Coalition of the Confused

Hosted by Jenifer (Zarknorph)

Confused malcontents swilling Chardonnay while awaiting the Zombie Apocalypse.

  • 832
    MEMBERS
  • 47119
    MESSAGES
  • 44
    POSTS TODAY

Discussions

US News - General   America - all of it

Started 7/17/19 by Jenifer (Zarknorph); 24292 views.
bml00

From: bml00

12/24/19

Our situation is not comparable our land mass is microscopic and those trying to enter are generally wishing us harm 

The last time we had a mass arrival of people was some 80,000 Africans who got across the border and despite all our efforts are still mostly here , we were able to buy off about 5000 or so who agreed to be taken to 3rd countries the rest are still here and are unlikely to move 

They however do not represent a strategic threat and electronic walls / fences / you name it has since reduced the number to zero 

BM

  • Edited December 24, 2019 12:22 am  by  bml00
Harold27Z

From: Harold27Z

12/24/19

Illegals would detour away if rightfully treated like invaders and used for target practice.

BerrySteph

From: BerrySteph

12/24/19

jra2750 said:

Those that are still in the quagmire called Afghanistan would B well-advised to get the hell out ASAP. 

You forget - BM left a country that was peaceful and safe in order to further rip up someone else's homeland.

Americans have been doing it in Afghanistan for 18 years while BM has been doing it (personally) for nearly 50 years.

He now boasts that he is there in the cause of "Eternal Conflict".

BerrySteph

From: BerrySteph

12/24/19

bml00 said:

Our situation is not comparable our land mass is microscopic and those trying to enter are generally wishing us harm 

When are you going to let them back to their homes, BM?

As you promised so solemnly when you were allowed, on the third attempt, to join the UN and sign up to non-attack on neighbours?

BerrySteph

From: BerrySteph

12/24/19

Harold27Z said:

Illegals would detour away if rightfully treated like invaders and used for target practice.

You imply that you live the farming life in South Africa.

When was your land stolen from the indigenous?

You're safe enough admitting it, since it was almost certainly done before 1945, before "Right of Conquest" was banned.

jra2750

From: jra2750

1/1/20

People have different values so I don't think preserving Values is a reason to  go to war.  The only reason 2 go 2 war is if One's country has been INVADED...not threatened but INVADED.  Otherwise diplomacy/negotiations is the way  to  go IMO.

BerrySteph

From: BerrySteph

1/1/20

jra2750 said:

The only reason 2 go 2 war is if One's country has been INVADED...not threatened but INVADED. 

Israel - and BM it would seem - are committed to Eternal Conflict.

And its been working for them - already done such immense damage to Lebanon that those in power only want to rob what remains and leave. (The Orthodox Church in Jerusalem doing the same thing for the same reason - selling off its land and stealing the money).

Expanding into Syria currently while it destroys still more of what was still working there.

bml00

From: bml00

1/2/20

Israel at its narrowest is some 25 miles and we have NO STRATEGIC depth , we cannot wait for the enemy to approach we need to take the fight to the enemy before they reach our borders - we have our backs to the sea .

Self preservation is a pretty good reason and most people seem to forget there are some 8 million Israelis and about 330,000,000 Arabs there is NO ROOM FOR ERROR permissible , history has shown that when we are (Israel) is threatened it is reasonable to assume that the threat will sooner or later be followed through.

Finally JAW JAW is far better than WAR WAR but you prepare for the worse and hope for the best

Happy New Year

BM

ps - The IDF Eternal Strife doctrine is based upon having a region which is always in turmoil with NO ARAB STATE having social peace , Egypt , Jordan , Syria , Lebanon , Iran , Yemen , Iraq even Saudi Arabia are all under threat from both within and without , the requirement of having a military ready and able to deal with multi fronted issues is an absolute for a country smaller than the state of New York or smaller than Wales etc

BerrySteph

From: BerrySteph

1/2/20

bml00 said:

The IDF Eternal Strife doctrine is based upon having a region which is always in turmoil with NO ARAB STATE having social peace , Egypt , Jordan , Syria , Lebanon , Iran , Yemen , Iraq even Saudi Arabia are all under threat from both within and without , the requirement of having a military ready and able to deal with multi fronted issues is an absolute for a country smaller than the state of New York or smaller than Wales etc

Good description of a cancer in the region, surely!

And a 180deg change from the soothing words that the Zionists used to come out with.

Even BM was still declaring he wanted peace until recently. eg:

israel never sought war,in the declaration made on the day of the announcement of the state of israel,ben gurion asked for peace with our neighbours.

our ambiguous nuclear situation is not the issue, with or without nuclear capability we are still seeking peace, we have nothing to gain by eternal conflict

BerrySteph

From: BerrySteph

1/2/20

bml00 said:

The IDF Eternal Strife doctrine is based upon having a region which is always in turmoil with NO ARAB STATE having social peace , Egypt , Jordan , Syria , Lebanon , Iran , Yemen , Iraq even Saudi Arabia are all under threat

All that money spent on hasbara declaring that Israel wants peace.

Then you abandon 70 years of good work with your anger!

TOP