Coalition of the Confused

Hosted by Jenifer (Zarknorph)

Confused malcontents swilling Chardonnay while awaiting the Zombie Apocalypse.

  • 1131
    MEMBERS
  • 61037
    MESSAGES
  • 9
    POSTS TODAY

Discussions

Trolls are Twunts   Vent Your Spleen!

Started 5/23/20 by Jenifer (Zarknorph); 5900 views.
RGoss99

From: RGoss99

5/24/20

Criticizine your false trivia is neither hateful nor abuse, it is the reason for a forum.

The term "forum" refers to a literal place where speech is free and uncensored. In England, Hyde Park Corner. However in your imaginary forum, you are playing the rold of an agent of the British secret service, taking notes and punishing those whose free speech does not agree with you. As judge, witness and jury you not only have no publish standards, but don´t even live up to your own imaginary rules.

BerrySteph

From: BerrySteph

5/24/20

RGoss99 said:

As judge, witness and jury you not only have no publish standards, but don´t even live up to your own imaginary rules.

Wizop rage, that's what I call it.

Jenifer (Zarknorph)
Host

From: Jenifer (Zarknorph)

5/25/20

RGoss99 said:

The term "forum" refers to a literal place where speech is free and uncensored.

I disagree that this applies here.

Ideally free and uncensored speech would be perfect, but it can only work if people play by the rules.

  • Attack the argument, not the person.
  • No hijacking
  • Don't be abusive

I have the right to set these rules on my forum, as it is a private enterprise.

This is not a democracy - even though I have given people plenty of say in how I run things.

Every change you demand that suits you, runs the risk of bothering others.

Yes, this forum is a public place.  However, so is a shopping centre.  There are rules.  No skateboarding, no bikes, wear clothes. 

I have the right to post rules at the door to my forum.

You can obey the rules, or leave.

RGoss99

From: RGoss99

5/25/20

Of course it does not apply here because your interpretation and roll make it not a fórum. But thanks for listing your rules, all of which you break yourselves, which is why most justice systems separate the role of judges, juries, witnesses, and enforcers, where you combine them in yourslef. Are you familiar with the word "recusal".

RGoss99

From: RGoss99

5/25/20

Your use of "ttwunts","trolls" (in ways not found in any dictionary), and treatment of Berry´s posts are exaples of abuses, and abusive of power.

bml00

From: bml00

5/25/20

Entering this or any forum etc carries with it the implicit rules of the person creating the forum , your choice (like all of ours) is to stay and abide or leave and seek elsewhere where we can express our opinions in a manner we find acceptable .

BM

BerrySteph

From: BerrySteph

5/25/20

Jenifer (Zarknorph) said:

Attack the argument, not the person. 

You've attacked RGoss (and me).

Jenifer (Zarknorph) said:

No hijacking 

Doesn't mean anything the way you've applied it. Talking about the Middle East or terrorism - but demand everyone ignore the elephant in the room.

Jenifer (Zarknorph) said:

I have the right to set these rules on my forum, as it is a private enterprise.

Stating it just makes you look like a control-freak.

But we know you're not a control-freak, don't we?

BerrySteph

From: BerrySteph

5/25/20

RGoss99 said:

Your use of "ttwunts","trolls" (in ways not found in any dictionary), and treatment of Berry´s posts are exaples of abuses, and abusive of power.

Must have decided that's what Zarknorph wanted to do.

Collected some pretty outrageous and disgusting people to play those games with. 

In reply toRe: msg 12
RGoss99

From: RGoss99

5/25/20

That would be a valid point if Jenifer preposted explecit rules and followed them herself and was consistant in her judgement. 

BerrySteph

From: BerrySteph

5/25/20

RGoss99 said:

That would be a valid point if Jenifer preposted explecit rules and followed them herself and was consistant in her judgement. 

So inconsistent is Zarknorph that she lashes out at others for misogyny - even while cultivating people like Harold who are obvious women-haters. (However, he had to be banned when his misogyny got overpoweringly nasty and personal!)

Then posts her own misogyny:

MEDDLY -> I'm afraid to ask but is that a combination of twat and cu#ts? 

Zarknorph-> Yes it is. One is stupid, the other is cruel. Sometimes a person can be both.

TOP