I gagged Slacker.

Ramsey gets the same chance.

8645 (RedBV) said:

You owe some folks an apology, Jen . . .

You're the one fucking up my forum.

The topic is Israel.

Not cattle rustling in South America (or wherever).

No hijacking.

The topic is Israel.

No hijacking.

8645 (RedBV) said:

calling him lad or son is simply showing him the like derision of him that he shows me . .

In other words, tit for tat.  He goads you, you goad him right back.

You call me "full of shit", then freely admit you do it to get under his skin in the very next sentence.

That is because you are full of shit and have failed . . . speaking to someone with derision is not goading or trolling . . .

Just because you outright refuse to accept the evidence I have presented to you, in no way means I 'failed'.

That is because you have no evidence . . . it's simply amazing that you are trying to defend that troll  . . . .

You troll him just as much as he trolls you.

Just because other people post "Yawn" as a single word response to a post, doesn't mean they're not douchebags for doing it.

Yes I do . . . but apparently you've not bothered to look into it . . . i.e. -

https://wiki.c2.com/?GodwinsLaw

"Godwin's law is not really about Nazis, as some posters here seem to assume; that just happens to be a particularly common epithet used (or was at one time) in collapsing threads, often regardless of the context. [i.e. the mere mention of nazis/hitler] The actual insult could be any slur or imputation that demonizes the target - depending on the forum, the triggers words could be 'communist', 'capitalist', 'pedophile', 'Suethor', or anything else meant solely to evoke rage and disgust from the other posters.

The point of the law is that the more protracted and bitter the argument, the more likely it is that someone will resort to name-calling or some other form of ad hominem attack. The corellary is that this usually causes a chain reaction as everyone begins to reply in kind, and any intelligent debate still remaining will get pushed aside by increasingly strident and vicious mudslinging. It may be a symptom of LaynesLaw that this isn't clearer." . . . thus the similar or akin to . . . and not just a specious comparison . . .to nazi's/hitler

. . .

So, Jen, who is that has accused folks of being fascists (btw were nazis fascist)(and other like comparisions), child abusers, etc. . . tell us, Jen . . . it wasn't any of the folks that slackerx was trolling or folks that were reporting his trolling to you . . .

Now of course if you wish application to to just nazi or hitler analogies, instead of the principle behind it . . . hey by all means go for it . . . then you'd be in the boat of trying to say that Godwin himself would supposedly be wrong . . . for saying that indeed the white supremacists of Charlottsville were analogous to nazis and nazism . . .

Like I said it's amazing the lengths your going to trying to defend slackerx and trying to make yourself a supposed victim . . . frankly you are a victim, but not in the way your trying to claim . . . you're a victim of the troll and his antics named slackerx . . . who doesn't give two hoots about you, your forum or your rules . . . and apparently you're two blind ta see that, Jen . . . 

They are the same person . . . and you yourself have admitted that to me, Jen . . .

8645 (RedBV) said:

You owe some folks an apology, Jen . . .

You're the one fucking up my forum.

Nah, it is yourself letting slackerx/ramseylurker do that, Jen . . .

Oh geeze . . .

My forum, my rules.