Confused malcontents swilling Chardonnay while awaiting the Zombie Apocalypse.
1597 messages in 83 discussions
Latest 9/28/21 by Jenifer (Zarknorph)
17252 messages in 763 discussions
Latest Jan-18 by OSarge (mahjong54)
Latest Jan-5 by OSarge (mahjong54)
4890 messages in 209 discussions
Latest Jan-2 by OSarge (mahjong54)
?I'm not defending him. I'm just pointing out that Korea will be destroyed if it can't retaliate.
Why? By WHO?
KJU does not care about the people of Korea. He only cares about his own wealth and power.
He does not fear his country being destroyed.
He fears that someone is going to come and take away his big pile of riches, luxury and food.
Does not take much to get the prick from Korea to Jews and of course they ( the Jews) are liars
That's why I ignore everything that is not on topic, instead of feeding it like you do.
Jenifer (Zarknorph) said:
Why? By WHO? KJU does not care about the people of Korea. He only cares about his own wealth and power. He does not fear his country being destroyed. He fears that someone is going to come and take away his big pile of riches, luxury and food.
The US will destroy Korea like it did last time. Its outrageous to suggest that Trump or Bush (or Obama) or the US is any friend of the little brown people.
What I'm posting you is the most horrific and disgusting and genocidal evil - it is outrageous to suggest otherwise.
Occupation forces drop baby down well.
Few escape as an entire population is burned.
South Koreans were targeted for mass-murder and the total destruction of all their history and all of their towns and villages. Number killed totally unknown - but a far worse destruction than Poland under Hitler and Stalin in succession.
As best I know the following commentary is uncontentious - is it true? 100% true or only 99% true?
"The Korean War: 1945-1953" By Hugh Deane (on google books, see link)
p.145 ... The authoritative British military publication Brassey's Annual ... in its 1951 edition: "The war was fought without regard for the South Koreans, and their unfortunate country was regarded as an arena rather than a country to be liberated. As a consequence, fighting was quite ruthless, and it is no exaggeration to state that South Korea no longer exists as a country. Its towns have been destroyed, much of its means of livelihood eradicated, and its people reduced to a sullen mass depending upon charity..."102
Napalm was first used in the third day of the 1950 war ... Soon the use of napalm was a celebrated weapon in military journals. ... "They Don't Like 'Hell Bombs'" (Armed Forces Chemical Journal, January 1951) ... the number of "hell bombs" dropped rose to "astronomical figures" and pilots soon, were complaining about the scarcity of targets.
... a soldier's account of a mistaken drop of napalm on about a dozen American GIs by a Marine Corsair in northeast Korea "Men all around me were burned. They lay rolling in the snow. Men I knew, marched and fought with begged me to shoot them ... I couldn't. It was terrible. Where the napalm had burned the skin to a crisp, it would be peeled hack from the face, arms, legs ... like fried potato chips"103
... Planes flew low down city and town streets killing clusters and targeted peasants in the fields. ... By the end of the war, by which time 33,000 tons of napalm had been dropped, most of the survivors were living in caves or underground shelters.
... The U.S. ... able to de-urbanize Korea in a matter of months. General Emmett (Rosie) O'Donnell ... testified at the MacArthur hearings that by the time the war was three months old "almost all the Korean peninsula" was "just a terrible mess ... Everything is destroyed. There is nothing standing worthy of the name" ... Senator Russell, in the chair, told O'Donnell that "I think you have demonstrated soldierly qualities that endeared you to the American people."101 http://books.google.com.au/books?id=XMJpnYmKNQsC&pg=PA145
Jenifer (Zarknorph) said:
KJU does not care about the people of Korea.
Don't tell patriotic people, threatening nobody (except from collaborators and foreign puppets) that they're wrong to defend their country from genocide by any means possible.
Over and over again, these terrorists say the same thing - Saddam is the problem, Gaddafi is the problem, the Taliban are the problem, Ho Chi Minh was the problem.
Hamas is the problem, Hezbollah are the problem, Assad is the problem, the Ayatollahs are the problem.
The communists are the problem, Islamics are the problem, Bernie Sanders is a threat to your way of life.
Putin is the problem, Castro is/was the problem. Absurdly gentle and defenceless Jeremy Corbyn was an existential threat to the Jews living in the UK. Jimmy Carter was the spawn of the devil.
Chairman Xi is a monstrous and disgusting tyrant who's just too big to handle at the moment.
When in fact, as must be bloody obvious by now, its sick fukks like them and rogue nations with WMD which are the problem.
Jenifer (Zarknorph) said:
In what appears to be a lax enforcement by China of UN sanctions, North Korean vessels - some carrying illicit coal shipments - are seen anchored in Chinese waters last year in photos from a UN report.
Why are you defending further US-sponsored suffering and freezing to death (genocide) of independent people under occupation?
Thank You , hopefully that will annoy Berry
What is with you Stephanie? Not getting any??
It is bad enough that you support terrorism in all its ugly forms, but now you are coming to the defense of Jong - Un?
Here is my solution for Jong - Un.
Military wise: Send in a covert team of Delta Force and SAS and take out the wee shite!
Politically wise: Rile up a coup and install a "pre-selected " non dictator and likewise administration.
Flood North Korea with food and goodies and show the "peasants" what life is really like on the other side of the wire~!
Stephanie is back to her usual modus operandi of using propaganda based pictures as " absolute proof "! LOL
Maybe she will post another round of photo shopped pictures to justify her defense of North Korea and its dictatorship government!