Confused malcontents swilling Chardonnay while awaiting the Zombie Apocalypse.
17318 messages in 770 discussions
Latest 7/5/22 by ricardomath
821 messages in 15 discussions
Latest Sep-29 by ElDotardo
5076 messages in 124 discussions
Latest Sep-29 by NISSY (NISSY2)
Latest Sep-27 by NISSY (NISSY2)
Latest Sep-25 by NISSY (NISSY2)
The very same MO is used with me and others , he makes outrageous statements and can NEVER EVER provide a link .
He is a real asset to this forum as you can see
He has been outed everywhere with his monotone junk
It gets so old . . . when he finds himself most always behind the eight ball or shut down by a forums staff . . . one would think at some point he would learn . . . repeating the same thing over and over with the same result . . . oh well . . .
Damn!! That Vox video was upsetting.
What do you know about your Goddaughter's aunt? When was she last seen and where?
It is his word against yours.
He is right, you cannot copy any of his posts and paste them into another forum without his consent.
You are free to post a link, however.
He has encouraged you to do so.
That is your only option.
However, it seems a silly thing to be wasting time arguing over.
The very same MO is used with me and others , he makes outrageous statements and can NEVER EVER provide a link . He is a real asset to this forum as you can see He has been outed everywhere with his monotone junk
How did you get involved in this Civil War, anyway?
RedBV is an American, unlike you.
You can start at this link. RedBV appeared to be trolling, and trying to intimidate me with his stalkerish comments. (I put the stalker stuff in the center square of his BINGO card, since it acts like a free square.)
I had to check with Jennifer first, because he asked it in the Israel thread, which seemed like a wierd place to come in out of the blue asking such questions. You can read the entire thread and count how many times he asked for an answer to his question. I keep losing count. I did my best to answer his question, but he just seemed to get more and more inexplicably abusive and bullying as the thread went on.
Finally, he got to the point where he was giving bogus and dangerous legal advice to bi-national couples to get common law marriages. His advice could have led to family separations should anybody listen to him, which I objected to. His legal advice was so dangerous for bi-national couples that Jennifer was forced to close the entire thread and start a new one.
Hey there slackerz/ramsey . . . a simple question for you - lets see if you know and understand the purpose of "controlled immigration" . . . and the consequences of non-controlled immigration . . .
Well now, once again you pull your game of - as soon as you see that a person who has seen a post you addressed to them . . . you then edit your post they are responding to . . . while that might be cute to some . . . the problem is, that when you do it, you're often doing it for the purpose of changing context and the like . . .
Be that as it may . . . your original claim was that I supposedly asked you about something that your posted vid deals with . . . you were told ta come up with link(s) that such took place . . . you've not done so . . . and why you haven't done so is very simple - the context is not what you try and pass off, lad . . .
Given the above is the case and you have a huge penchant concerning latino issues . . . where I asked you a question was in a thread concerning issues about Israel, which in fact you acknowledged the thread was about . . . and the context was you trying to go after BM, who apparently you don't like . . . in specific you attempted to hijack the thread to your favorite issue - Latino's . . . given you've not provided link(s) . . . here are the concerned links -
As anyone can see - the context of the conversation at that time was not about immigration, Latinos, etc. . . . in fact it was about a specific incident that had taken place in Israel . . .
Did you address that specific incident, make any attempt to discuss the incident . . . nope ya didn't . . . you got ticked off that BM briefly addressed your immigration penchant that most every nation in the world has policies concerning immigration to their respective nations and that following those policies results in, the person doing so, running afoul of the respective laws concerning immigration to the respective nations . . . you being ticked off then began spamming BM . . . until the forum host told you to stop -
Frankly, did you stop, nope ya didn't . . . in fact you continued on posting articles concerning immigration in the U.S. . . . in a thread that was supposed to be about Israel . . . in other words you went from spamming to trolling . . . which the forum host addressed and told you to stop -
Now to the question I asked you -
"Hey there slackerz/ramsey . . . a simple question for you - lets see if you know and understand the purpose of "controlled immigration" . . . and the consequences of non-controlled immigration . . ."
Did you ever address my question, no ya didn't . . . what ya did do is start spamming me as you had done with BM . . . as well making erroneous accusations toward me . . .
You see, exactly what RedBV has just accused you of, is the exact same kind of thing that I had accused you of!
But, of course, in your little trolling world, we are both wrong and only you are right!
In face I ignored your spamming and erroneous accusations . . . instead addressing the context of my question to you -
Seems you don't know me very well . . . ya see I back BLM, back immigration, have assisted getting rid of racists and like for well over 40 yrs, recently assisted in getting rid of one of the parler folks that was a city police chief, etc. . . . for the last 5 yrs worked on getting rid of donnie boy and other left side politics, etc. . . .
As to the question asked of you - what seems so hard about addressing it . . . it should be pretty simple to address controlled immigration and the consequences of non controlled immigration . . . for example - one of the consequences of non-controlled immigration can often result in what amounts to squalor style camps akin to 3rd world refugee camps overwhelming the resources of a nation and available assistance from agencies like the WHO, UN, etc. . . .
In other words - there is quite a bit involved for immigration to work well . . . and donnie boy damn sure screwed up on the southern border of the U.S. . . . as well in addition to curtailing many of the immigration/refugee programs that were in place in the U.S. when he became the occupant of the Oval Office . . . thankfully he is now gone and Biden is taking the steps ta get the U.S. back on track . . .
So, do you plan on addressing the question asked of you . . ."
It was interesting that while a favorite topic of yours is immigration . . . yet when I asked you about controlled immigration vs. non controlled immigration . . . apparently you didn't wish to discuss that aspect of immigration . . . instead continuing to spam me with articles about Latinos and the U.S.. . . to include a post about the Sanctuary Movement (as if I didn't know anything about it) until the forum host reminded you the thread is about Israel -
Oh, as to the SM I provided you an article regarding that -
So, it looks like you've decided on spamming me with vids from yer multiple nics . . . instead of taking part in any discussion, lad . . .
Anyway, regarding the sanctuary movement I happen to support it . . . and here is an article that describes it pretty well - origin, purpose, etc. . . .
The Sanctuary movement was a religious and political campaign in the United States that began in the early 1980s to provide safe haven for Central American refugees fleeing civil conflict. The movement was a response to federal immigration policies that made obtaining asylum difficult for Central Americans.
As the article also points out - the movement led to Temporary Protected Status . . . an item that donnie boy wrongly screwed up . . .
But ya see - the movement is about asylum not immigration (in and of itself) . . .
So, which is it that you are wanting to address - immigration or asylum, eh lad . . ."
8645 (RedBV) said...(continuing on)
Of course you are. You're just trying to hijack this thread, just like you hijacked the other thread.
It's just how you operate. Trolling by exhaustion.
Not interested in anything that happened before Advil's post here.
My conversation with BM was over. Just ask Jennifer.
I chose to wash BM's mouth out with soap, and did so.
I got repremanded for it. Meh. That has nothing to do with you.
Take it up with Jennifer.
You came here 4 and a half days after my last post in that thread.
Any reference by you later to a conversation that had already ended is trolling, plain and simple.
You asked me a question.
I sought and received permission first from Jennifer to answer your question, and then I did so, despite your disengenousness.
Well anyway, at that point it seems you started realizing you might be in over your head . . . and you tried to run away from info that belied your accusations toward me and the question that had been asked of you . . . by you posting to me that the thread was about Israel . . . which was comical from you, lad . . . ya see given most every nation deals with immigration . . . my question also dealt with Israel . . . ya see most every nation faces the issue of controlled immigration vs. non controlled immigration . . . what with your more or less trying to present yourself as a knowledgeable person concerning immigration, figured you might like to discuss the conundrum of my question . . . in fact I offered to discuss the conundrum limited to Israel . . . it was interesting that in effect you ran from doing so . . . and subsequently even ran from discussing anything about Israel, even though I offered to you - that you pick a topic about Israel and lets discuss it . . .
Anyway, it seemed you no longer wished to discuss topics about Israel so I let it drop . . . but you carried on making accusations, etc.
Anyway I ignored your antics and introduced to everyone a topic concerning Israel - marriage in Israel . . . including an article concerning common law marriage in Israel -
It was interesting that suddenly you wanted to perhaps discuss this issue about Israel . . . relating some past incident, as if the info I has provided was supposedly in error . . . I pointed out that that what you related may have happened . . . that currently in Israel that was not the case -
Apparently that, that things had changed in Israel, didn't sit well with ya . . . so for the next several posts you tried a game concerning the quote feature provided by Delphi (it failed) . . .
Seeing that your game had failed you tried another angle over the articles I had introduced concerning marriage in Israel . . . in specific concerning common law marriage -
However, what you neglected to comprehend was that the provisions for common law marriage were specific to Israel . . . while you might dislike common law marriage in some other country, how it takes place, the benefits, pro's and cons, etc. that is irrelevant, lad . . . the topic was marriage in Israel . . .
You then tried to falsely claim I was supposedly tying to give legal advice about marriage . . . sorry, lad that was not the case at all . . . I simply provided the current state of marriage, to include common law marriage, in Israel . . . apparently you couldn't comprehend that each nation in the world sets its on standards for marriage . . . while you may not like whatever nation has put in place . . . unless your a citizen of whatever nation, it has no bearing on you, son . . . the simple fact is - each nation decides for itself . . . while the international community may dislike something - it is still whatever nations choice for citizens, etc., of their nation . . .
You then started spamming the thread with your erroneous legal claims, which ended up with the thread closed . . .
Oh, by the way . . . regarding the single question that I asked you - controlled immigration vs. non controlled immigration . . . you've never addressed it and your posted vid doesn't address it either . . .
So, my lad, now that the actual facts have been addressed maybe you'll cease your trolling of me and false erroneous claims . . . do I think you will . . . not at all, you've been trolling me in a number of forums over the last some months trying for some get back and expect you will continue doing so . . . oh well . . .