are among 16 dead as gunmen dressed as police attack a hospital in the Afghan capital of Kabul.

Why would I defend US terrorism?

You really think Americans did this?

Of course not.  You think Americans DROVE people to do this.

Because shooting newborn babies is completely justifiable behaviour when you're cranky with the US.

Jenifer (Zarknorph) said:

You really think Americans did this?

They handed out weapons to jihadis. Boasted of it.

They did it in order that this kind of thing happen.

They do it themselves - targeting hospitals because they draw horrid journalists who want to interview people they've visited terrorism on.

Let's say all this is true.

You are saying that all anyone has to do is hand a Jihadi a gun and tell them there is a journalist nearby and they will immediately head into the nearest hospital and shoot a baby, just to get attention?

Of course not.  Then you'd be defending the acts of a deranged psychopath.

Jenifer (Zarknorph) said:

You are saying that all anyone has to do is hand a Jihadi a gun

If you arm terrorists you are a terrorist and are responsible both for what they do immediately and in the progress of their career.

None of this happened before the Americans smashed their way into the country - on an excuse everyone knows to have been fraudulent. Saudis were behind 911 - while Osama, with no money of his own and no communications anywhere cannot have contributed significantly atall.

But the real scandal is that Afghanistan was developing nicely before Jimmy Carter and Reagan set out to plunge it into chaos and suffering.

bml00 said:

I promise You they know who carried out the attack

Just as you know how bombed the US Marine Barracks in 1983, killing 241 of them. Flaming embers landed on the Shin Bet headquarters you'd set up in Beirut a mile away. (And the 70 French soldiers killed some time later).

That bombing was just one year after you'd invaded - and an Israeli boasted of torturing to death a prominent Lebanese and telling everyone that he'd confessed to the bombing.

Any connection to Afghanistan?

BM